{"id":6802,"date":"2015-03-20T18:25:18","date_gmt":"2015-03-20T18:25:18","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2021-05-24T11:04:57","modified_gmt":"2021-05-24T15:04:57","slug":"bibi_makes_his_case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2015\/03\/20\/bibi_makes_his_case\/","title":{"rendered":"Bibi Makes His Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: I mentioned earlier in the program <\/a>we had sound bites of Benjamin Netanyahu and Megyn Kelly last night, and I want to get to those now. This was Netanyahu\u2019s first appearance on American media after his election victory and after the Regime went after him as a racist for daring to turn out his base, after the Regime had made a big pitch to Arab Israelis to show up in droves to try to knock Netanyahu off. So Megyn Kelly, first question: “In 2009 you said that you supported a peace deal that would recognize a Palestinian state, but the day before Tuesday\u2019s election you completely reversed and said you didn\u2019t. Why?”<\/p>\n

NETANYAHU: I didn\u2019t retract any of the things that I said. The conditions for that today are not achievable for a simple reason. Abu Mazen, the leader of the Palestinians, rejects consistently the acceptance of a Jewish State. He\u2019s made a pact with the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas. And the conditions in the Middle East have changed to the point where any territory you withdraw from is immediately taken out by Iranian backed terrorists<\/a> or by ISIS. It\u2019s only a dozen miles away from us. We would vacate territory instead of getting a two-state solution, we could end up with a no state solution. That is a solution that would threaten the very survival of the state of Israel. I said we have to change the terms.<\/p>\n


\nRUSH: So he\u2019s basically saying he didn\u2019t change anything. He didn\u2019t change his opinion. He had never been in favor of a two-state solution as it has been discussed. He was always talking about in the context of today, meaning the present. And he\u2019s right here in pointing out, there is no desire for a two-state solution by the Palestinians. Abu Mazen, Hamas, you name it, and everybody knows it. Nobody on that side wants Israel to exist side by side with a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n

When they talk two-state solution, they\u2019re talking one state, and that\u2019s Palestine, and Israel is erased from the map. That\u2019s what they want. Well, who\u2019s ever gonna negotiate that? That is something the Palestinians are gonna have to win militarily. If they want that, if they want the map to no longer say “Israel,” if they want the borders of Israel to now say “Palestine,” they\u2019re gonna have to mount a military campaign. They\u2019re gonna have to defeat Israel and, as the terms of surrender, they\u2019re gonna have to get the Jews that live in Israel to somehow move out and go somewhere else.<\/p>\n

That is never gonna happen in talks. That is never gonna happen diplomatically. That is never gonna happen via UN resolution. It\u2019s never gonna happen because “Barack Hussein Obama! Mmm! Mmm! Mmm!” wants it to happen. The only way that can happen is if the Palestinians and their allies — hello, Iranians<\/a> with the nuclear bomb — can figure out a way to militarily defeat Israel.<\/p>\n