{"id":6651,"date":"2015-04-08T16:23:22","date_gmt":"2015-04-08T16:23:22","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2015-04-08T16:23:22","modified_gmt":"2015-04-08T16:23:22","slug":"marie_harf_corrects_obama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/","title":{"rendered":"Marie Harf Corrects Obama"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: I think everybody\u2019s got this Marie Harf thing wrong. Have you heard about this? Obama goes out there, and I forget where, it was an interview, NPR, somewhere — and, by the way, he\u2019s making the rounds on global warming. He\u2019s blaming asthma, every health malady your kid has is because of climate change now. And more scientists than ever agree that it is happening, that it is almost irreversible and the government is the only outlet that can do anything about it to save everybody. He\u2019s making the rounds all over TV, and the meteorology people are dutifully just sucking it all up. We have audio sound bites to prove it. <\/p>\n

Anyway, Obama\u2019s out there, and he let the cat out of the bag, that everything Netanyahu has said about the Iran deal is true, that the Iranians are gonna get a nuke courtesy of Barack Obama and the United States. Obama went out there and admitted it himself. And that\u2019s the story about in 10 to 13 years they\u2019re gonna be able to nuke up. Essentially they have promised to stay one year away from weaponizing their uranium for ten years. So they\u2019re one year away now, five years from now they\u2019re supposed to stay one year away. <\/p>\n

In other words, they\u2019re not supposed to advance their capabilities beyond where they are now, not much. And then 10, 13 years from now they can go ahead and close the deal and get a weapon. Obama essentially went out and said that. So they went to the State Department, and Marie Harf, who we have referenced on this program — you know, it\u2019s really tough for me. Marie Harf, you\u2019ve heard the old line, if you want to see X in the dictionary, whatever, go look at such-and-such. Marie Harf is that. <\/p>\n

<\/a>She is the textbook dictionary definition of “valley girl,” Northeastern Ivy League liberal, trained the government\u2019s the end all to everything, feminist. Everything in the ideal liberal female package, including appearance, she\u2019s it. She\u2019s second in command at it State Department as spokeswoman. Jen Psaki was her boss — Psaki is leaving and I think heading to the White House, but she may still be at the State Department. <\/p>\n

Anyway, Marie Harf went out and said that Obama was a little mixed up there in describing what he had said about the nuclear deal. Here\u2019s the headline of the story, and they\u2019re all over the place. “‘Open Confusion\u2019 at State Department as Marie Harf Tries to Walk Back Obama\u00c2\u2019s Zero Breakout Time Admission — ‘Open confusion\u2019 reigned today at the State Department after spokeswoman Marie Harf tried to withdraw a quote from President Barack Obama regarding Iran\u00c2\u2019s nuclear breakout time.”<\/p>\n

Now, let me check the audio. I want to see if we\u2019ve got her here. If we do, I will let you hear it. Marie Harf. Marie Harf. I don\u2019t think — No. No Marie Harf here. At any rate, everybody is now demanding she be fired. Everybody\u2019s demanding that this is an act of insolence. That this is an act of wanton public embarrassment of Obama. It was indeed in an interview with NPR. Obama acknowledged that “after year 13, the current deal being worked out with Iran would not provide the international community with the promised 1-year warning should Iran decide to violate the deal and go for a nuclear weapon.” (laughing) He admitted this! <\/p>\n

He admitted that Iran can violate it, don\u2019t have to tell anybody, but not until year 13. If anybody thinks they\u2019re gonna wait for year 13 they\u2019re crazy anyway, but this is what Obama went out and said. Obama said in the NPR interview: “‘In year 13, 14, 15\u2019 of the deal, ‘they have advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium fairly rapidly, and at that point, the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero,\u2019 and that the assurances of a 1-year warning time would be available to the international community for ‘at least well over a decade. And then in years 13 and 14, it is possible that those breakout times would have been much shorter.'”<\/p>\n

To translate this it\u2019s exactly what I told you. <\/p>\n

Iran is claiming\/promising to stay a year away from “breaking out” (i.e., weaponizing their nukes) for the next 10 years. When they get to year 13 or 14, they\u2019re gonna be much closer than a year out and they\u2019re not gonna have to warn anybody. They can just do it. This is what Obama went out and said. So the reaction to this has been quite common-sensical.<\/p>\n

“[U]nder that scenario” Obama just described here, “there will be no way to physically prevent them from building a nuclear weapon, and they would be able to go nuclear at will,” and Obama essentially laid out how that will happen. “In the State Department\u2019s attempted response to queries about the president\u2019s statement on Tuesday, Spokeswoman Marie Harf told reporters that the President was talking about a hypothetical sscneario [sic] in which the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) had not been enacted.<\/p>\n

“Harf asserted that while the president\u2019s words ‘were a little mixed up there,\u2019 he was in fact ‘referring to a scenario in which there was no deal,\u2019 adding that the president\u2019s scenario was ‘more of a hypothetical, “well look, without a deal, this is what could possibly happen.” He was not indicating what would happen under an agreement in those years.'” He was not indicating that this is what the deal is now. <\/p>\n

A lot of people, among them the website here, the Israel Project, “outright rejected Harf\u2019s explanation noting that the president wasn\u2019t muddled, as Harf asserted, but was responding to a question about whether the deal with Iran was worthwhile given the concessions on Iran\u2019s stockpile, ‘he dismissed the stockpile concern, then said the “more relevant fear” had to do with the sunset provisions that would allow Iran to have a zero breakout time after year 13. There\u2019s no room for reinterpretation there.'”<\/p>\n

He said what he said. He meant to say what he said. He said exactly what the deal is, and he wasn\u2019t supposed to, apparently. Or at least, Marie Harf, acting on her own instincts, believed that Obama had screwed up and had admitted something that nobody at the Regime wants admitted. That\u2019s how I interpret this. So she felt it her duty to the cause, which supersedes her duty to Obama. Remember, liberals are liberals first. <\/p>\n

Her duty to the cause was to, at all costs, make sure and try her best to make sure that people did not think Obama was actually spelling out terms of the deal. So she said his “words ‘were a little mixed up there,\u2019 he was in fact ‘referring to a scenario in which there was no deal.'” But that\u2019s not what Obama was doing. So now they\u2019re gonna need a new spin on Obama\u2019s comments, otherwise they\u2019re gonna be accused of blatantly trying to obfuscate with reporters and to confuse them. <\/line><\/p>\n

Marie Harf… I mean, there\u2019s one outtake here that says that that… Let\u2019s see. This is Charles… No, it\u2019s Mario Loyola, National Review<\/a>. He says, “Needless to say, I am not President Obama\u2019s biggest fan, but this affront to the president\u2019s authority on the part of the State Department\u2019s spokesman Marie Harf was shockingly incompetent. She should be fired, along with whoever it was at the White House that she cleared her statement with.”<\/p>\n

Well, that\u2019s the key. “At issue is Obama\u2019s statement in an NPR interview yesterday, to the effect that after the Iran nuclear deal has run its course, Iran\u2019s breakout time to nukes would be reduced to zero.” Everybody\u2019s known this! Obama said this many, many days ago, many weeks ago. Everybody has known. Netanyahu was right on the money with this. <\/p>\n

When I say, “Everybody has known,” it was it reported. Everybody could have known. The way this thing was originally reported (this is almost verbatim Obama) was that for ten years Iran has to stay a year away, and during the 10 years to 13 years they are able to continue improving, researching, developing their nuclear program. But they are promising to stay away from activating the weaponized portion for a number of years. <\/p>\n

And then after 10 years, the original report was they have a green light; they can go ahead and weaponize. After 10 years of getting close but holding back. Part of the original report was that Obama was not worried about this, because, again… Now, this is unstated, but everybody ought to realize that Obama\u2019s worldview on this is that we don\u2019t have the right to tell them they don\u2019t get a nuclear weapon. In fact, everybody ought to realize: He wants them to have a nuclear weapon!<\/p>\n

<\/a>You know, this little excerpt that I read from the Obama interview with Thomas “Loopy” Friedman in the New York Times yesterday<\/a>? Let me go back to that for a second here. Obama said, “We are powerful enough to be able to test these propositions without putting ourselves at risk. And that\u2019s the thing … people don\u2019t seem to understand. You take a country like Cuba. For us to test the possibility that engagement leads to a better outcome for the Cuban people, there aren\u2019t that many risks for us.<\/p>\n

“It\u2019s a tiny little country. It\u2019s not one that threatens our core security interests, and so (there\u2019s no reason not) to test the proposition. And if it turns out that it doesn\u2019t lead to better outcomes, we can adjust our policies.” Now here\u2019s the money portion: “The same is true with respect to Iran, a larger country, a dangerous country, one that has engaged in activities that resulted in the death of US citizens, but the truth of the matter is: Iran\u2019s defense budget is $30 billion. Our defense budget is closer to $600 billion. Iran understands that they cannot fight us.”<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s a small country, a tiny country? <\/p>\n

Well, so is Israel. <\/p>\n

My first reaction is, “So is Israel!” Why is he so afraid of Israel? Israel\u2019s a smaller country than Iran. I don\u2019t know about defense budget, I don\u2019t know about GDP, but in terms of population and geographical size, Israel\u2019s much smaller. Obama doesn\u2019t seem to say of Israel, “Eh, it\u2019s a small country. We don\u2019t have anything to worry about! Israel\u2019s a small country. The Middle East doesn\u2019t have anything to fear from Israel. We can try some new forms of engagement. <\/p>\n

“If it doesn\u2019t work out, we\u2019ll try something else.” Why doesn\u2019t he extend the same benefit of thought to Israel that he extends to Iran? The bottom line is, he wants Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I don\u2019t think there\u2019s any doubt about it. I have gone back. I went back and I researched. I have two things I want to share with you on this at this stage, one a brilliant column today by a man I really admire, Norman Podhoretz at Commentary<\/a>. <\/p>\n

But before I get to that, I went back to Obama\u2019s remarks at the Brandenburg Gate June 19, 2013. Barack Obama. There he was, Citizen of the World, standing at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. He wanted to do that in 2008, but they wouldn\u2019t let him. He did a big speech in Berlin. He wanted to go to the Brandenburg Gate, but they wouldn\u2019t let him because he wasn\u2019t anything at that point. <\/line><\/p>\n

So he made sure to go back to the Brandenburg Gate when he was somebody, and he said on June 19, 2013, “We reject the nuclear weaponization that North Korea and Iran may be seeking.” That\u2019s a quote. “We reject the nuclear weaponization that North Korea and Iran may be seeking.” This is in \u201913, which means it\u2019s pre-election, which means Obama is guaranteed to be prevaricating. <\/p>\n

So I guess today be safe to say that Obama rejects his rejection. In 2013, Obama said he was working to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, cited North Korea, cited Iran. Today, Obama is working, if not to guarantee the spread of nuclear weapons, he certainly isn\u2019t working to stop it in Iran. In context, this is kind of blockbuster to me. And Netanyahu spoke to Congress in support of Obama\u2019s declarations in 2013. <\/p>\n

So it\u2019s Obama who\u2019s flipped. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Here\u2019s another way of putting this, folks. For ten years Iran can build up its enriched uranium supply to the brink of it being almost usable for nuclear weapons. It currently has enough enriched uranium for seven bombs, and then after ten years, who knows how many bombs they\u2019ll be able to make. The Iranians\u2019 currently enriched uranium only needs to be boosted from 20% to 80% to be used as nuclear material.<\/p>\n

And they now have new centrifuges, which can do that very quickly because the sanctions have been lifted and they can get even more centrifuges. They\u2019re not gonna have to get rid of the centrifuges that they got, the new ones. They get to keep them. In fact, they\u2019re claiming they\u2019re gonna be allowed to start using them under this deal. <\/p>\n

Now, here\u2019s Marie Harf. This was at the State Department yesterday. An AP reporter, Matt Lee, said, “I\u2019d like to go to Iran and the president\u2019s rather unusual sales job in this most recent interview, in which he said after 13 years that Iran would have the capability — or could have — to produce a nuclear weapon.”<\/line><\/p>\n

HARF: I think that his words were a little mixed up there, but what he was referring to is a scenario in which they — there was no deal, and if you go back and look at the transcript, I know it\u2019s a little confusing. I spoke to the folks at the White House and read it a few times. It\u2019s my understanding that he was referring to — even though it was a little muddled in the words, to — a scenario in which there was no deal.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Now, how does that make Obama look?<\/p>\n

It means this woman had to get together with people in the White House and ask them, “What did he just say? My God, did he just tell the truth about this deal? Oh, my God, what are we gonna do?” So they sent Harf out there on damage control. (impression) “Well, he was a little mixed up in his words out there. You know, he was confused. I talked to people the White House, and he was he was talking about if there\u2019s no deal. Everybody knew that. Look at the context.”<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Look, folks, the bottom line is this. With the billions of dollars that are coming in from the end of sanctions on Iran, they\u2019re gonna be able to build a lot of new centrifuges or import them, and that\u2019s gonna speed up the enrichment to nuclear-grade uranium pretty damn quick. <\/p>\n

Now, we had a caller yesterday who suggested that a lot of people are missing the point, that they\u2019re not just trying to build a bomb. They have seven now, they\u2019re on their way to having seven, but that\u2019s not what they\u2019re doing. They\u2019re choosing to put off building individual bombs so that they can develop a nuclear arsenal, an entire nuclear program. Right now we could probably take out one, two, or even seven of their bombs, but ten years from now they\u2019re gonna have hundreds of them, which we won\u2019t be able to take out with bombs. I know it sounds, “Well, then what are we doing here?” Exactly. It\u2019s exactly right. <\/p>\n

Now, Marie Harf, if Obama was talking about the situation with no deal, and he clearly was not doing that, he let the cat out of the bag, and they were in panic at the State Department. Because on one hand you\u2019ve got John Kerry out there actually campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. And, despite the fact that nobody believes it, the Regime position is that they have put Iran on hold, that Obama\u2019s the first guy to come along to tackle this, and because of the power of Obama\u2019s personality, his charisma, his speeches, whatever, the Iranians have agreed to suspend the development of their weapons program. <\/p>\n

That\u2019s what the State Department position is. They\u2019re out there telling all these lies or prevarications, falsehoods about the deal. Then Obama goes out there in an interview with NPR, lets the cat out of the bag, first about ten years, then 13 years, and then this one-year period that they\u2019re supposed to stay way. If Obama was talking about this in a hypothetical, which he wasn\u2019t, clearly, but if he was, let\u2019s just play the game, if he was talking about this in the hypothetical that there\u2019s no deal, well, then all he had to say was that Iran could get a bomb within two months, because that\u2019s what everybody says. <\/p>\n

I mean, the intelligence people and everybody that\u2019s been studying this for any length of time says they\u2019re that close, just a couple of months away. The question is does Iran want just one or two bombs now, which could be taken out by Israel or by us, or do they want protection from Israel for ten years while they build up a large enough stockpile that could never completely be taken out? That\u2019s the game here. It\u2019s not a game, but that\u2019s the Iranian agenda. And that\u2019s why they eagerly agree to the supposed 10-year moratorium with the promise that they will stay a year away from fully weaponizing all of their uranium. <\/line><\/p>\n

During those 10 years they continue to build up an entire nuclear program, which, after 10, 13 years, would permit them to essentially weaponize a bunch of bombs. And during the ten years, nobody\u2019s gonna touch \u2019em because they\u2019ve agreed not to do anything for ten years, or 13. So there\u2019s no attack on them. And the sanctions have been lifted. <\/p>\n

So Iran tells everybody they\u2019re gonna agree to this deal, whatever it is, sanctions are lifted, nobody can touch \u2019em for ten years \u2019cause they\u2019re theoretically not doing anything for ten years. Then we get to years 12, 13, and all of a sudden Obama lets the cat out of the bag that at that point they could weaponize and we wouldn\u2019t even know. <\/p>\n

So the danger is that ten years from now, or even sooner, Iranians could have hundreds of bombs, which nobody would be able to take out. This is an estimate, but I think it\u2019s pretty close. I think what happened here is that Obama lets that cat out of the bag and Marie Harf panics. This administration is not about openness and transparency, despite what they say. So they had to go to immediate spin mode or CYA. So she admitted she called somebody over at the White House, “What the heck\u2019s he doing?” So they had to say he went out and got his words mixed up. <\/p>\n

Can you imagine Madeleine Albright, when she was secretary of state during the Kosovo war, conducting a press conference, answering a question from the AP about something that Slick Willie is out there doing. (imitating Albright) “Well, you know, he spoke out of turn. His words were kind of mixed up and muddled there, and I have to kind of straighten this out.” Can you imagine? <\/p>\n

Or, if George Schultz had done something similar to Ronaldus Magnus. Or Jim Baker, whoever. I mean, this is fascinating to me. Obama lets the cat out of the bag, Marie Harf panics, \u2019cause the truth is not what they\u2019re about, and they have to try convince everybody, “No, no, no, you didn\u2019t hear what he said. And even if you did, he didn\u2019t mean it because he was talking about a hypothetical.” <\/p>\n

Now, from the Times of Israel<\/a> today: “Israel Rejects US Attempt to Reinterpret Obama\u00c2\u2019s Admission of Nuke Deal\u00c2\u2019s Flaws.” Now, there are people — I may be in a minority here — there are people who believe that Marie Harf made a fool of herself yesterday, again. I\u2019m cutting her some slack. I\u2019m thinking she\u2019s trying to save the cause even if she appeared to be dumping on Obama. But there are a lot of people that think that\u2019s wrong. <\/line><\/p>\n

No, they think that she just made a fool of herself, that she\u2019s too big for her britches, that she\u2019s not nearly as important as she exists in her own mind, and that she takes it upon herself to know more than Obama does and to speak more openly about it than Obama. That\u2019s what the popular perception of Marie Harf is among some people, that she\u2019s just so full of herself, that she thinks Obama doesn\u2019t know what he\u2019s talking about but she does. And so she\u2019s gonna take it on herself to go out and tell the world that “the president essentially didn\u2019t know what he was talking about, but I\u2019m here to tell you what the truth is.” In that sense, in that view you\u2019d say she made a fool of herself when she claimed Obama was mixed up in his comments about the breakout time, but he wasn\u2019t, is the bottom line. <\/p>\n

Another interesting thing about this, in his remarks to NPR, Obama admitted exactly what Benjamin Netanyahu has been saying. Quote, “The official noted, furthermore, that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — a relentless opponent of the US-backed terms — had highlighted precisely the problem that Obama cited when he addressed both houses of Congress last month.” End quote. That is Obama has admitted that when the deal expires, Iran will have the bomb. <\/p>\n

This is not open to interpretation. This has been stated. Some of this is a little curious to me only because I\u2019m asking, “What\u2019s the big deal? He\u2019s already admitted this.” Was it last week or the week before? I remember being incredulous that he made this admission, coming to the Golden EIB Microphone and talking about it. In the original version of this Obama said (imitating Obama), “Yeah, they\u2019re gonna hold off for ten years. In ten years they\u2019re gonna get it, but in that time we\u2019re gonna be using the powers of our persuasion to convince them they should never use the bomb, but it\u2019s not up to us to deny them. We don\u2019t have that right. We don\u2019t have that authority. Who are we to tell \u2019em they can\u2019t have it?” Now, he didn\u2019t say that, but that\u2019s what he believes. It is abundantly clear. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: I think everybody\u2019s got this Marie Harf thing wrong. Have you heard about this? Obama goes out there, and I forget where, it was an interview, NPR, somewhere — and, by the way, he\u2019s making the rounds on global warming. He\u2019s blaming asthma, every health malady your kid has is because of climate change […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nMarie Harf Corrects Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Marie Harf Corrects Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: I think everybody\u2019s got this Marie Harf thing wrong. Have you heard about this? Obama goes out there, and I forget where, it was an interview, NPR, somewhere — and, by the way, he\u2019s making the rounds on global warming. He\u2019s blaming asthma, every health malady your kid has is because of climate change […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/\",\"name\":\"Marie Harf Corrects Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-08T16:23:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-08T16:23:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Marie Harf Corrects Obama\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Marie Harf Corrects Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Marie Harf Corrects Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: I think everybody\u2019s got this Marie Harf thing wrong. Have you heard about this? Obama goes out there, and I forget where, it was an interview, NPR, somewhere — and, by the way, he\u2019s making the rounds on global warming. He\u2019s blaming asthma, every health malady your kid has is because of climate change […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/","name":"Marie Harf Corrects Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-04-08T16:23:22+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-08T16:23:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/08\/marie_harf_corrects_obama\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Marie Harf Corrects Obama"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6651"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}