{"id":6554,"date":"2015-04-20T16:41:17","date_gmt":"2015-04-20T16:41:17","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2015-04-20T16:41:17","modified_gmt":"2015-04-20T16:41:17","slug":"schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/","title":{"rendered":"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to go out with a big, big scalp. It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to leave CBS News having taken out one of the Republican presidential candidates. Do you remember January of 2012? It was a Republican primary candidate debate. It was the debate where George Stephanopoulos kept hounding Mitt Romney on contraception and whether he favored the states having some role in it. <\/p>\n

The subject had not come up. It had not been brought up by anybody. It was not an issue anywhere. At that point in time, it was barely a talking point in Obamacare. But clearly the Republican candidates were not talking about it. They were off on other things. So out of the blue Stephanopoulos starts asking Romney, and Romney responded rather as expected. “What\u2019s this, George? Contraception?<\/p>\n

“Who\u2019s talking about this? I\u2019m even thinking about it. What do you mean?” And Stephanopoulos just kept pressing, “Yes or no? Yes or no? Do you favor states being in charge of banning contraception?” Whatever the question was, he just kept badgering and badgering, and Romney kept appearing more and more perplexed as to what was going on. Stephanopoulos wouldn\u2019t give up, and finally Romney gave an answer just to end the discussion. <\/p>\n

<\/a>I don\u2019t even remember what his answer was, but it was along the lines of, “It isn\u2019t a big deal. Nobody cares, George.” But it didn\u2019t matter what he said. All that mattered was that he did answer it, and that is how the so-called Republican War on Women was born. It was, I am convinced, a tactic that had been planned by Stephanopoulos and others in Democrat campaign war rooms as a means of tripping Romney up. So I\u2019m going through the audio sound bite roster.<\/p>\n

I didn\u2019t watch Sunday shows. I never watch the Sunday shows. I haven\u2019t watched the Sunday shows since the last time I was on one, and even then I didn\u2019t watch it live. I watched it via TiVo much later in the day. I really don\u2019t watch these anymore, and the reason is, no news is made on these shows anymore. And you don\u2019t learn anything on these shows anymore. And furthermore, all they are is just… Each network is a Democrat campaign. It literally is pointless. <\/p>\n

There is no value in the time it takes to watch any of these Sunday shows. Maybe Chris Wallace. I have an exception for him because I think he is actually trying to make news on what he does on the program, but the rest of the time it\u2019s just the promotion of the Democrat Party agenda. Bob Schieffer\u2019s announced he\u2019s leaving CBS. He\u2019s, what, 95? He\u2019s 30 years past the Walter Cronkite mandatory retirement age.<\/p>\n

They\u2019re gonna retire him, and they\u2019re gonna put in the political director named John Dickerson. He is gonna run this show once Schieffer leaves. I guess he\u2019s gonna leave sometime this summer, and it\u2019s clear that he wants to go out having claimed a scalp. Are you ready for this? This is so transparent. This is so typical. This is so unlike a question any Democrat would ever get. He\u2019s interviewing Marco Rubio, and Schieffer says, “Let\u2019s talk a little bit about the social issues.” <\/p>\n

Never mind the social issues are now front and center for the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party\u2019s going to town on social issues. It\u2019s the Democrat Party pushing the culture war in this country. It\u2019s the Democrat Party trying to score big on the so-called social issues. The Republicans are running away from social issues. They\u2019ve been trying to for 20 years. The Republican establishment wants nothing to do with the social issues. <\/p>\n

The Republican Party\u2019s made it clear time and time again that it doesn\u2019t matter. They\u2019re gonna forget about all of that and talk about the economy and other things. Right on cue, Bob Schieffer to Marco Rubio: “Let\u2019s talk a little bit about social issues. You\u2019ve said you\u2019re against gay marriage. Do you think homosexuality is a choice?” Now, that question has no probative news value. <\/p>\n

The answer to that question is worthless in terms of news value or even informing people who Rubio is. Furthermore the question, “Do you think homosexuality is a choice?” had nothing to do with whether or not somebody does or does not support gay marriage. So it\u2019s obviously a trap. It\u2019s a setup. Now, I understand the Republicans. If they\u2019re gonna go on these shows they have to be aware of it, and they have to be prepared for it. I understand all that. <\/p>\n

I\u2019m just saying this is lame, this is cheap, this is obviously partisan. It\u2019s low rent, it\u2019s undignified, and it is as clear as a bell what this is. It\u2019s an indication of just how biased Schieffer is, and it\u2019s the latest attempt by Schieffer to be the next George Stephanopoulos and enter a subject here that has nothing to do with who the next president is gonna be, absolutely nothing to do with Marco Rubio\u2019s campaign.<\/p>\n

Yet the very asking of the question is designed to make the low-information crowd and the rest of the audience watching this… The whole purpose of this question is not even dependent on the answer. The answer, if Rubio screws it up, is icing on the cake. The whole purpose here is the question: “Do you think homosexuality is a choice?” That question sends a message, and the message is:<\/p>\n

“Republicans are dinosaurs! Republicans are sexists! Republicans are mean-spirited! Republicans do not love people!” All of that is what\u2019s wrapped up in this question. It\u2019s an irrelevant, meaningless question when it comes to the presidential campaign, irrelevant and meaningless when it comes to defining who Marco Rubio is, and it has nothing to do with the way Schieffer set it up or whether or not he supports gay marriage. Well, let\u2019s listen to how Rubio answered it. <\/line><\/p>\n

Again, the question: “Let\u2019s talk a little bit about social issues. You\u2019ve said you\u2019re against gay marriage. Do you think that homosexuality is a choice?” What does that have to do with gay marriage? What in the world does it have to do with gay marriage? It has absolutely nothing to do with it. I don\u2019t care how esoteric some of you want to get, how legalese\u2019d some of you might want to get, it has nothing to do with it, and Schieffer knows it. <\/p>\n

This question could be rephrased: “Are you a bigot? Are you a homophobe? Do you hate people?” That\u2019s what this question is. That\u2019s what that question is. It\u2019s a question Schieffer would never ask Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama<\/p>\n

, both of whom opposed gay marriage before it harmed them. At times in their political careers when they felt it was okay to be honest, they said they opposed gay marriage. At the very moment where it became necessary to support gay marriage, they changed on a dime. <\/p>\n

If anybody deserves this question, it\u2019s Hillary Clinton: “Do you support gay marriage, because you used to not. Your husband used to not. Your husband used to oppose abortion. I don\u2019t know about you, but your husband used to oppose abortion and so did Barack Obama, but all of a sudden three years ago everybody in your party changed their mind. All of a sudden gay marriage became fabulous and wonderful. Why?”<\/p>\n

But they\u2019re never gonna ask that question of the Democrats, because the question really isn\u2019t about homosexuality, and it\u2019s really not about gay marriage. The question is, “Why do you hate people? You\u2019re a Republican! You obviously do. So why do you hate people? Why are you mean? <\/line>Why are you intolerant?” That\u2019s what this. It just ticks me off like you can\u2019t believe. I do not think these people deserve these Republican guests. <\/line><\/p>\n

It\u2019s such an obvious patent setup. (interruption) Yeah, yeah, yeah, we got Rubio\u2019s answer. It doesn\u2019t matter. I\u2019m telling you, the answer doesn\u2019t matter in terms of the audience. The audience got everything they needed to go know simply by the question being asked. I\u2019m talking about the low-information crowd or the naive or the ignorant or what have you. Here\u2019s his answer, if you want to hear it. I don\u2019t know what good it does.<\/p>\n

RUBIO: I believe the definition of the institution of marriage should be between one man and one woman. States have always regulated marriage, and if a state wants to have a differentiates definition, you should petition the state legislature and have a political debate. I don\u2019t think courts should be making that decision, and I don\u2019t believe same-sex marriage is a constitutional right. I also don\u2019t believe that your sexual preferences are a choice for the vast and enormous majority of people. In fact, the bottom line is I believe that sexual preference is something that people are born with.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Right. Fine and dandy. Cool. The first answer on marriage is right on the money. The last part of it\u2019s okay, too. But the whole idea of asking this question? He\u2019s as guilty as Bob Schieffer wants him to be. He\u2019s guilty before he says a word. He\u2019s guilty after he answers the question, because the question is a question that attempts to define Rubio. Just the fact that you have to ask the question means there must be some question here about how mean or nice a guy Rubio is, or how smart or erudite or whatever. <\/p>\n

This stuff ticks me off like I cannot tell you. <\/p>\n

Take a break here, we\u2019ll come back and get started with the sound bites that feature me, as there are many of them. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: There\u2019s another question like the one Rubio got that I think was asked of Scott Walker. Would you attend a homosexual marriage of someone in your family whom you loved? (interruption) Oh, you hadn\u2019t heard that one? Do you think they\u2019re gonna ask a Democrat that question? These questions would never be asked because, again, as I say, the hypocrisy on this issue is all on the Democrat side. They\u2019re the ones who all opposed this until it became politically opportunistic to do so. I dare say politically mandatory.<\/p>\n

About three years ago it became an obligation to be in favor of gay marriage, otherwise the gay campaign money was gonna dry up. At one time gay marriage was seen as a near impossibility, wasn\u2019t gonna happen. It was this extreme, wacko fringe cause, and no Democrat wanted to be seen anywhere near it, until the militant gay lobby, politically gay lobby got motivated and started threatening to withdraw money. So on a dime Obama and Hillary and all of the rest of them who needed to, switched and became ardent supporters of gay marriage.<\/p>\n

They sent Joe Biden out there to lead the transformation. Making it look like Biden screwed up, they sent Biden out. He was on a Sunday show or somewhere, some interview, and he made it look like he said something he shouldn\u2019t have said, as in letting the cat out of the bag or maybe making a gaffe. But nobody refuted it. They kind of got mad at Biden, “Joe, what are you doing?” They treated him as, “Ah, there goes Joe. That\u2019s just Joe, gums are flapping, nobody knows what\u2019s gonna come out.” But they stood by it because the gays were threatening to withhold money. <\/p>\n

I mean, if anybody deserves these questions, it\u2019s Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. They\u2019re the ones who used to be steadfastly opposed to this. “So do you think homosexuality is a choice? Would you attend a homosexual wedding if it featured someone you loved?” They asked Walker. Walker\u2019s answer was (paraphrasing), “Well, no, I wouldn\u2019t. I would attend the reception, but I would not go to the actual ceremony.” The questions are traps, and the answer can make it worse, but the question itself is what is to do the damage. <\/p>\n

The question being asked is the attempt to damage the candidate. “Do you think homosexuality is a choice?” The implication, “You bigot, you closed-minded Neanderthal, you hatemonger.” That\u2019s what\u2019s implied in the question. And the same thing with whether or not you\u2019d go to a gay wedding if a loved family member were in it. Loaded questions. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Liz in Richmond, Virginia. I\u2019m glad that you waited. I really appreciate it. Welcome to the program. It\u2019s great to have you here.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Oh, man, it\u2019s so cool to talk to you. How are you doing, Rush?<\/p>\n

RUSH: I\u2019m very well. Thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Cool. No, I was just gonna say that the candidates have been, you know, keep getting asked, “Do you believe that people are born gay?” and there\u2019s been such a simple answer, and it\u2019s what people really want to hear. They can just say, “Well, the prevailing science…” Because the American Psychiatric Association, if you go to their website, they literally say that no one knows what causes it. And there\u2019s quotes that say there\u2019s no replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological etiology for homosexuality. So they can just go with the science instead of giving their opinion.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Now, wait. I want to make sure I understand what you\u2019re saying. Are you saying — I\u2019m gonna use my own words here — are you saying that science has not discovered a gay gene, for example?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah. They\u2019re saying, the quote is, “No one knows what causes heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality.” So I know there\u2019s a lot of people on the left who are claiming that —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. I gotta take a break here and I don\u2019t want you to go away. Nobody knows what causes heterosexuality?<\/p>\n

CALLER: I\u2019m just saying that\u2019s what the American Psychiatric Association says on their website.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay. Right on. Yeah.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay. We\u2019re back now with Liz in Richmond, Virginia. Your point is that the psychological whatever you talked about, association, psychiatric association, they\u2019re claiming they can\u2019t scientifically pinpoint any reason for any sexuality?<\/p>\n

CALLER: That\u2019s right. And that\u2019s at the American Psychiatric Association. I mean, I assume that people would think that they\u2019re a credible authority on things like this. I would assume.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, not all people would, by the way. The American Psychiatric Association, I mean, like any other scientific outfit that can be bought. You know, what hasn\u2019t been politicized these days, is my point. But what\u2019s your real point here? She\u2019s calling two hours after the fact. Let me mention this. The National Institutes of Health has so far spent 400 grand surveying the satisfaction levels of first-time African-American adolescent males\u2019 homosexual experience, and they want to find out how enjoyable the first time was, 400 grand spent so far.<\/p>\n

And then we had a sound bite with Rubio being asked if he thinks that homosexuality is a choice in a setup question. So Liz here is calling to react to that, and your point is that this credible group of people, American Psychiatric Association, cannot give a scientific reason for homosexuality, heterosexuality, bestiality, they can\u2019t give a scientific reason for any sexuality, right?<\/p>\n

CALLER: That\u2019s exactly right.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay, so what\u2019s the point?<\/p>\n

CALLER: So the point is, when they\u2019re asked this question, they don\u2019t have to rely on their opinion. They can go to prevail — you know, people on the left are always saying go to science —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Oh, I get it, so you\u2019re saying that they\u2019re conveniently not finding a scientific reason, thereby allowing people to say, “I didn\u2019t choose this”? <\/p>\n

CALLER: Exactly. Listen, on social media all the time there\u2019s people saying (crosstalk) it\u2019s not a choice, they say it\u2019s not a choice, I was born that way.<\/p>\n

RUSH: So you think they\u2019re choosing it?<\/p>\n

CALLER: I\u2019m saying I have my opinion, Rubio might have his opinion, but the bottom line is the prevailing scientific organizations who study this say, “Yeah, we\u2019ve been trying to find out, but we can\u2019t.” So it might be a choice, it might not. <\/p>\n

RUSH: Wait a minute. Are you saying you want to throw Rubio overboard because he answered that way?<\/p>\n

CALLER: No, I\u2019m not. I\u2019m just saying that if they don\u2019t want to —<\/p>\n

RUSH: All right. Okay.<\/p>\n

CALLER: — be put into a corner, they could use this.<\/p>\n

RUSH: — I think we got to the bottom of this.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Kate, Carson City, Nevada, welcome to the EIB Network. Hello.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hello, Rush. How you doing?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Fine and dandy.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Good. Hey, listen, I just wanted to call — and Cheryl was just awesome. She was just amazing<\/a>. But, anyway, I kind of can dovetail with that. I\u2019m wondering if Bob Schieffer going after Marco Rubio on the homosexual question might not backfire on the mainstream media who are just the press folks for the Democratic Party. Because when you look at what happened with Memories Pizza, when you look at what happened with the florist in Washington, when you see the support for those folks, I don\u2019t think the support for the homosexual agenda is going to be as successful as, say, the War on Women or even attacking pro-lifers or any of that. I think they may be making a tactical error here and I\u2019m wondering what your position is.<\/p>\n

RUSH: See, I don\u2019t think, in this case, it\u2019s comparables to the Memories Pizza, because if I hadn\u2019t told you what happened on Bob Schieffer\u2019s show, you might not know. You may have watched it, I don\u2019t know, but most people didn\u2019t. And Rubio didn\u2019t act offended and all that. If there\u2019s a backfire, it\u2019ll be quiet, and it won\u2019t be something that anybody knows. It\u2019ll just show up on Election Day as one of the reasons why people did or did not vote a certain way. <\/p>\n

As to the homosexual agenda, gay marriage or whatever you might say, backfiring compared to War on Women or what have you, that\u2019s too soon to tell. I don\u2019t think that that\u2019s gonna have any impact on it being tried anyway. I don\u2019t think Bob Schieffer will come up with that question. I\u2019ve been thinking about that. I think it\u2019s a question some producer gave him. Bob Schieffer\u2019s too old. He doesn\u2019t think that way. I know he\u2019s a leftist and all that kind of thing, but that question is just too planted, it\u2019s too stock. “Do you think homosexuality\u2019s chosen?” Came out of nowhere, discussing gay marriage? That has nothing to do with anything. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s a trap question. It\u2019s a gotcha question. It\u2019s baseless, senseless, and so transparent. And to the extent that people in the audience who did see the show saw it that way, yeah, it won\u2019t work, but it could have worked depending on Rubio\u2019s answer, is the point. They\u2019re just waiting for one of these Republicans to say, “No, I think it is chosen.”<\/p>\n

They\u2019re just waiting for one Republican to say it\u2019s chosen, and the whole party is gonna get tarred and feathered as bunch of anti-gay bigots. You wait. All it\u2019s gonna take is one answer like that. “Yes, I think it\u2019s chosen, who wouldn\u2019t?” It\u2019s a setup, and they\u2019re gonna try it again, Rubio just got it first. Next up, George Stephanopoulos will try his version of it on Sunday. Mark my words. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to go out with a big, big scalp. It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to leave CBS News having taken out one of the Republican presidential candidates. Do you remember January of 2012? It was a Republican primary candidate debate. It was the debate where George Stephanopoulos kept […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nSchieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to go out with a big, big scalp. It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to leave CBS News having taken out one of the Republican presidential candidates. Do you remember January of 2012? It was a Republican primary candidate debate. It was the debate where George Stephanopoulos kept […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/\",\"name\":\"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-20T16:41:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-20T16:41:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to go out with a big, big scalp. It looks like Bob Schieffer wants to leave CBS News having taken out one of the Republican presidential candidates. Do you remember January of 2012? It was a Republican primary candidate debate. It was the debate where George Stephanopoulos kept […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/","name":"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-04-20T16:41:17+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-20T16:41:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/20\/schieffer_wants_to_go_out_with_a_scalp\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Schieffer Wants to Go Out with a Scalp"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6554"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6554\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}