{"id":4326,"date":"2016-01-29T19:07:05","date_gmt":"2016-01-29T19:07:05","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-06-14T10:49:20","modified_gmt":"2017-06-14T14:49:20","slug":"hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: Our last caller mentioned that he is for Rubio because thinks Rubio is the best chance the Republicans have defeating Hillary if she\u2019s not indicted. People keep bringing this up. Tom DeLay, former member of the House from Sugar Land, Texas, brought it up earlier this week. His nickname was The Hammer, and all he did is what the Democrats do. He was the whip. He whipped people into action. He got votes. He got people to vote the way the leadership wanted. His nickname was The Hammer. The left had their own hammers.<\/p>\n


\nHell, everybody in the left is a hammer. But they use that as a derogatory term on DeLay. Anyway he\u2019s out there saying he\u2019s got good friends in the FBI, and his friends are telling him that she\u2019s gonna be indicted, that evidence is mounting. It\u2019s worse than anybody even knows, and it\u2019s a slam dunk. And I say, “Please don\u2019t say it.” It\u2019s kind of like the jinx.” I asked, “Please don\u2019t say it, everybody. Don\u2019t say it. Don\u2019t get people\u2019s hopes up.” And Darrell Issa, who is chairman of the House Oversight Committee, is out now.<\/p>\n

“California Rep. Darrell Issa said Friday that the FBI ‘would like to indict both Huma [Abedin] and Hillary Clinton<\/a>‘ for conducting classified government business on a private email server.” The guy, Tom Fitton at Judicial Watch, produced even more information. I mean, people… This goes with Joe diGenova. He said, “My gosh, people at the FBI are telling me it\u2019s voluminous what they\u2019ve got. It\u2019s so bad that if there\u2019s not an indictment, there\u2019s gonna be a revolt in the FBI,” and people continue to come out and say this in their own words.<\/p>\n

People are providing details about what has gone on. One of the stories I read today — and I think it was the Judicial Watch story. It may be something else. I am not sure. Doesn\u2019t matter. The fact is that Hillary knew she was trafficking in classified data and didn\u2019t want to be bothered going the secure route. She was having people cut-and-paste classified data from classified documents and sending that to her in an e-mail so she could traffic in it and send it around.<\/p>\n


\nAnd the analysis that I read today said, “This stuff is so bad that there are intelligence experts,” of both parties, by the way, “who now have concluded that it is almost impossible that the Chinese were not monitoring her, that the Russians were not monitoring her, that the Iranians were not.” In other words, people are saying it\u2019s almost guaranteed that she was hacked. It\u2019s guaranteed that all of these people who should not know American diplomatic secrets were able to follow them in real time.<\/p>\n

The stuff that\u2019s trickling out here now — and this last part was in a story. It is so bad, this story said, that it may not be possible for Obama to hide this. It may not be possible for Obama to let this slide. It may… It\u2019s so deep and it\u2019s so bad. And from what\u2019s reported, it looks like it really is… Some of this stuff, there is no question it\u2019s criminal. No question it violates every kind of US statute that governs this. And no question that it was brazen and arrogant and that she just said, “To hell with the law! I\u2019m bigger than the law. I\u2019m gonna do it my way and to hell with it.”<\/p>\n

It\u2019s almost like, “They\u2019re gonna know our secrets anyway, so what the hell? Why go through the pretense.” But of course, there was more to it than that. The Clintons are seeking donations from these very outfits, countries, people that lead these countries, for one or another of their foundations. And what they\u2019re doing is seeking (and in many cases getting) prepayment for Mrs. Clinton\u2019s eventual presidency in which she can reciprocate with policy preferences in their favor. It\u2019s insidious. Now here\u2019s Darrell Issa who…<\/p>\n

By the way, there\u2019s another story. A Navy admiral. The stuff that Mrs. Clinton was trafficking in is so top secret, so secure, that a Navy admiral in the intelligence community was not even allowed to see it. It was way beyond his clearance level. That\u2019s how bad this all is. And you\u2019ve got all of these people either leaking… They\u2019re not leaking now. They\u2019re putting their names to it. DeLay says, “Yeah, my friends, in the FBI…” Another story said that Jim Comey may have to walk.<\/p>\n

If they don\u2019t act on this, Comey\u2019s gotta resign. It\u2019s all over the place, folks. This is more than a trickle. It\u2019s become more than drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip. It is an avalanche now or a flood of this stuff. And you couple it with the stories that Bill Clinton — the bloom is off the rose — that he\u2019s not drawing crowds, that his favorable number is at 39%. He\u2019s never been at 39 other than for a couple of hours during the Lewinsky scandal. (interruption) What is the reason for the drop? I think the… Oh, the reason for the drop of approval in Clinton?<\/p>\n

Part of it\u2019s generational. I think there\u2019s enough people who have become adults that were not adults when all that was going on and therefore have not been captivated like the Baby Boomers, particularly Democrats were during that era. People marveled at Clinton\u2019s ability to get away with it and how well he lied and his charisma such. If you found yourself in a room with him, he had this ability to make you feel like you were the only one in the room that mattered. And you add to it the news that\u2019s out there now about Hillary and the “bimbos” and how she led the charge to punish them, to stigmatize them.<\/p>\n

I think it\u2019s a cumulative effect.<\/p>\n

I think it\u2019s an accumulation of revelations that are finally sticking. The Teflon has peeled away. Couple that with the fact that I think we\u2019ve been sold a bill of goods since 2008, maybe even before, about how universally loved and popular Hillary was. I mean, it\u2019s all coming to a head now. But this FBI stuff, the fact that more and more people are putting their name to it. Robert Gates, the former… It might have been him that I was reading talking about all of our quote\/unquote “enemies” who no doubt had access to the data Mrs. Clinton was trafficking in. You\u2019ve got Issa now, you\u2019ve got DeLay, you have diGenova<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I mean, there are a lot of people out there who are saying there is so much here that it is almost impossible not to indict her. If something now doesn\u2019t happen, these people are gonna have all kinds of things to explain to people. “What do you mean? You said this was a slam dunk! You said there\u2019s so much evidence.” “There was. There was. I don\u2019t understand it.” Of course, everybody will understand it. Obama just decides to tell what\u2019s-her-face over there not to pull the trigger, Loretta Lynch — and then you\u2019ve got Biden.<\/p>\n


\nBiden\u2019s out there lurking. He\u2019s assuring people, “Don\u2019t sweat it. We\u2019ve got this covered.” What he means is, “I\u2019m ready to step in should something happen,” and then we haven\u2019t even talked about Crazy Bernie. Crazy Bernie is stirring things up. Crazy Bernie is rocking it now. He\u2019s raising money and he\u2019s drawing huge crowds way beyond anything Hillary can dream of. And the Democrat Party establishment is starting to go after Bernie. Headline: “Bernie Sanders Meets the Clinton Smear Machine, and He\u2019s Furious.<\/a>”<\/p>\n

This is from old buddy Bill Jacobson at Legal Insurrection. “Clinton advocate David Brock is the prime suspect.” That\u2019s the Media Matters founder. They\u2019re out there smearing Bernie Sanders. And of course, you know, as a “democratic socialist,” Bernie\u2019s not used to be being smeared. He\u2019s part of the bunch that smear everybody else. And now the smear machine\u2019s been turned on him. He doesn\u2019t like it; he\u2019s out there talking about it. He\u2019s furious at Brock and at Hillary — and he has a lot of sympathy.<\/p>\n

This is not the nineties where the Clintons were applauded for smearing their opponents.<\/p>\n

They were applauded for the bimbo eruptions. They were applauded, they were hailed as great politicians, smarter than the rest of the world in how to deal with adversity. Today there\u2019s a bunch of people that think they\u2019re just a bunch of slimeballs. They have no appreciation for it, no admiration for it, and many of them are the same outsiders upset with the establishment supporting Bernie as outsiders on the Republican side supporting Trump. It seems to be a universal anger at inside-the-Beltway establishment elites of both parties.<\/p>\n

But my only point is, every time we talk about, like I think Rubio would be the best to beat Hillary, or I think Cruz hands down would be the best one to beat Hillary, or Trump, Trump could just wipe the floor with Hillary. Depending on the attitude people have, they always now add the caveat, “If she\u2019s not indicted.” It\u2019s becoming apparently a much more real possibility in a lot of people\u2019s minds.<\/p>\n

And if half of this is true about who has had access to the documents and data she\u2019s been trafficking in, meaning of our enemies, if just half of that\u2019s true, the things that the ChiComs know about us and the Iranians, not have to guess, not have to assume, not have to use spies to find out, they know it because they have had access to whatever Mrs. Clinton was trafficking in. And now Issa says, yeah, I\u2019d like to see Huma thrown in this crowd.<\/p>\n

Oh. The story yesterday was, and this one I believe, the story yesterday was don\u2019t expect Hillary to be indicted, but Huma and Cheryl Mills and some of your support staff, if I were them, I\u2019d be feeling very nervous about now. So that story yesterday was, “Nah, they\u2019ll never go after the big fish. But they gotta go get somebody cause this is so bad. So they\u2019ll go get the Hillary support staff and claim that they had given her plausible deniability, that she didn\u2019t know any of this was going on until all of this news started leaking.” That story is probably a good indication of the efforts to save her and where they are right now.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: This is Bob in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Hello.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hey, I\u2019d like to thank you for taking my call today.<\/p>\n

RUSH: You bet, sir.<\/p>\n

<\/a>CALLER: I think you did an excellent job of explaining phase one of Obama\u2019s plan to protect Hillary Clinton<\/a>. Phase II\u2019s the biggie. Somewhere in the White House, closed door, not recording devices, will be a meeting with the president, the attorney general, and Secretary Clinton. She will tearfully apologize for a lapse of judgment in the handling of her e-mails. It\u2019ll be recognized that she\u2019s remorseful and that she has endured intolerable mental anguish over this. They will grant her a presidential pardon, expunge her record and seal the record to where nobody can mention it anymore.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Does she still run for president in this scenario?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah, and if somebody tries to bring up all this good stuff, she\u2019ll sue them for slander because it never happened.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Ha. (laughing) So are you just trying to be funny here, you trying to catch me on a serious day trying to be funny and loosen things up here —<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, as part of a lawsuit, yeah, that\u2019s kind of a gag, but in the not-too-distant future I can actually see a presidential pardon to help cover her to where she can become president.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Why would they go — why? Why would they do that?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, as you said, there\u2019s all kinds of people in the FBI and other legal circles going crazy trying to figure out why, you know, nothing has been done about these serious —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, but, well, Bob, thank you.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay. Now, about our last caller\u2019s theorem that essentially what\u2019s gonna happen is Hillary will be dragged into the White House, it\u2019ll be Obama in there and Loretta Lynch, and she will apologize and she\u2019ll say she\u2019s sorry and she wasn\u2019t aware and so forth. And they will announce that she came in and apologized, and Obama will pardon her — a presidential pardon for any and all future acts, crimes related to this. And then they will seal the record. They\u2019ll seal the record, it never happened, and she go run for president, and that\u2019ll be that.<\/p>\n


\nFolks, I don\u2019t know; Obama has said he doesn\u2019t think Hillary\u2019s done anything wrong. He\u2019s on the record saying that a number of times. Now, we just learned today the last batch of Hillary\u2019s e-mails are not gonna be released until the end of February, which is way past the original judge\u2019s deadline, and the State Department\u2019s saying, “No, we\u2019re gonna hold these back. It\u2019d be a little too volatile to release them now.” They\u2019re claiming they\u2019ve got built-in delays and there\u2019s all kinds of things stopping them and preventing them.<\/p>\n

Now, get this: Fox just ran this story. It\u2019s just been added to the mix that Hillary\u2019s e-mails are too damaging security-wise to release. They\u2019re so bad, they contain such secrets, there are such transgressions… “It is so bad, we can\u2019t release \u2019em. It would compromise national security like it\u2019s never been compromised to release them.” Of course, if that\u2019s true, they already have compromised national security because it means that our enemies have already seen them. So they try, “These are so bad, this is so volatile, this is such juicy stuff, we can\u2019t afford to release this stuff and make it public,” which would tend to convey a cover-up.<\/p>\n

But again, the question always comes down to this. I can\u2019t tell you a number of times… I asked you this last week, how many times? For those of you who are adults and were adults back in the nineties, how many times in all of these past 25, 26 years, have you been led to believe by one story or another that we\u2019re gonna get Clintons? “This is it! They\u2019re not gonna slither out of this one”? Whatever it is. “Hillary has stepped in it now!” How many times have you heard that? More times than you can count on two hands.<\/p>\n

And each and every time, nothing ever comes of it.<\/p>\n

Why should that change? We have a Democrat, totalitarian Regime running the country. A member of that Regime is in line to be the next president. Why on earth would that totalitarian Regime take out one of its own ranking members? And the only answer you can provide is that the current leader of the totalitarian Regime doesn\u2019t want Hillary anywhere near his totalitarian agenda after he\u2019s gone. It doesn\u2019t make sense that the Obama Regime would take out one of their own. “But, Rush! But, Rush! He doesn\u2019t want her to be president.”<\/p>\n

Well, there\u2019s all kinds of ways to have done this before we\u2019ve gotten this far. But to me it\u2019s the old “experience guided by intelligence” angle. How many times…? Honestly, folks, how many times have you been led to believe that somebody has got the goods on Hillary? Whitewater, Robert “Red” Bone and all the cattle futures, the Rose Law Firm billing records showing up out of clean air in the Maps Room in the White House. Monica Lewinsky, bimbo eruptions. Hillary Clinton running the show. Hillary Clinton lying about sneaking past sniper fire, wherever it was. And all the others.<\/p>\n

Lying to grand jury. All these other things I have forgotten. How many of those, “This is it! This is it!” and nothing ever, ever happens? So common sense would lead you to conclude that nothing\u2019s gonna come of this, either. And each of these previous incidents where at one point or another somebody thought, “This is it! We finally got the goods”? We\u2019ve got that characteristic here, from all these people who claim to have seen the evidence the FBI has accrued. We got Tom DeLay saying (paraphrased), “Oh, yeah! My FBI buddies tell me this is bad. It\u2019s a slam dunk.”<\/p>\n

Darrell Issa\u2019s out there saying (paraphrased), “I not only want to indict Hillary. I want to go get Huma.” Joe diGenova says (paraphrased), “Let me tell you something: This evidence? This is so bad that if they don\u2019t indict, there\u2019s gonna be a revolt.” It\u2019s the same stuff. We\u2019ve heard all this before, just about different things. We\u2019ve been there, we\u2019ve done that, and nothing ever happens to \u2019em. The smart bet, the-common-sense place to put your money here is nothing\u2019s gonna happen to her here, either.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Speak of the devil, White House press secretary Josh Earnest and the daily brief just moments ago. Fox News Channel, White House correspondent Kevin Corke said to the White House press secretary, “Can you say with certainty and confidence that Secretary Clinton will not be indicted?”<\/p>\n

EARNEST: That will be a decision that is made by the Department of Justice and prosecutors over there. What I know that some officials over there have said is that she is not a target of the investigation. So that does not seem to be the direction that it\u2019s trending.<\/p>\n

RUSH: So he says she\u2019s not a target. She not a target of the investigation. Folks, that cannot be true. You know, target, subject, person of interest, there\u2019s all these different characterizations of bad people that the good guys pursue. A lot of people think subject and target are the same thing, and they\u2019re not. They can be at times. Person of interest, subject. There\u2019s no way she can\u2019t be a subject. You know, this is just some people putting out — what they\u2019re trying to tell you is she\u2019s not a target. If she wasn\u2019t a target, they would have said she wasn\u2019t a target. They\u2019re trying to make you think that by saying, “Well, she not a subject.” She\u2019s not only a subject, she\u2019s a person of interest. Don\u2019t fall for this. This has been said, by the way. It was a couple of weeks ago I think that somebody said she\u2019s not a subject. That\u2019s so multi-purposed in US attorney jargon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Our last caller mentioned that he is for Rubio because thinks Rubio is the best chance the Republicans have defeating Hillary if she\u2019s not indicted. People keep bringing this up. Tom DeLay, former member of the House from Sugar Land, Texas, brought it up earlier this week. His nickname was The Hammer, and all […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nHillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Our last caller mentioned that he is for Rubio because thinks Rubio is the best chance the Republicans have defeating Hillary if she\u2019s not indicted. People keep bringing this up. Tom DeLay, former member of the House from Sugar Land, Texas, brought it up earlier this week. His nickname was The Hammer, and all […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/\",\"name\":\"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-29T19:07:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-14T14:49:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Our last caller mentioned that he is for Rubio because thinks Rubio is the best chance the Republicans have defeating Hillary if she\u2019s not indicted. People keep bringing this up. Tom DeLay, former member of the House from Sugar Land, Texas, brought it up earlier this week. His nickname was The Hammer, and all […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/","name":"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-01-29T19:07:05+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-14T14:49:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/01\/29\/hillary_indictment_talk_ratchets_up\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hillary Indictment Talk Ratchets Up"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4326"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4326"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":236984,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4326\/revisions\/236984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}