{"id":37469,"date":"2011-02-01T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T00:05:27","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T00:05:27","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T00:05:27","slug":"lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: It appears, ladies and gentlemen, the regime is just going to ignore the judge\u2019s ruling. We go now to… Who is this? Jean Cummings, a managing editor of The Politico. She was asked, ‘What\u2019s the administration gonna do?\u2019<\/p>\n

CUMMINGS: I think the administration is just going to move forward and hope for the best and hope that they get the ruling that they argue they deserve. Clearly this judge in Florida went further than anyone else did, and basically put the entire issue of the law now before the Supreme Court once the case gets there. But the Supreme Court would have had the ability to review the whole law anyway. So whether these negative rulings are narrow or broad doesn\u2019t really change the process that this issue is on, and that is resolution in the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Right. Well, but it does. See this is the key, and this is where, as I mentioned earlier, any one of the 26 attorney generals who have filed suit can move now and ask for an immediate ruling from Judge Vinson. The minute the signal is made that the regime is gonna ignore his ruling, somebody needs to consult him again, and that\u2019s what this sounds like. Well, you know, they\u2019re just gonna keep going \u2019cause everybody knows it\u2019s gonna go to the Supreme Court anyway. So we\u2019ll just wait until he gets there. In the meantime, they\u2019re just gonna move forward. They\u2019re just going to move forward on all of this. It doesn\u2019t surprise me. Frankly, it\u2019s what I expected from them. This is an increasingly lawless administration anyway. Ignoring the judiciary. I just want you to think back again: What would happen if Nixon had done this during Watergate.<\/p>\n

‘What are you gonna do? The judge has ruled.\u2019<\/p>\n

Nixon says, ‘I\u2019m not gonna pay any attention to \u2019em. Screw \u2019em. We\u2019re just gonna keep going.\u2019 <\/p>\n

There could have nuclear blowoffs, explosions going off all over Washington, DC. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: We spent a lot of time in the previous hour explaining severability, lack of a severability clause. I\u2019m certain, as I said, that the regime did not want to play around with any severability, particularly because of the mandate and the fundraising aspect that was crucial to having the mandate that 32 million people (well, everybody) buy insurance or at least pay a fine if they don\u2019t. Now, the judge said that he\u2019s not going to sever the individual mandate from the rest of the law because it was not possible to do so given the structure of the law and how it all revolves around the mandate — which it does, which was my point. It all resolves around the mandate. But there\u2019s plenty of arrogance to go along the part of the regime, too, in this. <\/p>\n

Now, the judge said something else. He didn\u2019t write this but essentially he said: I\u2019m not a legislator; I\u2019m not gonna rewrite the law. So I just voided all of it. <\/p>\n

Now, the left is out there saying he\u2019s an activist judge. If he were an activist judge, he would have rewritten it. That\u2019s what activist judges do. Activist judges take a law they don\u2019t like and rewrite it so that it will pass their version of constitutional muster. They\u2019d put a tax increase or whatever in it. This guy said, look, this thing is flawed, it\u2019s unconstitutional, and I\u2019m voiding it. The whole thing. Which takes us back to this sound bite, again, Jean Cummings at Politico. She was asked this afternoon on television: What will the regime do as a result of this ruling? (replaying of sound bite) Look… (sigh) These people, Ms. Cummings as an example, really, honestly, folks, they make this job very hard. Because what she just said is senseless. <\/p>\n

What she just said is ignorant. I do not like talking this way about people. She\u2019s clueless. It is clear she hasn\u2019t the slightest idea what she\u2019s talking about. (interruption) I know people have told her that, but that\u2019s the point. You know, the people that she wants to hear certain things told her what she wanted to hear, and she went out and reported it. ‘I think the administration, they\u2019re just gonna move forward. They\u2019re gonna hope for the best and hope they get the rules that they argue they deserve.\u2019 They deserve? Gee, they deserve to be able to act extra-constitutionally? ‘This judge in Florida went further than anyone else did,\u2019 she said, ‘and basically put the entire issue of the law now before the Supreme Court, once the case gets there. <\/p>\n

‘But the Supreme Court would have had the ability to review the whole law anyway, so whether these negative rulings are narrow or broad doesn\u2019t really change the process that this issues on, and that is resolution in the Supreme Court.\u2019 Negative ruling? This was a positive ruling. It reaffirmed the constitutional premise of individual liberty and limited federal power. It\u2019s a very positive ruling. You know what she\u2019s saying? ‘Essentially, the judge never ruled. Well, it doesn\u2019t matter what he said \u2019cause everybody know it\u2019s gonna go to the Supreme Court.\u2019 How does everybody know that? It\u2019s gonna go to the Supreme Court \u2019cause of what this guy did! And tell me, if this case doesn\u2019t matter, why did the regime defend in this case? <\/p>\n

They sent a lawyer to defend. They presented their case to Judge Vinson just as the opponents of Obamacare presented their case to Judge Vinson. So if the case doesn\u2019t matter, why did they even bother to show up and defend themselves in court on this case? Clearly it matters. It\u2019s very sad that this is the state of competence that we have in big time media. ‘Well, you know, they\u2019re just gonna move forward. They\u2019re gonna hope for the best, and hope to get the rules that they argue they deserve.\u2019 Ms. Cummings, what…? The whole thing has just been thrown out. It\u2019s just been ruled unconstitutional. That means it stops; it has been voided. <\/p>\n

Apparently what she\u2019s been told is the real news here is the regime\u2019s just gonna ignore this on the premise that it\u2019s gonna end up on the Supreme Court anyway. So we\u2019re just gonna keep implementing this until it gets there, and there are I must stress again (to the point of having to apologize and being redundant) there are people who think that the judge\u2019s ruling gave them permission to keep implementing under appeal. He didn\u2019t. So, as I said in the first hour, the next thing to happen is one of the attorney generals from these 26 states can go back to Judge Vinson and say, ‘The regime is ignoring your ruling. We need an injunction. We need something,\u2019 and then the regime would have to go argue that. That would, of course, then make the point of what we are all up against. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: John Lewis has weighed in, ladies and gentlemen, on all this. This afternoon on television he was asked the following question: ‘The Supreme Court will probably decide it by a 5-4 ruling and the odds are that it could go against the administration. Doesn\u2019t this throw all of its planning into jeopardy?\u2019<\/p>\n

LEWIS: There have been two ‘jerges\u2019 rulings against a section of the law, and two ‘jerges\u2019 ruling in favor of the law. I\u2019m sure the administration will appeal and we will wait for the decision of the United States Supreme Court, but I believe health care is a right and not a privilege. I think the president and the administration and the Democrats in the Congress did what was right to set us on a path to providing comprehensive health care for all of our citizens and we cannot go back. We\u2019ve come too far.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Come too far, in violating the Constitution. We\u2019ve taken too many steps beyond where the Constitution says we can go to come back. We\u2019ve been there and we\u2019ve gone so far over the line where the Constitution says we shouldn\u2019t go that we shouldn\u2019t have to go back. I crossed that bridge once before. I don\u2019t want to have to walk back across that bridge. John Lewis on the Obamacare ruling. We\u2019ve come too far to go back now. <\/p>\n

Lemont, Illinois. James, you\u2019re next on the EIB. <\/p>\n

CALLER: Once and for all we have to put to rest the idea that health insurance is anything like automobile insurance. Driving is a privilege. You must pass an eye test, a written test, a road test, and you must provide proof of financial responsibility. The Illinois law, when it first went into effect, you could post a bond. Now, nobody does that. They simply buy liability insurance.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Right.<\/p>\n

CALLER: And liability insurance pays others, should you be judged liable in operating an automobile on a public road. My mom is 94. She doesn\u2019t drive. She doesn\u2019t have to buy automobile insurance.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Right.<\/p>\n

CALLER: And you can buy lots of things from insurance companies. Annuities, stuff like that. Now, in a matter of the court decision, if the president goes ahead and starts enforcing the health insurance law, I believe he would be in contempt of court.<\/p>\n

RUSH: No question about it.<\/p>\n

CALLER: If that was a Supreme Court, a federal court decision, I think that it would be incumbent upon the US Marshals, which are the enforcement arm of the US courts, to arrest the president —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well —<\/p>\n

CALLER: — and hold him for contempt of court.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I don\u2019t know about that. You know, those kinds of things involving presidents, I don\u2019t know. But it is clear, it is clear that this judge has voided the law and it appears the regime is just gonna say, screw it, we\u2019re gonna keep implementing. If they\u2019re not stopped, keep doing it, some AG is going to have to go back to Judge Vinson and —<\/p>\n

CALLER: And get a contempt of court ruling.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, or some other ruling. I don\u2019t know if it would be called contempt of court. Obama is already in contempt of the American people by just this whole health care bill in itself. He\u2019s already in contempt of the people.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yes.<\/p>\n

RUSH: He\u2019s already doing things the American people don\u2019t want. Now he is defying, it appears, a federal judge. The rest of us can\u2019t do this.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, if it\u2019s a federal judge, then the US Marshals may be after him.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, do you really expect that? Do you really expect the federal marshals will be knocking on the Oval Office door?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Maybe the American people should be expecting that.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, that\u2019s a different thing. But I hear you. Don\u2019t misunderstand. These kinds of things are different with presidents, and for certain reasons. I know that the media would have loved to frog march Karl Rove out of the Oval Office. They would have loved to frog march Bush out of there over what he said were lies about Iraq and all that. I\u2019m glad James called because that is an illustration of the seriousness of this. We have a certain percentage of people in the country who believe the federal government\u2019s all powerful, whatever they want to do they can do, and the judge says it doesn\u2019t matter. People do think that presidents are above the law. And we\u2019ve had some presidents who think they are above the law, particularly if they are confused and think that they are on some moral crusade that supersedes the law. Anyway, James, I appreciate it. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Bill in St. Matthews, South Carolina. I\u2019m glad you called, sir. Welcome to the program.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hey, Rush, thanks for taking my call.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yes, sir.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hey, listen, I think people are missing the biggest thing. It\u2019s not health care that just got ruled on. Obama is basically backed himself into a game of Supreme Court roulette. When this goes before the Supreme Court, it\u2019s not about health care. This is about Obama. And listen, he can\u2019t afford to lose this. And because he can\u2019t afford to lose this, he will find a way not to go to the Supreme Court. Listen, Rush, if he loses on the Supreme Court, his presidency is over. So he has to circumvent this. I predict he\u2019ll get with the Republicans and come out and say they\u2019re gonna fix health care, and he cannot let this go to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, wait a second. Two things. If the Republicans fall for that, I can\u2019t see it. Republicans bailing him out on — number two, I\u2019m not ready yet to accept the premise that his presidency is dead. There might be a devious part of Obama that would love the Supreme Court to rule against him. Gives him every opportunity to point out how the right wing and the enemies of the little people have taken over this country and how finally he is needed more than ever to make sure he gets his shot to appoint correct judges that are gonna recognize the needs of the downtrodden in this country, he\u2019s tried so far but this is what he\u2019s up against. He is already on record as calling them out at the State of the Union speech two years ago on the Citizens United ruling. <\/p>\n

I think he would love nothing more than an occasion and an opportunity to rip these people a new one and blow that place up, and use himself almost as a martyr. We\u2019ll have to ask if Elena Kagan will have to recuse herself on any health care cases. She argued a bunch of them. You know, she was solicitor general for the regime for a time. I\u2019ll have to ask my legal beagles about that. I understand what you\u2019re saying. It is about Obama. If the Supreme Court says he is unconstitutional, I can see you thinking he can\u2019t tolerate that. That\u2019s a repudiation he doesn\u2019t want. This guy so dislikes the Constitution, that would just fit right in with his whole argument that it\u2019s outdated, needs drastic change and so forth and so on, but still an interesting point.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: It appears, ladies and gentlemen, the regime is just going to ignore the judge\u2019s ruling. We go now to… Who is this? Jean Cummings, a managing editor of The Politico. She was asked, ‘What\u2019s the administration gonna do?\u2019 CUMMINGS: I think the administration is just going to move forward and hope for the best […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nLawless Regime to Ignore Ruling - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: It appears, ladies and gentlemen, the regime is just going to ignore the judge\u2019s ruling. We go now to… Who is this? Jean Cummings, a managing editor of The Politico. She was asked, ‘What\u2019s the administration gonna do?\u2019 CUMMINGS: I think the administration is just going to move forward and hope for the best […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/\",\"name\":\"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T00:05:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T00:05:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: It appears, ladies and gentlemen, the regime is just going to ignore the judge\u2019s ruling. We go now to… Who is this? Jean Cummings, a managing editor of The Politico. She was asked, ‘What\u2019s the administration gonna do?\u2019 CUMMINGS: I think the administration is just going to move forward and hope for the best […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/","name":"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T00:05:27+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T00:05:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2011\/02\/01\/lawless_regime_to_ignore_ruling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lawless Regime to Ignore Ruling"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37469"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}