RUSH: Well, greetings to you, music lovers, thrill-seekers, and conversationalists all across the fruited plain. Here we are locked and loaded — a little Second Amendment lingo there, sends the Democrats into a tizzy — revved and ready for three hours of broadcast excellence hosted by me, Rush Limbaugh. This, the most-listened-to radio talk show in the country. You want to appear on the program, 800-282-2882. The email address, ElRushbo@eibnet.us.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/APP-101320-Barrett.jpg\")
So, I watched some of the hearings today, Amy Coney Barrett. Folks, I don\u2019t know that I\u2019ve ever seen this. I probably have, but I haven\u2019t taken any notice. For some reason I took notice today even before a senator asked her a question. She has literally no notes in front of her. She doesn\u2019t even have — well, yeah, there\u2019s a blank piece of paper in front of her in case she\u2019s gotta make some notes to try to translate some of these questions.<\/p>\n
Have you heard Senator Leahy today, Senator Depends? That\u2019s our nickname for the guy \u2019cause he used to leak like a sieve. Senator Pat “Leaky” Leahy, you know who this guy is sounding like now? He\u2019s sounding like Larry Flynt. (doing impression) “I — I — ha-ha-ha — haven\u2019t been able — 10 years now that — that\u2019s all right.” She asked him to turn up the volume on the TV \u2019cause he\u2019s not there.<\/p>\n
He\u2019s respecting the social distancing and all that for COVID-19. But he sounds like Larry Flynt. You know, this guy, I was taken aback today. “Leaky” Leahy and Senator Dianne Feinstein were sitting there bragging about when they were in college in the fifties, and that\u2019s when I was born. We got two fossils here on this committee and they are the ones obviously with seniority, and they have both taken their turns at Judge Barrett.<\/p>\n
And believe me, folks, she doesn\u2019t have a single note. She doesn\u2019t have anything to remind her. She is a teacher in addition to being a judge, and she literally is swatting away these questions. She\u2019s doing it with profound respect. And when I thought that\u2019s what I\u2019d seen — here, put the picture up, Brian. I wanted to make sure that those of you on the Dittocam<\/a> could see this. Senator Cornyn from Texas asked her to hold up notes that she brought with her, and she held up a blank piece of paper. That\u2019s her right there, if you\u2019re watching on the Dittocam<\/a>. We\u2019ll have this at RushLimbaugh.com as well.<\/p>\n And we\u2019re gonna be loading up the Twitter page today, folks. You gotta stand by. Twitter handle, new Twitter handle, @RealRLimbaugh<\/a>. We\u2019re gonna be loading it up all day today. You don\u2019t want to miss the great things we have coming there.<\/p>\n You know, so she holds this up, blank piece of paper, and in a simple maneuver proves that she is the smartest person in the room. And it was a great thing because it makes that point. Every Democrat senator — probably Republican, too — but certainly every Democrat senator in that room had mountains of notebooks, stacks of paper, file after file after file from which their questions were ostensibly coming.<\/p>\n Senator Leahy, just to give you an idea, Senator Leahy is so old — and I got nothing against age. I mean, you can say I\u2019m old. I\u2019m approaching 70. Senator Leahy is like I think 88. I don\u2019t know what DiFi is, but she\u2019s in that range. But Leahy is so old he has participated in every confirmation hearing for every justice now on the Supreme Court. And Leahy is who they put to replace DiFi. They were running around before the hearings began saying that DiFi is maybe too old and too out of it to do this.<\/p>\n But, man, folks, it has been a brilliant display of knowledge of the subject. She\u2019s a brilliant teacher, brilliant judge, unflappable. And you know what one of the brilliant things that she has done is invoked previous statements from, say, Justice Kagan. “Well, Justice Kagan said…”<\/p>\n (Larry Flynt impression)<\/p>\n And then she will say, “I remember Justice Ginsburg said this…”<\/p>\n (Larry Flynt impression)<\/p>\n She has just been running rings around them. But, yeah, I like doing the impersonation of Larry Flynt, so I will take the occasion any chance I get.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: Here\u2019s one example — sound bite number 1, we have time — of Amy Coney Barrett swatting away Dianne Feinstein…<\/p>\n FEINSTEIN: In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Justice Scalia joined the dissent which took the position, and I quote, “We believe that Roe was wrongly decided and that it can and should be overruled, consistent with our traditional approach to stare decisis in constitutional cases.” Do you agree with Justice Scalia\u2019s view that Roe was wrongly decided?<\/p>\n RUSH: Oh, my goodness! Oh, my goodness. Not only is she saying, “Look, look, DiFi, not only am I not gonna answer your question… Your question is a setup. You know that Scalia is my mentor; you want me to trash Scalia. Well, not only am I not gonna do that, DiFi, I\u2019m gonna throw Elena Kagan back at ya! Elena Kagan said that it would be ‘wrong to grade precedent.\u2019<\/p>\n “I\u2019m not gonna sit here and say this previous court was stupid. I\u2019m not gonna sit here and do that. I\u2019m not gonna sit here and say that a previous justice was stupid. I\u2019m not gonna do it. I\u2019m not gonna give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down. It\u2019s stare decisis, it\u2019s precedent, and it would be wrong and a violation of the canons for me to do that as a sitting judge. I\u2019m not gonna do it.”<\/p>\n So citing leftist justices on the court to back up her answer. Really good.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: So Sheldon Whitehouse, who is a Democrat senator from — I don\u2019t know — Connecticut or he\u2019s from New Hampshire, Rhode Island, wherever. Sheldon Whitehouse. He\u2019s probably one of these guys in high school and college that was just a nerd that ran everybody ragged, irritated \u2019em. He\u2019s now a United States senator. (interruption) “Rhode Island.” Figures.<\/p>\n “This is the Judicial Crisis Network, Carrie Severino. (Gasp!) These are evil people out there, don\u2019t you know? Nobody knows about them, and they are cultivating all of these robot conservatives out there to just be conservatives. That\u2019s all they\u2019re doing, and then they have the ear of Trump. Whenever there\u2019s a vacancy, they go here! Dark money sustains this operation.”<\/p>\n Then the third little pamphlet he had encompassed a whole bunch of other legal groups. So, A, it isn\u2019t illegal. It isn\u2019t dark money. There\u2019s nothing untoward about the Federalist Society. You know how to understand why they don\u2019t like the Federalist Society? It\u2019s the same thing as understanding why they hated the Tea Party. The Tea Party was an organic, bubbled-up-out-of-the-American-population political group that had no leader.<\/p>\n They couldn\u2019t control them. So the Democrats went out and created Occupy Wall Street, tried to make it look like it was organic, but it wasn\u2019t. Now here came Sheldon Whitehouse today trying to say that the Federalist Society is some dark money group. The Federalist Society is nothing more than American patriots. To suggest that Democrats don\u2019t have a network of young judges on various courts that are not being groomed for the Supreme Court?<\/p>\n It\u2019s absurd. Of course they do! But nobody else is supposed to have one, you see. Nobody else is supposed to do this kind of stuff. Nobody else is supposed to be able to have the same kind of operation that Democrats do. Now Leonard Leo and The Federalist Society — of which Justice Scalia was a proud member. So Sheldon Whitehouse tries to turn all of this on Amy Coney Barrett, because she\u2019s a member of The Federalist Society.<\/p>\n I take it back. He did pause, giving her an opportunity to jump in, \u2019cause he thought that he had set her up. He thought… Sheldon Whitehouse thought that he had prompted her, intimidated her, maybe had roused her up enough that she had to say something. She just sat there. In a 30-minute Q&A, Amy Coney Barrett said not a single word. They can\u2019t touch her. They moved on.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/APP-101320-Coney-Barrett-Hearing.jpg\")
And if they had done that, that would have put Leahy in charge, although I don\u2019t think they could have done that because I think Leahy is chairman of another committee, and you can\u2019t be chairman of two committees at the same time. So I think they would have moved on to maybe to Senator Durbin. I don\u2019t know who\u2019s in line after that.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/APP-101320-Coney-Barrett-2.jpg\")
BARRETT: I\u2019m gonna invoke Justice Kagan\u2019s description, which I think is perfectly put. She said that she was not gonna grade precedent or give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down. It would actually be wrong and a violation of the canons for me to do that in violation of a sitting judge.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/ZZ-APP-Rush-Flag-STARS-006.jpg\")
He was going to destroy Amy Coney Barrett. He was gonna destroy Amy Coney Barrett on the subject of dark money. Now, dark money in this case, he wanted to show how (sinister) “There\u2019s a secret network out there that\u2019s getting justices named to the court!” So he puts up the Federalist Society and Leonard Leo. Leonard Leo run the Federalist Society; then he put up another little thing that looks like a pamphlet.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/sheldonwhitehouse.png\")
He tries to shame her, to intimidate her into believing she\u2019s the product of dark money. She\u2019s the product of this silent operation to groom little mind-numbed judge robots. He was so frustrated. He questioned Judge Amy Coney Barrett for 30 minutes. Do you know how many words she uttered in the 30-minute Q&A? Zero. He never broke for a question.<\/p>\n