{"id":365130,"date":"2020-09-21T16:20:00","date_gmt":"2020-09-21T20:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=365130"},"modified":"2020-09-22T16:29:07","modified_gmt":"2020-09-22T20:29:07","slug":"on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/","title":{"rendered":"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Let me go to Whitesboro, New York, and grab a quick phone call. This is Ed. And welcome, sir. Great to have you here with us.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Thank you, Rush. Hey, this Murkowski, Collins, and Romney, what of those three do we need to get this justice through?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: We don\u2019t need any of those and we can\u2019t lose any more.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Okay. I don\u2019t know what these people are thinking. My God.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I don\u2019t know what Romney &#8212; I don\u2019t know why the people of Utah &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I tell you what they\u2019re thinking, Ed. They\u2019re thinking like Democrats. They are thinking that most people in the country hate Trump. They think that most people look at Trump and see this vile Mr. Orange Man. And they are dead wrong about it, but there\u2019s nothing new in it. They are proud moderates. If there\u2019s anything that ought to disqualify or discredit moderates, it\u2019s these three. Because they illustrate how misunderstood the term is. Moderate is not open-minded and willing to examine. Moderate means anti-Republican or, in the current context, moderate means anti-Trump. Moderate, undecided, means anti-Trump. That\u2019s all you have to know.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-365147\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx-480x270.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>So here\u2019s what can happen. You lose Murkowski and Collins almost by rote because they misunderstand what\u2019s going on and they\u2019re scared to death of the Democrats. There\u2019s a photo out there &#8212; you know, I need to find this photo from my archives. There is a photo of Dianne Feinstein during the Kavanaugh hearings. And this photo, she\u2019s with Murkowski, she\u2019s got Murkowski pinned up against the wall. And she is attempting, even though Feinstein\u2019s a tiny little hump, too, she\u2019s attempting to tower over Murkowski. It is clear that Dianne Feinstein\u2019s engaging in intimidation of Murkowski.<\/p>\n<p>And I think it works. But Trump has some things up his sleeve such as the nominee him or herself. If Trump nominates the right person, it can bring a lot of pressure on these three people. &#8220;Oh, really, Senator Murkowski? You have a problem with an Hispanic female being nominated who happens to be Republican conservative-leaning on the Supreme Court? Really, Ms. Collins, you got a problem? You want to join the Democrats here in trashing an Hispanic female or a Catholic female,&#8221; in the case of Amy Coney Barrett.<\/p>\n<p>Now what they would say, &#8220;No, it\u2019s not about the nominee. I think the president should wait. I think the next election should determine the nominee.&#8221; That is such a cop-out. That is fear. That is fear, I mean, making itself so obvious. But the numbers are this, and we can afford to lose three, but no more. It would bring in Mike Pence as the tie-breaking vote, the vice president, the president of the Senate, he would go in and he would break the tie, and then the Trump nominee would be confirmed.<\/p>\n<p>But okay, I got the photo here. It\u2019s gonna take me awhile \u2019til the next break before I can get it moved into position for the <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/dittocam\/the-rush-limbaugh-show-live-mon-sep-21\/\">Dittocam<\/a>. But hang on for that. I\u2019ll show it to you in just a jiffy here, folks. The bottom line is that I don\u2019t know if we\u2019ve really lost Murkowski and Collins for good. Probably so. But who the nominee is is going to play a big role in this. They are, as I say, illustrating the phoniness of being moderate and undecided.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I just got a quick note from a brilliant friend, a brilliant legal mind and friend. He said, &#8220;Mr. Limbaugh, there\u2019s another possibility out there, and it is that Susan Collins and Murkowski could not vote at all, as opposed to voting against the nominee. They could simply vote &#8216;present,\u2019 thereby abstaining, showing their opposition against a procedure but not voting against the nominee.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s true. They could abstain. They could express their displeasure with the procedure (and thereby dump on Mr. Orange Man), but not vote against the nominee. If they vote &#8220;present,&#8221; it doesn\u2019t count against the vote against the nominee. Now, the Democrats only have 47 votes against. The Republicans only need 48, if the Collins, Murkowski people don\u2019t vote at all. Let\u2019s throw Romney in there.<\/p>\n<p>If they don\u2019t vote at all, they abstain, if they vote &#8220;present,&#8221; all we need\u2019s 48 votes, and you don\u2019t need get to 51, and that is something they could do. It\u2019s something that they might seriously consider, if they do not want to vote against the nominee but do want to vote against the procedure and that\u2019s how they would do it.<\/p>\n<p>All right. Here\u2019s the photo. And we have had this photo up at RushLimbaugh.com before. We put it up during the Kavanaugh hearings, but I want to show you how this stuff works. The first photo I want to put up is a long shot of Senator DiFi have pinioned Murkowski up against the wall and telling her what-for, and we\u2019ve gotta close-up of this.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-365108\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/rawImage.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"450\" height=\"603\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/rawImage.png 553w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/rawImage-224x300.png 224w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/rawImage-480x643.png 480w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/dittocam\/the-rush-limbaugh-show-live-mon-sep-21\/\">We\u2019re showing this the Dittocam right now for those of you who are subscribing to the Dittocam<\/a>. But fear not. These photos that we\u2019re showing will be on the website &#8212; the RushLimbaugh.com website &#8212; on the free side in mere moments. This is not a cheap trick to get people to subscribe. But that picture, you know, with Feinstein&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>She\u2019s got her left hand up with her hand up there against the wall. It looks like a Hitler salute just to give you an idea. It\u2019s not what it is, don\u2019t misunderstand, but looks like that. With the left arm, left hand &#8212; which, of course, makes it a not Hitler salute because that happened with the right arm. I\u2019m just trying to give you a mental picture here.<\/p>\n<p>And Murkowski is cowering. She\u2019s holding what looks like her phone in her right hand or something. She\u2019s got her purse in her left hand. But Dianne Feinstein is telling Murkowski how it\u2019s gonna be. Now, let\u2019s switch. We have a close-up of this, and there is the close-up, for those of you watching the Dittocam. You could say on the left side there that Dianne Feinstein is not happy, and she is giving Murkowski the what-for.<\/p>\n<p>And Murkowski looks pained. Murkowski looks like to be suffering. Would you agree with this interpretation, Mr. Snerdley? (interruption) Looks&#8230; Her eyes are closed. She looks to be&#8230; She\u2019s either frustrated, flabbergasted, or she is frightened. Ah, maybe not frightened. She just maybe she realizes (ha-ha-ha) on which side of the bread her butter is. But Dianne Feinstein, there is no doubt what\u2019s happening here.<\/p>\n<p>Dianne Feinstein is telling Murkowski how she gonna vote; what it\u2019s gonna mean. I mean, there is a sense of resolve, a mean spirit; there\u2019s a demand on that facial expression of Dianne Feinstein. (interruption) What are you saying in there? What are you saying? (interruption) Oh, that\u2019s a good way to put it. &#8220;It looks like bullying.&#8221; That\u2019s exactly right.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a great way to describe it. &#8220;Bullying&#8221; is not in my vocabulary \u2019cause, you know, it\u2019s not a big deal, but&#8230; (interruption) Yes, there it is. That\u2019s exactly what\u2019s happening there. Dianne Feinstein is bullying poor little Lisa. The Democrat is bullying the Republican babe.<\/p>\n<p>Grab another phone call here while we have time. This is Brian in St. Augustine, Florida. Great to have you, sir. You\u2019re next.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hey, thanks for taking my call, Rush. I just wanted to say that the biggest mistake the Republicans made was in 2016 people like Lindsey Graham making excuses for doing what they had the power to do, and now it\u2019s coming to bite them all in the rear end.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Like what do you mean? Give me an example. What did he do?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Well, when he said, &#8220;Oh, well, use my words against me. We\u2019re doing this because the last year when &#8212; when there\u2019s a &#8212; an election coming up, with &#8212; with the &#8212; with Merrick Garland.&#8221; They should have just said, &#8220;You would do the same thing if the roles were reversed to the Democrats, and that\u2019s the result of having the power in the Senate.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Oh, I see. You\u2019re thinking that Lindsey Graham should have just been forthright, upfront, and honest rather than try to make excuses.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Exactly.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: You don\u2019t have to make excuses for it.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Yeah, but is it gonna matter now? Does it matter now?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Well, it doesn\u2019t matter, but now the Democrats have all these talking points that they can go ahead and say, oh, well, you said this four years ago. But now the Republicans have&#8230; Well, Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself said this four years ago.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-287472\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/ZZ-APP-Rush-Flag-Bunting-008.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/ZZ-APP-Rush-Flag-Bunting-008.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/ZZ-APP-Rush-Flag-Bunting-008-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>RUSH: That\u2019s right. &#8220;You said this four years ago&#8221; goes both ways. But that doesn\u2019t&#8230; I don\u2019t mean to be trying to say your call is insignificant. Please don\u2019t misunderstand. The only relevant bottom line we have here is not what Lindsey Graham said or any other senator, whatever, Murkowski and Collins. The fact is, we got President Trump, and that\u2019s gonna determine what\u2019s gonna happen &#8212; and, mark my words, it\u2019s going to happen.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Here\u2019s Kathy in Waterford, Michigan. Great to have you on the EIB Network. Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hi, Rush. Love you. Pray for you and our president and your family.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Thank you very much. I appreciate that.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: All bets should be off as far as what senators have said and the ones who say they\u2019re not gonna vote. After what they put us through with Kavanaugh, this whole country through, it\u2019s a disgrace for those who are not gonna vote.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I think that\u2019s exactly &#8212; folks, after what the Democrats put this country through, there is no way they should be offered any semblance of deference. I\u2019m not saying that this whole thing doesn\u2019t need to happen fairly or with fairness, but we don\u2019t need to defer to these people\u2019s wishes or demands. They attempted to destroy not just a nomination, they tried to destroy the nominee\u2019s life, his character, his future, his family.<\/p>\n<p>They spared nothing as they attempted with a series of lies stacked on other lies, they attempted to literally destroy Brett Kavanaugh. There is no way they are owed any deference whatsoever.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Caroline in Virginia Beach, Virginia. You are next, and welcome to the EIB Network. Hi.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hey, Rush. Mega dittos and mega prayers sent to you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I was wondering all weekend, why do we worry about Murkowski and Collins &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: You know, I have to tell you something. I saw that your call was about this. I saw up there on my cheat sheet that you were gonna say this.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yeah.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-303668\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/APP-032219-RINO-GOP-Capitol.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/APP-032219-RINO-GOP-Capitol.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/APP-032219-RINO-GOP-Capitol-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>RUSH: And I started slapping, \u2019cause you\u2019re exactly right. Why do we give a rat\u2019s rear end what they\u2019re gonna do? And I\u2019ll tell you, the answer to it is, we shouldn\u2019t care. The media throws them up at us, the media throws Collins and Murkowski up on us on every, be it a government shutdown, a piece of legislation, or this simply because they\u2019re trying to pressure other Republicans into following lead of these two women.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Right. And then you were saying that Feinstein intimidated Murkowski. I\u2019m thinking, why aren\u2019t we talking about Feinstein\u2019s connection with China and Biden\u2019s connection with China? You want to intimidating people, like, why are we not talking about that?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: We are. Trump has done everything he can. They tried to impeach him over talking about Biden and his son and Ukraine. And they tried to impeach him over it. And Trump constantly talks about Hunter Biden and China at his rallies. So when you say, why aren\u2019t we talking about it, Trump is. The Republican Party isn\u2019t. And I suspect the reason why they don\u2019t link Dianne Feinstein to China, look, she had a driver. Her chauffeur for 20 years was a ChiCom spy. Her husband has beaucoup business dealings in China.<\/p>\n<p>The Feinstein family, her husband\u2019s name is Blum. Richard Blum. I don\u2019t know that she\u2019s taken his name or not. Dianne Feinstein Blum, whatever. They are wealthy thanks to the Chinese government like you can\u2019t believe. But how many other senators have strange connections? Biden does. And so it\u2019s probably because they don\u2019t want to dump on each other. They protect each other in the Senate.<\/p>\n<p>But Trump tries to get everybody to understand the relationship between Biden and the ChiComs and Biden and Ukraine, and they tried to impeach him over it. But, you know, your question is actually right on the money. Why do we care what Murkowski and Collins say or do? They don\u2019t vote Republican on most important issues. And you\u2019re exactly right. And it\u2019s an object lesson. The media hypes \u2019em. The media hypes Murkowski &#8212; and it\u2019s how these women get their name in the news. It\u2019s how they get acclaim, by going against their own party. Of course the media\u2019s gonna make heroines out of \u2019em. And they do.<\/p>\n<p>So these women have every reason in the world to continue to oppose their own party and president. Except in an election year it\u2019s proving somewhat dangerous for Senator Collins, but the media constantly &#8212; it doesn\u2019t matter who the Republican is &#8212; Mitt Romney, John McCain &#8212; if any Republican comes out opposing the Republican Party and\/or conservatism, the media immediately makes \u2019em heroes.<\/p>\n<p>I guess the reason that some people react to it is because it\u2019s so close. Their votes would be very helpful if they could be on the team. But they never are on things that actually seem to matter. Collins, though, has had her moments. I must admit.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-288008\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/ZZ-APP-Rush-SCOTUS-BBB-006.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/ZZ-APP-Rush-SCOTUS-BBB-006.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/ZZ-APP-Rush-SCOTUS-BBB-006-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>RUSH: There\u2019s another reason why we need this replacement too. We don\u2019t want a Supreme Court with eight justices. That means, in the current makeup, that means a 4-4 vote on matters that do need a decision. That won\u2019t fly, that won\u2019t work. I mean, to hell whether the Democrats agree with that or not. I\u2019m just telling you, there\u2019s just more evidence of why we need to fill this seat ASAP, and we will do that.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: This is Jay in Pine, Colorado. Great to have you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Mr. Limbaugh, mega dittos. We pray for you and Kathryn and your health and hope you live a long life together.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, thank you very much. We both appreciate that more than you know.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I just have one quick comment, and that\u2019s ANWR and lobsters.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: ANWR and lobsters. Okay, let\u2019s see. This is Jeopardy, right? What\u2019s the question? What\u2019s the question? What has Donald Trump done to support things the Democrat Party\u2019s opposed?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Exactly.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: There you go.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I can\u2019t understand why Senator Murkowski would oppose him after there\u2019s been so many presidents promising to open up ANWR and Trump does it.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, see, you\u2019re looking at this with common sense, and that\u2019s an ingredient here that may not be all that represented in the &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Well, I don\u2019t think she cares about her constituency \u2019cause she\u2019s really not up for election, but Ms. Collins, her I do not understand totally. I mean, here he\u2019s opened up thousands of miles of fishing territory and got rid of the tariffs on lobster imports to Europe, which has gotta be making the fishing industry in Maine very happy, and so I think definitely she does not have a clear conscience of what her constituency is.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-278325\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/APP-070318-Amy-Coney-Barrett-002.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/APP-070318-Amy-Coney-Barrett-002.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/APP-070318-Amy-Coney-Barrett-002-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>RUSH: Yeah. Well, you know, the makeup of the electorate in Maine is, as I understand it, it\u2019s one-third Republican, it\u2019s one-third Democrat, and then one-third independent. She\u2019s a a Republican. So going in at best she starts out with at least a third of the electorate and she\u2019s gotta go out and find the balance of her support among people not in her party.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yeah, but using that same concept, if fishermen are one-third, one-third, and one-third.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, okay. You got a point. He\u2019s gotta point. Susan Collins will surprise you sometimes. Like she stood fast on Kavanaugh like you can\u2019t &#8212; she was unaffected by any of the things that Blasey Ford and Feinstein and the rest of the Democrats did to try to disqualify Kavanaugh, and her reason, the speech that she gave, the remarks that she gave in support of Kavanaugh were all judicial, every one of them. And she did the same thing when Gorsuch was up.<\/p>\n<p>But she didn\u2019t hold any of what the Democrats did against them. And that\u2019s really what you\u2019re, I think, recognizing here is that the opposition with Susan Collins is allowed to go all over the place, be extreme, untrue, they can engage in character assassination, and that is not something that has any impact on her.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line is that in both of these women\u2019s cases they\u2019re given a pass under the guise that they are independent. So the media is gonna automatically love them because they will not automatically be counted as check the box for the Republican nominee or check the box for the Republican piece of legislation or check the box for anything else. So the media highlights they\u2019re open-minded, these are responsible women, these are senators and women who are not under the spell of Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell. They\u2019re very independent. So they fit the bill. They go against the Republicans, are automatically loved and adored. I mean, you know that as well as I do.<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t have any answer for you in terms of why, you know, they are reluctant to credit Trump for any of the things he\u2019s done that would benefit them. I think you just go in and you look at both of them as votes that we have to overcome. And then you appeal to them to vote &#8220;present&#8221; as opposed to voting &#8220;no.&#8221; Don\u2019t vote on the nominee. Just say you\u2019re there, but vote against the process. Vote against the fact that you\u2019re voting. You don\u2019t want to have to vote before the presidential election, okay. Then abstain. But don\u2019t vote against the nominee. You got nothing against the nominee, whoever the nominee\u2019s gonna be.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s gonna be a very qualified woman. Nobody is gonna have a problem. And whoever is nominated is gonna have been vetted. Whoever is nominated is gonna have to have been through the confirmation process with the Senate Judiciary Committee at some point in her career, whether it\u2019s Amy Coney Barrett.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: If Trump nominates the right person, it can bring a lot of pressure on these three people. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":365147,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: If Trump nominates the right person, it can bring a lot of pressure on these three people.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"keith doherty\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":360},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/\",\"name\":\"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-21T20:20:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-22T20:29:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f6b9cb73da215aa25e18d3c20857012d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f6b9cb73da215aa25e18d3c20857012d\",\"name\":\"keith doherty\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/91c6b1776351bd54081e9a2fc5a5d7aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/91c6b1776351bd54081e9a2fc5a5d7aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"keith doherty\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/kdohertypremierenetworks-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: If Trump nominates the right person, it can bring a lot of pressure on these three people.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"keith doherty","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/APP-092120-difi-murkowski-xx.jpg","width":640,"height":360},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/","name":"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2020-09-21T20:20:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-22T20:29:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f6b9cb73da215aa25e18d3c20857012d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2020\/09\/21\/on-rinos-replacing-ruth-bader-ginsburg\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"On RINOs Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f6b9cb73da215aa25e18d3c20857012d","name":"keith doherty","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/91c6b1776351bd54081e9a2fc5a5d7aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/91c6b1776351bd54081e9a2fc5a5d7aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"keith doherty"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/kdohertypremierenetworks-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365130"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=365130"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":365288,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365130\/revisions\/365288"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media\/365147"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=365130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=365130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=365130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}