{"id":35412,"date":"2010-05-17T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T01:00:27","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T01:00:27","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T01:00:27","slug":"the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/","title":{"rendered":"The Voters are Angry at Democrats"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: Now, the Washington Post today: ‘Tuesday\u2019s Primaries Could Provide Early Answers for Election Year,\u2019 by Chris Cillizza and Dan Balz. ‘An angry electorate, which already has delivered a series of shocks to the political system, will render a fresh verdict on Washington, incumbency and both party establishments in a slate of high-stakes contests Tuesday that are shaping up to form one of the most important voting days of the year. Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) could be the next incumbent to fall, but by late Tuesday night, everyone from President Obama to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) could feel the sting of voter anger that has shaped the election climate and that could produce a dramatic upheaval in Congress by November. Everyone has a different definition of the anger: anti-incumbent; anti-Obama; anti-establishment; anti-Washington. But the expressions of displeasure are everywhere. <\/p>\n

‘Some voters think Washington is spending too much…\u2019 I would have a question for these people in the media. They write the story, Dan Balz and Cillizza, without one regard for context or one regard for history. Recent history! During the of the Obama administration, what were we told? ‘A new day, a new man, a politician unlike any who has ever trod American soil. A man who can unify not just Americans, but the world. We will have a post-partisan presidency. We will have a post-racial presidency. We are going to have a unity and a happiness and a contentment unlike that we\u2019ve ever seen.\u2019 Now, the very people who either wrote those stories or echoed them when the regime made those statements during the campaign, are now filled with stories of the gigantic unrest and diabolical dislike of Washington, DC. <\/p>\n

Do you not think, Mr. Balz and Mr. Cillizza that after you write a story here that tries to lump the Republicans in with the Democrats and all this ‘anti-incumbancy\u2019 and you do so facetiously and falsely, you think you might go back and ask: How did this happen? You led everybody to believe — with you and your brethren in the Drive-By Media — that there wasn\u2019t going to be any more discord. It was going to be loving bipartisan. It was going to be unity and love and contentment and peace. The world was going to love us! Iran would stand down. The North Koreans would stand down. Europe would once again love the United States. Instead, Europe is disintegrating before our very eyes. The Iranians are nuking up. The North Koreans are nuking up.<\/p>\n

There is more partisan divide in this country than at any time in my life. The exact opposite of what these people expected, the exact opposite of what they reported is happening, and yet here is this story: ‘Everyone has a different definition of the anger.\u2019 Shouldn\u2019t the story be: Why is there anger? There is an all-time high disrespect for Washington: 75% of the American people. Seventy-five percent think Washington\u2019s a big problem. They don\u2019t trust it. In just a year and a half after the election of ‘The One who we\u2019ve all been waiting for,\u2019 The Messiah, why is there anger? That should be the story. There\u2019s anger everywhere. There\u2019s anger on the left; there\u2019s anger everywhere. Why? How can this possibly be? Are you in the media not the least bit shocked? None of this was supposed to happen. <\/p>\n

‘Democratic pollster Peter Hart said anyone searching for meaning from Tuesday\u2019s races need only look to grievances that have been building for months. ‘How many times do we need to tell the same story, which is that voters are looking for something that is not in Washington right now,\u2019 he said.\u2019 Whoa. A Democratic pollster says, ‘[V]oters are looking for something that\u2019s not in Washington\u2019? But we were told that when Obama got there, it would be almost heaven-like, idyllic, utopian — and now there\u2019s anger unlike anybody\u2019s ever seen, and ‘voters are looking for something that\u2019s not in Washington right now\u2019? I can understand them writing this if Bush were still in office, but Bush is gone — and the smartest, cleanest, most well-spoken president in our history is bombing? Yet we get stories on ‘anti-incumbancy.\u2019 <\/p>\n

What\u2019s really going on here, ladies and gentlemen, is Mr. Balz, Mr. Cillizza, and the rest of the media are trying to equate Democrat primary fights like Sestak and Specter and what\u2019s going on in Arkansas with voter unrest with liberals Democrats and Republicans-in-name-only. They are intentionally, here, trying to confuse the subject. This primary is not a reflection on the unrest across the country. It\u2019s whether the Democrats in Pennsylvania will back one of two losers, Specter or Sestak.\u2019 ‘Specter-Sestak Dogfight Tops Senate ‘Super Tuesday\u2019 Primaries\u2019 The New York Times has: Angry Voters, But How Many?\u2019 Now, the fight in Arkansas is between a liberal who poses as a moderate (that\u2019s Blanche Lincoln) and a liberal who is a liberal. Once again, this has nothing to do with what\u2019s occurring across the country, which is a conservative revolt against socialism.<\/p>\n

That is what the revolt is, and the revolt is against Obama. It is against anybody in Washington who is for the expansion of Washington. Put very simply, ladies and gentlemen, people in this country today do not think, by a wide margin, that they should be paying for others in this country who don\u2019t want to work or who don\u2019t want to pay for their homes or don\u2019t want to pay for their health insurance. Furthermore, people in this country today don\u2019t believe they should be paying for all of that for people who aren\u2019t yet born. There is a revolt against socialism. There is a revolt against statism. There is a revolt against the regime, Mr. Balz and Mr. Cillizza. I know they don\u2019t miss it. They\u2019re just trying to deflect attention. <\/p>\n

They don\u2019t want anybody to remember all of the platitudes that we were treated to during the 2008 presidential campaign. Post-partisan! Post-racial! Euphoric! Utopia! Contentment, happiness, peace breaking out all over! What the media, these guys are trying to do, they\u2019re trying to use the primaries tomorrow to intentionally misstate what has and is taking place in this country. In Pennsylvania, you have a battle there among many Democrats to stop Specter \u2019cause they don\u2019t view him as a Democrat. He\u2019s a turncoat. In Arkansas you have a battle by the libs to take down Blanche Lincoln, who isn\u2019t liberal enough for them. It has nothing to do with the rise of conservatism and anger over our out-of-control government. <\/p>\n

Kentucky\u2019s different. There is a battle between a more establishment candidate and Rand Paul in the GOP primary there. The more establishment candidate is the secretary of state of Kentucky, Rand Paul\u2019s a private citizen, and the lib media will do anything they can to downplay the rise of conservatism and the opposition to big government that exists in the country today and try to focus on, ‘What are people mad at? Are they mad at incumbents or are they mad at Washington or are they mad at Democrats?\u2019 They want to say, ‘They\u2019re just mad at Washington.\u2019 They are missing it or if they\u2019re not missing it they are deflecting attention way from it on purpose because the anger is at them. The anger is at the left. There is a rising ascension of conservatism here against socialism, against big government, against the Obama way of doing things. That\u2019s what\u2019s happening and that\u2019s what they don\u2019t want to report.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: John Harwood today, New York Times: ‘Angry Voters, But How Many?\u2019 Now, this is hilarious, this story. ‘Three United States Senate primaries on Tuesday offer new signs of the election-year intentions of America\u2019s dyspeptic voters.\u2019 See what they\u2019re setting up here is the American people in November are going to have another childlike ‘temper tantrum\u2019 by throwing out Democrats. That\u2019s what they\u2019re setting up here. All of you voters, you\u2019re deranged and you\u2019re unstable. ‘A few voters, anyway,\u2019 he says. The real question is, how many are really angry? How many are really angry? He said the voters on Tuesday is ‘only a sliver of the population.\u2019 There\u2019s ‘no groundswell\u2019 out there. So prior to this story being published, the tea parties were just a bunch of racist, hate-filled, firebombing mobs swarming town halls, and now we\u2019re nothing. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s just a tiny sliver! Nothing to get worried about, Mr. President. These people showing up on Tuesday are just a small sliver of the population: ‘ Yet the voters rendering those verdicts will represent only a sliver of the population.\u2019 So that\u2019s intellectually dishonest. Not everybody can vote this Tuesday! There aren\u2019t primaries in every state, Mr. Harwood. Of course it\u2019s a sliver of the population. But that is not to say that these voters are irrelevant. How can we on one day be a mass, growing mob that wants to blow everything up — that you wish had planted the bomb in Times Square — and yet on Election Day we don\u2019t count; we\u2019re just a sliver? Cutting us right once and just stick with it? We\u2019re either the unruly mob that wants to blow up the country or we don\u2019t matter. But you don\u2019t get to interchange it depending on the news outcome you\u2019d like on that particular day. <\/p>\n

He writes, ‘Polls show that Republicans are at least poised to erode the Democrats\u2019 House and Senate majorities. But as with the Democrats\u2019 midterm gains four years ago, the uprising will almost certainly be narrow and targeted — not a mass movement. … In the 1994 midterms, for example, overall turnout as a proportion of eligible citizens dropped slightly.\u2019 So what? So now we\u2019re trying to diminish what happened in 1994 by saying, ‘Not that many people voted anyway. Doesn\u2019t matter.\u2019 So history must always be revised. The truth of the eighties, the truth of Reaganism, the truth of supply-side economics, the truth of the \u201994 elections, the truth of the destruction that\u2019s being wrought daily by the regime? Can\u2019t write that. Have to revise that, have to mischaracterizing it, have to continue the fiction Obama\u2019s got a 50% approval rating. Where does Obama have a 50% approval rating? In his own poll? In no other poll does he have a 50% approval rating.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Houston, Texas, this is Jason, and welcome to the EIB Network, sir. Nice to have you here.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hi, Rush. Longtime listener, big fan.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I was calling in, I find it extremely ironic that the state of California is currently violating federal law for the sale of illegal drugs and\/or the paraphernalia associated with it is trying to dictate to a state that is enforcing what federal law is not being done —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Wait, wait, wait, wait, how is California violating federal law by selling illegal drugs?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, the state doesn\u2019t, not necessarily the state, but there are communities within California, Encino (sic) County I believe is the name of where all the marijuana is sold and used and whatnot.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Oh, you mean under the guise of medical purposes?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Correct.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay.<\/p>\n

CALLER: And so obviously it\u2019s illegal by federal law, and I find it extremely ironic that the state of California is then going to dictate to another state that is choosing to enforce federal law.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, once again, you start analyzing — it\u2019s a good point, don\u2019t misunderstand — but we start analyzing these things rationally or logically, it\u2019s not going to make any sense. The boycotts of Arizona are not based on genuine heartfelt concern for anything. They\u2019re not based on rationality or logic. California and elsewhere, the boycotts of Arizona are purely political. The oil spill is purely political. We need to depoliticize the oil spill. We need to depoliticize the environment. The whole thing has become politicized. Four Corners of Deceit: Media, government, academia, and everybody else. It\u2019s incestuous and it never stops. Everything is a political opportunity or a problem for the left. Nothing is real. Nothing is as it is. The oil spill is not an oil spill that might threaten marine life and poison the Gulf for a number of years. That\u2019s not what it is. This is an opportunity to expand and create crisis, to expand the opportunity to implement more liberalism and big government growth, expansion in the American law. They just say they\u2019re concerned about the oil. But you don\u2019t see \u2019em doing anything to try to stop it, do you? <\/p>\n

Do you see one leftist group out there trying to stop it? Do you see any group in the government shrieking about all this? Are they out there trying to stop it or are they simply pointing fingers of blame and simply saying, ‘See, see? This proves we can\u2019t drill for oil. We gotta stop drilling for oil.\u2019 Are they trying to stop it? All of the problems their legislation\u2019s created, the war on poverty — we just had somebody call who accurately described what liberal welfare policies have done regarding black families, split \u2019em up, they\u2019ve blown up the black family. Single parenthood is almost a guaranteed invitation to poverty. Do we see them doing anything about it? No. We see them criticizing us who want to do something about it as trying to impose our morality on people. Do they really care about all these things they say they care about? No. They want you to think they do. But they don\u2019t. It\u2019s all a political opportunity. Every negative thing that happens, Dick Gephardt back in the early 2000s, stock market was plummeting after the dot-com bubble, he\u2019s all happy. ‘Every hundred-point drop in the stock market, we pick up another seat.\u2019 They\u2019re not real, folks, they\u2019re not genuine, they\u2019re not tolerant, they\u2019re not compassionate, they don\u2019t have a monopoly on feeling. And even their supposed commitment to fairness is not a commitment to fairness. Their commitment to fairness is nothing more than an attempt to punish high achievers. It\u2019s no more complicated than that. <\/p>\n

Jason, Traverse City, Michigan, welcome to the program, sir.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hey, how you doing, Rush?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Very well, thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I\u2019ll get right to the point. I got some more deception for you by the left, and they\u2019re doing it right here in Michigan, and we\u2019re pretty sure that Mark Brewer and the Michigan Democratic Party are behind it. There\u2019s a movement or petition drive to get a third party on the ballot, a tea party on the ballot but nobody here in Michigan, none of the tea party leaders in Michigan even have an idea of who\u2019s behind it. The organization that\u2019s actually doing the petition drive is a company called Progressive Campaigns, Incorporated and it was reported on OutsideLansing.com. Apparently they get paid a dollar a signature, and they\u2019re trying to get this — <\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah. I know. Look, Dingy Harry tried to do this in Nevada. He tried to get a guy, a Democrat, an extremist nutcase to say he was running on the tea party to try to split the vote and so forth. They\u2019re scared to death of this. The left must by definition be scared of what\u2019s real. They have to be frightened by what\u2019s real, because none of what they are is real. Everything they are is a lie, everything they are is a head fake, is a distraction. Something real comes along, real and substantive, and they panic, and they have to destroy it and that\u2019s what they\u2019re trying to do with the tea party, Sarah Palin, me, whoever gets in their way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Now, the Washington Post today: ‘Tuesday\u2019s Primaries Could Provide Early Answers for Election Year,\u2019 by Chris Cillizza and Dan Balz. ‘An angry electorate, which already has delivered a series of shocks to the political system, will render a fresh verdict on Washington, incumbency and both party establishments in a slate of high-stakes contests Tuesday […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe Voters are Angry at Democrats - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Voters are Angry at Democrats - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Now, the Washington Post today: ‘Tuesday\u2019s Primaries Could Provide Early Answers for Election Year,\u2019 by Chris Cillizza and Dan Balz. ‘An angry electorate, which already has delivered a series of shocks to the political system, will render a fresh verdict on Washington, incumbency and both party establishments in a slate of high-stakes contests Tuesday […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125109.Par.89380.ImageFile_579144a547f3d.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125109.Par.89380.ImageFile_579144a547f3d.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125109.Par.89380.ImageFile_579144a547f3d.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/\",\"name\":\"The Voters are Angry at Democrats - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T01:00:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T01:00:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Voters are Angry at Democrats\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Voters are Angry at Democrats - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"The Voters are Angry at Democrats - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Now, the Washington Post today: ‘Tuesday\u2019s Primaries Could Provide Early Answers for Election Year,\u2019 by Chris Cillizza and Dan Balz. ‘An angry electorate, which already has delivered a series of shocks to the political system, will render a fresh verdict on Washington, incumbency and both party establishments in a slate of high-stakes contests Tuesday […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125109.Par.89380.ImageFile_579144a547f3d.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125109.Par.89380.ImageFile_579144a547f3d.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125109.Par.89380.ImageFile_579144a547f3d.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/","name":"The Voters are Angry at Democrats - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T01:00:27+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T01:00:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2010\/05\/17\/the_voters_are_angry_at_democrats\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Voters are Angry at Democrats"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35412"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35412\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}