![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/APP-012720-Explained.jpg\")
<\/p>\nRUSH: Do you remember the book by Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth? Remember that “bombshell book,” how that was gonna bring down the Trump administration? Remember that book? And then whatever happened…? Remember the New York Times or Washington Post (I forget which) published an op-ed from “Anonymous” that basically said, “Look, there are some adults in here, and we\u2019re doing everything we can to make sure this guy Trump doesn\u2019t go off and ruin things. Count on us! We can\u2019t tell you who we are.”<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Well, then this person writes a book, and it was gonna be a “bombshell.” It was gonna bring down the Trump administration. What happened to that book? And Andrew McCabe! Andrew McCabe had a “bombshell book” that was gonna take down Trump, and then James Comey. James Comey had his book about honor and integrity and how he\u2019s the only guy in Washington that has any, and that book was gonna take down Trump — and then Avenatti.<\/p>\n
Avenatti and Stormy Daniels and their thing were gonna take down Trump, and Avenatti was gonna be the Democrat primary nominee for president. Now he\u2019s in court on charges of defrauding clients and Nike. Not to mention books by Bob Woodward, Laurence Tribe. There have been how many anti-Trump books that have been “bombshells” that were going to destroy Trump? Now, I want to go back to Friday. Trump was the first sitting president to appear at the March for Life rally<\/a>, and there\u2019s a point to be made about this as it relates to the impeachment trial and the ongoing shenanigans.<\/p>\n The Democrats are constantly on offense here and attempting to get the Republicans to slit their own throats. “You gotta call witnesses! You can\u2019t do this without calling witness. You must! In the Senate, you must do your own investigation.” Meanwhile, the House, as you know, didn\u2019t call any of the witnesses they\u2019re now demanding — and the Republicans had held firm, and over the weekend it didn\u2019t look… I mean, you ought to see the Drive-By Media stories out there before this Bolton leak happened.<\/p>\n There\u2019s a piece from Mike Allen at Axios<\/a>. You\u2019ve got people on F. Chuck Todd\u2019s show, on Meet the Press lamenting (sobbing)<\/a>, “Nobody cares. It\u2019s so horrible! The Senate gallery\u2019s only half full. We can\u2019t find anybody in America who cares about it! Oh, my God.” They\u2019re devoting every ounce of energy they got; they can\u2019t get anybody to care about it. The Senate gallery only being half full during the House managers\u2019 presentation? I mean, what more do you need to know about how uncompelling the Democrats\u2019 whole case and their allegations are.<\/p>\n And yet, despite the president\u2019s team holding all the cards, because the House managers\u2019 case is one lie after another, and it was decimated in two hours on Saturday morning by Trump\u2019s team. So the Republicans — Ted Cruz is right — they need to go on offense and whenever these Democrats start whining and moaning about witnesses or this other that just tell \u2019em to go pound sand. Now, what does this have to do with the March for Life rally? Well, I\u2019ll tell you what it has to do with it.<\/p>\n Donald Trump\u2019s the first sitting president to ever attend one. A lot of presidents appeared by video. They appeared on a video screen. A lot of presidents sent videos. But no sitting Republican president (certainly Democrat) ever actually attended it. Trump did on Friday. What happened to him? Not a thing. In fact, his stature rose, and he cemented that voting bloc even more firmly than it was already with him. But the point is, the bottom didn\u2019t fall out.<\/p>\n A Republican president actively participated in a pro-life rally, which had never been done before, the biggest one — in Washington — of the year. Now, normally Republicans think doing that kind of thing is going to kill them politically. It\u2019s gonna destroy them. (sniveling) “Oh, my God, it\u2019s provocative. It\u2019s unnecessary,” blah, blah, blah, blah. All Trump did was benefit. But there\u2019s something else Trump did — and he\u2019s been doing this his entire presidency.<\/p>\n He\u2019s been teaching and show and demonstrating to Republicans, “You don\u2019t have to be afraid of the media anymore. You don\u2019t have to be afraid of the Democrats — and certainly you don\u2019t have to be afraid of Adam Schiff, and you don\u2019t have to be afraid of Chuck You Schumer or Harry Reid or any of the others. You don\u2019t have to be afraid of them! You don\u2019t have to be defensive. You don\u2019t have to say and do things to make half the country think you\u2019re not the bad people the Democrats say you are, which is what the Republican modus operandi has always been.<\/p>\n This whole business of calling witnesses, all these weak Republicans who think they want to call witnesses, it\u2019s in response to Democrat demands. It\u2019s not because they actually think it\u2019s necessary. It\u2019s not because they actually want to. They think they\u2019ve gotta do it because the media\u2019s demanding it and because the Democrats are demanding it. And if they don\u2019t follow through, they\u2019re worried that the American people are gonna see \u2019em as a bunch of — you know — racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes, whatever the cliches are.<\/p>\n Trump is demonstrating that you don\u2019t have to go them the time of day, particularly when you hold the cards. The Democrats cannot get a conviction of Trump here, and the purpose for witnesses is not to get a conviction. It\u2019s to sully and dirty the Republican Party at large and President Trump in particular. There is no reason to kowtow to this, and even after the Bolton thing comes out there\u2019s no reason to waver. There\u2019s no, “Oh, my God. I guess we do need witnesses.” No, you don\u2019t. You do not need to change from your instinct.<\/p>\n You don\u2019t need witnesses. They don\u2019t have a case, and the Bolton leak can\u2019t even be confirmed. It is a tweet from a New York Times reporter, and the New York Times in this area is widely more known for making it up and lying through their teeth about things. Throughout this entire Trump presidency when it\u2019s come to any story that has to do with maybe getting rid of Trump or overturning the election results, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the mainstream media — and there\u2019s no embarrassment.<\/p>\n These people have been wrong on every assertion. They published lies under the guise of leaks from intelligence community people, former government officials, former defense department officials. They ran the gamut, and not a single one of them was true. The Steele dossier, which was responsible for all of that? None of it was true! Trump has not committed a crime. He hasn\u2019t even committed a thought crime because there\u2019s no such thing as a thought crime, but they\u2019re trying to impeach him on the basis of that.<\/p>\n I was watching Schumer today at his regularly scheduled 11 o\u2019clock-in-the-morning press conference, and he said — here it is — that “there had been uncovered a plot to remove the ambassador.” That would be Maria Yovanovitch. A plot! A plot to remove the ambassador, which is Chuck You Schumer, saying that Trump has behaved additionally in a criminal way, “because we\u2019ve uncovered a plot to remove the ambassador.” This is Trump telling some associate, “Just get rid of her. She\u2019s in there undermining my foreign policy. Get rid of her. I don\u2019t want her in there.”<\/p>\n He can fire any ambassador he wants, and it isn\u2019t a “plot.” It isn\u2019t a crime. It isn\u2019t an impeachable offense. The president, whoever he is, runs American foreign policy. If he doesn\u2019t like an ambassador… Who do you think appoints the ambassadors? She\u2019s a holdover from the Obama years! I think Trump\u2019s going out of his way trying to be gracious here, not firing — in summary — a bunch of political appointees like Obama did. Obama fired every U.S. attorney when he took office. George W. Bush didn\u2019t. He waited a couple years; then all hell descended on him when it happened.<\/p>\n But there\u2019s no “plot” to remove the ambassador!<\/p>\n They\u2019re trying to make it look like there\u2019s some sinister, criminal behavior in firing an ambassador. But that is an indication of how all of this is being treated. The bottom line is, you can\u2019t find a more partisan — apparently, supposedly partisan — and volatile issue than abortion, right? “Abortion? No, Rush! You\u2019re not supposed to bring. Don\u2019t talk about it, Rush. Don\u2019t talk about religion. Don\u2019t talk about it. Nothing to be gained, Rush.” Trump is the first sitting president to attend a pro-life rally. His approval numbers are at an all-time high, not only after that, but in the midst of this impeachment fiasco.<\/p>\n The U.S. economy continues to roil, and the American people know it and give it five-star ratings. Record consumer sentiment. Record consumer confidence. This is the stuff the Democrats are scared to death of and angry about. That\u2019s why they keep trying to talk about a recession looming down the road. The bottom line is: You do not die politically when you take on the Democrats. The bottom line is: You do not die politically when you take on the media. Donald Trump has demonstrated this for three years! Now, there are gonna be a lot of Republicans and maybe even some of you who would disagree.<\/p>\n You might say, “Well, Rush, Trump hasn\u2019t died, but look at what they say about him. My God. He can\u2019t be treated fairly. It\u2019s gotta be a hellacious existence. They lie about him all the time.” Yeah, and there\u2019s nothing he can do to stop it. This has been my point since I\u2019ve been doing this program. There\u2019s nothing you can do to change what they are gonna say about us — and you certainly can\u2019t do it by convincing them that we\u2019re not what they think we are, because they know that we\u2019re not what they think…<\/p>\n Well, I take it back. Kathryn and I watched Bombshell over the weekend. Pfft. Folks, whatever you do, don\u2019t watch it. If I say this, it\u2019s just gonna get people intrigued and want to watch, and it is an absolute… It barely rises to high school-level quality of production. The only reason to watch that stupid-ass movie is to find out every cliche they think about you and me. By the way, in this movie, everybody who works at Fox News hates it. Everybody that works there — everybody — has to hide who they are. You know there are a lot of lesbians at Fox News! Did you know that?<\/p>\n They have to hide it! They can\u2019t put pictures of their partners on their desktops because otherwise management might see it and fire \u2019em. But everybody hates Fox News. My point is this. You do not die politically when you take on the Democrats and the media, and Trump has shown. It he is triumphing. Yeah, they hate him. This is exactly why! Yeah, they say mean things about him — and I\u2019m sure Mitt Romney doesn\u2019t want mean things said about him as he\u2019s making himself available to be temporary president every day.<\/p>\n “Hi, I\u2019m Mitt Romney. I think we ought to call witnesses. By the way, do you want me to be president? I\u2019ll be happy to do it. Just put me in there right now. Do whatever you want.” That\u2019s what Romney\u2019s gaming for. It\u2019s time to stand up to this! I don\u2019t care Bolton leak, Bolton book, whoever. Tell \u2019em, “No witnesses! We\u2019re gonna present the rest of our case, we\u2019re gonna make our case, we\u2019re gonna decimate their case, and we\u2019re gonna get out of here,” because all of this is a bogus waste of time. And again, I ask<\/a>, is our government doing anything about this virus that has come from the communist haven of China?<\/p>\n It doesn\u2019t appear so.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: This is Anna in Grand Junction, Colorado. Great to have you with us today, Anna. How are you?<\/p>\n CALLER: I\u2019m fine. Thank you, Rush. I wanted to get back to the March for Life. You pointed out the history of not one president in the past ever coming in person to support that March for Life until President Trump. I am delighted to know that he has done this. Out of his many firsts, this is the most important first of accomplishments since he\u2019s been in office so far. He says what he means, and he means what he says. He doesn\u2019t give us lip service like you\u2019re hearing from these candidates that are running for the Democrats. They\u2019re gonna lip service you and say what they want you to hear until it no longer serves them. But not President Trump. He means what he says, and he\u2019s got no aspirations to make any lies or untruths to us. He\u2019s telling us the truth in each of these things that goes on, and his past accomplishments in office have demonstrated that.<\/p>\n RUSH: You don't have to be afraid of them! You don't have to be defensive. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":334487,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/APP-012420-TRUMP-March-for-life-2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-011718-Combat-Drive-By-Media.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/APP-011020-Trump-Rally-Toledo-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/APP-012720-FOX-Pete-Butti-002.jpg\")
<\/a>RUSH: Well, let\u2019s contrast this, Anna, because this is a good point. Let\u2019s contrast this with Mayor Pete. Mayor Pete Buttigieg — who likes being photographed kissing his husband. Mayor Pete was approached by a woman on Sunday at the Fox News town hall for Mayor Pete Buttigieg<\/a>. A woman — a Democrat woman, a Democrat voter — asked Mayor Pete if there was room for her as a pro-lifer in the Democrat Party. (paraphrased exchange) She said, “I\u2019m a pro-life Democrat, a proud pro-life Democrat, Kristen Day,” a member of the audience. Mayor Pete said, essentially, “No. The Democrat Party is pro-choice, and we\u2019re not gonna change, and you essentially have no role in our party if you are pro-life.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"