{"id":32807,"date":"2009-06-30T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T02:15:13","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T02:15:13","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T02:15:13","slug":"swooning_over_sanford_s_letters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/","title":{"rendered":"Swooning Over Sanford\u2019s Letters"},"content":{"rendered":"<section>\n<p>RUSH: Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, if you were here at almost this exact time, you recall we had a couple of examples of the chickification of the news. Women were writing news stories about the Mark Sanford-Argentina &#8216;girl from Ipanema\u2019 affair. I missed one yesterday because it wasn\u2019t <img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"250\" class=\"alignright\"\/>yesterday, it was June 27th. It is by Erika Lovley at ThePolitico.com. &#8216;Inside Sanford\u2019s Love Letters &#8212; It\u2019s a love story worthy of a &#8230; Nicholas Sparks novel. A high-ranking politician sneaks away from the pressures of political life to meet his secret lover &#8212; a beautiful, intelligent brunette from Argentina. He\u2019s willing to risk anything, even a potential shot at the presidency, to be with her. In the meantime, he plies her with hopelessly romantic love letters.\u2019 This piece goes on to analyze the love letters. He\u2019s a great writer. He\u2019s &#8216;colorful, descriptive, and unabashedly romantic, at times to the point of being schmaltzy and embarrassing.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>I have a question ladies &#8212; actually for everybody. If you\u2019ve read some of these Sanford e-mails, he pours his heart out to her. Now, why is that &#8216;schmaltzy\u2019? I mean, do you think she thinks it\u2019s schmaltzy? Do you think the girl from Ipanema thinks it\u2019s schmaltzy when she gets it or is it just these prying eyes of outsiders who say, &#8216;Oh, oh, that\u2019s schmaltzy.\u2019 Ms. Lovley, would you love to get a love letter from whoever is in your life like Mark Sanford writes them and would you consider it schmaltzy? I mean I\u2019m not making too big a deal about this, but schmaltzy and embarrassing only to the people outside her relationship looking at it, but still the bottom line is &#8212; <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;What emerges is that &#8212; regardless of the moral ambiguities of Sanford\u2019s character &#8212; the man was a real romantic with a knack for writing. &#8216;The most cherished gift a lover can give and receive is a love letter from the heart,\u2019 says romance coach Leslie Karsner&#8230;\u2019 You got me. I don\u2019t know what a &#8216;romance coach\u2019 is. I ought to look one up. (laughing) And note, note that the romance coaches are women. I bet you don\u2019t find a guy romance coach. Well, by now you probably do. Anyway, Leslie Karsner &#8216;sells prewritten love letters through a website called &#8216;Love Letters Now.&#8221; It\u2019s sort of like the Hallmark cards of love letters. &#8221;If you take the politics out of it, it\u2019s the story of a man whose heart was captured and he was willing to run the risk of being caught.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>They love this guy! Women are going nuts over this guy\u2019s love letters, and I just wanted to mention this because I left it out of yesterday\u2019s stack because I didn\u2019t have it. It\u2019s from June 27th, three or four days ago. Male romance coaches, I think they\u2019re called &#8216;players.\u2019 Players. Romance coach! Prewritten love letters. What would you think, ladies, if you got a love letter that some clown procured off the website. <\/p>\n<p>By the way, an update, ladies and gentlemen. We also had a story yesterday from TIME Magazine that marriage makes women bloat up. In fact, not even marriage, just getting into a relationship causes women to become obese. It doesn\u2019t happen to men, but it causes women to gain weight, and this came from the magazine Obesity Today. That\u2019s the survey. <\/p>\n<p>(playing of obesity spoof: Post-Commitment Bloat) <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: By the way, the Associated Press just breathlessly reported that Mark Sanford has admitted to more than one liaison with the girl from Ipanema. I know Ipanema Beach is in Brazil. It just fits, the Argentinean babe. I\u2019ll guarantee you that news chicks across this country are now swooning. This is just fascinating.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Janet, it\u2019s great to have you here on the EIB Network. Hi.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Thank you, Rush. I know you\u2019ve heard this a million times, but it really is a thrill to talk to you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Thank you very much.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I heard earlier about Mark Sanford, and the letters. First of all, how could anyone think that it\u2019s all so romantic and just swoon when the man has cheated on his wife?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, I know. See, again, now, you are asking a rational question about liberal women in the media.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: You\u2019re right.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: They are different. They don\u2019t think the same. I\u2019ve read them, and they think, &#8216;Oh, this is real love. This is the real thing. He needs to marry this woman. He needs to leave his wife &#8212; it\u2019s not working, everybody understands this &#8212; and go marry this woman. And then he needs to understand that gays are not allowed to do this,\u2019 is what one female reporter said. They are swooning over this. These liberal media babes are swooning over his love letters.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Any man who would send me a love letter that was pre-composed, I &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: No, his are not pre-composed. He wrote his. In the story that\u2019s in The Politico (the woman\u2019s last name is Lovley) she went out and found a &#8216;romance coach,\u2019 and the romance coach has a website where you can log on and get prewritten love letters.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: How stupid&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Sanford wrote his own. He\u2019s special.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: How stupid can people be? I mean, a pre-composed love letter? I know his weren\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, now, wait a second, now. I had the same view of greeting cards.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yeah, you\u2019re right.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I mean, why do I need to go to a store to find a greeting card to say something that I couldn\u2019t come up with myself?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: You\u2019re right. Even if it\u2019s also &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: No, no. But no. It\u2019s not that I want to write greeting card. I\u2019m just saying it\u2019s the same thing with Valentine\u2019s Day. It\u2019s a holiday out of duty.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Right. I\u2019m &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Everybody goes out, orders the flowers, the candy. No wonder women are gaining weight after they get married or into a relationship. <\/p>\n<p>CALLER: (laughs)<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Flowers, candy, go to dinner, whatever. It\u2019s because they have to. Not because anybody wants to. It\u2019s just there. And the greeting card business. You know, Valentine\u2019s Day was created. I think Hallmark invented it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Oh, probably. By the way, on July 5th my husband and I will have our 28th wedding anniversary, and I weigh 90 pounds. I have not gained weight. (laughs)<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Twenty-eighth wedding anniversary. Congratulations.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Thank you, thank you. And that\u2019s the way it\u2019s supposed to be. People just have the wrong idea about romance and obligation and morals. You know, like you said: It\u2019s liberal. It\u2019s all liberal.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Yeah, you have to understand this. Standards and this kind of thing are flexible today, and I find it fascinating that it\u2019s liberal media women who are swooning. I mean, now they\u2019re all excited because they have discovered that Sanford made more than one trip to Argentina to see the woman. It\u2019s like these liberal women are saying, &#8216;If only me. If it was only me!\u2019 Are they missing love in their lives? And they\u2019re finding it vicariously through this guy? Well, they might be missing romance. I\u2019m sure. (interruption)Who knows. Have you ever dated a liberal woman? Have you? (laughing) Snerdley, with his review, I shall stand mute. Because I respect people\u2019s privacy, including my own. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: If there are any liberal newswomen in this audience, stop what you\u2019re doing. I have more <img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.17711.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"206\" class=\"alignright\"\/>Mark Sanford news. This guy is amazing. He\u2019s already being heralded by liberal infobabes for being really great at love letter writing, and he\u2019s really in love with the babe down in Argentina and he just ought to go for it. I mean, they\u2019re schmaltzy, they\u2019re embarrassing, but, man, how romantic, oh, it\u2019s just wonderful. Remember when I said last week, this guy could have been our JFK? Still to this day, educated liberal reporters do not understand this. They think that I\u2019m saying that Mark Sanford has some sort of great political reputation, image, charisma that could cause him to win a landslide. No. I\u2019m not going to explain it. You people understand it; the Drive-Bys do not. But here are the two AP alerts: First, &#8216;South Carolina governor tells AP that the mistress down in Argentina is his soul mate, but he will try to fall back in love with his wife.\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>AP alert number two: &#8216;South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford says he &#8216;crossed lines\u2019 with a handful of women other than his mistress &#8212; but never had sex with them.\u2019 This guy is loyal to the mistress. This guy does not cheat on the mistress. Do you realize how the liberal women are going to eat this up? The liberal infobabes, they\u2019re swooning, folks. I\u2019ll guarantee you they are having to excuse themselves and go to the bathroom here to control themselves. This guy is amazing. He tells the AP that his mistress is his soul mate, but that he\u2019s going to try to fall back in love with his wife. Of course it\u2019s a devastating turn of events here for the wife, but the liberal news babes don\u2019t care about the wife, don\u2019t you understand? They care about the romance; they care about the Hollywood angle; they care about the fairytale; it\u2019s real love. They don\u2019t have it. They dream about it. He\u2019s got it. He\u2019s writing about it. Go for it, Gov. And so now they\u2019re even more deeply immersed. He has admitted that the mistress is his soul mate, but he\u2019s going to try to fall back in love with his wife. Have you ever tried to fall in love with somebody? <\/p>\n<p>Snerdley, I got a great question. A friend of mine said, &#8216;Where was Obama born?\u2019 And I don\u2019t know. He\u2019s not a native Hawaiian. Where was he born? I don\u2019t know. Supposedly Hawaii, but we don\u2019t have independent confirmation of it. I don\u2019t want to go there. God doesn\u2019t have a birth certificate, either, so it\u2019s no big deal. South Carolina governor tells AP the mistress is his soul mate, gonna try to fall back in love with his wife. Have you ever tried to fall in love with somebody? Have you ever tried to fall out of love with somebody that you\u2019re in love with? That\u2019s called heartbreak, and people jump off the Golden Gate Bridge because of this sometimes. It\u2019s just not something you can snap your fingers and do. And then, to really seal the deal, he may have a political future. <\/p>\n<p>The chickification of the news is happening. These liberal women love this guy, they love this story, they\u2019re captivated by it, they\u2019re going to love it even more. Once they hear that Mark Sanford has told State-Run Media, the Associated Press that he crossed lines with women other than the mistress, but he never had sex with them. He has never cheated on the mistress. Folks, I\u2019m looking at this from the perspective of the liberal women who are already in heat reporting this. Of course this is bad for the wife. To me it\u2019s a phenomena to watch liberal infobabes report this story and get totally lost in it. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.43919.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"305\" height=\"196\" class=\"alignright\"\/>RUSH: This Mark Sanford story, I\u2019m thinking about this more and more from the viewpoint of these liberal media babes. Remember Nina Burleigh? Liberal media babes, they\u2019re different, they think different. Nina Burleigh was at TIME Magazine, and back in the nineties, she promised, she wrote in TIME Magazine or a blog or somewhere, she wrote an opinion piece &#8212; it may not have been in TIME but it was somewhere, New Republic or somewhere &#8212; she wrote that she would give Bill Clinton a Lewinsky just for keeping abortion legal. So it is not strange to me to see all these media women, liberal fawning, just melting over this Sanford business. Now, if you\u2019re just joining us here, AP just ran two alerts. First alert: &#8216;South Carolina governor Tells AP that his Mistress is His Soul Mate &#8211;&#8216; I\u2019m telling you, this is Hollywood, there are tears in the newsrooms of America. &#8216;&#8211; But he\u2019s gonna try to fall back in love with his wife.\u2019 Second alert from AP: &#8216;South Carolina Governor tells AP he Crossed Lines with Women Other than Mistress, but Never Had Sex with Them.\u2019 He never cheated on the mistress, do you realize, folks, this could rival &#8212; Mark Sanford &#8212; no wait, stick with me on this. This could rival the first black president in terms of electability, the first governor to fall in love with his mistress. It\u2019s never happened. <\/p>\n<p>Kennedy never fell in love with them; Spitzer didn\u2019t fall in love with them; Clinton didn\u2019t fall in love with them that we know about. What if Sanford, what if he ends up giving up his throne for love? Just like King Edward and Wallis Simpson, what if he gives up the throne for love, do you realize how electable that will make him with certain women in this country, gave up the throne for love? First governor to fall in love with and not cheat on his mistress. First black president &#8212; now, compare this with the stink of a story that is the John Edwards scandal. Here\u2019s the latest from the New York Times: The book proposal from a man who was one of former Senator John Edwards\u2019 closest aides claims that Edwards, the Breck Girl, promised him he &#8221;would be taken care of for life,\u2019 in return for falsely claiming he was the father of the baby carried by Mr. Edwards\u2019s mistress, Rielle Hunter. The aide, Andrew Young, sold his book proposal to St. Martin\u2019s Press for an undisclosed price late last week. In his proposal, Mr. Young quotes Mr. Edwards, a Democrat who was his party\u2019s vice-presidential nominee in 2004 and ran for president last year, as begging him to confess to fathering Ms. Hunter\u2019s baby. &#8216;You know how much I love you,\u2019 Edwards said. &#8216;You know I\u2019d walk off a cliff for you, and I know you\u2019d walk off a cliff for me,\u2019 Mr. Young wrote in the book proposal. &#8216;I will never forget this. And I will always be there for you.\u2019 The proposal was shared with The New York Times by a book publishing industry executive. Portions of it were reported over the weekend by The Daily News of New York.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>For some reason TMZ did not have this first. The New York Times did. But you compare the tawdry stink, you had an illegitimate child, you had Edwards having an aide lie about being the father and so forth, offering to take care of him for life, Mark Sanford loves the mistress, never cheated on the mistress. She\u2019s his soul mate. Now, folks, again, don\u2019t misunderstand. Do not think I am at all condoning this. This is all being reported to you within and from the context and frame of mind of liberal media women who find the story captivating, enthralling, and beautiful. To me, this is just&amp;hellip; (laughing) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, if you were here at almost this exact time, you recall we had a couple of examples of the chickification of the news. Women were writing news stories about the Mark Sanford-Argentina &#8216;girl from Ipanema\u2019 affair. I missed one yesterday because it wasn\u2019t yesterday, it was June 27th. It is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Swooning Over Sanford&#039;s Letters - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Swooning Over Sanford&#039;s Letters - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, if you were here at almost this exact time, you recall we had a couple of examples of the chickification of the news. Women were writing news stories about the Mark Sanford-Argentina &#8216;girl from Ipanema\u2019 affair. I missed one yesterday because it wasn\u2019t yesterday, it was June 27th. It is [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/\",\"name\":\"Swooning Over Sanford's Letters - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T02:15:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T02:15:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Swooning Over Sanford\\u2019s Letters\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Swooning Over Sanford's Letters - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Swooning Over Sanford's Letters - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, if you were here at almost this exact time, you recall we had a couple of examples of the chickification of the news. Women were writing news stories about the Mark Sanford-Argentina &#8216;girl from Ipanema\u2019 affair. I missed one yesterday because it wasn\u2019t yesterday, it was June 27th. It is [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/","name":"Swooning Over Sanford's Letters - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T02:15:13+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T02:15:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2009\/06\/30\/swooning_over_sanford_s_letters\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Swooning Over Sanford\u2019s Letters"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32807"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32807\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}