{"id":326859,"date":"2019-10-29T16:13:00","date_gmt":"2019-10-29T20:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=326859"},"modified":"2019-10-30T16:15:32","modified_gmt":"2019-10-30T20:15:32","slug":"pelosi-emasculates-schiff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/","title":{"rendered":"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Now, Pelosi and her de facto emasculation of Schiff.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m sure many of you ask, &#8220;Wuh wuh wuh wuh, what do you mean?\u00a0 When did Pelosi emasculate Schiff?\u00a0 I thought Schiff already was emasculated.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Well, I get your point.\u00a0 But Nancy Pelosi has decided that the best way to distract from Trump killing Baghdadi &#8212; and, by the way, we got his successor the next day.\u00a0 Al-Baghdadi\u2019s successor is also now room temperature.\u00a0 Actually, Baghdadi never made room temperature.\u00a0 He was vaporized at about 3,000 degrees with his own explosive suicide vest.\u00a0 But we got his successor.\u00a0 So Pelosi has gotta distract from that.\u00a0 She can\u2019t have her party sympathizing too long with al-Baghdadi.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-326864\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>So she has announced the House is finally going to vote on Thursday whether to hold an impeachment inquiry or not.\u00a0 Now, hang on, because this still is not the vote everybody thinks it is.\u00a0 Now, let\u2019s remember.\u00a0 Less than two weeks ago, Pelosi brushed off all the calls from Republicans to hold a vote to formally authorize the impeachment probe.\u00a0 She said, &#8220;No way.\u00a0 We don\u2019t need to do that.\u00a0 It isn\u2019t necessary.&#8221; She didn\u2019t want to call a vote, didn\u2019t want to endanger these 40 Democrats that won in 2016 from Trump districts.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans were demanding that she do it.\u00a0 She has accused Republicans of focusing on the process in an effort to distract from the allegations against Trump, but now she\u2019s gonna hold a vote.\u00a0 Now, it wasn\u2019t that long ago that Pelosi was claiming Trump was trying to trick the House Democrats into impeaching him.\u00a0 Do you remember that?\u00a0 That was barely a month ago.\u00a0 Pelosi and the Democrat leaders were saying, &#8220;We\u2019re not gonna fall for this!\u00a0 Trump is goading us.\u00a0 Trump is trying to get us to impeach him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, why would Trump be doing that?<\/p>\n<p>Well, the popular conventional wisdom is that it would benefit Trump if the Democrats do this.\u00a0 History says that impeached presidents end up having their polling numbers rise because of sympathy and a number of other factors.\u00a0 But it\u2019s undeniable that, whatever the reasons, Pelosi was claiming she wasn\u2019t gonna have a vote because Trump was trying to goad her. She wasn\u2019t gonna have a vote because the Republicans were simply making a mockery of the process and trying to distract from the real work that Adam Schiff was doing behind closed doors that nobody could see.<\/p>\n<p>Now, both sides in the media now are claiming that this vote means their side has called the other\u2019s bluff.\u00a0 For example, The Atlantic says, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2019\/10\/democrats-call-trumps-bluff\/600970\/\">&#8220;Democrats Call Trump\u2019s Bluff.&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0 The New York Post says, <a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2019\/10\/28\/calling-pelosi-and-schiffs-bluff\/\">&#8220;Calling Pelosi and Schiff\u2019s Bluff.&#8221;\u00a0<\/a> Anyway, this vote on Thursday is a clear admission of one thing, and that is that the Schiff-headed inquiry so far has not been legitimate.\u00a0 Now, Pelosi and her buddies can use cover from the media to try to hide that, and they can try to say, &#8220;This is just the next step.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is the next legitimate phase in the legitimate impeachment of President Trump.&#8221;\u00a0 But it\u2019s not.\u00a0 If what Schiff was doing behind closed doors was working, nothing would change.\u00a0 If what Schiff was doing was really collecting evidence of impeachable offenses, then Pelosi would keep it going and they wouldn\u2019t fall for the pressure to call for a vote. But the killing of Baghdadi has changed the equation.\u00a0 The press will never admit this &#8212; the Democrats will never admit it &#8212; which is why I am telling you.<\/p>\n<p>So now are the Democrats gonna have to throw out all the testimony and documents they got when they were conducting their inquiry illegitimately for more than a month?\u00a0 You know, the vote is to formalize it.\u00a0 The vote is to make it official.\u00a0 By calling for a vote, Pelosi is admitting that what\u2019s happened to date with Schiff has not been legitimate. (pause) No, I\u2019m joking.\u00a0 The Democrats are not gonna throw anything out.\u00a0 I\u2019m making a point here.\u00a0 The Democrats are gonna use all that testimony, all those documents that they collected from their secret, behind-closed-door meetings in their final report on impeachment.<\/p>\n<p>But now they\u2019ll claim their investigation was completely transparent because they\u2019ve now decided to open up the hearings to the public (maybe) and maybe the Republicans\u2019 actual questioning of the witnesses will happen.\u00a0 But, of course, not the witnesses who\u2019ve already testified.\u00a0 We\u2019re not gonna bring them back in.\u00a0 This whole thing is a sham, folks. And then &#8220;Pelosi said Monday that the House vote on a resolution to formalize the next steps of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump will not be an &#8216;impeachment resolution.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What?<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-325766\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-101819-Pelosi-thought-Nixon.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-101819-Pelosi-thought-Nixon.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-101819-Pelosi-thought-Nixon-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Pelosi was asked by NBC News about the resolution, which she announced earlier in the day, and responded by saying &#8216;it\u2019s not an impeachment resolution.'&#8221;\u00a0 Why not?\u00a0 &#8220;Pelosi previously said she would not hold a full vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry&#8230;&#8221;\u00a0 Trump has continued to &#8220;call for&#8221; this. &#8220;Pelosi has said she believes Trump is &#8216;goading\u2019 Democrats to impeach him because he thinks it will help him fire up his base.&#8221;\u00a0 His base is already fired up.<\/p>\n<p>His base is fired and will remain so, and is going to get even more fired up as all of this continues.\u00a0 That\u2019s what I mean about the snowball effect.\u00a0 Pelosi is responding to something by calling for this vote then telling NBC it\u2019s not an impeachment resolution.\u00a0 For some reason, she doesn\u2019t want to make this official.\u00a0 They want to continue to try to get away with illusion that they are impeaching Trump. I know the conventional wisdom is that they\u2019re gonna do it, and I know the conventional wisdom is it\u2019s not stoppable.<\/p>\n<p>I know the conventional wisdom is that it\u2019s a fait accompli &#8212; and I remain unconvinced.<\/p>\n<p>I think this is all part of the 2020 reelection strategy for the Democrats, but we\u2019ll see.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2019\/10\/23\/this-show-gets-results-republicans-finally-start-pushing-back\/\">Do you remember when the Republicans stormed the SCIF?<\/a> Republicans went in there and demanded to be part of the process, and the media called it a &#8220;stunt,&#8221; and the media derided the Republicans. The Democrats made fun of \u2019em and laughed at \u2019em. &#8220;You guys have no business being in here! You guys can\u2019t bring your phones in there,&#8221; which they didn\u2019t do.\u00a0 I maintain that it was not a stunt. The stunt is Schiff!\u00a0 Schiff and the Democrats are the stunt.<\/p>\n<p>They are the charade.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-326262\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102319-Republicans.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102319-Republicans.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102319-Republicans-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>They are manufacturing an illusion.<\/p>\n<p>More on these witnesses that you are seeing reported on breathlessly in the media. (Just hang on.\u00a0 We\u2019ll get to that in the next half hour.)\u00a0 But I think it worked.\u00a0 I think a number of things are forcing Pelosi\u2019s hands here.\u00a0 The Republicans did something they\u2019re not used to doing and the Democrats are not prepared for them to do.\u00a0 The Republicans stormed in there like Code Pink, in effect, and so here is Pelosi yesterday on Capitol Hill. A reporter asked her about the upcoming vote.<\/p>\n<p>ABC NEWS REPORTER:\u00a0 Madam Speaker, can we have you talk about the impeachment resolution?<\/p>\n<p>PELOSI: It\u2019s not an impeachment resolution.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 What?\u00a0 &#8220;It\u2019s not an impeachment resolution&#8221;?\u00a0 Why is everybody saying they\u2019re gonna have a vote on an impeachment resolution on Thursday?\u00a0 Why is everybody saying that?\u00a0 If it\u2019s not a vote on impeachment resolution, then what are they voting on Thursday?\u00a0 And if you want to know, here\u2019s Rosa DeLauro.\u00a0 She is a Democrat from Connecticut on the Fox News Channel this morning.<\/p>\n<p>DELAURO:\u00a0 This is about laying out how we are going to try to move forward in terms of collecting data and the continued process. It\u2019s nothing to do as to whether or not there is a, uh&#8230; an inquiry.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 I don\u2019t&#8230; Could you hear that?\u00a0 No plans to vote for a formal inquiry.\u00a0 This is a rules-and-process vote.\u00a0 It\u2019s &#8220;about laying out how we are going to try to move forward in terms of collecting data and the continued process. It\u2019s nothing to do as to whether or not there is &#8230; an inquiry.&#8221;\u00a0 There still isn\u2019t gonna be a vote on impeachment, folks.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: We go to the Tampa. This is Lou. Great to have you with us, Lou. How are you?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hey, Rush. How you doing today?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Fine and dandy, sir. Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I\u2019m confused. Well, maybe not confused, but a rhetorical question. We\u2019re taking a vote, or the Congress is, on whether they\u2019re gonna set up the rules and the process for something that\u2019s already been established for almost two months. But there\u2019s news reports out there, including Judge Napolitano, who\u2019s been saying the rules have already been in place and some places are even saying that the Republicans are the ones who set up the rules. So why are we voting on the rules &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, this actually is a good question. I am so grateful for this question. Because the way Congress works is a gigantic secret to people that have never studied it. Yeah, you think the rules are in place because the Constitution spells out how impeachment happens, and the House has to go by it. Well, there can\u2019t be any impeachment without high crimes and misdemeanors.<\/p>\n<p>Have you ever seen the definition of a high crime or misdemeanor? Well, don\u2019t those two cancel each other out? High crime and misdemeanor? A misdemeanor is jaywalking. Well, you can\u2019t impeach people for jaywalking. Gerald Ford was asked in 1970, what is high crimes and misdemeanors? What is an impeachable offense? Gerald Ford said, &#8220;Whatever the House of Representatives wants to say it is.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-326219\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102319-US-Capitol-RUSH.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102319-US-Capitol-RUSH.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102319-US-Capitol-RUSH-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>Now, the rules. There are rules, and then there are rules. Each Congress sets up its own rules in the Senate, for example, for judicial confirmations, whether there\u2019s gonna be a filibuster or not, whether it\u2019s gonna be usable or not. In the House case of this impeachment, we\u2019re not talking about the general rules as laid out by the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>These are specific rules, like how many Republicans will be permitted to participate? Will the Republicans be allowed to cross-examine? The Democrats are in charge of this. The Democrats can get away with whatever they want to try to get away with, Lou. If the Democrats want to pass rules suggesting that certain Republicans are not permitted in the impeachment hearing, they can try to do it. They have to submit it to a vote for the whole House. But there are procedural rules for every piece of legislation.<\/p>\n<p>Have you ever been paying attention to news and there\u2019s this big bill, a big piece of legislation\u2019s up, and in the Senate they have to take a vote first for cloture. Cloture. What the hell is cloture? Well, they gotta get 60 votes before they can actually vote. Every bill is considered to be filibustered. Senate rule. Filibusters were not what they are today when the Senate began proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>A filibuster is simply automatically assumed on every piece of legislation and to end a filibuster, which used to be somebody talking and talking and talking and talking until they couldn\u2019t anymore, a filibuster is now just assumed, and you need 60 votes to stop debate. Filibuster now equals debate. You gotta get 60 senators to vote to end debate, and then you vote on the bill.<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u2019s assumed, well, if you get 60 votes to end debate, then you\u2019re gonna have 60 votes to pass the bill, but not always. Some senators will vote to end debate just so they can get to the vote, but they have no intention of voting for it. The House can set up their own procedural rules for this, like how many hours they\u2019re gonna give to it each day, how many days they are gonna allot, how many weeks they are going to allot.<\/p>\n<p>So there are the procedural rules, then there are the constitutional rules, and then there are whatever rules that Schiff and Pelosi want to try to implement. And it\u2019s whatever they can get votes to do. And if it appears undemocratic or unconstitutional, well, elections have consequences.<\/p>\n<p>I mean, you would think the last three weeks Adam Schiff has been conducting a so-called impeachment inquiry behind closed doors in a room two stories below ground level in the House of Representatives with no electronic devices permitted. There have been no transcripts. The Republicans were not allowed in. The Republicans were not allowed to read full transcripts of what witnesses said.<\/p>\n<p>The only thing that was made public was what Adam Schiff leaked to the New York Times, the Washington Post, or CNN. It was not Democratic. It was not fair in anybody\u2019s definition. But that\u2019s what happened. That\u2019s when the Republicans decided to storm that room and to demand to be admitted. And it was after that and after the killing of al-Baghdadi, the ISIS leader, that all of a sudden now Nancy Pelosi is, okay, okay, okay, we\u2019ll have a vote, we\u2019ll have a vote.<\/p>\n<p>But they\u2019re not having a vote on impeachment. They\u2019re having a vote on procedure. They\u2019re having a vote on rules. They\u2019re having a vote on how they\u2019re gonna move forward. So if somebody\u2019s telling you the rules are already set, they don\u2019t know what they\u2019re talking about. Constitutional rules, yeah. They can\u2019t change the rule that says two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict. They can\u2019t change the rules about articles of impeachment being created. They can\u2019t change the rule about house managers, but they can assign them.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-324138\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-100319-Schiff.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-100319-Schiff.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-100319-Schiff-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>So they can do as much as they want and try calling it impeachment when impeachment hasn\u2019t even begun. And I\u2019m telling you, Lou, that\u2019s exactly what\u2019s going on right now. They are creating the illusion that Donald Trump has been impeached. The media is helping them. And it is thus assumed that all of these witnesses &#8212; I\u2019m gonna have details on these guys in the next hour &#8212; all these witnesses are coming in to testify in the impeachment of Donald Trump.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s what they want you to believe. That is not what is happening. They\u2019re being brought in so that Adam Schiff can lift damning testimony from them amidst whatever else they say and leak it to the furtherance of the illusion that Trump has been impeached. If some people think that the actual impeachment and the trial has begun, all the better! Although that will come back and bite \u2019em because it hasn\u2019t begun. And if people think that, they\u2019re gonna expect a result at some point down the line.<\/p>\n<p>So I\u2019m really glad that you asked the question, because it\u2019s something largely misunderstood by casual observers of the way Congress, which is the House and the Senate, the way they work. But the take away here, Lou, is that no official impeachment anything has begun. No official vote on an impeachment inquiry has been taken or taken place.<\/p>\n<p>This entire thing &#8212; it\u2019s real, I mean, don\u2019t misunderstand. They\u2019re gonna do it if they can get away with it, if they think they can. They\u2019re monitoring polling data, but right now they are still in the stage creating the illusion that all of that has begun.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: There still isn&#039;t gonna be a vote on impeachment, folks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":326864,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pelosi Emasculates Schiff - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: There still isn&#039;t gonna be a vote on impeachment, folks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"George Prayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":360},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/\",\"name\":\"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-29T20:13:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-30T20:15:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\",\"name\":\"George Prayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"George Prayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: There still isn&#039;t gonna be a vote on impeachment, folks.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"George Prayias","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/APP-102919-Schiff-Pelosi-B.jpg","width":640,"height":360},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/","name":"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-10-29T20:13:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-30T20:15:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/10\/29\/pelosi-emasculates-schiff\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pelosi Emasculates Schiff"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349","name":"George Prayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"George Prayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326859"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326859"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326859\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":326891,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326859\/revisions\/326891"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media\/326864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=326859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=326859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}