![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-052819-Weak-Man.jpg\")
<\/p>\nRUSH: Mr. Snerdley, can I ask you a quick question just to set your memory back?\u00a0 How many times over the course of this program have you heard me either say directly, making a big point of it, or just in passing, that I am stunned, that I am shocked that real men can be liberals?\u00a0 How many times have you heard me raise this or ask this? It\u2019s a lot.\u00a0 Over the years I\u2019ve often asked a lot — it\u2019s tough for me to understand how real guys, real guys can be liberals!<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Well, guess what?\u00a0 The U.K. Times, headline:\u00a0 Weak men more likely to be socialists, study claims<\/a>.\u00a0 Once again, your host on the cutting edge of societal evolution.\u00a0 I mean, decades ago I began to raise this anomaly.\u00a0 Don\u2019t tell John Prescott, but maybe socialists are socialist because they aren\u2019t that good in a fight.\u00a0\u00a0 (paraphrasing) \u201cConversely, free marketeers may not actually have a sincere belief in the power of Adam Smith\u2019s unseeing hand, instead have a justified belief in the power of their clenched fist.<\/p>\n A study has found that weaker men…\u201d The first paragraph there, the definition of weak versus strong by fists and fighting is not really what this is about.\u00a0 \u201cA study has found that weaker men are more likely to be in favor of redistributive taxation.\u00a0 They are more likely to be sympathetic and feel sorry for minorities and others.\u00a0 The strong, on the other hand, according to the study, are far less likely to see the virtue of egalitarian social policies.\u201d<\/p>\n Now, listen to the way… I just interpreted the paragraph.\u00a0 I want to read to you the way this thing is actually written.\u00a0 The people that wrote this do not like this, they don\u2019t agree with it, and they\u2019re impugning it as they write.\u00a0 Listen to this paragraph.\u00a0 “A study has found that weaker men are more likely to be in favor of redistributive taxation.\u00a0 The strong, on the other hand, who in their cavemen past had no problems controlling both women and resources that they had no intention of sharing are far less likely to see the virtue of egalitarian social policies.\u201d See how strong people are portrayed here?<\/p>\n Controlling women, abusive, they don\u2019t share anything.\u00a0 Just the exact opposite!\u00a0 Weak people demand that other people share what they have.\u00a0 The strong already do it.\u00a0 The strong take care of who knows how many!\u00a0 That\u2019s the point of getting strong and being strong, it\u2019s the point of becoming a provider.\u00a0 I don\u2019t think other people ought to have to do it, like liberals do.<\/p>\n Liberals are great at spending everybody else\u2019s money and even keep spending it when there isn\u2019t any left.\u00a0 Let\u2019s see how strong people are portrayed here.\u00a0 (impression) \u201cManipulating and controlling women, and they don\u2019t share resources.\u201d\u00a0 This is one interpretation of research by academics in Brunel University who assessed 171 men.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: From The Daily Wire<\/a>, but it\u2019s actually about an NBC poll, which was announced Sunday on Meet the Depressed. This has just got to rip \u2019em apart at NBC News.<\/p>\n \u201cNBC Polling Data Shows Sanders Voters Are ‘Low Information\u2019 And Sanders Voters Aren\u2019t Happy.\u201d Low-information voters are leaving the Democrat Party primary. \u201cAn NBC poll which debuted Sunday on Meet the Press revealed a characteristic about Bernie Sanders (I-VT) voters that wasn\u2019t exactly flattering. It turns out, the less you pay attention to politics, the more likely you are to support the socialist option for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination,\u201d led, of course, by Crazy Bernie.<\/p>\n Chuck Todd delivered the bad news to his panel. And people watching this on social media were downright insulted, because what it says is that people who pay the least attention to politics — i.e., watch NBC News — people that pay the least bit of attention to the Drive-By Media are more prone to support socialist candidates.<\/p>\n In other words, people that don\u2019t watch a lot, therefore, don\u2019t know a lot, therefore, are low-information voters, happen to be the people propelling the Democrat Party primary race. “The less you are paying attention, the more likely you are a Bernie Sanders supporter,” reported F. Chuck Todd, pointing to a Monmouth poll taken recently showing that Sanders is losing ground to both Sleepy Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren is catapulting up. Mayor Pete is trying to raise a lot of money to be taken seriously.<\/p>\n But I just absolutely love this because the media, of course, thinks that their audience is the most informed and the most sophisticated and the most erudite and all of that. And their own poll has revealed — (laughing) — they\u2019re the least informed! And the less they know, the more they are inclined to support governments like Cuba, Venezuela and the old Soviet Union.<\/p>\n By the way, speaking of which, if you are too old to remember the, quote, unquote, Soviet Union — that was an eighties and nineties thing — if you\u2019re too old, if that\u2019s ancient history, if you weren\u2019t old enough or you weren\u2019t paying attention back then, you really need to watch a series on HBO called Chernobyl<\/a>.<\/p>\n Six parts. Episode 4 I think aired last night or episode 5. It\u2019s coming up on the conclusion. But if you have HBO, you can stream all episodes back-to-back except for the finale I think is next week. I\u2019ve never seen a show that so accurately portrays what the Soviet Union was as this.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/APP-053018-Chuck-Todd.jpg\")
<\/p>\n