![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-051719-Comey-Brennan-Communist.jpg\")
He admitted, “I\u2019d moved from communist to whatever I am now.” Now, we know that John Brennan, Obama\u2019s CIA director, was a communist, or at least had voted for the Communist Party. But I had never heard this about Comey. Zero Hedge has the story.<\/a> I think Red State has the story. Now we find out that under Obama, the CIA director and the FBI director both had histories of not just flirtation but serious immersion into communism. And like the KGB always said, “No one ever leaves the KGB.” Nobody ever leaves this way of thinking.<\/p>\nBREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n
RUSH: Here is Stan in Belhaven, North Carolina. Glad you called, sir. You\u2019re next on Open Line Friday. Hi.<\/p>\n
CALLER: It\u2019s an honor, sir, an honor to talk to you.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Thank you. Thank you very much.<\/p>\n
CALLER: I have two quick comments. You mentioned earlier that James Comey has said that he supported the Communist Party in the seventies, is that correct?<\/p>\n
RUSH: He voted! He voted for communist candidates, yes.<\/p>\n
CALLER: So we know that Brennan supported the Communist Party, and now Comey. Yet they both later on were employed by the FBI and the CIA, went up through the ranks, became the directors. Now, Brennan in 2003 and 2004, according to Wikipedia, was director of the Terrorist Threat Integration Center, and that office sifted and compiled information for President Bush\u2019s intelligence briefings. That ties into your speculation that Bush was played about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So Brennan was right there to be in a position to do that. I think that Comey, Brennan, and Clapper… It wasn\u2019t just pride about them wanting to have their daily intelligence briefings with Trump. They wanted to be able to pull the puppet strings and control the information.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/APP-060118-Clapper-Clown.jpg\")
RUSH: Well, yeah. Yeah. The intelligence — and not just these three guys. The intelligence community — no matter when you go back in American history, any administration — they all want access. Everybody wants access to president. Everybody. Intel community particularly, State Department, they all want access. Trump was telling the intelligence community, “I don\u2019t need to talk to you guys every day. I\u2019ve got a good memory and I\u2019m smart. I know what\u2019s going on around the world anyway,” and they were righteously indignant about that and also fearing like their access was gonna be denied. So it\u2019s time to show him exactly what they can do to somebody not cooperating with them. There\u2019s all kinds of factors that went into that. But —<\/p>\n
CALLER: Well, it\u2019s am–<\/p>\n
RUSH: Yeah, go ahead.<\/p>\n
CALLER: It\u2019s amazing to me that those two, after it was known — it had to be known — that they that support the Communist Party were even employed by the FBI and the CIA to start with. I just don\u2019t see how that happened. And I have one more point, quick point after that, if that\u2019s okay.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Well, look, when it comes to Comey, I\u2019m not… I don\u2019t know how serious this guy was. I mean, it\u2019s out there at Zero Hedge and it\u2019s out there at Red State that Comey is saying he was a communist and voted left and he then moved from being a communist to whatever he is now. With him as dryball as he is, it could have been Comey just trying to be funny. But your question is… Brennan is an acknowledged… I mean, that was not a youthful flirtation.<\/p>\n
Brennan was committed when he was innovating in the seventies for communists and so forth. So your question is, “How do these guys pass clearance? How do they get hired?” And I don\u2019t know. I can\u2019t tell you. I honestly don\u2019t have the slightest idea. The only thing I could think is that the people vetting him didn\u2019t see much wrong with it, or believed it was genuinely in their past and was not a… My guess is that the people doing the vetting wouldn\u2019t see that much wrong with it.<\/p>\n
CALLER: I agree with you. My second real quick point is at local affiliate WTIB Greenville, North Carolina, there\u2019s a show that does as much to inform us on local and state politics as you do nationally, and it\u2019s Tom Lamprecht and Sadie Klaus, and I wanted to give them a shout-out. They do a great job.<\/p>\n
RUSH: It\u2019s a big deal to get mentioned on this program, so I\u2019m sure they are highly, highly appreciative.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Well, if you ever play Pinehurst, give \u2019em a call; see if they want to play a round. (chuckling)<\/p>\n
RUSH: All right. (laughing) Well, thank you.<\/p>\n
BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n
RUSH: I want to say one more thing about the intel stuff on 9\/11. I don\u2019t want to be misunderstood about this. During the Bush administration, the first term, the buildup about to weapons of mass destruction… I\u2019m like everybody else. I believed it, because I knew that Saddam Hussein had used mustard gas and nerve gas on the Kurds. I knew he had used weapons of mass destruction. Saddam was not denying any of the allegations that were made.<\/p>\n
Bush was running around the country for a year and a half building up public support for the invasion of Iraq, and it was after 9\/11. Iraq could not be directly tied to the 9\/11 attacks. Tangentially, yeah. There had been some 9\/11 training that might have occurred in Iraq. But Colin Powell\u2019s up at the United Nations and he\u2019s got photos. He\u2019s got satellite photos, and he\u2019s trying to convince everybody at the Security Council that Saddam\u2019s got weapons of mass destruction, and everybody believed it!<\/p>\n
Bush believed it. Colin Powell believed it. The photos, satellites, we all believed it. And then after the invasion of Iraq happened and no weapons of mass destruction were found, everybody still believed it. They thought, “Well, Saddam succeeded in getting the stuff out of the country before our invasion started,” and there were stories about semi-trucks and this and that and the other moving the WMDs to Syria and other places. But people believed it, because people believed the intelligence.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s Colin Powell at the Security Council using satellite photos and committed to telling the Security Council people that Saddam had \u2019em. So there wasn\u2019t any doubt, and after it happened, and there aren\u2019t any WMDs, we still just thought, “Well, something happened.” If you remember, the Brits agreed. It wasn\u2019t just us. It wasn\u2019t just our intelligence apparatus. It was the U.K. and our allies in Europe. Everybody was agreeing with us that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/APP-012318-Deep-State-Secret-Society-B.jpg\")
Then when it happened that he didn\u2019t, everybody just assumed that they got it wrong, that it was a mistake but not purposeful. They just… Somehow, they got it wrong, or Saddam had \u2019em and moved \u2019em out. I didn\u2019t start doubting this until this coup attempt on Trump, and I see that every leak and every story in the Drive-By Media — and remember, in the first year\/year and a half there were four stories a day, folks.<\/p>\n
If you count the stories in the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN, there were four different stories a day, all featuring leaks from anonymous sources that were said to be current and former American intelligence officials or experts or analysts or what have you. So it was clear that the media was using anonymous intelligence agencies or apparatus sources as their leak material — and there was never a name attached to it. Never any name. Never.<\/p>\n
And every one of these story had the 13th to 15th paragraph where they acknowledge that there was yet any evidence for this. And then as it slowly began to dawn on all of us that this was a gigantic coup — that this was totally made up, that there wasn\u2019t any collusion, that there wasn\u2019t any cooperation between Trump and Russia and that the Russians had not affected the election — the stories continued, nevertheless, from the same people.<\/p>\n
So that\u2019s when I began to think, “Wait a minute, who\u2019s doing this? Somebody\u2019s trying to undermine Trump. Somebody\u2019s trying to overturn the election results. Somebody is trying to drive Trump out of office — and they\u2019re using the credibility of what? Intelligence agencies.” It was at that point, maybe a year into this attempt to get rid of Trump, that it dawned on me, maybe others sooner, “Okay, here\u2019s a bunch of people that don\u2019t like Trump, don\u2019t think he should have won.<\/p>\n
“They\u2019re trying to get him out of office, trying to overturn the election results,” and I thought, “What if the same thing happened to George W. Bush?” and I started to think back to the controversy of the aftermath of the recount in Florida, and how much hatred there was for Bush, and how many stories in the media about how his presidency was illegitimate, that he wasn\u2019t the real winner, that Algore won the popular vote. “The Supreme Court stopped a legitimate recount. Gore was on the way to winning. Bush is an unjust president!”<\/p>\n
I said, “Wait a minute.” You know, there was Bush hatred out the wazoo, just like there was Reagan hatred, just like there is Trump hatred, and I began to wonder. “Did these same people or these same agencies run a gigantic scam on Bush (and, by association, Tony Blair in the U.K.), and any number of our other allies that joined the coalition to drive Saddam out of Iraq to get the weapons of mass destruction?” Well, who knows! Don\u2019t have an answer.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s when I first started making the association. I still don\u2019t know if it happened. The last caller talked about this as though I have a conclusive opinion on it. I don\u2019t. I\u2019m still asking the question. But it never occurred to me until I saw what they\u2019re capable of with Trump, and then I know how a whole bunch of Washington establishment types and Democrats in the media hated Bush and thought he was a cowboy. And then after 911, they still tried to destroy Bush\u2019s Iraq war effort.<\/p>\n
After getting rid of Saddam, the effort to continue the War on Terror into Iraq, people were trying to undermine that. And that\u2019s when I began to wonder if we\u2019re seeing the same kind of thing play out here with Trump. Now, if that had happened, the one thing I can say:” George W. Bush will never acknowledge it. If that is what was happening, if the intel community had turned on Bush and were running a scam, he\u2019ll never say it. Even if it were shown to him as with conclusive proof, he would never acknowledge it.” But you have to wonder — that\u2019s all I\u2019m saying — and I am.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
RUSH: Now, we know that John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, was a communist, or at least had voted for the Communist Party. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":309654,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n