{"id":307886,"date":"2019-05-01T16:11:00","date_gmt":"2019-05-01T20:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=307886"},"modified":"2019-05-02T16:26:21","modified_gmt":"2019-05-02T20:26:21","slug":"barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: (impression) Poor Robert Mueller. Poor Robert Mueller. He writes a letter to William Barr complaining that Barr\u2019s summary letter did not capture the &#8220;context&#8221; of the probe.&#8221; There is no context! You didn\u2019t find any collusion, and you punted on finding obstruction, and there\u2019s nothing that\u2019s changed, and the summary just said that. Upset it didn\u2019t capture the context? The hell it didn\u2019t! You had 488 pages. Barr writes a four-page summary. The media\u2019s taken care of your context for you, Mueller. For crying out loud! You have the audacity to complain about media coverage?<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-307893\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Robert S. Mueller III complaining about media coverage? For crying out loud, this guy\u2019s been portrayed as Mr. Honor, Mr. Integrity, Mr. Honesty, the most honorable\/the most honest man in Washington &#8212; except when he couldn\u2019t find any collusion, and now he\u2019s a schlub. So he\u2019s gotta protect his well-cultivated, 75-year image with the Washington D.C. media. I tell you, folks, this is just disgusting. All of this is. But you know what? If the Democrats want to not let go of this, and if the media wants to maintain their complicity in this all the way through 2020, you go ahead and let \u2019em.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I now want to move on to the audio sound bites. We\u2019re gonna start here with Lindsey Graham &#8212; Lindsey Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Here\u2019s a portion of his opening remarks.<\/p>\n<p>GRAHAM: August 26, 2016: &#8220;Just went to the southern Virginia Walmart. I could smell the Trump support.&#8221; October the 19th, 2016: &#8220;Trump is a f[bleep]ing idiot. He\u2019s unable to provide a coherent answer.&#8221; Sorry to the kids out there. These are the people that made a decision that Clinton didn\u2019t do anything wrong and that a counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign was warranted. We\u2019re gonna &#8212; in a bipartisan way, I hope &#8212; deal with Russia. But when the Mueller report is put to bed &#8212; and it soon will be &#8212; this committee is gonna look long and hard at how this all started.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/tMM9-igkpdY\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>RUSH: He was reading from the texts between Strzok and Page. August 26, 2016: &#8220;Just went to the southern Virginia Walmart. I could smell the Trump support.&#8221; October the 19th, 2016: &#8220;Trump is a f&#8212;ing idiot,&#8221; and he read the word! And apologized to the kids for it. Let me show you what&#8230; This is all they\u2019ve got. I mean, this is just&#8230; This continues to boggle my mind. This is Dianne Feinstein, who was feebly asking questions here today. But before she got to the questions &#8212; you know, she\u2019s the ranking member, the lead Democrat on the committee. Here\u2019s a portion of her opening remarks&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>FEINSTEIN: The Mueller report documents the Trump campaign\u2019s communications regarding Secretary Clinton\u2019s and the DNC\u2019s stolen emails. Specifically, the report states &#8212; and I quote &#8212; &#8220;Within approximately five hours of President Trump calling on Russia to find Secretary Clinton\u2019s emails, Russian intelligence agency GRU officers, quote, &#8220;targeted, for the first time, Clinton\u2019s personal office,&#8221; end quote.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Aw, come on.<\/p>\n<p>FEINSTEIN: The Mueller report also reveals that President Trump repeatedly asked individuals affiliated with his campaign, including Michael Flynn, quote, &#8220;to find the deleted Clinton emails.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: He\u2019s out there telling a joke. &#8220;Hey, Russia, maybe you can find the Clinton emails.&#8221; Mueller actually says that within five hours, the Russian GRU (that\u2019s the new version of the KGB, the GRU) went out there and &#8212; within five hours of receiving instructions from Trump &#8212; they followed through and attempted for the first time, for the first time targeted Clinton\u2019s personal office. What an abject crock! It is all a crock. It is a joke, and they are trying to make something out of it, and the fact that Barr is actually using this&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Why not&#8230;? Let me tell you, why not find collusion, if they\u2019re gonna report this? Let me ask a serious question: Why not report that there was collusion? All it would have taken for Mueller to do was say, &#8220;Right here, Trump was unwittingly colluding with the Russians. When he asked them to find Hillary\u2019s emails, they &#8212; in five hours &#8212; began to try to find Hillary\u2019s emails.&#8221; Why not conclude that there was collusion? That remains, by the way, a big question. But I\u2019m throwing it out here. Why not conclude that?<\/p>\n<p>I mean, if you\u2019re gonna write this, if you\u2019re gonna make the claim that the Russian intelligence agencies were busy twiddling their thumbs until Trump gives them the order to find Hillary\u2019s missing 30,000 emails, and for the first time the Russians tried to hack her personal account&#8230;? There wasn\u2019t any collusion. They had so many opportunities to claim there was. Now, the reason is because if they had called this collusion, there would have been an investigation into this, and they would have been embarrassed with egg on their faces.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-307855\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-1.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-1-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>It would have been obvious that they can\u2019t take a joke, they have no sense of humor, or worse. Here\u2019s Barr. I mentioned earlier, it\u2019s really refreshing to hear somebody that\u2019s confident, and assured, and not at all excitable, just plain factual, answering questions. This is a portion of his opening remarks dealing with this little attempt by Mueller\u2019s office and the Washington Post with this story last night claiming that Mueller wrote Barr a letter saying that Barr misrepresented his conclusions. So they want everybody to think that Barr is lying about Mueller\u2019s conclusions in his report.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s how Barr dealt with that today&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>BARR: I received a letter from Bob, the letter that\u2019s just been put into the record, and I called Bob and said, &#8220;You know, what\u2019s the issue here? Are you sugg&#8230;?&#8221; And I asked him if he was suggesting that the March 24th letter was inaccurate. And he said, no, but that the press reporting had been inaccurate and that the press was reading too much into it. And I asked him, you know, specifically what his concern was. And he said that his concern focused on his explanation of why he did not reach a conclusion on obstruction. And he wanted more put out on that issue. He argued for putting out summaries of each volume, the executive summaries that had to be written by his office. And if not that, then other material that focused on the issue of why he didn\u2019t reach the obstruction question. But he was very clear with me that he was not suggesting that we had misrepresented his report.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: That\u2019s all there is. The Washington Post, thus, exposed &#8212; although they\u2019re not, because it\u2019s the technique the media is using. You issue a fake news story with a fake headline designed to create the impression, in this case, that William Barr lied, that William Barr misreported, that Mueller did find collusion and that Barr didn\u2019t report it and that Mueller is now mad. That\u2019s what their story said. But then if you get to the 13th paragraph, you find where the Washington Post makes clear that that\u2019s not what they\u2019re saying, that Mueller was not challenging Barr\u2019s summary, was not challenging the accuracy but rather was upset with the media narrative.<\/p>\n<p>But the first 12 paragraphs are designed to make the reader (and small-minded, single-minded members of the Drive-By Media) think that Mueller is accusing Barr of covering up what\u2019s in Mueller\u2019s report. That there was collusion, that Mueller found it, and that Barr doesn\u2019t want to report it because Barr is Trump\u2019s &#8220;handpicked attorney general;&#8221; therefore, is conflicted. But right there it is in paragraph 13 of the Washington Post\u2019s own story. They essentially say, &#8220;The first 12 paragraphs of this story are a lie.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The first 12 paragraphs are designed to give you a total misunderstanding of what actually happened, and we don\u2019t think you\u2019re gonna get to paragraph 13 and it\u2019s why we\u2019re putting it here. But if we\u2019re called on it, we can say, &#8216;No, our story makes clear that Mueller was not challenging Barr\u2019s summary.'&#8221; So the first 12 paragraphs are devoted to making the reader think that\u2019s exactly what happened, and this has become a new journalistic technique. The New York Times perfected it in these past 2-1\/2 years, the Washington Post does it, and now each paper is a wingman to the other.<\/p>\n<p>The Times now has an accompanying story basically backing up what the Washington Post says in its first 12 paragraphs. So they\u2019re doing their best today to make you think that there was collusion, that Mueller found it, and that Barr lied about it. But there was no collusion. Barr reminded everybody today &#8212; once again, under oath &#8212; at the Judiciary Committee. He said (summarized), &#8220;Nothing\u2019s changed. There\u2019s no collusion, there\u2019s no obstruction, there\u2019s not a single thing of substance that has changed. And in fact, Bobby Mueller is simply mad that the media did not get the narrative that he wanted, and he wanted me to fix it. He came to me like a 4-year-old and said, &#8216;Daddy, fix it for me, please,\u2019 is essentially what happened here.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What a bunch of phonies!<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: And it\u2019s hard to disagree with that. Even though you can and even though you should take my word for it, you don\u2019t have to. We\u2019re we go to ABC News special coverage, William Barr testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. After an exchange between Pat &#8220;Leaky&#8221; Leahy and Barr, the anchor David Muir cut in and talked to the chief legal analyst, Dan Abrams, and they decided to bump out of coverage. It was a dud. Barr had not lied, and so there\u2019s no reason to continue wasting time covering this. This is how that sounded.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"MRC TV video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mrctv.org\/embed\/539276\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>MUIR: A very nuanced answer. And Dan Abrams, it sounded to me as thought he was splitting hairs there saying, \u201cI didn\u2019t talk to members of his team, so I didn\u2019t know why they were upset.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>ABRAMS: Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>MUIR: \u201cI talked to Bob Mueller himself.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>ABRAMS: Look, it\u2019s a very lawyerly answer. And this is why, you know I don\u2019t think they\u2019re going to be able to truly, kind of prove that Barr, quote unquote, \u201clied.\u201d Right? Because I think that there\u2019ll be an explanation for every one of Barr\u2019s comments about the Mueller investigation.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Okay. See, he\u2019s admitting they\u2019re trying to prove that Barr lied and they can\u2019t. We gotta bump out of coverage, we\u2019re never gonna be able to prove Barr lied. Why? Well, maybe because he didn\u2019t. Maybe because the Mueller report says there was no collusion, and maybe because the Mueller report didn\u2019t have the guts to say whether or not they thought anything that happened was obstruction. And so the report doesn\u2019t find collusion, didn\u2019t find obstruction, and Barr said that.<\/p>\n<p>So now they\u2019re hoping that they can find evidence today that Barr lied and ABC\u2019s concluded, \u201cWell, we\u2019re not gonna be able to prove Barr lied, damn it, so we\u2019re ending coverage.\u201d And also over on CNN Anderson Cooper last night, this is David Gregory talking about what was upcoming last night.<\/p>\n<p>GREGORY: Can I just offer one contrary view, though. I think that there is a fair argument to be made that this is a special counsel who works for the attorney general. The special counsel did a report and concluded that he couldn\u2019t conclude. Well, guess what? The boss gets to decide and concludes that there was no obstruction of justice. Time to move on. And he\u2019s still releasing the report to Congress, Congress is still gonna take a look, could decide to initiate impeachment proceedings. I think there is an argument in defense of Barr that says he was doing what he was supposed to do.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-263900\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/APP-011518-Stop-The-Tape-x.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/APP-011518-Stop-The-Tape-x.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/APP-011518-Stop-The-Tape-x-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>RUSH: It helps here that Gregory\u2019s wife is a very accomplished lawyer and probably read him the truth of this last night. &#8220;Hey, Dave, jsut so you don\u2019t embarrass yourself, good old hubby of mine, Barr runs that show, not Mueller, and whatever Barr says goes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s another thing. Members of Congress were demanding the unredacted report, demanding it, because they knew somewhere in there, there had to be evidence of collusion. So Barr prepared an unredacted version, and it\u2019s in a room where anybody in the Senate can go look at it. They can\u2019t take it out, but they can go look at it. You know how many people have? Two.<\/p>\n<p>Two members of Congress have gone to look at the unredacted report, and both are Republican. Not a single Democrat has gone in to look at the unredacted version, meaning they\u2019re lying through their teeth. They know that the report doesn\u2019t have any collusion. They\u2019re just saying this stuff for public consumption so they can continue to try to poison the minds of the American people who only watch Drive-By Media for their news.<\/p>\n<p>The whole unredacted version is there for anybody in Congress that wants to see it, and only two people have. I think 12 people have scheduled appointments, but only two people have gone up to actually look at it. And none of them are Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>Quickly to Decatur, Illinois, the original home, by the way, of the Chicago Bears. Decatur, Illinois. They were the Decatur Staleys when George Halas put them all together. This is Greg. Great to have you on the program, sir. Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hello, Rush. It\u2019s great to finally get through to you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Thank you, sir.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Since you were talking about the Mueller investigation, I have one observation to make, and this comes from someone who has acted as a special prosecutor on occasion. The nature and function of a special prosecutor is to gather evidence and decide whether or not that evidence is sufficient to sustain a charge.<\/p>\n<p>Because Mr. Mueller found no evidence of collusion, he did reach a determination of that. His failure to reach a determination to bring a charge on obstruction is itself, when you consider the function and purpose of a special prosecutor, a conclusion that the evidence was insufficient, whether he stated so or not.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, you know what? That\u2019s actually a good point. His point is that Mueller punted the decision on obstruction. By the way, Professor Dershowitz ripped Mueller a new one for cowardice shortly after this happened. I\u2019m sure Mueller didn\u2019t like that either.<\/p>\n<p>(imitating Mueller) &#8220;Hey, Mr. Attorney General, you make Dershowitz quit criticizing me, it isn\u2019t fair, it\u2019s not fair.&#8221; Crybabies, crybabies in the special counsel office. Anyway, the point is, hey, he punts on finding obstruction. That\u2019s a conclusion in and of itself and it\u2019s hard to disagree with that.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, here\u2019s the bottom line. There were no crimes that were found by Robert Mueller except for the crimes that were created by his investigation. There were no crimes. If there had been no investigation, there would have been zero crimes. The only crimes that happened were those that this investigation created.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Robert S. Mueller III complaining about media coverage? For crying out loud, this guy&#039;s been portrayed as Mr. Honor, Mr. Integrity, Mr. Honesty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":307893,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Robert S. Mueller III complaining about media coverage? For crying out loud, this guy&#039;s been portrayed as Mr. Honor, Mr. Integrity, Mr. Honesty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"George Prayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":360},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/\",\"name\":\"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-01T20:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-02T20:26:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\",\"name\":\"George Prayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"George Prayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Robert S. Mueller III complaining about media coverage? For crying out loud, this guy&#039;s been portrayed as Mr. Honor, Mr. Integrity, Mr. Honesty.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"George Prayias","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APP-050119-Barr-blah.jpg","width":640,"height":360},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/","name":"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-05-01T20:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-02T20:26:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-testifies-mueller-complained-about-media-coverage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Barr Testifies: Mueller Complained About Media Coverage"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349","name":"George Prayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"George Prayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307886"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307886"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307886\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":307979,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307886\/revisions\/307979"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media\/307893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}