{"id":30393,"date":"2008-09-12T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T03:20:26","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T03:20:26","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T03:20:26","slug":"palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/","title":{"rendered":"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson"},"content":{"rendered":"<section>\n<p>RUSH: I want to go to one Sarah Palin sound bite. This is perhaps one of the highlights of Sarah Palin\u2019s interview. It\u2019s number 23. It is one of the highlights of the whole interview last night. She\u2019s great in this. I just want to set up this. She would not allow Charlie Gibson to put different words in her mouth when she answers his question about Israel. Now, just listen to this. This is Gibson\u2019s question. &#8216;What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?\u2019<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"217\" class=\"alignright\"\/>PALIN: I don\u2019t think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves, and for their security. <\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: So if we wouldn\u2019t second guess it and if they decided they needed to do it, because Iran was an existential threat, we would be cooperative or agree with that? <\/p>\n<p>PALIN: I don\u2019t think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation. <\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right?<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: She would not let him put words in her mouth. She would not let him trip her up. He tried 25 different ways to try to trip her up on that. She\u2019s essentially saying, &#8216;Screw you, Charlie, did you hear my answer? This is my answer, and I\u2019m sticking to it. You can ask it however many ways you want, but this is my answer.\u2019 This is just fabulous, people worried about how she did. Play it again, listen to this, the resolve that she has in her answer here despite Charlie Gibson\u2019s attempt to get her to say, &#8216;Damn right we\u2019ll nuke you,\u2019 because they want the headline, &#8216;Palin: Nuke Iran,\u2019 that\u2019s what they want. They tried it with her answer on Russia and NATO, misrepresenting that. Here it is one more time, again, Charlie Gibson\u2019s question, &#8216;What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?\u2019 <\/p>\n<p><BR\/>PALIN: I don\u2019t think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves, and for their security. <\/line><BR\/> <\/line><BR\/> GIBSON: So if we wouldn\u2019t second guess it and if they decided they needed to do it, because Iran was an existential threat, we would be cooperative or agree with that? <\/line><BR\/> <\/line><BR\/> PALIN: I don\u2019t think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation. <\/line><BR\/> <\/line><BR\/> GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right?<\/line><BR\/> <\/line><BR\/> PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.<\/line><\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I just love that. I just absolutely love it. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Debbie, Mission Viejo, California, thank you for waiting, and welcome.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I love you, Rush.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I just wanted to say, hey, if the Dems want to go back in history, last night reminded me of Torquemada interrogating Joan of Arc. I thought Charlie Gibson was the biggest bag of hubris wind ever, and I thought every time Sarah said, &#8216;Charlie,\u2019 she was poking him in the chest, and I loved it. <\/p>\n<p>RUSH: You know how that\u2019s being interpreted by the Drive-Bys today is that she was way out of league, way out of touch, and she was trying to establish familiarity with a news god.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Well, she wasn\u2019t blinking, and all Charlie Gibson could do was ask her these stupid questions about her faith and war and try to turn it around and look down his nose and take off his glasses and eat the stem.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: You realize who Charlie Gibson\u2019s audience was last night, don\u2019t you?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Well, I was one of them.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: No.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I know who he\u2019s playing to.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: No, no, no, you weren\u2019t the audience, I wasn\u2019t the audience, none of us listening to the program were the audience. The audience for that interview last night was Tom Brokaw, Brian Williams, Dan Rather, all of his colleagues in the Drive-By Media. Charlie Gibson got the first get. Charlie Gibson had to prove that he could be tough with the girl, that he wasn\u2019t going to get caught up in her celebrity, and he was gonna bear down, and he was gonna expose her, and he was gonna make news. If he went too soft his colleagues would say that he wimped out. He knew that if he went too hard, people like you and I would dump all over him. He made the calculation that his reputation within his own news business was what was important, so that\u2019s why he conducted the interview in the way that he did, kept probing after she had answered, kept asking the same question over and over, kept trying to trip her up on all the usual liberal cliches about God. I mean, they\u2019re the ones out there saying things like Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a governor. And they\u2019re, &#8216;Oh, I\u2019m not comparing Jesus to Obama.\u2019 Well, you\u2019re certainly comparing Pontius Pilate to Palin. They\u2019re the ones out there talking all this religion stuff and blaspheming it, by the way, and misrepresenting it. Pontius Pilate basically let the people decide, get out of the way, he didn\u2019t want any part of this. So he turned it over to the mob.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yep.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: You know, these people, they don\u2019t even know what they\u2019re talking about when they get into these kind of areas, and it\u2019s woefully obvious. But he was not doing this interview for you. Sure, he wanted a large audience to watch it, but believe me, when it was over, and he\u2019s doing another one today, they\u2019re doing a whole big thing on 20\/20, or Prime Time Live, whatever the show is.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I\u2019m going to be watching. I just couldn\u2019t believe that hubris comment about him, because he\u2019s full of hubris.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Yeah. Well, it takes one to know one. It takes one to know one. Debbie, thanks very much.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Here\u2019s Tom in Valentines, Virginia. Tom, I\u2019m glad you waited. Welcome to the EIB Network.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hey, Rush! How are you?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Very good, sir. Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: It\u2019s a big honor. I\u2019m a longtime listener, first-time caller.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Great to have you here.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I was calling you about Sarah Palin, Bush Doctrine issue last night, Charles Gibson.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Yes.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: There\u2019s a great blog post over on, I think it\u2019s Media Blog on National Review, which really shows that actually on that issue, Charlie Gibson was wrong and Sarah Palin was right.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I think that\u2019s probably true for most of the interview. I\u2019ll tell you what, I haven\u2019t played much of the Palin interview, and let me take the occasion of your call to get there.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Okay.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: In fact, here\u2019s where I want to start. Let\u2019s go sound bite 17, and we\u2019ll get to this Bush Doctrine thing. The Bush Doctrine thing was the one area where people on our side cringed. &#8216;Oh, no, she doesn\u2019t know what the Bush Doctrine is?\u2019 Probably 12 people in the Bush administration know what it is. CIA\u2019s forgotten about it, State Department\u2019s forgotten about it, Pentagon\u2019s forgotten about it. But when she found out what he was talking about, she gave the right answer. Anyway, let\u2019s go to number 17. This is the NATO question. Charlie Gibson says to Sarah Palin, &#8216;Do you favor putting Georgia and Ukraine into NATO?\u2019<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.57631.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"262\" height=\"190\" class=\"alignleft\"\/>PALIN: Ukraine, definitely, yes. Yes. And Georgia. Putin thinks otherwise, obviously he thinks otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: Under the NATO treaty wouldn\u2019t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally is, if another country is attacked, you\u2019re going to be expected to be called upon and help.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Now, we\u2019re working on an Obama answer to a similar question to this that he got some time ago. He didn\u2019t know how NATO works. We\u2019re working on finding that answer. He does not know what she just said. Now, this was reported by the Drive-Bys as Palin would go to war with Russia. She was just detailing what the NATO agreement calls for. By the way, NATO, it\u2019s a shambles. The European members of NATO are worthless right now, except for the Brits. But she said, &#8216;Perhaps so, that\u2019s the agreement, when you\u2019re a NATO ally, another country is attacked, you\u2019re going to be expected to be called upon to help.\u2019 So they love talking this up last night on CNN. Let\u2019s go to Wolf Blitzer, and he\u2019s got first up, Jeffrey Toobin and then Lou Dobbs coming up. He says to Toobin, &#8216;On the Georgia thing &#8211;&#8216; by the way, Toobin is their legal guy, talks about what goes on in courts and so forth. &#8216;On the Georgia thing and what Palin basically said was that if Georgia were to be a member of NATO the US, of course, would be obliged to come to the defense of Georgia or Ukraine or any other NATO ally under those circumstances, so she had that little nuance in there.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>TOOBIN: Well, yes, but we went through 50 years of a Cold War without going to war with Russia over things a lot more important frankly than Georgia, so I mean I just thought it was a somewhat odd answer, but we\u2019ll parse them very carefully.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Okay, he doesn\u2019t know what he\u2019s talking about. It\u2019s an odd answer because he\u2019s also thinking, okay, Cold War and Sarah Palin wants to take us to Russia. Lou Dobbs has to now bury these guys and explain to them what was really going on. Blitzer says, &#8216;First of all, what do you think about this latest sort of twist and turn in the presidential contest?\u2019<\/p>\n<p>DOBBS: If you\u2019re sitting there listening to Obama, who\u2019s run the slickest, smartest, shrewdest campaign right up until Russia invaded Georgia, the man cannot find his tempo again. His campaign is like they\u2019re still on vacation. You just heard the man talking there with Letterman. He\u2019s boring, just as Palin comes in to give excitement to the Republicans. He talks about exciting the base &#8212; 62 percent of men in this country have a favorable view of Governor Palin. And I heard our colleague Jeff Toobin say, &#8216;Well, he\u2019s got some questions or he\u2019s got to think about that answer of hers on whether or not, as a member of NATO, the United States would have to defend Georgia had Russia invaded it.\u2019 Let me help you out, Jeff Toobin. No nuance required. We would be required to do so, as would all of the members of NATO.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Exactly right. So there\u2019s Lou Dobbs bringing the kids in the sandbox at CNN back to reality. So Blitzer says, &#8216;So I hear you saying that Obama seems to have lost his momentum, his mojo, if you will, but McCain\u2019s gained it, is that what you\u2019re thinking, Lou?\u2019<\/p>\n<p>DOBBS: This woman has turned feminism on its head. You\u2019re watching women in this country trying to figure what in the heck, on the left, what in the heck this woman is doing to them. Women on the right are sitting there saying, you know, wow she\u2019s talking sensibly because she\u2019s first, pragmatic, who is trying to be painted as an ideologue of course by the Democrats, but she\u2019s coming across very pragmatic, she\u2019s strong, and, man, you gotta love the fact that this woman knows how to shoot.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: So kids at CNN are having lots of trouble here understanding this. They think they\u2019re the smartest people in the room and Lou Dobbs is handing them their lunch. I want to go to sound bite 22. We\u2019re going to skip 21, Ed. Folks, I\u2019m sorry to give you these instructions publicly here, but we\u2019re doing it on the fly here today. This is Charlie Gibson talking to Sarah Palin. &#8216;Have you ever met a foreign head of state?\u2019<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: I have not, and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But, Charlie, again, we gotta remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual, and somebody\u2019s big, fat resume, maybe, that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where yeah, they\u2019ve had opportunity to meet heads of state.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: But they\u2019ve been wrong. Whoopee-doo. Decades and decades, yeah, they\u2019ve had opportunity to meet heads of state, but it doesn\u2019t mean that they\u2019re right about anything. I want to replay this. This is one of my favorite exchanges from the whole interview. This is Charlie Gibson saying, &#8216;What if Israel decided that it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>PALIN: I don\u2019t think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves, and for their security. <\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: So if we wouldn\u2019t second guess it and if they decided they needed to do it, because Iran was an existential threat, we would be cooperative or agree with that? <\/p>\n<p>PALIN: I don\u2019t think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation. <\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right?<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: So they were saying, &#8216;She just repeats, she\u2019s robotic.\u2019 No, she was sticking to her answer and not letting him ask it 17, 25 times and put words in her mouth. When we come back we\u2019ll play the question and answer on the Bush Doctrine. But before we go to the break I have a question. The National Hurricane Center &#8212; I\u2019m serious. You think I\u2019m going to be funny here. I\u2019m dead serious. National Hurricane Center, Galveston, Texas, a warning has been issued. If you don\u2019t evacuate in time and get out of the way of the approaching Hurricane Ike, you face &#8216;certain death.\u2019 I\u2019ve never heard the government issue an order like that about a hurricane. My serious question is, given the serious life-threatening nature of the storm surge of Hurricane Ike, where is Obama lowering the level of the seas? Said he could do it. Said it was going to happen. Do we have to wait for him to be president for that to happen or can he just go right now and wave the seas back? Stand athwart the seas and say, &#8216;Stop.\u2019 Has anybody seen Obama at any of these disaster sites, by the way?<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Here is the exchange between Charlie Gibson and Sarah Palin last night. He says, &#8216;Do you agree with the Bush Doctrine?\u2019<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: In what respect, Charlie?<\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: The Bush &#8212; well &#8212; what do you &#8212; what do you interpret it to be?<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: His worldview.<\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: No, the Bush Doctrine enunciated September, 2002, before the Iraq war.<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell-bent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes made. And with new leadership &#8212; and that\u2019s the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy as well &#8212; is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better.<\/p>\n<p>GIBSON: The Bush Doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right tie preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that?<\/p>\n<p>PALIN: Charlie, if there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Now, when she finally was told what it was, she got it dead right. She did get it more accurately than Charlie Gibson got it. Charlie Gibson\u2019s flaw here when he says, &#8216;The Bush Doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense and we have the right to a preemptive strike against any country we think is going to attack us.\u2019 Well, we don\u2019t. We could think somebody\u2019s going to attack us any time we want to think it. She applied a more strict standard to this. We have legitimate evidence that tell us a strike is imminent, the threat is imminent, what do we do? Look, as I said earlier, folks, this is the one question and answer that made people cringe who watched it. But people don\u2019t look at these things like they watch quiz shows. You don\u2019t get just one chance to get it right. She came across as likable. There were no major gaffes or any of this sort of thing. <\/p>\n<p>She did fine. She did extremely well. I think the Drive-Bys trying to parse this will again make a mistake. Here\u2019s the thing. This is what we forget. Do you remember back in the middle of the July, Barack Obama was out there, and CNN played the clip of him saying this about his plan for Iraq. He said, &#8216;I\u2019m going to call in the Joint Chiefs of Staff and give them a new mission, and that is to bring the war in Iraq to a close. We\u2019re going to get out.\u2019 There\u2019s only one problem with that: the Joint Chiefs of Staff does not have operational command of US Military Forces! That authority resides in the commanders of the Unified Combatant Command, CENTCOM is the expand with approximately for Iraq and 26 other countries, including Afghanistan and Pakistan. Petraeus makes these decisions. He would have to call Petraeus. You don\u2019t call the Joint Chiefs of Staff!<\/p>\n<p>Now, that is a major gaffe, along with 57 states. This guy\u2019s asking to be commander-in-chief. This guy says he\u2019s qualified. He\u2019s going to get the Joint Chiefs in there and tell them what to do. Now, this is a major gaffe, and like all Obama gaffes, they\u2019re ignored, and he\u2019s never asked about them. Oh, maybe he is sometimes. They sort of do it with a chuckle. &#8216;Hey-ey-ey, you know what he said about the Joint Chiefs? Do you really&#8230;?\u2019 It\u2019s like when he said, &#8216;my Muslim faith\u2019 with Stephanopoulos this past Sunday. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;My Muslim faith.\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>Stephanopoulos says, &#8216;Your Christian faith!\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>(doing Biden impression) &#8216;Hey, Chuck! Hey, stand up there, Chuck! Hey. Oh&#8230;my&#8230;God. Okay.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>(doing Obama impression) &#8216;My Muslim faith.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Your Christian faith, Barry!\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Oh, yeah.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Imagine if Stephanopoulos had not corrected him, imagine if that had made it all through Sunday without Obama correcting it. Where would we be today? Would that not be a firework?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: I want to go to one Sarah Palin sound bite. This is perhaps one of the highlights of Sarah Palin\u2019s interview. It\u2019s number 23. It is one of the highlights of the whole interview last night. She\u2019s great in this. I just want to set up this. She would not allow Charlie Gibson to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson  - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson  - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: I want to go to one Sarah Palin sound bite. This is perhaps one of the highlights of Sarah Palin\u2019s interview. It\u2019s number 23. It is one of the highlights of the whole interview last night. She\u2019s great in this. I just want to set up this. She would not allow Charlie Gibson to [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/\",\"name\":\"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T03:20:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T03:20:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson  - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson  - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: I want to go to one Sarah Palin sound bite. This is perhaps one of the highlights of Sarah Palin\u2019s interview. It\u2019s number 23. It is one of the highlights of the whole interview last night. She\u2019s great in this. I just want to set up this. She would not allow Charlie Gibson to [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125111.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/","name":"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T03:20:26+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T03:20:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/12\/palin_takes_on_charlie_gibson\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Palin Takes on Charlie Gibson"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30393"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30393\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}