{"id":298087,"date":"2019-01-30T16:07:00","date_gmt":"2019-01-30T21:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=298087"},"modified":"2019-01-31T16:13:53","modified_gmt":"2019-01-31T21:13:53","slug":"why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump\u2019s Judges?"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Have you heard about the lead editorial in the Wall Street Journal<\/a> today? Well, let me tell you about this. The new White House counsel apparently has been consulting with Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, negotiating with them on Trump judicial nominees for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals! It is pretty safe to say Trump may not know this is going on!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>He\u2019s a got a new White House counsel, and this White House counsel has been working with Kamala Harris and Feinstein, two senators from California, to the choose nominees that Trump would choose to be on the Ninth Circuit that meet their approval! What the hell! We run the Senate. We have 53 senators! The reason Trump ran — in addition to not doing amnesty and shutting down the border, building a wall and all that — was the courts! What in the name of Sam Hill is going on when somebody has to…?<\/p>\n

Feinstein!<\/p>\n

Feinstein is the one that when Amy Coney Barrett was up for nomination… She is on the short list for the next Supreme Court opening whenever that is and wherever it is. She was engaged in confirmation hearings for her current slot on the court that she currently sits on, and Dianne Feinstein\u2019s looking at her and says (paraphrased), “The dogma is thick with you,” meaning, “You\u2019re really a big Catholic.” Feinstein\u2019s not Catholic. “The dogma is thick with you.” So we\u2019ve got a little bit of an indication how Feinstein is gonna approach Amy Coney Barrett if she\u2019s nominated for the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Well, why in the name of Sam Hill is somebody in the Trump administration negotiating with the people that lost in the Senate elections? Now, occasionally this happens. It does happen, but it\u2019s a throwback to years gone by when there was at least the pretense of bipartisanship, cooperation, comity, and all that. But not during these hyperpartisan days where there\u2019s no overlap of anything in common. You start negotiating with Feinstein and Kamala Harris and then senators from New York are gonna be the next ones that call you and demand to negotiate.<\/p>\n

And then if you don\u2019t negotiate with senators from New York, then senators from some other liberal state will be calling the White House, “Why won\u2019t you negotiate with us? Why would you…?” They don\u2019t get a say in this! That\u2019s the whole point of winning the presidency! They don\u2019t get a say in who judicial nominees are, and this is the Ninth Circuit! We\u2019re trying to go deliberalize the Ninth Circuit as much as we can, and we\u2019re giving Feinstein and Kamal Harris a say? Why are we doing this? What is the point? Does it not reside in, “We must show them that we\u2019re able to cross the aisle.<\/p>\n

“We must show them that we\u2019re able to work together. We must show America that we\u2019re not the racist, sexist, bigots they think.” This stupid, defensive premise that we accept that they say we are all these horrible things, so we must then try to prove that we\u2019re not. It\u2019s been tried for 30 years. It doesn\u2019t work. They have to be beaten, not compromised with and not cooperated with. Not now, not today, not in this day and age, not when they are hell-bent for destroying this country as founded.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: But I tell you, this negotiating with Feinstein and Kamala Harris? And she\u2019s got her own mess today. She\u2019s now walking back her pledge to get rid of private health insurance companies. She\u2019s walked it back because a bunch of private health insurance companies raised hell. They started getting mad.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

So she\u2019s caved already, and CNN reported that she caved, and she got mad that they reported it that way. So CNN has retracted the story that she caved, because she told CNN to retract it. But she did! She\u2019s already caved to the big moneyed interests less than 24 hours after making her grand proposal at a CNN town hall in Iowa on Monday night to eliminate private health insurance. They complain; she caves. CNN reports it; she gets hold of CNN, “You pull that story! I didn\u2019t cave.” CNN dutifully pulls the story.<\/p>\n

CNN is not a news network anymore.<\/p>\n

They are an adjunct to the FBI and the DOJ when they happen to just be there when Roger Stone is raided at 6.a.m. Now they do this town hall with Kamala Harris and when she doesn\u2019t like the results, she goes to CNN and tells them to change the way they report it, and they dutifully do. She\u2019s not gonna like this. We got the audio. Don Lemon actually hosted the discussion last night on CNN whether Kamala Harris is dark enough. You know, there\u2019s a difference between being “black” and being an “African-American.”<\/p>\n

That\u2019s what Don Lemon says. There\u2019s a big difference. We had this argument with Obama, and I got blamed for this. We created a parody out of it, “Barack the ‘Magic Negro'” based on a column in the LA Times. There were civil rights activists all back in 2007, 2008 debating whether Obama was “really” African-American, whether he was “really” black, whether he was… “Does he have slave blood?” they asked. “Was he down for the struggle?<\/p>\n

\"\"“Because, you know, he\u2019s Kenyan,” and so there was in debate on whether he\u2019s black enough. Now they\u2019re having it all over again with Kamala Harris. (interruption) Yeah, I should play “Barack the ‘Magic Negro.'” There\u2019s some people who may not have heard that in a while. “A Bad Judges Deal — The White House may make concessions to Feinstein and Harris.<\/a> President Trump\u2019s best achievement has arguably been judicial selection.<\/p>\n

“From the Supreme Court to the appellate circuits to district-court nominees, he is remaking the federal courts. So more than a few eyes widened this month when the White House omitted three names from the list of 50 judges Mr. Trump sent back up to the Senate. … The three missing names were Californians nominated to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals last year. Two other Ninth Circuit nominees, Eric Miller of Washington and Bridget Bade of Arizona, were renominated.<\/p>\n

“But Daniel Collins, Kenneth Lee and Patrick Bumatay were withheld because,” the Journal says, “we\u2019re told the White House is negotiating with California Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris. Ms. Feinstein and the White House counsel\u2019s office have been pen pals on this for some time. In a November letter to new White House counsel Pat Cipollone, Ms. Feinstein and Ms. Harris requested ‘that the White House work with us to reach an agreement on a consensus package of nominees.\u2019<\/p>\n

“The Democrats want to pick one name from the White House list, one from their own” list of acceptable judges, “and a third consensus nominee,” somebody that the White House and Dianne Feinstein both agree on. Well, that means two of the three are gonna be judges that Feinstein agrees on. The Journal says, “Why Mr. Cipollone or the president would agree to this or any other deal with these senators is a mystery. The hope…” Here\u2019s the thing: “The hope seems to be that a White House concession would somehow produce less resistance to Mr. Trump\u2019s nominees” such as down the way to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

\"\"This is exactly how we lose! We give them what they want with the appearance that we\u2019re being nice, we\u2019re being cooperative, we\u2019re crossing the aisle, we\u2019re being bipartisan. See? So then when we want the Supreme Court justice we want, you\u2019re supposed to stand down and let us have it. And it never works that way, do they? They always stand up and try to destroy our nominees, not just defeat \u2019em! How many years is it gonna take for our side to learn this is not how we win, survive, thrive? And it\u2019s certainly not how we make them lose.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: I swear. I don\u2019t know who in the White House could be thinking this way. This Wall Street Journal story dumps this off on the new White House counsel, Pat Cipollone. But how in the world…? (sigh) Kamala Harris is running for the Democrat presidential nomination. Why in the world are we gonna give her veto rights over a Trump-selected judge for the Ninth Circuit? Ditto Dianne Feinstein. She not running for president, but none of this makes any sense.<\/p>\n

It looks like political weakness. It looks like defensiveness. It looks like we have once again got to prove that we\u2019re not the ogres and the heathens that they say we are. Screw that! I am so done with trying to prove a bunch of garbage to people that\u2019s lies in the first place! How do you prove a negative? You know the old argument. But to accept the premise keeps us constantly on the defensive and keeps us constantly thinking that we\u2019re inferior, at least acting like we think that!<\/p>\n

This is absurd.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: We\u2019re gonna start Richard in Poughkeepsie, New York. Welcome, sir. Great to have you here.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Oh, thank you, Rush. Mega dittos to you and God bless you for what you\u2019re doing out here.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Thank you, sir. Thank you very much.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Listen. My question is, I love President Trump. I voted for him, very proud of it, glad about what he\u2019s doing. I just don\u2019t understand why it seems like his advisers or some of his cabinet members all seem to be deep state people. I mean, look at this counsel you talked about that\u2019s negotiating with Kamala Harris and Dianne Feinstein about Ninth Circuit judge appointees. That\u2019s retarded. What is he doing?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, in this instance it actually is not known whether the president\u2019s aware of this. Now, I don\u2019t offer that as a defense of it. I know what your question is. I\u2019ve shared with you and everybody from the beginning, even in the Trump campaign, I have been really puzzled by some of the staffing choices, and I\u2019ve made no bones about it. But it\u2019s none of my business. I mean, it\u2019s not my regime or administration. But the way I\u2019ve answered this to people, let\u2019s take you, Richard. Now, you\u2019re not Trump.<\/p>\n

But Trump\u2019s in the construction business, the real estate business, and one day he gets elected president. Do you think Donald Trump personally knows everybody he needs to be a cabinet secretary? Do you think he knows enough people intimately well to know their qualifications, to know their capabilities to fill every cabinet post? Do you think he knows enough lawyers to pick out the exact ones to be White House counsel, various other legal jobs in the administration?<\/p>\n

\"\"My point is that he\u2019s got to get advice from people he trusts because there\u2019s not a\u2019one of us… The last president that may have known enough… George H. W. Bush probably knew enough people to put his whole cabinet filled with people he loved and trusted, and maybe Clinton because his whole life has been at, you know, Ivy League schools and people like that. But Trump certainly is not. As an outsider, he\u2019s the definition of it. So I think he may be getting some bad advice. I think a lot of people are purposely trying to trick Trump.<\/p>\n

I think they\u2019re lying to him about their loyalty. They get in there and they try to sabotage and undermine. I don\u2019t doubt any of that. So his circle of advisers on this and whose advice he takes on staffing? It\u2019s gotta be driving him nuts, some of these people that he\u2019s had to let go, some of these people that didn\u2019t work out. When you get into chief of staff, national security director? You had some people trying to undermine him at some of the highest jobs in his administration. And you\u2019re right. The deep state… That\u2019s everybody in Washington who\u2019s not Trump and not personally known by Trump. Everybody in that town\u2019s a deep stater. When it comes to Trump, they all oppose him.<\/p>\n

CALLER: It\u2019s truly a shame.<\/p>\n

RUSH: And then you could have some true believers. I don\u2019t know this guy, this new White House counsel. I don\u2019t know this guy. He could literally be a swamp Republican who fully accepts that they hate us and that we\u2019ve gotta do everything we can to prove to them that we\u2019re not worthy of their hate, that they\u2019re wrong. So the traditional Republican way is (whispering), “Let\u2019s show them we will cooperate. Let\u2019s show them that we are open-minded. Let\u2019s show them that we\u2019re not closed-minded bigots. So we\u2019ll work with Feinstein.”<\/p>\n

And what they think is gonna happen is that Feinstein is gonna have a new revelation. “My God, these Republicans are not that bad,” and then immediately start working with them. Where is the evidence that this ever happens? But there are Republicans who despite the evidence in front of their face… Just like these people that think socialism has only failed because the right people haven\u2019t done it, we\u2019ve got Republicans who think the only reason we haven\u2019t made the Democrats and the media like us is because we haven\u2019t gone about it the right way.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

This is why I go crazy when I\u2019m encountered by people that do not understand the left, particularly people that deal with them every day for their whole lives. So time will tell on this, whether Trump knew about it or not. You can\u2019t know everything. That\u2019s the point here. The federal government, the West Wing itself, you\u2019ve got to have people you trust. You\u2019ve gotta be able to delegate things. You can\u2019t do it all yourself. Nobody can. Not even Martin Sheen in The West Wing could do everything himself.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Let me ask, can anybody cite a time…? Do you remember a time when the Democrats ever engaged in horse trading to get their judicial nominees when there was a Democrat president in the White House? Do you think they ever called Mitch McConnell, “Hey, Mitch! We want to consult with you on judges.” Do you think it ever happened? Do you think Mitch McConnell would ever demand it? That\u2019s the thing. Mitch McConnell would never demand to be consulted on Democrat nominees. Our attitude…<\/p>\n

I was thinking about this just last night. I don\u2019t know why. Our attitude when we lose the presidency and the Democrats — Clinton or Obama — start picking judges… You go to any Republican senator on the Judiciary Committee and they\u2019re gonna vote for the guy, barring some revelation that he\u2019s an axe murderer. Our people, our Republican senators will say… I\u2019ve heard Lindsey Graham say it. I\u2019ve heard McConnell say it. They all say, “Well, the president won the election, and he gets his choice. That\u2019s how our system works.”<\/p>\n

No! It doesn\u2019t work that way when the Democrats lose the presidency! We don\u2019t get our choices. Go talk to Brett Kavanaugh about that. But we play it that way. We make a big deal of saying, “Well, the president won the election. The Democrats, they get their nominees.” That\u2019s… We say that thinking that these hate-filled Democrat base voters are going to say, “You know what? Those Republicans aren\u2019t that bad, maybe. Maybe they aren\u2019t these racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes.”<\/p>\n

\"\"That\u2019s why they do it. And this is the kind of thing thinking we get out of the Never Trumpers. This is how the Never Trumpers operate, precisely so the people in the media on the left will respect them and not think of the Never Trumper conservative intellectuals as being a member of the talk radio elite. So we never oppose. “They win the election, they get to do whatever they want. That\u2019s our system,” and they lose the election and it is though that didn\u2019t happen.<\/p>\n

When we win the presidency, their objective is to obstruct everything, which is what politics is! I don\u2019t blame them for that! That\u2019s the whole point! It\u2019s a fight for power. It\u2019s ongoing. It never ends. It\u2019s just that our side demurs and never engages in it, particularly when we lose. But even when we win! I\u2019ll never forget when we had the Senate by one vote and one of our senators decided to become an independent so that there would be a balance of power to show people that we were not…<\/p>\n

It was the Jim Jeffords era. I think it\u2019s no more complicated than we just don\u2019t have people who know how to win. We have people afraid of success, afraid of winning because of the responsibility that it might entail. Or maybe other nefarious reasons as well. But I just don\u2019t remember Democrats ever asking Republicans to consult in the selection of judges.<\/p>\n

Now, we do have our moments. Obama picked Merrick Garland in his last year of his presidency, and Mitch McConnell told him to go pound sand. But that was only because of the Biden Rule. The Democrats had established that presidents don\u2019t get to nominate Supreme Court picks in the last year of their presidency \u2019cause an election is upcoming, the American people might not approve and so forth. That was a Democrat rule that put that in motion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: How many years is it gonna take for our side to learn this is not how we win, survive, thrive? And it's certainly not how we make them lose.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":266235,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nWhy Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump's Judges? - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump's Judges? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: How many years is it gonna take for our side to learn this is not how we win, survive, thrive? And it's certainly not how we make them lose.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/APP-030118-Rush-Court-Gavel.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"George Prayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/APP-030118-Rush-Court-Gavel.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/APP-030118-Rush-Court-Gavel.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":360},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/\",\"name\":\"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump's Judges? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-30T21:07:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-31T21:13:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump\\u2019s Judges?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\",\"name\":\"George Prayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"George Prayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump's Judges? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump's Judges? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: How many years is it gonna take for our side to learn this is not how we win, survive, thrive? And it's certainly not how we make them lose.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/APP-030118-Rush-Court-Gavel.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"George Prayias","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/APP-030118-Rush-Court-Gavel.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/APP-030118-Rush-Court-Gavel.jpg","width":640,"height":360},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/","name":"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump's Judges? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-01-30T21:07:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-31T21:13:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/01\/30\/why-are-feinstein-and-harris-picking-trumps-judges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Are Feinstein and Harris Picking Trump\u2019s Judges?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349","name":"George Prayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"George Prayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298087"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298087"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298087\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":298203,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298087\/revisions\/298203"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media\/266235"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}