{"id":289070,"date":"2018-10-18T15:31:00","date_gmt":"2018-10-18T19:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=289070"},"modified":"2018-10-19T16:57:59","modified_gmt":"2018-10-19T20:57:59","slug":"claire-mccaskill-steps-in-it-big-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2018\/10\/18\/claire-mccaskill-steps-in-it-big-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Claire McCaskill Steps In It Big Time"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Then you go to Missouri. Claire McCaskill. Claire McCaskill got caught. Our old buddy James O\u2019Keefe and the hidden cameras of Project Veritas. And they get into the McCaskill campaign. They get McCaskill campaign people admitting that Claire would take everybody\u2019s guns away yesterday if she could. She\u2019d take away their magazines. She\u2019d do everything she could but that they can\u2019t say so because they wouldn\u2019t get elected if they did. And then O\u2019Keefe\u2019s cameras capture McCaskill saying pretty much the same thing<\/a>.<\/p>\n

(paraphrasing) “Yeah, I can\u2019t say that. I wouldn\u2019t win reelection if I told the truth about…\u201d These are not her words; I\u2019m paraphrasing. But she admits that she doesn\u2019t tell the truth about her intents on the Second Amendment and on guns because she wouldn\u2019t get elected. She was also overheard saying on secret hidden video that she would gladly, gladly give up some votes from the Bootheel of Missouri in exchange for winning big in St. Louis.<\/p>\n

Well, she\u2019s so mad about this. Now, by the way, those videos, the O\u2019Keefe videos, the Drive-By Media in St. Louis was ignoring them. St. Louis television stations were not showing the video. So nobody knew about it! Other than those of us here in real American Media. But ABC, CBS, NBC, for example, nationwide, and none of the St. Louis TV stations were showing or even talking about the video. So what did Claire do? She called everybody\u2019s attention to it!<\/p>\n

She should have just shut up she should have said nothing, but you know what she did? She went out and she accused her opponent of being involved in this trick, Josh Hawley, the Republican candidate. And then she demanded some kind of investigation, special counsel or something to find out how this guy was engaging in illegal political tactics and… When he had nothing to do with it. Josh Hawley had nothing to do with what O\u2019Keefe and Project Veritas were doing.<\/p>\n

But McCaskill has come along and has demanded that there be an investigation or… that something happen to Hawley because of this. This has forced media outlets in St. Louis to play the video so they understand what it is she\u2019s talking about! So she\u2019s succeeded in getting the video played on St. Louis TV. You remember it was Claire McCaskill… Could this be six years…? It might\u2019ve been 12 years ago. Remember one of the previous Claire McCaskill campaigns, the big issue in that campaign was stem cell research.<\/p>\n