![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/650-071317-Senator-Grassley-e1537988073270.jpg\")
<\/p>\nRUSH: Okay, folks, I think it\u2019s gonna be very easily established at some point that this new babe, Julie Swetnick, has ties to Democrat social justice warriorism or Democrat activism or somewhere down the line. I don\u2019t think they want any of this corroborated. Grab audio sound bite No. 27. Senator Grassley, the chairman of the committee, spoke to reporters outside the committee room today or outside his office, and a female reporter said, “Can you respond to these latest allegations that are popping up? We know that your committee\u2019s been contacted by Julie Swetnick.”<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
GRASSLEY: Obviously, with this one, we have a contact, and our lawyers are on it right now — our staff investigators — and I won\u2019t have anything because I can\u2019t say anything until they get done.<\/p>\n
RUSH: They\u2019re turning this thing into an absolute abomination of an embarrassment! Anybody who comes forward with something that there\u2019s no evidence of, no corroboration of, no nothing at the last minute and they\u2019re gonna be off and investigating it. Are they gonna be able to finish their investigation in time for the hearing tomorrow? They don\u2019t want any corroboration for this story because there won\u2019t be any. The affidavit presented by Avenatti — and Avenatti is saying (summarized), “I\u2019m not speaking beyond the affidavit. You can ask me whatever you want but I\u2019m not answering.<\/p>\n
“It\u2019s all there. It\u2019s all in the affidavit. I\u2019m not answering any questions about it.” Well, guess what\u2019s not in the affidavit? No names! No names of anybody else at these parties. No names of victims. We don\u2019t have the name of one victim who was, quote-unquote, “gang raped.” We don\u2019t have the names of the gang rapists, and it\u2019s important to point out that Kavanaugh is not being alleged to be a gang rapist. He is said to have been nearby, in the vicinity, and may have participated in the drugging of the women. But they don\u2019t want any of this corroborated.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s what this means. With nothing specific, with no names, with no specific dates! There were supposedly 10 of these, 10 of these parties in one year? This accuser, the latest one, Julie Swetnick, says that gang rape was “commonplace at parties.” Really? Why would she go back? Why did nobody call the cops? If the guys doin\u2019 the gang rape are waiting politely in line for their turn, were they passing out numbers? I mean, none of this makes any sense. It doesn\u2019t pass any kind of test — and this affidavit as well.<\/p>\n
It had to be happening at parents\u2019 houses. Either the parents were there and were in on it or were not there or nobody told them about it or they did tell them and they didn\u2019t care. Those are all valid questions too. Ten of them! “The latest accuser says that these gang rape parties were commonplace and that Kavanaugh and his friends with regularly drug women and violently assault them.” But she doesn\u2019t specifically say Kavanaugh did that. Just that he was there. She alone went to 10 of these parties in one year.<\/p>\n
Why would you keep going to these things, particularly if you\u2019re not one of the drugged and liquored-up women? If you\u2019re there and you know what\u2019s happening upstairs — if you know that a bunch of women have been drugged and prepared for gang rape upstairs, and you\u2019re downstairs — you just go to the party and you party and you hang out and you don\u2019t care any of this is going on upstairs or downstairs, wherever it was. But the fact that there are no names, the fact that there are no specifics tells me they don\u2019t want this corroborated.<\/p>\n
They don\u2019t want investigators to be able to find anything. They want to leave it at the seriousness of the charge, and they want to avoid the nature of the evidence. This is the same strategy (with slight alterations) that they used in suckering in poor old George Papadopoulos. They would tell Papadopoulos — FBI spies would tell Papadopoulos — that the Russians had Hillary Clinton emails. Well, Papadopoulos is a young guy on the periphery of the Trump campaigns, thinks he\u2019s an insider now. Man, they like him! They trust him. They\u2019re telling him this inside dope.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/DemocratSHORT-1.jpg\")
So he starts telling other people, \u2019cause he wants to be seen as an insider! So he starts tellin\u2019 people. So he goes to a bar with the ambassador from Australia. “Hey, you know, the Russians? We find… I\u2019m in the Trump campaign. We know the Russians have a bunch of Hillary\u2019s emails.” Well, he only knows that \u2019cause the FBI told him. The Australian ambassador calls the FBI.<\/p>\n
(laughing) “Hey, I got a guy here! He\u2019s in the Trump campaign, and he says he knows that the Russians have Hillary\u2019s emails.” The FBI says, “What? Well, we better go get a FISA warrant.” They plant it! They make sure it circulates! It comes back to them. Then they go to the judge and then the media gets wind of it and starts running it, and they get a warrant spy. That\u2019s what this is. Somebody 12 years, 35 years after the fact says, “Yeah, you know what happened?” “Yeah, I know! I\u2019ll sign a corroborating statement that she told me that it happened.”<\/p>\n
So you get a bunch of people saying, “Yeah, I heard about it.”<\/p>\n
“Were you there?”<\/p>\n
“No, no. I wasn\u2019t there.”<\/p>\n
“Do you know where it happened?”<\/p>\n
“No, I\u2019m just telling you she told me. She told me and I can corroborate that she told me.”<\/p>\n
“Oh, you can\u2019t corroborate what she told you. I mean, you don\u2019t know that it actually happened. You\u2019re just corroborating that she told you that it did.”<\/p>\n
“Yeah, yeah. I can corroborate that.”<\/p>\n
So, folks, Snerdley can in here to me today and say that he overheard while he was in Washington two weeks ago Barack Obama admit that he ordered the FBI to spy on Trump. And when he told me that, I could corroborate it. I could corroborate it. I could come to you and say, “Snerdley told me that Obama ordered the FBI to spy on Trump. I\u2019m a corroborating witness, not to the fact that Obama did that but to the fact that Snerdley told me.” This is the scam that they\u2019re running, among many other things.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/APP-091318-Dem-Playbook.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s another thing. It\u2019s starting… The trickle is starting from conservative media. “Kavanaugh has got it pull out. Kavanaugh has got to withdraw. He cannot continue with this deluge. He just cannot continue. He cannot, because he will not be able to ever get out from underneath this cloud no matter what. We do not,” say our conservative brethren in the Never Trump community. “We do not want a great justice on the court forever clouded by these allegations where we\u2019re gonna be always questioning every decision that he writes,” and that\u2019s why we lose.<\/p>\n
We got people that want to cave, and that\u2019s not how you deal with this stuff. Decent people are forever going to be treated indecently if they stand aside and allow it. I don\u2019t know where Kavanaugh\u2019s head is. My guess is that Kavanaugh no more wants to walk away from this than Clarence Thomas wanted to walk away from Anita Hill. Kavanaugh has put everything he\u2019s got into this, his latest statement. Oh, this is another thing. There are people running around, I saw it on TV earlier today, “You know, I don\u2019t know about Kavanaugh. He\u2019s starting to equivocate.”<\/p>\n
Well, that perked my ears up. When did Kavanaugh “equivocate”? This person on TV said, “Yeah, he said, ‘Well, you know, I\u2019m not perfect.'” He didn\u2019t say that today! I was looking for that.” He said that on Fox News earlier this week in the midst of an interview! It wasn\u2019t about this! It wasn\u2019t in response to this specific allegation. Yet there are people running around today saying, “Ah, this is not a very strong response to say, ‘I\u2019m not perfect.\u2019 That\u2019s not how you…” He didn\u2019t say it! He called it the Twilight Zone.<\/p>\n
He said he doesn\u2019t know this woman. This is absurd. It\u2019s ridiculous. None of this ever happened. They can\u2019t prove it. All they can do is find Democrat activists to conjure up stories and go to willing accomplices in the… Oh! Another thing. Remember the call we had yesterday from somebody who went to Yale with Kavanaugh<\/a>. She was calling from Wyoming. She was in a residential college with Kavanaugh. She told us on this program yesterday that reporters from the Huffing and Puffington Post and other Drive-By outlets were hounding her throughout the summer for data, for information, tell-all on Kavanaugh.<\/p>\n From the summer!<\/p>\n From THE SUMMER!<\/p>\n The media has been chasing down, tracking down anybody and everybody that might have gone to school with Kavanaugh! They\u2019re calling them up and they\u2019re interviewing them, in some cases browbeating them, and this caller yesterday said (summarized), “They\u2019re clearly looking for certain angles, and I didn\u2019t provide it to them, and they got irritated and pending ending the conversation.” Do you remember the caller\u2019s first name? Doesn\u2019t matter. But I asked her to hold over through the break, and we talked to her.<\/p>\n There\u2019s a story here today that this has been going on throughout the media throughout the summer. This is so obviously gotcha. This is a coordinated plan. It\u2019s been planted and coordinated for months, and now we are in the execution phase of it, and it\u2019s being made to look like all of these women coming forward are random. But Avenatti produced this woman today because Blasey Ford is bombing out and Ramirez isn\u2019t gonna go anywhere because Ramirez doesn\u2019t even want to testify. That\u2019s the second woman.<\/p>\n She doesn\u2019t even want to testify before the committee. Blasey Ford I don\u2019t think ever was, and I still don\u2019t. They wanted to force Kavanaugh out simply with the allegations. They wanted Kavanaugh to conclude it be impossible to go on. They wanted Trump to conclude it\u2019d be impossible to go on. That\u2019s what they were trying to do. Kavanaugh refused to go away. So here comes Julie Swetnick after Avenatti telegraphs that it\u2019s coming earlier this week, a couple days ago, Monday.<\/p>\n We\u2019re being led to believe is that Swetnick is so frustrated! (sobbing) “She didn\u2019t want to come forward, but… but… but the fact that Blasey Ford is being mistreated and Ramirez is being mistreated and women are being mistreated and women are not being believed and I\u2019ve got no choice to come forward and talk about the rape-train stories!” This has the potential of backfire — and I said that earlier this week — at the Democrat Party like you cannot believe. Okay. Let me take a brief time-out. I promise when we come back… I know you\u2019re itching out there. I know you\u2019re dying to get on the air.<\/p>\n I know you want to tell everybody what you think about this so we will start… Oh. One more thing before the break. See… (Snort!) I go through the Stack, I\u2019m ready to go to a break, and I turn what I just used and put it at the bottom of the Stack and I see what\u2019s next up and say, “Oh, yeah! I remember that.” Headline: “Surprise: Democratic Operative Admits Derailing Kavanaugh is Really About ‘Saving\u2019 the Supreme Court from Trump.” Guy Benson as Townhall has the story<\/a>.<\/p>\n It\u2019s about Brian Fallon, former top spokesman for Hillary. This is not news. Anybody that\u2019s paying attention to this for years knows that this is a scam that the Democrats are running, and it\u2019s one that they have run many times before. Nothing new in this, other than the depth to which they are sinking. But it\u2019s a strategy, and Brian Fallon has admitted it in an interview with the New York Times. He “unambiguously admits what the Brett Kavanaugh destruction project is [is] part of a high-stakes, two-step strategy to thwart Trump — via a former aide to Mitch McConnell.” A former aide to McConnell is confirming this.<\/p>\n That\u2019s all this is.<\/p>\n Stop Trump.<\/p>\n Stop Trump.<\/p>\n Stop Kavanaugh.<\/p>\n Stop conservatives.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: Here\u2019s another thing. Remember we had the call by Jenny from Wyoming yesterday? She told us that she was getting called from media people throughout the summer because it had been learned that she attended a residential college at Yale at the same time Kavanaugh was there. She was at the same residential college. So she and other people had been tracked down by the media, and all summer long the Drive-Bys were calling anybody and everybody that they thought might have known Kavanaugh to try to dig up some dirt on the guy.<\/p>\n ‘Cause the Drive-Bys have been working with the Democrats to destroy every Republican nominee in your lifetime and mine. How come it is…? With the Drive-Bys scouring the earth, scorched-earth policy just in the past three or four months talking to all of these people that went to school with Kavanaugh, why did this never come up? If there\u2019s anything to this one, why wasn\u2019t this first? Why was Christine Blasey Ford first? Because all of these three are part of a structured Democrat plan.<\/p>\n We have that from none other than Brian Fallon, “former top spokesman for Hillary Clinton\u2019s failed presidential campaign, a confidante to Sen. Chuck Schumer, and an-ex senior official in Eric Holder\u2019s Justice Department. He\u2019s also now the public face of a left-wing group devoted to defeating President Trump\u2019s judicial nominees, with the most urgent priority being doing whatever is necessary to prevent Republicans from filling the current Supreme Court vacancy.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/APP-092518-Kavanaugh-003b.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-26-at-2.55.40-PM-e1537988222154.png\")
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/HAtedemocrats-hate-us.jpg\")
Here\u2019s a pull quote from the story: “It is downright frightening that multiple United States senators, who\u2019ve supposedly been specifically chosen to sit on this influential committee due to their legal acumen, are saying that a man accused of sexual misconduct more than [35 years] ago … is responsible for disproving” it! How can this happen? “It is downright frightening that multiple United States senators,” not just Democrats, Republicans too, who are on this “committee due to their legal acumen,” can sit there and claim that an out-of-the-blue allegation 35 years later has to be disproven by the accused!<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/RushLiberalismLIES.jpg\")
“So with a number of Republican and Democratic Senators still undecided on the nomination, and with highly-anticipated testimony slated for tomorrow, Mitch McConnell should make sure that every one of his members read the” New York Times piece where Brian Fallon of the Clinton campaign admits that this is a structured, strategic campaign to keep every Trump nominee off the Supreme Court. Every damn one of these Republicans ought to read it. They ought to not have to read this to know that!<\/p>\n