![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/APP-092018-Christine-Blasey-Ford.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
(interruption) That\u2019s what it was, folks. I mean, Snerdley is bowing his head in there, can\u2019t believe it. Well, I mean, that was the big deal. Remember, the media was going to video stores like Blockbusters trying to figure out secret porn movies that Thomas may have rented. I kid you not. And what was it? There was Long Dong Silver, that\u2019s what it was! Somebody claimed that Justice Thomas had rented Long Dong Silver. (interruption) This is what a Supreme Court confirmation hearing was reduced to.<\/p>\n
Anyway, Byron York reminds us that Hill testified in October 1991 that Thomas harassed her in 1991 and \u201982<\/a>. That\u2019s like ten years before, far more recent than Christine Blasey Ford\u2019s 36-year-old charge against Kavanaugh. Also, Hill and Thomas were both adults when the alleged pubic hair was left on the alleged Coke can in the workplace. They were both adults whereas we\u2019re talking about teenagers in high school here with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford. Now, the Democrats are livid. Grassley…<\/p>\n We were one of the first to point this out yesterday. Grassley even tried to get hold of the accuser and her lawyers, and they\u2019re not responding to him. She, of course, isn\u2019t, but her lawyers are not responding to Grassley. Grassley said (paraphrased), “I\u2019ve tried smoke signals and I\u2019ve tried SOS. I\u2019ve tried Morse code. I\u2019ve tried email. I\u2019ve tried text. I\u2019ve tried SMS. I\u2019ve tried EMS. I\u2019ve tried everything I know to do out there and I can\u2019t get a call-back from them.” So Mazie Hirono from Hawaii — who obviously is seeing this as a moment to raise her national stardom — is starting to utter profanity we\u2019re not used to hearing from senators.<\/p>\n She\u2019s saying (paraphrased), “You go to hell! You go to hell! That is BS,” except she\u2019s not using the initials. And she says, “Grassley, who are you to reach out and contact with woman without any of us know? You can\u2019t do that!” Why, is that bullying, too, the chairman of the committee trying to get hold of the lawyers? Anyway, what Grassley\u2019s offered… This is unprecedented. We were among the first to pass this on to you yesterday that Grassley even offered to take the Senate Judiciary Committee staff to California wherever Christine Blasey Ford is holed up.<\/p>\n And they\u2019re rejecting that. And of course I predicted they would reject it. You know why they reject it? Because they will say she\u2019s in hiding. She\u2019s afraid for her life because wacko Trump supporters are all over her. So this is just Grassley trying to find out where she lives so he can leak it to people and further endanger her. We can\u2019t let Grassley and his staff know where we are. (This is the tone that they are taking.) But it raises some questions. Why does an accuser claiming firsthand knowledge need more time to testify about her story?<\/p>\n What kind of preparation is necessary here? We\u2019re talking about an event that took place in less than seven minutes if it happened. Seven minutes. Maybe not even that long. So what the hell else is there to remember? What really is there to prep for? Is the preparation designed to sound credible when you don\u2019t know what you\u2019re talking about? Is the preparation designed to cover up for periods of time you don\u2019t recall? What could possibly be necessary here? She took a lie detector test. She wrote it all down. She was there.<\/p>\n And her lawyers say she passed the lie detector test that they gave her. The Republicans desperately want to hear from her, and I don\u2019t think this is an act. You have the president saying (summarized), “It\u2019d be wonderful if she showed up. We want to hear what she has to say.” The president said yesterday, “Look, if she shows up and credible, we\u2019re gonna have to rethink this whole thing.” I mean, they\u2019re practically rolling out the red carpet for her. (interruption) What are you frowning at? (interruption) You think it\u2019s a sham? (interruption) You think it\u2019s a track? (interruption) What are you laughing at in there?<\/p>\n They want to talk to her. They want her to show up. They want to hear her story. (interruption) Well, Snerdley says, “So you say the only reason they\u2019re acting eager to hear from her is because they know she\u2019s not coming.” Okay, let me tell you. They know she doesn\u2019t have what? The story? She doesn\u2019t have the details? She doesn\u2019t have the goods? Is that what you\u2019re gonna say, “She doesn\u2019t have what she claims to have”? She\u2019s not gonna show up? That\u2019s what you think? (interruption) Okay. If she doesn\u2019t show up, I\u2019m gonna tell you what\u2019s gonna happen.<\/p>\n I\u2019m telling you right now it\u2019s already in the works with, and I know it\u2019s in the works because I heard a Drive-By Media person talking about it. The Drive-By Media person was Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post who says she wouldn\u2019t be surprised if more women surface over the weekend alleging similar acts by Kavanaugh. She\u2019s just telegraphed that they\u2019re out there trying to find women that they can convince to come forward and say what they want them to say. You know they\u2019re working on that.<\/p>\n You know that the Democrat Party, you know that the media — they\u2019re working in tandem — are scouring women who went to the same school or went to school where Kavanaugh was seen, you know, lurking around and so forth. And they\u2019re gonna try to find as many women — not too many, find one or two women — to come forward and say, “Yeah, I didn\u2019t want to come forward but I watching what\u2019s happening to Christine Blasey Ford, and I can\u2019t stand it.”<\/p>\n So don\u2019t be surprised. That would be the cover if she doesn\u2019t show. (interruption) You\u2019re sitting there thinking that the Republicans and you know she\u2019s not gonna show. Well, that means the Democrats know she\u2019s not gonna show. The Democrats are not gonna let the fact that she doesn\u2019t show kill their effort to wipe out Kavanaugh. So in replacement for her not showing, don\u2019t be surprised, don\u2019t be surprised if later today or tomorrow — sometime before this 10 o\u2019clock tomorrow morning headline — that another woman surfaces.<\/p>\n But I want to remind you one thing. We had audio yesterday from a friend of Christine Blasey Ford. Her name was Guerry, G-u-e-r-r-y. I forget her first name. Doesn\u2019t matter. We played the sound bites, and she was talking about how when they were in school that this kind of thing happened a lot. But not with Kavanaugh! She did not have any firsthand knowledge of anything Kavanaugh did, but she did say that all the boys — a lot of the boys — this is how they behaved. A lot of the boys did.<\/p>\n “You mean Brett Kavanuagh?”<\/p>\n “No, no, no! I — I –”<\/p>\n “She made it so clear she never saw Brett Kavanaugh. She never heard his name in any of this. Well, to me that\u2019s all anybody needs to know if we\u2019ve got a friend of Christine Blasey Ford coming out there trying to establish that Christine Blasey Ford is not making it up. But this woman, this friend of hers went out of her way… Cookie, grab that bite again from yesterday. I mean, no mad dash hurry. Just whenever you get it. She made a point twice in the audio sound bite we played to make sure no, she\u2019s not talking about Brett Kavanaugh here.<\/p>\n There\u2019s also a little bit of news here. There\u2019s a website. There\u2019s a guy that runs a website. I don\u2019t have it right in front of me. I can\u2019t remember the name of the site. I\u2019ll find it here in a second. I\u2019ve not heard of the website before. But I\u2019m gonna go ahead and tell you, the guy running the website claims that he knew that they… He went and looked at the yearbook, the high school yearbook from the year in question here at the yearbook where Christine Blasey Ford went to school.<\/p>\n There are stories, “What we did when the parents were gone,” complete with pictures, making it look like the girls in this school knew how to party with a keg just like guys did. And it establishes that, you know, many of the entrees or entries in this particular yearbook make it clear that people didn\u2019t remember the next day what had happened the night before in perfect detail and so forth. So he writes that when he saw it, he predicted that they would scrub this. They\u2019d have to get rid of it. They\u2019d have to wipe it off of the Web.<\/p>\n And it is. It\u2019s gone. So we have that little bit of detail. But back to this whole thing. Republicans want to hear from her, despite the smirks from Mr. Snerdley. The Republicans want to hear from her. They\u2019re making it clear. The media believes her. I\u2019m asking here why doesn\u2019t she show up? Here. Grab sound bite No. 22. Cookie came through. This was yesterday afternoon on Wolf Blitzed on CNN. Jim Acosta was Acosta-ing Christine Blasey Ford\u2019s friend and ex-classmate, Samantha Guerry<\/a>. And Acosta said, “What Dr. Ford is alleging, is this the first time you heard anything like that about Judge Kavanaugh?”<\/p>\n GUERRY: It\u2019s not the first time I\u2019ve heard anything like that in terms of the community of women I know, and not regarding him but \u2014<\/p>\n ACOSTA: Those sorts of things went on?<\/p>\n GUERRY: A lot\u2026 You know, one of the things that\u2019s surprising to me as I\u2019ve gotten involved in this in the last couple days is how many women of my class have come forward to me in this last few days and said, \u201cI had similar experiences in high school,\u201d and this hits me very deeply and it\u2019s very \u2014<\/p>\n ACOSTA: Not with Brett Kavanaugh, but with other boys?<\/p>\n GUERRY: Not with Brett Kavanaugh! But with other boys in our community, and we all feel that if we were in her shoes, we\u2019d want (chuckles) to be taken seriously as well.<\/p>\n RUSH: Okay. Fair enough. But, look, there\u2019s some questions here. This woman is 50-some-odd years old now — same age as Christine Blasey Ford — and she says, “You know, one of the things that\u2019s surprising to me as I\u2019ve gotten involved in this in the last couple days is how many women of my class have come forward to me in this last few days and said, ‘I had similar experiences in high school\u2019…” Well, if you went to high school with \u2019em, why wouldn\u2019t you know it when they happened? So much of this doesn\u2019t pass the consistency test.<\/p>\n But the primary thing here is, “It\u2019s not the first time I\u2019ve heard anything like that in terms of the community of women that I know, not regarding him.” Meaning: I don\u2019t know anything about Kavanaugh. And then Acosta, after she describes how women of her class have come forward the last few days and told her they had similar experiences in high school and it now hits her very deeply \u2019cause because I know all this was going on while she was in high school. But now she\u2019s hearing about it from all of her friends who say, “Oh, yeah, it was going on in high school.”<\/p>\n But not with Brett Kavanaugh! She makes it clear twice here that in all of this debauchery that was supposedly going on at this private school, she never heard the name Brett Kavanaugh mentioned. Yet she\u2019s coming forward here in support of Christine Blasey Ford. Now, does that… To me, this is the kind of thing that gets passed over. The Drive-By Media conducts the interview, they hear the answer, doesn\u2019t even register. To me, this is close to bombshell.<\/p>\n You got a good buddy exonerating Kavanaugh from the type of behavior she says she\u2019s now learned was commonplace. Not Kavanaugh though. Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no! Not Brett Kavanaugh. So why does she need more time to testify when she\u2019s got firsthand knowledge? Why does she need more time when she took a lie detector test? She wrote it all down. She answered the questions. The Republicans desperately the want to hear from her. The president said it\u2019d be a wonderful thing. The media believes her.<\/p>\n The media wants to believe this woman so bad that they already do. So why is Kavanaugh — who is portrayed as a creepy liar by the media. Why is he ready, willing, and able to testify and Ford isn\u2019t? Could somebody explain that to me? He said he\u2019ll show up anytime, anywhere. She will not! I think Senator Grassley\u2019s handled this well. For people following the story, it\u2019s clear what\u2019s going on. Knee-jerk identity politics haters and abortion zealots. Nothing matters to them anyway other than that.<\/p>\n Republicans are evil because they\u2019ve got minds of their own. It doesn\u2019t matter how accomplished and achieved and impeccable their reputations are like Kavanaugh. It desn\u2019t matter how much charity work they do. It doesn\u2019t matter how many people vouch for them. It doesn\u2019t matter how many people love and adore them. It doesn\u2019t matter how stellar their lives and career and work has been. It doesn\u2019t matter if they\u2019ve led normal, productive lives. Nothing matters except removing them as obstacles.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n I mean, she started this process, did she not? In fact, if we\u2019re to believe something, the Democrats and the media are really to blame for her trauma here. She wrote the letter to Feinstein, but she asked that it not be made public and that her name not be mentioned. And somebody — either on Feinstein\u2019s staff or some colleague — on the Democrat side leaked all of this against Christine Blasey Ford\u2019s wishes. Meanwhile, the Republicans are catching all the heat here, but it\u2019s the Democrats and the media who want this woman to put her psyche at risk in order to nail this nominee.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: Senator Grassley is trying to convince Kavanaugh accuser to testify on Monday. He said, “What I\u2019m focused right now is do everything we can to make Dr. Ford comfortable with coming before a committee either in an open session or closed session, public or private interview.” He even offered to go to California. No matter what Grassley has offered, the answer has been, “Nyet, nyet, nyet.”<\/p>\n “‘I would like for us to come together and figure out what\u2019s the best way to proceed,\u2019 Hirono says in the video. ‘Not this seat-of-the-pants stuff,\u2019 she added.” She doesn\u2019t like this. “A communications aide for Grassley\u2019s office responded, however, calling Hirono\u2019s claim ‘nonsense\u2019 and stating that the committee had made multiple attempts to contact Ford directly. ‘This is such nonsense. The committee has sent nine emails and left two voicemails,\u2019 communications adviser Garrett Ventry wrote on Twitter.”<\/p>\n Now, Mazie Hirono\u2019s out there saying Kavanaugh\u2019s fudging the truth. She doesn\u2019t know what the truth is here. You know, we\u2019re back to this. We\u2019re back to a woman says it, you gotta believe it, except that\u2019s only in force when the Democrats are not in power or when the women doing the accusing are accusing Republicans. But when the women were accusing Bill Clinton, they were targeted and destroyed. The double standards are rife.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: This Jerry in upstate New York. Welcome, sir. Great to have you here.<\/p>\n CALLER: Hi, Rush. Been a listen since around 2012. I\u2019m what you can call a surprise a Millennial by age. Had a quick theory for you on the Blasey Ford-Kavanaugh situation.<\/p>\n RUSH: Okay.<\/p>\n CALLER: So I\u2019m thinking that obviously Democratic Party\u2019s pushing for this FBI investigation before she testifies so that they can be sure that whatever she has to say during the testimony, that it aligns with what the FBI is, you know, so-called gonna uncover.<\/p>\n RUSH: Oh. You\u2019re saying they want the FBI to go first so that she can coordinate with what she tells the FBI and be consistent with it?<\/p>\n CALLER: Correct. Yeah. I haven\u2019t heard anybody mention anything, you know, regarding that. But that\u2019s just a theory I was thinking about.<\/p>\n RUSH: You mean that they\u2019re trying to make sure she doesn\u2019t get convicted of lying to the FBI and going to jail like Martha Stewart or Michael Flynn? I don\u2019t think… (laughing) I marvel at the… It\u2019s very fascinating the way people think. That\u2019s an interesting point that you\u2019re making. The whole idea of the FBI investigating a high school event from 36 years ago. It\u2019s not exactly what they do. But the left is saying, “Trump could make \u2019em! Trump… Trump could tell the FBI to do anything,” except Trump can\u2019t make them (chuckles) declassify documents.<\/p>\n Trump is now declassifying some of this stuff and the Democrats are running around saying, “He can\u2019t do that! That… That… He can\u2019t do that! That\u2019s a violation their security.” On the other hand, “Trump, you make the FBI investigate this.” They\u2019re so all over the ballpark and all over the place. Jerry, I appreciate the call. Find audio sound bite No. 12. This is what I alluded to, if she doesn\u2019t testify, if she doesn\u2019t accept the invite by 10 a.m. tomorrow. Here\u2019s Karen Tumulty last night, Fox News Channel\u2019s Special Report, Shannon Bream. This is the All-Star Panel and Karen Tumulty talking about what could happen to change the Kavanaugh story between now and Monday.<\/p>\n TUMULTY: The thing I think we all need to remember is that we still have 4-1\/2 days until Monday. And we\u2019re… The way the news cycle works in these times, this — this whole thing is probably gonna take five or six twists and turns.<\/p>\n BREAM: Right.<\/p>\n TUMULTY: Now, maybe other people coming out of the woodwork either to verify what Judge Kavanaugh is saying or to back up when she is saying. By Monday, this could look like a very different situation.<\/p>\n RUSH: All righty now. How do you translate that, folks? I\u2019m gonna tell you what it means. Karen Tumulty is expecting that by time Monday comes around the media will have found additional women to come forward and say, “Oh, yeah! Kavanaugh did this to me. I know Kavanaugh did this to a bunch of women.” That\u2019s what she\u2019s telegraphing here.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: John in Cape Canaveral, Florida.\u00a0 I\u2019m glad you waited.\u00a0 I really am.\u00a0 And welcome to the program, sir.\u00a0 Hi.<\/p>\n CALLER:\u00a0 Thank you, Rush.\u00a0 Mega law enforcement dittos, longtime listener, first-time caller.<\/p>\n RUSH:\u00a0 Thank you.\u00a0 Love hearing from law enforcement.<\/p>\n CALLER:\u00a0 Well, I tell you, we used to have to have our own little transistor radios bungee corded to the dashboard because back in the late \u201980s there were no commercial radios in the patrol cars.<\/p>\n RUSH:\u00a0 Yeah, I remember that.\u00a0 I remember hearing about that.\u00a0 Airline pilots also had to listen to the program on the HF radio up in the cockpit.\u00a0 People going into… Yeah, had Rush rooms in the restaurants and everything so people wouldn\u2019t miss anything when they went in to eat.\u00a0 Transistors in the cop cars.\u00a0 I remember hearing about that.<\/p>\n CALLER:\u00a0 Yep, you had to actually strap \u2019em onto the dashboard because, you know, occasionally there were some interesting turns and the transistors would end up in all sorts of strange places.<\/p>\n RUSH: \u00a0(laughing) Well, you know, I used to do that when I was 12, 13, riding a bicycle. I had a little transistor radio that I taped to the handlebars and it\u2019s how I listened to radio driving around, riding around on my bicycle.\u00a0 I know exactly what you were doing.\u00a0 Absolutely.<\/p>\n CALLER: (garbled cell) Well, sir, anyhow, you know, this ongoing debate with this professor or doctor has been orchestrated, since it became public. The Democratic Party has really been doing this thing just real methodically.\u00a0 And I think (unintelligible) it\u2019s pretty common knowledge that it\u2019s gonna be a he said, she said.\u00a0 So what I think they\u2019re doing is they\u2019re setting us up on this (unintelligible) and all these commentators, and TV, and so forth that are saying that she\u2019s been bullied, she\u2019s been railroaded, (unintelligible) and all these white guys on the judiciary committee are against her.<\/p>\n RUSH:\u00a0 I like this.\u00a0 For those of you having trouble hearing, your cell connection is probably worse than that transistor radio you used to have in the car.\u00a0 But this is actually a brilliant observation.\u00a0 What John thinks is happening here is that we\u2019re all being set up, as we\u2019re talking about what a bunch of bullies the Republican senators are. With the deadlines, she\u2019s gotta say whether she\u2019s gonna show up on Monday by 10 a.m. tomorrow or else!<\/p>\n That what they\u2019re planning all along is for her to make a dramatic entrance on Monday, at the last moment, displaying bravery and courage that we haven\u2019t seen since Anita Hill, and that she will take her place and submit to an interview and questions.\u00a0 This is what he thinks is being assembled right now.\u00a0 I wouldn\u2019t be surprised by anything, but I… They\u2019re obviously planning something and still, folks, do not discount that they are looking for and have found other women to claim the same thing about Kavanaugh between now and Monday as well.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: I mentioned about a half hour ago that I was watching something. (laughing) I was just cracking up watching it on CNN as they were reporting — one of their infobabes, Kaitlan Collins, was reporting — how stunned Trump\u2019s own aides are at how gentle and nice he\u2019s being to the accuser! They can\u2019t believe it! Trump\u2019s own people, the people who know him best, cannot believe that he\u2019s a nice guy. I wanted you to actually hear it. This is Kaitlan Collins talking about Trump to Wolf Blitzer, who asked her, “What are you hearing about the White House strategy and how the president handled this problem and all the problems surrounding the Kavanaugh nomination?”<\/p>\n President Trump himself has been boasting this week to allies and outside advisers about the positive coverage he\u2019s getting in response to the measured response that he\u2019s had about these allegations. And aides say they think (gulp) that that has helped encourage him to continue responding in such a measured way. But also, they think that a lot of that restraint, Wolf, has to do with the fact that this allegation isn\u2019t made against the president. The president is gonna leave the White House here in a few hours. He\u2019s going to Las Vegas for a rally tonight. Of course, Wolf, know those rallies are where the president is often not very scripted and not usually on topic sometimes — and he\u2019s often in a room full of supporters who are chanting and cheering him on!<\/p>\n RUSH: So what the reporterette here is expecting is for Trump to become who he is again. Once he\u2019s in Vegas and with his supporters, he\u2019ll start ripping into his accuser, he\u2019ll start ripping into the Democrats, and he\u2019ll blow this new persona that he\u2019s established that nobody can believe. (interruption) Yeah. I… (interruption) (interruption) Yes. Snerdley asked me, “Do you believe there are Trump aides that talk to CNN?” Yes. I think Trump\u2019s got one of the leakiest West Wings we\u2019ve ever had.<\/p>\n I think there are a lot of people in there that are out for themselves to this day still. I don\u2019t have any doubt that they\u2019re leaking in there. I don\u2019t have any doubt that they would make something like this up. People that know Donald Trump know that… It\u2019s not news that he\u2019s a nice guy! Believe me. It\u2019s not news that he treats people with respect! He\u2019s got no animus about this woman. He\u2019s not.. This isn\u2019t anything about him and he\u2019s treating this in the exact way he should.<\/p>\n But the point of this is that even when he\u2019s behaving in ways that all of these establishment people think he should — with the proper decorum, a proper morality, he\u2019s being presidential — even then, it isn\u2019t real. Even then, he\u2019s faking it. It\u2019s so unreal that his staff doesn\u2019t even believe it, and then they throw bit in (impression), “Yeah, he\u2019s so excited with the coverage he\u2019s getting, he might continue being a nice guy.<\/p>\n “But that\u2019s until he gets to Vegas tonight, Wolf! As you well know, Wolf, the president goes off script — and he\u2019s in that room with those literally insane supporters of his — and that\u2019s when anything can happen, Wolf. And we will be there, Wolf, to chronicle every instance of Trump not being this fake nice guy that he\u2019s been acting the past three days.” That\u2019s what her report meant.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" RUSH: I think Senator Grassley's handled this well. For people following the story, it's clear what's going on.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":285193,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/650-071317-Senator-Grassley.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/APP-091918-Kavanaugh.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/yearbookSCOTUS.png\")
<\/a>What he saw, he writes, convinced him that they were gonna have to scrub that yearbook from the web<\/a>. They\u2019re gonna have to delete it. They\u2019re gonna have to erase it. So knowing that that would happen earlier this week, he made screenshots and copies and so forth and cached it. The yearbook for the year your question here at Christine Blasey Ford\u2019s school is all… (laughs) Well, not all about, but there are numerous references of the girls having keggers, keg party after keg party.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CNNFriend.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/APP-091918-Christine-Blasey-Ford.jpg\")
RUSH: Okay. So the reason that she needs more time is what? (interruption) This was so traumatic that she has been trying to forget it. She\u2019s been trying to…? (interruption) Right. She\u2019s been trying to forget it her whole life, and, now, because of these dastardly Republican senators she\u2019s being forced to try to remember it? That\u2019s what they\u2019re telling us is why she can\u2019t show up and testify immediately because she spent all this time trying to forget it? Now she\u2019s being forced to remember it? Okay. So what evil, dastardly Republican made her write her letter to Senator Feinstein?<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/APP-091918-mazi-hirono.jpg\")
<\/a>He was even willing to send committee staff to California to speak with the Kavanaugh accuser. Mazie Hirono, the Democrat senator from Hawaii<\/a>, says Grassley\u2019s office hasn\u2019t really tried to contact the illusive doctor, professor, Ph.D. He hasn\u2019t really tried! He hasn\u2019t really tried! He\u2019s just saying he\u2019s try. He doesn\u2019t really mean it, according to Mazie Hirono. In an interview with ABC News, “she called the assertions that Republicans had exhausted every method to contact Blasey BS,” except she didn\u2019t say “BS.” She said the word.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-20-at-12.56.45-PM.png\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-20-at-2.39.46-PM.png\")
COLLINS: Aides back here in the West Wing are quietly stunned by just how respectful President Trump has been when talking about this woman who has accused his Supreme Court nominee of sexually assaulting her when they were a teenager. (sic) Aides really thought on Sunday that when President Trump read that Washington Post interview where she first came forward detailing this allegation that he may have that sense of volcanic anger that we\u2019ve seen from the president before.<\/p>\n