{"id":283498,"date":"2018-08-29T16:30:00","date_gmt":"2018-08-29T20:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=283498"},"modified":"2018-08-30T16:50:31","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T20:50:31","slug":"cnn-still-wont-retract-bogus-story-based-on-lanny-davis-lie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2018\/08\/29\/cnn-still-wont-retract-bogus-story-based-on-lanny-davis-lie\/","title":{"rendered":"CNN Still Won\u2019t Retract Bernstein\u2019s Bogus Story"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: So yesterday when I spent a lot of time on CNN and the fact that they will not retract the story that their only source is now admitting he lied<\/a>, CNN will not retract it. Remember when I said, ladies and gentlemen, as the reason why this was happening, I said they are protecting the reputation and the legacy of Carl Bernstein. Woodward and Bernstein.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

You know, Woodward and Bernstein did their Watergate stuff back in the seventies, and Woodward and Bernstein — well, Bernstein primarily, has been all over the place doing his brand of journalism ever since and has not really stepped in it but now 74 years old, and this is a doozy. This is an embarrassment. And CNN, I have no doubt — now everybody\u2019s speculating that this is the reason CNN is hanging tough and refusing to retract is because they feel the need, and probably Bernstein\u2019s working on \u2019em, too, to protect his legacy.<\/p>\n

He\u2019s one of the three bylines on the story. The other one\u2019s Jim Sciutto, and I forget who else. What we\u2019re gonna do in mere moments, we\u2019re gonna go back and we\u2019re gonna relive the day CNN announced this story. That was back on July 27th. And it was Alisyn Camerota in the infobabe anchorette chair. And they thought they had the scoop of the season. They thought they finally had it, that Trump had lied and that he had colluded with Russia, because they had a source telling them — it was Cohen and Lanny Davis — that Cohen had seen it, that Cohen had seen Trump, Cohen knew that Trump had done it.<\/p>\n

And this lie lasted for a month. It was finally exposed when Lanny Davis realized that Cohen testified before Congress saying something entirely different. When Cohen testified before Congress, he said he knew nothing about Trump having prior knowledge of the Trump Tower meeting. And that\u2019s under oath. So Lanny\u2019s sitting there saying, “Wait a minute. My client has told me that he saw Trump,” and then Lanny, after Cohen told him that, sourced CNN.<\/p>\n

Have you ever thought of this? Why would CNN use Lanny Davis as an anonymous source? Everybody knows Lanny Davis, and at the time he\u2019s Cohen\u2019s lawyer. And he comes right off of the Clinton war room reservation from the seventies. So why would Lanny Davis be an anonymous source? Why would CNN not name him? Does Lanny Davis not have credibility, or did CNN not want to identify that one of their sources was a lawyer defending his client.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Anyway, they didn\u2019t identify the source. Lanny Davis then finally, after a month of fundraising, after a month of a GoFundMe campaign, there is a significant amount of time where Cohen had generated enough money to pay Lanny enough money for his tireless work, Lanny then starts calling everybody saying (imitating Lanny), “You know, I made a mistake. My client didn\u2019t know. My client doesn\u2019t know. My client cannot say for sure. He wasn\u2019t there. My client totally made it up. And, thus, I made a mistake.”<\/p>\n

Well, CNN will not retract any of this. And I speculated yesterday, just to be repetitive here to make the point home, because I don\u2019t think there\u2019s any doubt about it that at the top of the list of reasons — it\u2019s not the only reason — but one of the primary reasons CNN\u2019s hanging tough is what\u2019s gonna happen to \u2019em? Nothing\u2019s gonna happen to \u2019em. How can they lose my more respect than they\u2019ve already lost? How can their audience get any smaller, significantly?<\/p>\n

What really is anybody gonna do to \u2019em? Nobody\u2019s gonna do anything to \u2019em. If anything, other media might get mad at them for misleading the rest of the media, because, you know, the Washington Post had to withdraw. They had to change their story, New York Times. But CNN\u2019s still hanging. What\u2019s gonna happen to \u2019em? Nothing happens to any of these people on the side of this that are trying to nail Trump with bogus, trumped-up, never-happened evidence.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re CNN saying, “What\u2019s gonna happen?” They\u2019re not gonna lose any respect. Nobody\u2019s gonna give them any grief over it. May as well hang in, continue to try to mislead as many viewers as possible and protect the image and the legacy of Carl Bernstein.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Let\u2019s now go to the audio sound bites. This is the CNN Lanny Davis story. And let me just review for you essentially what happened here. Back on July 27th, CNN breathlessly ran breaking news claiming they had an anonymous source. We now know that source was Lanny Davis. They had an anonymous source saying that it was now fact that Michael Cohen knew in advance that Donald Trump knew in advance of the Trump Tower meeting involving Russians visiting and talking with his son.<\/p>\n

\"\"And CNN ran this story breathlessly as though they had finally discovered the Holy Grail. They had found the collusion that the media and journalists had been searching for for over two years. They did not identify their source as Lanny Davis, which I still say remains very curious. Why would Lanny Davis be their anonymous source? They got a source. Everybody knows who Lanny Davis is. Lanny Davis is a dyed-in-the-wool, loyal Democrat advocate. He was the and is the lawyer for Cohen. And CNN lived off of this story for a month. And they kept hammering it and hammering it.<\/p>\n

One of the names, one of the bylines on the story for their website was Carl Bernstein of Woodward Bernstein. And nobody corrected the story, even though Lanny Davis knew this was not true. And he knew it wasn\u2019t true because Michael Cohen had lied. Michael Cohen testified to a congressional committee or two that he had no knowledge of Trump and the Trump Tower meeting. He didn\u2019t have any idea if Trump knew or didn\u2019t know. He had no idea if Trump went. He didn\u2019t know a thing. And that was his testimony.<\/p>\n

But he had told Lanny Davis something else, supposedly, which Lanny then told CNN, which CNN then ran their breaking news story and couldn\u2019t stop having orgasms live on cable television. Then Lanny figured out somehow, some weeks later, that Cohen had lied to him, which meant that Lanny had lied to CNN and the Washington Post because when CNN ran the story, the Washington Post and CNN all independently confirmed it, they said.<\/p>\n

See, that\u2019s what journalism is all about. An outfit will run a story. The New York Times, Washington Post have not heard about it; so they get in gear and they try to confirm it with their own sources. And then they reported that they were able to confirm with their own source. Lanny Davis was the source for everybody. And then Lanny had to come clean at some point, which he did recently by saying that he\u2019d made a mistake.<\/p>\n

And there are actually two elements to this that Lanny had lied to CNN about. The Washington Post, the New York Times have run their so-called corrections. The Washington Post has run a story really ripping Lanny Davis and Cohen for doing great damage to the case against Trump. Because now there isn\u2019t a case against Trump! Everything about the story was made up! CNN will not pull it. CNN will not correct it. CNN will not withdraw it. CNN will not change a thing.<\/p>\n

And that is because I\u2019m convinced, as I said yesterday, they\u2019re dying to protect the reputation and legacy of Carl Bernstein and Jim Sciutto. There are three other people on this. So let\u2019s go back to July 27, 2018, CNN\u2019s New Day, cohosts Alisyn Camerota and John Berman are breathlessly introducing the breaking news.<\/p>\n

ANNOUNCER: CNN Breaking News.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

ALISYN CAMEROTA: We do begin with breaking news. For those of you who have not paid much attention to the Russia investigation, today would be a good day to start doing so.<\/p>\n

BERMAN: Indeed.<\/p>\n

CAMEROTA: Sources tell CNN that President Trump\u2019s longtime former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, has begun spilling the beans. One of the bombshells he reportedly wants the public to know is that then-candidate Donald Trump knew in advance and approved of that June 26, 2018, Trump Tower meeting in which Russians promised dirt on Hillary Clinton. And these sources say Cohen is prepared to make that claim to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.<\/p>\n

BERMAN: Now, if — if — this is true, it means the president lied about it publicly. It means that Donald Trump Jr. lied about it under oath. And it means the current president of the United States had knowledge of and approved of accepting Russian help during the campaign.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Folks, they can barely keep their pants on. You could just hear it in their voices. The only problem is that none of that was true. Let me unpack it just a little. I\u2019m not gonna go through it line by line.<\/p>\n

“Sources tell CNN that President Trump\u2019s longtime former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, has begun spilling the beans. One of the bombshells he reportedly wants the public to know is that then-candidate Donald Trump knew in advance and approved of that June 26, 2018, Trump Tower meeting in which Russians promised dirt on Hillary Clinton.”<\/p>\n

A, if Trump had known, there\u2019s no crime. There is no crime. This would be what people would call collusion, and it isn\u2019t a crime. Look, this is all moot because none of this happened, but I\u2019m just telling you in addition to how weak the CNN case is here, the Russians also did not promise dirt on Hillary. Well, there were a couple of people that set the meeting up that said they had some dirt, but what this meeting was really about was a bunch of Russian adoption activists trying to get something called a Magnitsky Act changed.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In other words, Trump Jr. was set up. The whole meeting was a setup. They had no Hillary dirt. There wasn\u2019t any Hillary dirt. And when Jared Kushner and Trump Jr. found out about it, the meeting ended. There wasn\u2019t any Hillary dirt. All there was was an effort to lobby people who were not even in power to change the Magnitsky Act.<\/p>\n

I believe that this whole meeting was part of the setup run by the FBI and the deep state and all these other people. I think, just as they did not warn Trump when they supposedly found spies in his campaign, well, we know they planted the spies, Stefan Halper and a couple others. This, I think, was a setup. They wanted this to happen so that they could then leak that it had happened to the media.<\/p>\n

Now, Alisyn Camerota says here that Michael Cohen has begun spilling the beans, he wants the public to know. Well, then why isn\u2019t he the source? And then the second thing, Cohen couldn\u2019t wait to tell Mueller. Cohen wants to talk to Mueller. Cohen can\u2019t wait to tell Mueller this. Well, that wasn\u2019t true, either. In other words, folks, not a word of this, not a single word of this breaking news story is or was true.<\/p>\n

In the next bite, they bring in Jim Sciutto, whose name was also on the story as a byline. And he, too, has now spread elements of this story on his own outside of this report that we have the sound bite for, he did so multiple times later. And everything that CNN said about this has been debunked. But here is the next bite with Sciutto.<\/p>\n

BERMAN: Let\u2019s go first to CNN\u2019s Jim Sciutto, part of the team that broke this exclusive story. Jim is live in Washington. Jim, lay it out for us.<\/p>\n

SCIUTTO: Good morning, John. As sources tell myself and Carl Bernstein, that President Trump\u2019s long-time lawyer, Michael Cohen, is willing to tell the special counsel, Robert Mueller, that then-candidate Trump knew in advance about his campaign\u2019s June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russians who were promising dirt on Hillary Clinton and that the president approved of that meeting.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Do not doubt me. None of that\u2019s true. It did not happen, and the Washington Post and New York Times have now written stories saying so. They have retracted it. Well, I don\u2019t think there\u2019s been official retractions. They\u2019ve done corrections. They\u2019ve done their mea culpa, and now they\u2019re dumping all over Cohen.<\/p>\n

And remember, Lanny Davis let this live! Lanny Davis let this live for three weeks! Until he decided to tell media that he\u2019d made a mistake and that Cohen had not said that and Cohen had not seen this and that Trump didn\u2019t know of the meeting, that Lanny can\u2019t prove anything. (paraphrasing) “I can\u2019t tell you the president knew of the meeting. I can\u2019t tell you that he approved the meeting because my source — I got it wrong. I made a mistake.”<\/p>\n

Well, what happened was Cohen, when he testified before a congressional committee, did not say what CNN reports him saying, when he\u2019s under oath. So he either lied to Lanny Davis or they both concocted some scheme story to end up raising money for Cohen. Remember, Lanny Davis goes out there and begs people to send money to Cohen\u2019s GoFundMe page so that Cohen can continue to tell the truth.<\/p>\n

As I keep asking, what does it cost anybody to tell truth? I guarantee you, if Michael Cohen wants to go on TV today, there will be 15,000 cameras waiting for him. It won\u2019t cost him a dime. Lanny Davis needs to get paid. He\u2019s a lawyer. He\u2019s working for — which is another thing — what is a Clinton lawyer doing defending this guy? I mean, none of this passes the muster test.<\/p>\n

One more bite. Glenn Greenwald, Glenn Greenwald cofounded a website called The Intercept<\/a>. He lives in Rio because he\u2019s become persona non grata on the American left, but he is an official card-carrying leftist progressive. He championed Edward Snowden. Snowden granted him all kinds of access after Snowden got caught, or discovered to be leaking all kinds of NSA secrets.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Greenwald used to have a regular guest appearance window on MSNBC, but they have banned him now because he publicly writes and states that he doesn\u2019t think there\u2019s anything at all to this the Russian story. He doesn\u2019t think that there\u2019s any Russian collusion with Trump. He thinks it\u2019s all been a big waste of time, and so he\u2019s persona non grata. Here is Greenwald last night with Tucker Carlson to Fox News. Tucker asked him, “What do you make of this? What do you make of CNN not retracting it, not correcting it?”<\/p>\n

GREENWALD: I\u2019ve been on your show to talk about a lot of these humiliating moments, and this might be one of the worst ones yet. After Lanny Davis went on CNN with Anderson Cooper and, to Anderson Cooper\u2019s shock, admitted that everything CNN had been breathlessly hyping is true was actually false. The Washington Post and the New York Post listened to that and they said, “Wait a minute. We independently confirmed CNN\u2019s story based on an anonymous source and our anonymous source was Lanny Davis, who\u2019s now saying the whole thing is false.” So they did what they had to do and what they should have done, which is they retracted the story, they outed their own source. CNN couldn\u2019t do that because they lied to the entire world. They can\u2019t retract the story and they can\u2019t admit they lied so they\u2019re just continuing to stick to what everybody knows is a lie.<\/p>\n

RUSH: And there is no other source but Lanny Davis! When the Washington Post, New York Post wanted to confirm it, they went to Lanny Davis. That was CNN\u2019s source! Lanny has told them he made it up. CNN is not withdrawing, not retracting the story. It is a humongous embarrassment. And they can\u2019t withdraw it and it\u2019s because of, I\u2019m telling you, folks, it\u2019s Bernstein. It\u2019s Bernstein, to protect him.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: We are not quite finished with the CNN, Carl Bernstein story. We move to other things, then get back to your phone calls. Now, where we left off here, we had played the audio sound bites of CNN having their orgasm back on July 27th with breaking news, proof that Trump had colluded, an anonymous source claiming that Trump knew of the Russian meeting in Trump Tower and approved of it.<\/p>\n

The source for that was Lanny Davis. CNN runs the story. The Washington Post and the New York Post said<\/a>, wait a minute, what is this? They independently try to confirm it. They call Lanny Davis. Lanny Davis confirms it for them. CNN does not identify Lanny Davis as their source. So Lanny Davis is the only source, anonymous, for this story that Cohen has the goods on Trump and can\u2019t wait to tell Mueller about it.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Then a month goes by, three weeks to a month, and Lanny learns that his client is telling a different story under oath before congressional committees. But enough time passes that the fundraising campaign for Cohen, GoFundMe, can get sufficient money in there be, 400 grand, much of which will go to Lanny, we presume. So Lanny then comes clean and tells the Washington Post and the New York Post that he made a mistake, that none of what he told them was actually true.<\/p>\n

Well, since he\u2019s the source for CNN, he told them the same thing. But CNN has not retracted. The New York Post, the Washington Post have. CNN continues to live by the story, claiming they have other sources, or another, but they won\u2019t identify, nobody knows who it is. But none of the other news outlets can find another source to confirm what Lanny said. We now know it\u2019s not true because Lanny admitted that he made it up. And Lanny has admitted that Cohen made it up.<\/p>\n

So CNN continues to hang on a lie. They continue to stand behind a lie. I have a story from the Style section of the Washington Post. The headline: “A journalist of Watergate Fame Faces Questions About a Blockbuster Trump Piece.” Well, that would be Bernstein, who used to work at the Washington Post. What kind of headline is this? “A journalist of Watergate Fame Faces Questions About a Blockbuster Trump Piece.” It\u2019s Bernstein of Woodward and Bernstein fame. And they go on to identify him in the story.<\/p>\n

John Nolte at Breitbart: “CNN\u2019s Jeff Zucker Claims Another Soul – Carl Bernstein\u2019s<\/a> — Imagine for just a moment you are Carl Bernstein. Here you sit, a 74-year-old living legend co-credited … with uncovering the story of Nixon\u2019s corrupt White House, and you have made it this far, you have made it another 45-years without sullying your image, without pulling a Dan Rather, and then\u2026 you are caught lying \u2014 flat-out, straight-up lying,” about the Trump Tower meeting. And it\u2019s worse than that! Bernstein, on numerous occasions, claimed that this entire Russian collusion story was worse than Watergate!<\/p>\n

Back on August 22nd, one week ago today, Carl Bernstein talking to CNN\u2019s John Berman about how the Manafort and Cohen cases will impact the Trump presidency, saying that it is worse than Watergate, a line that he repeated on August 3rd, July 26 , January 29. He\u2019s been living off that for all of this time.<\/p>\n

We\u2019re gonna go back to the audio sound bites, number 24. This is the same day — well, two days later, July 29th, two days after CNN\u2019s scoop he appeared on Reliable Sources on Sunday with Little Brian Stelter as the host. And Brian said, “Your byline graced all the stories –” Graced. Oh, yes. Carl Bernstein\u2019s byline graced. It didn\u2019t appear. No, no. When Carl Bernstein\u2019s name appears above a story, the space is graced. Yes.<\/p>\n

“Your byline graced all the stories about Watergate 45 years ago. Your byline is back on the scoop about Cohen and Trump, who claims that Trump knew in advance about that pivotal Trump Tower meeting. How did you do it, Mr. Bernstein?” Little Brian setting up, how\u2019d you do it, Carl? How did you do it? Oh, my God. Carl, you took down Nixon and here you\u2019re back 45 years later, oh, my God. Oh, my God. You\u2019re on the verge of taking down Trump. How did you do it, Carl?<\/p>\n