{"id":27825,"date":"2007-12-14T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T04:30:30","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T04:30:30","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T04:30:30","slug":"is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/","title":{"rendered":"Is It Really the End for Hillary?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: There was genuine trouble with Mrs. Clinton because the typical Clinton behavioral mode is not working. The Drive-Bys are not going along with it anymore, at least for now. And these apologies, by the way, I want to see where she actually said to Obama, ‘I\u2019m sorry.\u2019 We have the press spokesman out there saying, ‘Mrs. Clinton has apologized on the tarmac at Reagan National on the way to the Iowa debate.\u2019 Well, I want to see if she actually said, ‘I\u2019m sorry,\u2019 or she said, ‘My campaign\u2019s not going to ever do this again.\u2019 In the meantime, they say they\u2019re never going to do it again, they mention the word ‘cocaine.\u2019 One of Hillary\u2019s advisors is on television last night saying, ‘Those allegations of cocaine use–‘ So it\u2019s a nonapology apology. Mrs. Clinton just today in an interview in Iowa, alluded to the fact that there are huge surprises in Obama\u2019s past and that people will be stunned when they learn what they are. <\/p>\n

This was classic, not a pretty moment. Well, depends on your view of ‘pretty.\u2019 Obama was asked by this dreadful debate moderator — did you see her, Rachel? Carolyn Washburn? Whoa. Man. I\u2019ve seen the type in my life before, but this takes the cake. Just takes the cake. Obama was asked about former Clintonistas on his advisory staff. It\u2019s audio sound bite number eight, Mike. Here\u2019s Carolyn Washburn. She says, ‘Senator Obama, you have Bill Clinton\u2019s former national security advisor, state department policy director, Navy secretary, among others advising you, with relatively little foreign policy experience of your own. How will you rely on so many Clinton advisors and still deliver the kind of break from the past that you\u2019re promising voters?\u2019 Does anybody doubt this is a setup and planted question? I for one do not. This is a short bite. It goes 15 seconds. Obama starts out, and Hillary, you know, she interrupts, and then we hear the cackle in there, but I mean this is like an egg hitting her square between the eyes when she thought that her planted question was going to destroy the guy. So again, ‘How will you rely on so many Clinton advisors and still deliver the kind of break from the past that you\u2019re promising voters?\u2019<\/p>\n

OBAMA: Well, the — you know, I am —<\/p>\n

HILLARY: I want to hear that. (laughter)<\/p>\n

OBAMA: Hillary, I\u2019m looking forward to you advising me as well. (applause)<\/p>\n

RUSH: Oh, yes! Right on, right on, right on. In that moment, much of the remaining air in the flawless inevitable campaign just like came out of the tires. Now, I think people have missed the main point on this, and that\u2019s why I am here, of course, to provide the main point. Oh, by the way, the steroid thing. I\u2019ve had a chance to look at this, this baseball steroid thing, I\u2019ve got some updated thoughts on this, too, that will be part of the program as it unfolds today, but the question asked by this odd and scary newspaper woman was purposely designed to underline the Hillary claim of Obama\u2019s inexperience versus hers by citing all those former Clinton advisors Obama has on his staff. Now, my question is, ‘Why the hell are they not with her? What do they know that we don\u2019t know? Why did they go with him? Why did they jump the Hillary ship?\u2019 But, in addition there is that brilliant and unique observation, which is not really brilliant because it\u2019s so obvious but nobody else has come up with it.<\/p>\n

It is obvious! He has a bunch of former Hillary advisors on his staff and nobody thinks to ask, ‘Why did they leave her?\u2019 The question in my mind was completely planted by the Clinton camp, and that it backfired is just another show of the desperation that Hillary is in right now. On top of a very bad, horrible day, she has been bested by this young, inexperienced guy, who they are attacking behind the scenes as a potential possible drug dealer? He\u2019s the first legitimate black presidential candidate? The Democrats and liberals are attacking this guy as a drug dealer while Mrs. Clinton is down in Selma trying to sound like a black? And Andrew Young is out there saying Bill Clinton\u2019s been with more black women than Obama has and that\u2019s somehow a r&eacute;sum&eacute; enhancer for Democrats and blacks? Obama\u2019s comeback was great, Hillary shut up. He was finally able to shut her up, and that is the story. He shut her up, and he could have said even more, ‘Well, I wonder why I have so many of your former staffers advising me now, Mrs. Clinton.\u2019 <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Look, I want to address this one more time here, folks. People have been commenting on me all morning in the e-mail asking me, ‘You really believe it\u2019s the end for Hillary? Do you really believe this?\u2019 We\u2019ve got all kinds of stories, flood of campaign operatives causes worry, Obama surprises, the Democratic chief in Wyoming saying Clinton would hurt the party if she\u2019s the nominee, Howard Fineman, the surprising falls and unexpected gains ahead of Iowa\u2019s caucuses. He starts out by saying, ‘Sen. Hillary Clinton\u2019s campaign is teetering on the brink, no matter what the meaningless national horse race numbers say. The notion that she has a post-Iowa &ldquo;firewall&rdquo; in New Hampshire is a fantasy, and she is in danger of losing all four early contests, including Nevada and South Carolina — probably to Sen. Barack Obama, who is now, in momentum terms, the Democratic front-runner.\u2019<\/p>\n

Now, I know they didn\u2019t plan for this, and this is a shock and a surprise to everybody. Mrs. Clinton, her whole candidacy, I think this inevitability is off the road. Inevitable candidates cannot lose, not once, certainly not twice, and certainly not four times. In addition to that, I want to make this point again. If you want to trace the beginning of her problem, you have to go back to me. On a Tuesday I read a report in New York Newsday about Hillary\u2019s tough position on New York driver\u2019s licenses for illegal aliens, that it was a nuclear issue, that she really hadn\u2019t said anything about it, and I shout to the reporter, ‘Well, ask her! Don\u2019t just sit there and say it\u2019s a nuclear issue. Ask her about it. You\u2019re a reporter.\u2019 That night, in a Democrat debate on PMSNBC, Russert asked her about it, and she flubbed it, she flubbed it big time. It was after that that she brought on Bill, and when Bill gets going trying to help you, you don\u2019t succeed. Ask Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, ask Gray Davis, ask the Democrat that ran for governor in Hawaii against Linda Lingle. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s a giant myth that the country loves the Clintons. There are some pockets of the Democrat Party that do, but it\u2019s a huge, huge myth that these people are national icons. They\u2019re soap opera characters. Their lives are soap opera. He\u2019s not looked at today as a political statesman to recommend his wife to be president. He\u2019s a soap opera figure. Andrew Young, ‘He\u2019s been with more black women than Obama.\u2019 This is a soap opera. Bill Clinton didn\u2019t get a majority of votes in either of his two presidential elections, 43% in \u201992, 49% in \u201996. Everybody is living out these giant myths. At the same time, they are soap opera figures, and they play for keeps. All this talk about Hillary\u2019s, you know, perhaps past the point of no return, they\u2019ve got so many political lives, she does especially, that it would be silly here to start assuming this far out. I think we\u2019re, what are we, two or three weeks from the Hawkeye Cauci? January 3rd. Three weeks from the Hawkeye Cauci, and until I see the house fall on her — for those of you in Rio Linda, that\u2019s a reference to the Wizard of Oz, when the house finally fell on the bad witch. <\/p>\n

Until I see the house fall on her and those legs curl up underneath the house and the body in the casket, she is not dead, she is not finished. Don\u2019t forget, folks, there\u2019s an old soap opera rule, and she\u2019s a soap opera figure along with her husband, and that is, \u2019til you actually see the body, the person\u2019s not dead. And in soap operas, villains don\u2019t die. Villains don\u2019t get written out. Good guys get written out. The Clintons are a soap opera. There\u2019s no question she is in trouble. Whether or not it keeps up is another matter, and it probably will. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: This is Ron in Atlanta. You\u2019re up first today. Nice to have you with us, sir.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Sir, it\u2019s an honor to speak to you.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Mega dittos from a transplanted Yankee. Did anybody else notice how often that obnoxious moderator cackled and laughed at the Democrats, but yet at the Republicans all she did was continually interrupt them and tell them their time was up when she let the Democrats, on a 30-second question, oftentimes go into 40 and 90 seconds of time?<\/p>\n

RUSH: I think everybody notices this stuff by now. I really do.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I hope they do.<\/p>\n

RUSH: They do. You can trust me.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Thank you, sir.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Don\u2019t doubt me.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Take care.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Trust me on this. Thank you. Rick in Phoenix, Open Line Friday, you\u2019re next, hello.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Mega dittos, Rush.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: From the land of the sun. I got a question for you.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yes.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Let\u2019s assume Hillary does not get the nomination, which I hope she doesn\u2019t, who\u2019s gonna file for divorce first, her or Bill, because she doesn\u2019t need him, and he doesn\u2019t want her. So I was just wanting to get your opinion on that.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I thought you were going to ask me who will be blamed, her or Bill.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, I mean, she\u2019s going to blame Bill, so, you know, she doesn\u2019t need him anymore.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I frankly haven\u2019t given any thought to that because we\u2019re not at that stage yet, and I\u2019ve evolved a theory not too long ago, and that is to try to not tell myself stories, particularly in the context of serious analysis, because, frankly, what happens after she loses, if she loses? I really don\u2019t care. She\u2019ll stay in the Senate. I don\u2019t think she\u2019ll try another presidential bid down the road. But let\u2019s cross that bridge when we get to it. In a question of who would file divorce first? These people need each other, folks, business, career, politics, they need each other. In fact, I\u2019m going to tell you people a little story. I have never repeated this. I\u2019ve never told anybody this. This goes back to 1995, and I got a phone call from — I will not mention the name — but I got a phone call from a very prominent media baron, he said, ‘I want to have dinner with you.\u2019 ‘Oh, cool.\u2019 I never met this man. This was a very nice thing to do, so I went and had dinner. ‘You know what I think?\u2019 he said to me. ‘This couple, this Clinton, she\u2019s going to divorce him, she can\u2019t stay with him, she just can\u2019t.\u2019 This might have been \u201996 or ‘7, I forget which. <\/p>\n

Now, I thought about this after dinner, I went home and I said, ‘This is awfully weird.\u2019 I never reported and retold the story, never told the story, period, certainly not on the air. This is the first time. And, of course, they didn\u2019t get divorced. I actually think what it was, as I look back on it, I think a bunch of people wanted me to go on the air the next day and announce a big exclusive, a scoop, something that I had that I would then be immediately tarred and feathered and discredited for, and it didn\u2019t work, because I didn\u2019t repeat it. I\u2019m not that easy. I am not a journal. I need at least ten sources before I go with anything, not just one. <\/p>\n

All right, George in Vacaville, California, you\u2019re next. I\u2019m glad you waited.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hello. Mega dittos, Rush.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Thank you, sir.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I was wanting to ask you a question on what do you think Fred Thompson\u2019s electability is.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, he\u2019s electable. Can he win based on where he is in the primaries right now is another thing. He got a late start. He had that great performance in the debate on Tuesday, but everybody said it was the most boring debate in the world.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I don\u2019t think too many people saw it. The Republicans are thinking of actually doing another debate — <\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah.<\/p>\n

RUSH: — the week after Christmas between New Year\u2019s.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah, because this is the last debate before the Iowa caucus.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, it may not be. There may be another one. He\u2019s got a lot of ground to catch up. I would caution everybody, I keep saying this, these polls are interesting to track and they show right now that Huckabee\u2019s made this big move. But it\u2019s easy for people in a poll to say anything. I really try to discount polls like this that fluctuate, go back and forth, because when people get in the privacy of either the Hawkeye Cauci or the voting booth, you never know what they\u2019re really, really going to do. We\u2019re not anywhere near the finish line yet, really, and so these polls in the strict sense are meaningless. They may be giving us an accurate indication, we don\u2019t know, and we won\u2019t know until the votes are taken. So I\u2019m content to sit back and watch all this stuff fall out, take shape, and try to make some sense of it. George, I appreciate the phone call.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Everybody wants to play the what-if game and I don\u2019t really like what-ifs, because you can\u2019t know. It\u2019s crazy to start telling yourself stories, particularly solutions and answers that you have no idea about, but we\u2019ll play it because everybody wants to know, ‘What happens if Hillary loses, Rush, what are Bill and Hillary going to do?\u2019 Don\u2019t rule out the possibility of third party. Don\u2019t rule it out. You don\u2019t know, folks, if you are pooh-poohing me on this, you do not know how they think they are destined for this! You do not know how focused singularly both of them are on this. It is the only thing that they see when they look out the windshield. They will not be denied this. This is a generational thing. This is the last gasp of the sixties anti-war left to get their hands on direct control of the upper echelons of leadership in this country. <\/p>\n

If she thinks that Obama is going to be a weak national candidate, I\u2019ll tell you what, if Obama and Huckabee, if Obama and Huckabee are the nominees, I will make this — ah, it\u2019s not a prediction. But don\u2019t be surprised if you see Hillary, Michael Bloomberg, on a third-party ticket. Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of Nuev Orc. I frankly, you know, we keep hearing about all the discord in the Republican Party, nobody satisfied with their candidates, doesn\u2019t look like there\u2019s a whole lot of satisfaction of the Democrat candidates, either. Why is there no talk of a third-party liberal candidate? If they\u2019re so unhappy and split, why not another candidate as an independent liberal? This is how they try to beat us. We should encourage it, an honest, socialist anti-war third-party candidate. They\u2019re out there pushing for a third-party Republican candidate is what I\u2019m talking about, the media is. Ron Paul, or whoever it might be. Why rule this out on the Democrat side, either? <\/p>\n

Brenda in Cadillac, Michigan, hi, I\u2019m glad you waited. Welcome to the program.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hey, Rush.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Hey.<\/p>\n

CALLER: How are you?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Couldn\u2019t be better.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Good to talk to you. I listened to you for a long time, happy to finally get through.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I appreciate that. You know, you\u2019re very subdued. Most people tell me what an honor it is and how excited they are and how nervous they are, and you\u2019re all business. I like that. Get in, get it, and get out.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, that\u2019s kind of what I was told to do, so —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yes. Yeah, but how many people do what they\u2019re told to do?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, I guess I\u2019m a very compliant person.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I bet you\u2019re not. (laughing)<\/p>\n

CALLER: Oh, little do you know.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I mean that in a complimentary way, too, that you\u2019re not a pushover.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Oh, thank you. That\u2019s right, that\u2019s right, I\u2019m not. I had a comment about Hillary.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah?<\/p>\n

CALLER: It seems like her latest mantra against Obama, she\u2019s kind of mocking him about his theme of hope, ‘Well, it takes more than hope to lead a country,\u2019 and —<\/p>\n

RUSH: I saw that. ‘It takes more than hope. It takes experience. I\u2019ve been fighting.\u2019 Her answer is as vacuous as his is.<\/p>\n

CALLER: What\u2019s really hilarious about that comment, that mocking the whole hope thing, is that when Bill Clinton ran his first campaign, he ran on the little platform that he was the man from Hope.<\/p>\n

RUSH: That\u2019s right. And, by the way, so is Huckabee.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah. He says if a governor from Hope, Arkansas —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Exactly right. I think we\u2019ve got these two sound bites. Let\u2019s go ahead, Brenda, I\u2019m going to play these because I want them to know what you\u2019re talking about. But you\u2019re right, that it is kind of ironic, but the Clintons are having a lot of things called on them that they don\u2019t expect to be called on, and you know something else that is becoming patently obvious to people? And that is a Hillary presidency, nothing changed about it. A Hillary presidency is we\u2019re going back in time to the nineties. We\u2019re going backwards. That\u2019s what she keeps talking about under the guise of change. She was asked about the Bill Shaheen comment. This is this morning in Johnson, Iowa, she held a press conference, asked about the Bill Shaheen comment made about candidate Obama, and here\u2019s what she said. Number three, we\u2019re staying in order here.<\/p>\n

HILLARY: I made it clear it was not authorized, in no way condoned. I didn\u2019t know about it, and he stepped down. On January 20th, 2009, I\u2019m going to have to start dealing with two wars, ending one as quickly as I possibly can, and trying to salvage the other. I\u2019m going to have to deal with the way we\u2019ve alienated the rest of the world, all the people calling Leonard, they call me. What is going on in America? What are you going to do to repair the damage? We\u2019re going to have to keep faith with the American people, get this economy working for everybody, begin to reverse the inequity that President Bush has enshrined in our tax policy, and then take on the big challenges. This is a big job, with a lot of big challenges. I\u2019m up for it, and that\u2019s why I\u2019m making my case, and others are making their cases, and I want to keep focused on what I intend to do as president<\/p>\n

RUSH: So she\u2019s back to that. We don\u2019t have the bites right now that I was thinking about. I saw \u2019em on television today that Brenda in Cadillac, Michigan, was talking about. Her answer was entirely vacuous. She said, ‘We need something more than hope,\u2019 and then she went on to just be vacant, intellectually vacant about her experience and how she can forge change and so forth. She went on to say in this press appearance today that she is vetted, and then, listen.<\/p>\n

HILLARY: I have said for months in this campaign, I am vetted, I am tested. The Republicans will go off whomever we nominate. I think all of you know that, every single one of you know that. And I\u2019ve been dealing with their incoming fire for 16 years, and I\u2019m still here. And I think that voters should take that into account, because I\u2019ve been through those fires, and I have emerged, and not just survived, but thrived, much to their amazement and dismay. So I think that\u2019s a very strong factor in favor of my being the candidate for Democrats to nominate. I apologized to Senator Obama yesterday.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, she had to get that in. I\u2019ll tell you why. She didn\u2019t mention specifics in this interview this morning, but she drew a contrast with unnamed rivals, with Shaheen\u2019s claim that unexplored elements of Obama\u2019s candidacy will make him an easy Republican target. She said, I\u2019ve been tested, I have been vetted, there are no surprises, there\u2019s not going to be anybody saying I didn\u2019t think of that, my goodness, what\u2019s that going to mean? She\u2019s aiming right at Obama — she is letting it be known that there are surprises, that she\u2019s got surprises for Obama. That\u2019s why she threw in here that, ‘I apologized to Senator Obama yesterday.\u2019 So the same tactics continue, even the nonapology apology continues. But she\u2019s all over the board here, and this is not persuasive stuff, this is not substantive in any way, shape, manner, or form. And see, this is another thing they\u2019ve got to think about on the Democrat side. If she does get the nomination, she cannot go for the rest of the year, because it will happen early in February. She can\u2019t hide for ten months without getting specific on things. She\u2019s going to have to amuse beyond platitudes, and the more she shows up in public and the more she speaks, there\u2019s a corresponding drop in her numbers.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: We have that audio sound bite of Mrs. Clinton that I referred to in the previous hour. This is from the debate. It\u2019s her answer about hope, because that is one of Obama\u2019s primary campaign themes. In fact… (muttering) I\u2019m just reading the transcript here of the sound bite that I\u2019m also going to play, to see if it mentions hope. (muttering) It doesn\u2019t, that I can see real quick. Here\u2019s what Mrs. Clinton said, trying to attack Barack Obama\u2019s campaign theme.<\/p>\n

HILLARY: Everyone wants ‘change.\u2019 Well, everybody on this stage has an idea about how to get change. Uh, some believe you get change by demanding it. Some believe you get it by hoping for it. I believe you get it by working hard for change. <\/p>\n

RUSH: Stop the tape!<\/p>\n

HILLARY: That\u2019s what I\u2019ve done my entire life.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Stop the tape! Will somebody please explain to me what is the ‘change\u2019 with the Clintons getting back into the White House? Would somebody please explain to me why we\u2019re even talking about here as a serious candidate? She was a crumby first lady! Here\u2019s the rest of this…<\/p>\n

HILLARY: That\u2019s what I will do as president. I will end the war in Iraq and bring our sons and daughters home, I will get quality affordable health care for every single American, and I will not rest until every child has a chance to live up to his or her God-given potential. So I hope you will go caucus for me on January 3rd. Stand up for me and I\u2019ll stand up for you, during this campaign and when I\u2019m in the White House.<\/p>\n

RUSH: This is nothing but platitudes. She says she\u2019s not going to rest ‘until every child has a chance to live up to his or her God-given potential?\u2019 Where\u2019s this? Here it is. New York Times today, and the headline says it all: ‘School Recess Gets Gentler, and the Adults Are Dismayed.\u2019 The New York Times just came up with this. This has been something that\u2019s been percolating throughout our culture for years. It\u2019s from Montville, Connecticut. ‘Children at the Oakdale School here in southeastern Connecticut returned this fall to learn that their traditional recess had gone the way of the peanut butter sandwich and the Gumby lunchbox. No longer could they let off their youthful energy — pent up from hours of long division — by cavorting outside for 22 minutes of unstructured play, or perhaps with a vigorous game of tag or dodgeball. Such games had been virtually banned by the principal, Mark S. Johnson, along with kickball, soccer and other ‘body-banging\u2019 activities, as he put it, where knees — and feelings — might get bruised.\u2019 Where has the New York Times been? This is a cultural story that\u2019s been around for ten or 12 years, if not longer. <\/p>\n

‘Instead, children are encouraged to jump rope, play with Hula Hoops or gently fling a Frisbee. Balls are practically controlled substances, parceled out under close supervision by playground monitors. The traditional recess, a rite of grade school, is endangered not only in the Oakdale School here in Montville, [Connecticut]. From Cheyenne, Wyo., to Wyckoff, N.J., recess … is being rethought and pared down.\u2019 Frankly, Mrs. Clinton, what are you going to do about this? You\u2019re not going to rest until ‘every child has a chance to live up to his or her potential.\u2019 When the National Education Association teachers union (a bunch of libs, that\u2019s who\u2019s behind this) says (New Castrati impression), ‘We can\u2019t push our children too far, Mr. Limbaugh. These are gentle young things. We make \u2019em grow up too fast as it is. They could get terribly hurt. They could get bruised egos, and in tag if you\u2019re not IT, your self-esteem suffers.\u2019 You know, this is the way these people think. Now, I think that at the root of this is modern-era feminism, which has emasculated a bunch of, heretofore, men. Men, in too many places — particularly in education — are not men anymore. They\u2019ve been emasculated. The chickification, the feminization of the culture — and it\u2019s rife throughout. It\u2019s not just here in recess. It\u2019s even in the classroom in some of these skrools. At any rate, Mrs. Clinton will do just the opposite. She believes in this kind of stuff. The NEA is a mirror image of Hillary Clinton and vice-versa. <\/p>\n

So to say that she\u2019s going to run out there and make sure she doesn\u2019t rest \u2019til every child ‘has a chance to live up to his or her God-given potential\u2019? <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: There was genuine trouble with Mrs. Clinton because the typical Clinton behavioral mode is not working. The Drive-Bys are not going along with it anymore, at least for now. And these apologies, by the way, I want to see where she actually said to Obama, ‘I\u2019m sorry.\u2019 We have the press spokesman out there […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nIs It Really the End for Hillary? - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Is It Really the End for Hillary? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: There was genuine trouble with Mrs. Clinton because the typical Clinton behavioral mode is not working. The Drive-Bys are not going along with it anymore, at least for now. And these apologies, by the way, I want to see where she actually said to Obama, ‘I\u2019m sorry.\u2019 We have the press spokesman out there […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/\",\"name\":\"Is It Really the End for Hillary? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T04:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T04:30:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is It Really the End for Hillary?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is It Really the End for Hillary? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Is It Really the End for Hillary? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: There was genuine trouble with Mrs. Clinton because the typical Clinton behavioral mode is not working. The Drive-Bys are not going along with it anymore, at least for now. And these apologies, by the way, I want to see where she actually said to Obama, ‘I\u2019m sorry.\u2019 We have the press spokesman out there […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/","name":"Is It Really the End for Hillary? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T04:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T04:30:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/12\/14\/is_it_really_the_end_for_hillary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is It Really the End for Hillary?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27825"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27825\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}