{"id":27426,"date":"2007-11-07T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T04:40:42","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T04:40:42","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T04:40:42","slug":"clinton_debate_fallout_review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/","title":{"rendered":"Clinton Debate Fallout Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<section>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"346\" height=\"258\" class=\"alignright\"\/>RUSH: Yesterday, folks, we were going to talk a little bit about Hillary, but I cut back. (interruption) If you point at me and start mouthing at me without talking &#8212; (interruption) that\u2019s exactly right, that\u2019s exactly right. (interruption) What Snerdley? He\u2019s pointing at me and he\u2019s shouting at me, but, of course, he didn\u2019t turn on the IFB mic, so I have no clue what he\u2019s saying. He just told me, &#8216;This is why they hate you. You got this whole thing started over a week ago over this illegal immigrant driver\u2019s license thing, and now it\u2019s mushroomed, and the Clinton support teams are trying all kinds of different strategies to make this go away, and it\u2019s not going away.\u2019 Yes, you\u2019re right, Mr. Snerdley, it will result in a much, much larger target on my front and on my back. We\u2019re going to go back and relive this whole thing. I think it\u2019s time now, because there\u2019s been enough time past, people may not realize what this is all about, what started this. <\/p>\n<p>Clinton\u2019s out there attacking Obama. Obama\u2019s attacking Clinton. The Hillary team\u2019s debating what color her pantsuit should be in the next debate, should it be black to show power, or should it be pink or orange to show lady ruffles and this sort of thing. Dawn, they are. This is what happens. Of course, she says, &#8216;I\u2019m your girl,\u2019 and, when you\u2019re a girl, you\u2019ve gotta worry about your wardrobe and what it says about you, what it projects. This is what we\u2019re dealing with here in a presidential campaign. So anyway, we\u2019re going to go back and we\u2019re going to relive this and get you up to speed with some of the current comments because now people are starting to wonder &#8212; this is really funny &#8212; people are starting to wonder if Bill Clinton is trying to sabotage Hillary with the things that he\u2019s doing and saying. Does he really want her to be a president? Does he really want her in the Oval Office? Does he really want to have an East Wing office, you know, first ladies are in the East Wing. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: By the way, Rasmussen has poll out. Hillary is plummeting. She remains the front-runner &#8212; front burner, front-runner &#8212; but by a narrower margin out there. Her lead in New Hampshire over Obama has narrowed from 16% prior to the debate to 10% after the debate, she\u2019s lost six points, and she\u2019s going to keep losing more as long as the story stays alive, which we are going to keep alive. She\u2019s down. See, previous&#8230; Hold it. She\u2019s never fallen below 37% in New Hampshire. Today she\u2019s at 34%. So she\u2019s plummeting out there in some of these states. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: This is the AP. This is our old buddy Nedra Pickler. &#8216;Bill Clinton was hit with caustic criticism Tuesday from his wife\u2019s Democratic rivals, who accused the popular former president of falsely comparing questions about her candor to smears of past campaigns.\u2019 They tried the Swift Boat thing and it didn\u2019t work. Bill went out there and said the same thing happened with John Kerry, the Swift Boat stuff. Didn\u2019t fly. The strategery of, oh, poor little girl, you can\u2019t hit the girl, just minding her own business. That didn\u2019t fly. So they\u2019re up there in Chappaqua strategerizing now trying to figure out how to get out of this mess. &#8216;The week after Hillary Rodham Clinton\u2019s campaign accused her rivals of &#8216;piling on,&#8221; Boy, you just don\u2019t want to see that mental image of the Democrat candidates piling on Hillary &#8212; ooh. When I first heard that, you know, I came up with a better phrase so as not to create that image. Anyway, they showed no signs of easing up in the piling-on. Her opponents &#8216;even went so far as to criticize the former president, a strategy that comes with risks in a party filled with voters who admire him.\u2019 (laughter) That\u2019s not the risk. <\/p>\n<p>Democrats don\u2019t like Clinton, Inc., turned on them. Well, well, well. You know, Obama has criticized Hillary Clinton\u2019s drive. She wants this too much. She\u2019s too calculating. She\u2019s too secretive. He\u2019s out there attacking Bill Clinton because Clinton attacked him. See, in the media\u2019s eyes, you can\u2019t touch these people. You can\u2019t criticize the Clintons. You can\u2019t talk about them. You can\u2019t be critical, and it\u2019s a risky strategy, so many Democrat voters love Bill Clinton because he rescued the party from oblivion in the nineties. The real risk is having Clinton, Inc., the Clinton war room, aimed at you. Snerdley had it right at the top of the program. This is why they so despise me, because this story has been going on over a week, and it was started by me. I put that question about driver\u2019s licenses for illegal immigrants out there in the media, and it got picked up by Russert. We\u2019ll never know if that\u2019s actually how it happened, but if not, it\u2019s a very unique coincidence. <\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s review Russert\u2019s question. This is about not releasing her records of communications between herself and her husband when he was president and she was co-president. She\u2019s saying, &#8216;I\u2019ve got all this experience,\u2019 and they won\u2019t release any of these documents so everybody can see what really happened. Well, we\u2019re going to release the health care task force documents. We don\u2019t care about those. We know what a debacle that was. We know what you tried to do there. It\u2019s the documents that detail your conversations with Bill about other stuff, like Lewinsky and Paula Jones and other policy things like the selection of Janet Reno as attorney general, if you participated in that. You\u2019re going to be selecting attorney general and we want to know what role you played. These are the documents they\u2019re talking about hiding. Well, they\u2019re making some show that the archives are in the process of getting them out. But, as Newsweek pointed out earlier this week, well, I\u2019ll mention it after the bite because it\u2019s relevant. Tim Russert said, &#8216;In terms of your experience as first lady, in order to give the American people an opportunity to make a judgment about your experience, would you allow the National Archives to release the documents about your communications with the president, the advice you gave? Because you well know, President Clinton has asked the National Archives not to do anything until 2012.\u2019<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.4584.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"280\" height=\"196\" class=\"alignleft\"\/>HILLARY: Well, actually, Tim, the archives is moving as rapidly as the archives moves. There\u2019s about 20 million pieces of paper there. And they are moving and they are releasing as they do their process, and I am fully in favor of that.<\/p>\n<p>RUSSERT: But there was a letter written by President Clinton specifically asking that any communication between you and the president not be made available to the public until 2012. Would you lift that ban?<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY: Well, that\u2019s not my decision to make, and I don\u2019t believe that any president or first lady ever has, but certainly we\u2019ll move as quickly as our circumstances and the processes of the National Archives permits.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Now, what was unknown at the time was that Bill Clinton had appointed two people to supervisor the handling and the archiving of these records, these documents at his Library and Massage Parlor in Little Rock. Those two people were Bruce Lindsey and Hillary Rodham Clinton! She knew full well when she answered this question that she was involved. When she said, &#8216;Well, that\u2019s not my decision to make, and I don\u2019t believe that any president or first lady ever has.\u2019 There are some documents that they have said we\u2019re not going to release \u2019til after 2009 or until 2009. This is not going away. The Clintons expect that whenever they say something, issue a denial or make another lie or refuse to answer, that that\u2019s it, that the question gets dropped. But for some reason, some of her opponents in the primaries here have decided not to let go of this, and some in the Drive-By Media haven\u2019t, either. Drive-By Media is upset that she pulled the gender card. Now they\u2019re making fun of the strategeral moves that she\u2019s making to try to handle the damage. <\/p>\n<p>You know, everybody talks about how secretive the Bush administration is. The Bush administration can\u2019t hold a candle to the Clintons and secrecy. You also would think &#8212; just a human nature thing &#8212; that if these documents showed brilliance, if they showed great decisions, if they showed a woman really, really involved in some of the great, quote, unquote, things the administration did, don\u2019t you think they\u2019d be eager to get them out there? By the same token, this reluctance and this hiding behind, &#8216;Well, presidents have a right,\u2019 and they do. They can sequester these documents for whatever length of time they want. They\u2019re not doing anything illegal here. But don\u2019t you think that if there was something good in there they\u2019d get it out, and if there was something bad in there they would be trying to hide it? So their move here, their strategery is leading a lot of people to wonder, &#8216;What are they trying to hide?\u2019 We thought she was the smartest woman in the world. If they\u2019ve got evidence of what a brilliant first lady and co-president she was, I just think that they would be out there. Now, Clinton, he decided to go after Russert. This is next in the timeline here, wagging his finger over Russert\u2019s question about his records. This is last Friday in Redmond, Washington. He was out there doing some motivational talk to the Microsoft employees. This is a little bit off mic, but this is what he said about Hillary and Russert in the debate.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.53052.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"278\" height=\"247\" class=\"alignright\"\/>CLINTON: All my born days in watching presidential debates, Tim Russert holding that letter up to my wife and telling the American people that that was a letter from me to the Archives to cover up records involving her, and to make sure none were released by 2009. That is what he said. Do you agree that\u2019s what he said? You asked the question, so I\u2019m asking. Why did you ask the question? Because of what he said during the debate, right? What did he say? The truth is Hillary didn\u2019t know what he was talking about. The implication was that in the last few weeks since she\u2019s been a candidate, I had endeavored to cover up records involving her. Do you agree with that? That was what people thought when they heard that question.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, it\u2019s true! You got those records sequestered. But what also is not true, &#8216;Hillary didn\u2019t know a thing about that.\u2019 She did! You put her in charge, along with Bruce Lindsey, of archiving these documents. &#8216;Hillary didn\u2019t know anything.\u2019 Newsweek said that, anyway. Newsweek reported it this week. Clinton then went on to explain the facts and how Russert\u2019s question was breathtakingly misleading.<\/p>\n<p>CLINTON: She was incidental to the letter. It was done five years ago. It was a letter to speed up presidential releases, not to slow them down. And she didn\u2019t even, didn\u2019t know what he was talking about. And now that I described to you what the letter said, you can readily understand why she didn\u2019t know what he was talking about. It was breathtakingly misleading. Now, I don\u2019t know whether Tim Russert, I\u2019ve never seen him deliberately mislead people before. So, it could be that he just read what was in Newsweek, which is also dead wrong, and believed that because it was in Newsweek, it was the Gospel.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Now they\u2019re trying to deny that they\u2019ve put a far-off date as the release date for these documents? They did do that. And now they\u2019re trying to speed the process up? Uh, something doesn\u2019t fly here, folks, something is very, very fishy, and very, very defensive here, I might add, that they are breathtakingly misleading. Hillary didn\u2019t even know what he was talking about? How can they continue to portray this woman as the smartest woman in the world, hands on, she knows everything. She knows nothing when controversy comes up. She\u2019s as ignorant as that lamppost down your street. She has absolutely no clue, she says, what\u2019s going on with any of this, and nobody believes it. Clinton says this. We all sit here and marvel at Clinton\u2019s lying, and we sit here and marvel at Hillary\u2019s lying. They don\u2019t think they are. It\u2019s an interesting psychological thing, and I read a story today that some psychologists, psychiatrists have done studies. They took two groups of people: people that are very moral and trying to be very moral all over the place, and asked them if they ever cheated, and another group, asked them, do you ever not cheat, do you try to be as ethical as possible. They found that both groups thought that they were the epitome of morality and virtue, including the people who admitted that they cheat and will lie. That was their morality. <\/p>\n<p>Now, the conclusion here is that you make up your own morality. Is when Clinton says, &#8216;I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky, not a single time, ever. I never asked anybody to lie,\u2019 he believes it! His morality, and his ethics, and what he\u2019s trying to protect, allow him to say that in his mind with no guilt or conscience whatsoever. It\u2019s sort of like a pathological liar. They tell their lies often enough that they often think that what they lie about was the truth. Bob Kerrey, &#8216;he\u2019s an unusually good liar.\u2019 That\u2019s because he has no shame, no consequence, no guilt, conscience whatsoever about any of it, so he can sound like, &#8216;well, she didn\u2019t know about that,\u2019 when she was in charge of it, &#8216;I never told anybody to hide those documents. We\u2019re trying to speed those documents up. I don\u2019t know what Russert\u2019s talking about.\u2019 He can pull this stuff off as though it\u2019s the truth because, in his mind, it is, and because he says it\u2019s the truth. The truth is an abstract thing. What he says is the truth in his mind is the truth, and the same thing with Hillary. She\u2019s just not quite as good at it yet.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Brent Bozell, the Media Research Center, has published a column on all of this. &#8216;Hillary\u2019s Airtight Archives\u2019 is what this column is entitled. They ran it yesterday. Let me give you a couple pull quotes from it. &#8216;Back in 1992, no one in the media banged a can as the Clintons failed to release federal tax returns from the late 1970s. Inside those returns was proof that Hillary Clinton had made a mysterious $100,000 fortune from a $1,000 investment in the highly risky cattle-futures market. It\u2019s bad enough that the media to this very day have never gotten to the bottom of that smelly and mysterious quid pro quo with Hillary\u2019s pal Jim Blair, the lobbyist for Tyson Chicken. How many more episodes of Team Clinton\u2019s corruption are still locked away in Hillary\u2019s airtight archives?\u2019 &#8216;Many Hillary-loving pundits ganged up on Russert in 2000&#8230;\u2019 I had forgotten this until I read the piece. &#8216;Many Hillary-loving pundits ganged up on Russert in 2000 when he asked Hillary in a Senate debate if she regretted misleading the American people when she claimed the Monica Lewinsky sexual sheananigans [sic] would not be &#8216;proven true\u2019 and whether she would apologize for branding people who deplored the Lewinsky affair as a &#8216;vast-right wing conspiracy.\u2019 Journalists from Geraldo Rivera to Gail Collins of the New York Times scorned Russert for punching below the belt.\u2019 The point is that there is evidence of these people hiding all kinds of things, lying about all kinds of things. If your kid lies to you repeatedly, your first thought when he tells you anything is, he\u2019s lying. Why is that not the assumption made with the Clintons when they tell you anything? It\u2019d be a very intelligent and wise thing to do, to doubt them! Yet, so many people don\u2019t seem to. They look past it because the Clintons represent something else to them, in large part: the only chance to beat the evil conservatives and Republicans.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s go to Las Vegas. John, hi, welcome to the EIB Network, sir. You\u2019re up first today.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hi, Rush. I just want to show, me and my wife are registered independents, and we\u2019ve been discussing at length, you know, what\u2019s going on with Hillary and, you know, Bill\u2019s comment that the good old boys are piling up on her, this poor little woman. My wife\u2019s comment last night was, &#8216;Well, what\u2019s going to happen when Ahmadinejad, and Putin, and Chavez, and Castro pile on to her, if and when she\u2019s president? Is Bill going to come out or get on a plane and go to every capital in, you know, Russia and Iran and berate them about the way they\u2019re treating Hillary?\u2019 I mean, it\u2019s utterly ridiculous. If she can\u2019t stand up to the heat of these boys, how is she going to handle dictators?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: She can stand it. That\u2019s not what this is about. Look, this is Nurse Ratched! This is the woman with the testicle lockbox. This is a woman about whom it\u2019s said, &#8216;She\u2019s not warm. She\u2019s not friendly.\u2019 All of these things are accurate portrayals. She\u2019s not going to cower and blanch from anybody. She runs Bill\u2019s life. She\u2019s got him on, probably, a three-mile leash and he\u2019s got three miles he can play around in, but beyond that, you know, she\u2019ll start railing him in. She\u2019s running this show. That\u2019s what makes this even more reprehensible. It\u2019s all an act to try to win the election! It\u2019s nothing but positioning, and posturing and pandering, and it illustrates that she doesn\u2019t have the talent to do this. What it adds up to is that she is not willing to show herself as she is in this campaign. So all of this, &#8216;The boys are piling on. It\u2019s unfair. You can\u2019t hit the girl.\u2019 She probably laughs at that herself, but, if it\u2019ll work, she\u2019ll use it, because it did work once with Rick Lazio. So it\u2019s just an old page in the playbook brought back to life. She\u2019s not going to cower from anybody! Again, that\u2019s what makes this so disingenuous. It\u2019s all an act. Every bit of this is an act, from the driver\u2019s license statements and flip-flops&#8230; Well, that wasn\u2019t an act. She was caught short on that. She was totally unprepared. But the act is the various stratagems that they have used since then, to try to put this to bed, and it won\u2019t go to bed. Nobody is willing to get in bed with her! They can\u2019t put it to bed; they can\u2019t put her to bed. (interruption) Well, that\u2019s about as&#8230; Yeah, I agree. That\u2019s about as disgusting as the &#8216;piling on\u2019 analogy. I\u2019m sorry.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: The latest from Hillary is, she\u2019s now admitted that in the debate she wasn\u2019t at her best. &#8216;I wasn\u2019t at my best the other night in the debate.\u2019 They tried everything they can to diffuse this and put it to bed. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Yesterday, folks, we were going to talk a little bit about Hillary, but I cut back. (interruption) If you point at me and start mouthing at me without talking &#8212; (interruption) that\u2019s exactly right, that\u2019s exactly right. (interruption) What Snerdley? He\u2019s pointing at me and he\u2019s shouting at me, but, of course, he didn\u2019t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Clinton Debate Fallout Review - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Clinton Debate Fallout Review - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Yesterday, folks, we were going to talk a little bit about Hillary, but I cut back. (interruption) If you point at me and start mouthing at me without talking &#8212; (interruption) that\u2019s exactly right, that\u2019s exactly right. (interruption) What Snerdley? He\u2019s pointing at me and he\u2019s shouting at me, but, of course, he didn\u2019t [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/\",\"name\":\"Clinton Debate Fallout Review - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T04:40:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T04:40:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Clinton Debate Fallout Review\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Clinton Debate Fallout Review - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Clinton Debate Fallout Review - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Yesterday, folks, we were going to talk a little bit about Hillary, but I cut back. (interruption) If you point at me and start mouthing at me without talking &#8212; (interruption) that\u2019s exactly right, that\u2019s exactly right. (interruption) What Snerdley? He\u2019s pointing at me and he\u2019s shouting at me, but, of course, he didn\u2019t [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/","name":"Clinton Debate Fallout Review - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T04:40:42+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T04:40:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/11\/07\/clinton_debate_fallout_review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Clinton Debate Fallout Review"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27426"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27426"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27426\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}