{"id":26802,"date":"2007-09-12T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T05:00:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T05:00:12","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T05:00:12","slug":"hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal"},"content":{"rendered":"<section>\n<p>RUSH: Let\u2019s go to yesterday\u2019s program. Remember, we had two stories on Mrs. Clinton\u2019s fundraising. One was from ABC. This gets interesting, by the way. One was from ABC and their blog, and the other was from the Washington Post, both blogs. I said, &#8216;They\u2019ve given themselves cover here because they can run stories on this and say, &#8216;Hey, we put it on our blog.&#8221; I have to be very careful here. I love bloggers and they\u2019re extremely valuable and they do great, great work, but they\u2019re still small. They\u2019re growing. They do not have the reach of the newspaper websites, and they don\u2019t have the reach of the dead-tree newspapers yet. Basically the bloggers out there talk to themselves. They do have some readers and subscribers, but it\u2019s a small audience right now. So what happens is that the Post and ABC put these research stories on Mrs. Clinton\u2019s fundraiser, on their blogs, and not in their primary broadcasts or publications, and then they can say, &#8216;We covered it. What do you mean we\u2019re biased? We covered it,\u2019 but not with one of their seasoned journalists. So I said this yesterday on this program:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"234\" height=\"322\" class=\"alignright\"\/>RUSH ARCHIVE: Cookie, I know you\u2019re out there. We\u2019ll do a little study. We\u2019ll find out if this shows up on the ABC television network &#8212; what do they call it? &#8212; World News Tonight with Charles Gibson. I\u2019ll bet somebody a couple of iPhones that it doesn\u2019t. I\u2019ll bet it doesn\u2019t show up on Good Morning America, and I\u2019ll bet they don\u2019t talk about this on Nightline. (Well, they might do it on Nightline, when everybody but the perverts, are in bed.) Who knows? You want to make a bet about this?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Nobody took me up on this. I had a couple iPhones, willing to bet people, nobody took me up on this. So Cookie did the research, results are in, and we have a montage here of all the mentions we found on the ABC broadcast network of the Norman Hsu, Hillary Clinton fundraising scandal. <\/p>\n<p>(Silence)<\/p>\n<p>By the way, none of those examples are repeated, ladies and gentlemen. (Laughing) I was right. I know these people like every square inch of my shrinking and glorious naked body. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I want to set this up for you. I\u2019ve been wondering whether the Norman Hsu-Hsu Xiao Ling-Hillary Clinton-Democrat Party finance scandal would take root and take off. The place that you have to look to find out if this is going to happen (it\u2019s sad, but this is the reality) is the New York Times. If the New York Times decides that this scandal is too threatening to Mrs. Clinton and the party, then the New York Times is going to start saying so in its own way. Now, I don\u2019t know that that\u2019s happened yet, but I got two stories here from the New York Times that may indicate they\u2019re having real problems with this story as it relates to Mrs. Clinton. If it\u2019s true, then I suspect that they\u2019re going to have a problem with this. They will then have to have an alternative candidate, which would be Obama. He\u2019s not as hip-deep in the Hsu scandal as Mrs. Clinton is, but he\u2019s deep in it. The headline here of this Times story: &#8216;Clinton Sees Fear Realized in Trouble with Donor,\u2019 and another story from the New York Times: &#8216;Take the Money and Rue.\u2019 That is their editorial on this, and they say that Hillary is in a &#8216;scandal\u2019 in this editorial. They use that word and associate it with her. The editorial is basically just (sobbing), &#8216;Oh, can\u2019t we go back to the days of public financing and clean up this mess?\u2019 Go talk to the McCain-Feingold boys, New York Times. You guys got what you want here, and now it turns out you don\u2019t like it because it\u2019s leading to a scandal of your front-runner. It\u2019s gonna be fascinating to watch this. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: The Washington Post, by the way, is giving Mrs. Clinton a pass on the fundraising, but the New York Times is not, ladies and gentlemen. In fact, the AP is even worse, calling her a hero. &#8216;In returning $850,000 to donors associated with the disgraced fundraiser&#8230;\u2019 &#8212; who is not named &#8212; &#8216;Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton sets a significant new standard for how campaigns should respond in the face of potential&#8230;\u2019 A new standard? For crying out loud! Who wrote this? Jim Kuhnhenn. Jim, you\u2019re an idiot! How many millions did the Clintons have to give back already in the mid-nineties? What do you mean, setting new standards? The new standard being set here is having foreign countries in Asia finance Democrat presidential campaigns. What an absolute absurdity. Setting a new standard. Oh, yes, she\u2019s a victim and she\u2019s a hero. Well, the New York Times isn\u2019t playing it that way, and that\u2019s what counts. That\u2019s the house organ to keep an eye on here to see how they treat this. The Washington Post gives her a pass today: &#8216;Clinton campaign cites flawed background check. No evidence of fundraisers, lawsuits or bankruptcy turned up in records search, said a campaign spokesman.\u2019 We have a little bit here of what that spokesman said. Howard Wolfson, a montage of his explanation for how this could have possibly happened.<\/p>\n<p>WOLFSON: There\u2019s been additional reporting on some of Mr. Hsu\u2019s business practices, and we think an abundance of caution would dictate returning the money. The accumulated weight of all of what we\u2019ve seen and read compelled us to act out of an abundance of caution and return the money. Examination of publicly available databases and information was undertaken and unfortunately this decade-plus old warrant did not show up.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Decade-plus old warrant &#8212; you think that\u2019s all there was out there? The guy has a phony business. He scammed a bunch of people. This guy sold latex gloves made in China that he never delivered. Mr. Wolfson, I\u2019m sorry, you\u2019re just not credible on this, which requires a willing suspension of disbelief to accept the Clintons\u2019 story on this. &#8216;Though a commonly used public record search shows that Hsu had multiple business lawsuits filed against him dating to 1985, filed for bankruptcy in 1990, and was a defendant in two 1991 California court matters listed as possible criminal cases, the campaign said its computer checks used insufficient search terms that did not include the two middle names Hsu used in the California case. &#8216;In all of these searches, the campaign used the name Norman Hsu, which, like the search results of other committees and campaigns, did not turn up disqualifying information,\u2019 Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson explained.\u2019 You didn\u2019t want to find the information. I don\u2019t understand. We keep hearing people care about money, and politics, and ethics; they don\u2019t like earmarks; they don\u2019t like all this pork-barrel spending. <\/p>\n<p>I swear, folks, I don\u2019t understand, how, when this starts happening again to this degree, I don\u2019t understand why there\u2019s just not a massive running &#8212; well, I do, understand it, but parts of it I don\u2019t. &#8216;Hsu\u2019s troubled past eluded the Clinton campaign\u2019s detection even though he was a well-known figure who frequently appeared at campaign events.\u2019 I can\u2019t read this. They\u2019re victims. They\u2019re poor victims of a bad system. My gosh, take a look some of the pictures from the nineties. You got Charlie Trie in there; you\u2019ve got John Huang; you got Pauline Kanchanalak; you got the Riadys; you got the Lippo group. You have money that was being brought in from the Chinese People\u2019s Liberation Army, the Chinese Red Army, the ChiComs\u2019 army, that found its way to the Clinton administration. Let\u2019s not forget something. At the time the Chinese were having trouble orbiting rockets, and they launched some rocket over there, the Ding-Dong II or whatever, and it fell down out of the sky, and so Bernie Schwartz of Loral Space went over there and basically taught them how to orbit the Ding-Dong rocket. Searched the debris, found out what they were doing wrong. We advanced their rocket technology 25 or 30 years. <\/p>\n<p>Now, the way this was made to happen, normally the state department is in charge of allowing US corporations to interact with the nations that are considered on the quasi-enemy list. But the Clinton administration took that out of the state department\u2019s purview and gave it to whom? The commerce department, where who was in charge? Ron Brown, former Democratic National Committee chairman and so forth, so that\u2019s how this all happened. So the ChiComs sent all this money and we\u2019re led to believe here that another Asian, Hong Kong, Chinese, has eluded the Clintons on the possible &#8212; I don\u2019t believe a word of it. I think they knew and were trying to get away with it. The guy is running around in this country on the lam for 15 years and nobody can find him? There\u2019s so much strange about this, folks. They didn\u2019t take his passport either time he was arrested. He fled the country once. They didn\u2019t take it this last time. I\u2019m still suspicious about what the hell happened on this Amtrak train heading to New York from California in Colorado. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Clinton campaign chairman Terence R. McAuliffe &#8212; famous for his careful, methodical courting of big donors and fundraisers &#8211;&#8216; I\u2019m going to choke. This is the Washington Post giving them all a pass here. &#8216;&#8211;said in an interview yesterday that he does not know where Hsu came from. &#8216;I don\u2019t know how he became involved in the Clinton campaign,\u2019 McAuliffe said. &#8216;I\u2019ve never asked the man for a check.&#8221; My mind is Jell-O, Jell-O, Jell-O, I don\u2019t recall; I don\u2019t remember; it\u2019s not my fault; can\u2019t possibly be expected to remember all these donors, Jell-O, Jell-O, Jell-O. Later in the story, &#8216; McAuliffe, the man who built his reputation by raising huge sums for Bill Clinton, said it was not until 15 months after Hsu wrote his first check to Clinton\u2019s Senate bid that they met, &#8216;and I had very little interaction with him after.\u2019 Major Clinton donors said this represents a departure for a campaign that prides itself on preparation and will not hesitate to lavish attention on those who raise money.\u2019 I swear, this Washington Post story was written by the Clintons. It\u2019s just laughable. McAuliffe ended up with $15 million from Gary Winnick, that phone company that went bankrupt, Global Crossing, yeah. It\u2019s just amazing all this stuff that happens to the Clintons.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.7321.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"202\" class=\"alignright\"\/>RUSH: I just want to share with you some of the details here in today\u2019s Wall Street Journal page one story. Who is Norman Hsu? Where did he get his money? You need to know this. The Clinton campaign is acting like they have no clue who the guy is. They never found out and their computers couldn\u2019t find out, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It\u2019s such BS. The Wall Street Journal has found out all kinds of stuff about this guy. &#8216;New documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal may help point to an answer: A company controlled by Mr. Hsu recently received $40 million from a Madison Avenue investment fund run by Joel Rosenman, who was one of the creators of the Woodstock rock festival in 1969. That money, Mr. Rosenman told investors this week, is missing. Mr. Hsu told Mr. Rosenman the money would be used to manufacture apparel in China for Gucci, Prada and other private labels, yielding a 40% profit on each deal, according to a business plan obtained by the Journal. Now the investment fund, Source Financing Investors, says Mr. Hsu\u2019s company owes it the $40 million, which represents 37 separate deals with Mr. Hsu\u2019s company. When Source Financing recently attempted to cash checks from the company, Components Ltd., the investors say they were told the account held insufficient funds. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Source Financing\u2019s arrangement with Mr. Hsu\u2019s company, according to court documents and investor accounts,\u2019 that the Clintons couldn\u2019t find, &#8216;echoes an older matter that came to light in recent weeks. In 1991, California officials charged Mr. Hsu with grand theft for failing to repay investors for money he raised to import latex gloves from China.\u2019 Now, this is the same scam, only this time it\u2019s with knockoffs of name-brand clothing. &#8221;Norman Hsu has an extraordinary ability to deceive,\u2019 says Seth Rosenberg of Clayman &amp;amp; Rosenberg, a lawyer representing Mr. Rosenman. Mr. Rosenman and a partner, Yau Cheng, wrote a joint letter on Monday to alert their fund\u2019s investors. &#8216;Last week, our attorneys met with representatives of the Manhattan District Attorney\u2019s office to inform them of the situation,\u2019 they wrote. The district attorney is investigating, the letter says. A spokesman for the district attorney did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Hsu\u2019s lawyers had no immediate comment to the allegations by Source Financing. Where Mr. Hsu got his money has been a burning question in recent weeks. He financed a web of political donations and a lavish lifestyle, despite two bankruptcies and a felony record. Telling acquaintances he was an apparel executive, he set up multiple companies, sometimes giving early investors profits, they say, so they would bring in friends. In some cases, investors in his businesses say they were so eager to please Mr. Hsu that they donated to political candidates alongside him.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>The LA Times told us this the other day. People who had no intention to vote for Hillary gave him money for Hillary because they wanted to stay on his good side. &#8216;Mr. Hsu himself has donated $750,000 to Democrats and Democratic parties out of his own pocket since 2004, according to campaign-finance records. In checks no larger than $2,300 apiece &#8212; the legal limit for donations to single candidates for a primary or a general election &#8212; Mr. Hsu also raised more than $850,000 for New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton\u2019s presidential campaign. He co-hosted fund-raisers that brought in hundreds of thousands of dollars more, including a recent event for Mrs. Clinton at the Modern, a restaurant at the Museum of Modern Art in Manhattan.\u2019 They were standing there side-by-side! He\u2019s co-hosting fundraisers for her! &#8216;My mind is Jell-O, Jell-O, Jell-O.\u2019 She has no idea, and the campaign has no clue who this guy is! &#8216;The contributions are now haunting the Democratic [P]arty. Mrs. Clinton\u2019s campaign said on Monday it would refund all of the,\u2019 money. &#8216;More Democrats announced yesterday that they would dispose of funds that Mr. Hsu gave or raised, including Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York ($25,000), Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts ($35,000), Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu ($11,700), Montana Sen. Jon Tester ($4,750), Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill ($20,700) and Pennsylvania Rep. Joseph Sestak ($2,500). <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Others have given their money to charity, including Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau,\u2019 the Manhattan DA, &#8216;whose campaign received $2,000 in March from Mr. Hsu,\u2019 and they\u2019re now investigating. Now, some of these people are fine. Morgenthau is a fine guy. They say they\u2019re going to give the money to charity. I want proof! The Drive-Bys just accept it. Let\u2019s see the checks. Let\u2019s see the wire transfers. &#8216;More Democrats are expected to follow. A Wall Street Journal analysis of campaign finance reform records has linked Mr. Hsu with at least $1.8 million in donations to Democrats since 2004.\u2019 Campaign finance reform, anyone, by the way? &#8216;Mr. Rosenberg, the attorney for Mr. Rosenman,\u2019 the Woodstock guy, who gave Hsu $40 million, &#8216;asked politicians to hold on to the funds so that Source Financing and other investors can be made whole. &#8216;It appears that Source Financing Investors joins Hillary Clinton&#8230;and many others as his victims,\u2019 Mr. Rosenberg said in an interview.\u2019 Awww! Bring out the Stradivarius here, folks. Then, of course, they tell us the story of the family of Mr. Paw. Let me repeat this story for you in case you missed it. In late August the Journal had a story &#8216;that called attention to similar donations by Mr. Hsu and a California family who shared one of his many addresses. The family lives in a modest home and one member, William Paw, is a mailman.\u2019 This is the family that has a lot of pets, but no money. &#8216;Campaign-finance records show the $55,000 in donations the family members have made to Mrs. Clinton since 2004 place them among her leading financial supporters.\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>William Paw makes 45 grand a year as a mailman, and he\u2019s one of her leading contributors! &#8216;The family has donated about $225,000 to Democrats since 2005. The U.S. Justice Department is investigating possible campaign-finance violations.\u2019 This is the man that the Wall Street Journal can find out everything about, the feds can find out. The Clintons? The mind is Jell-O, Jell-O, Jell-O. I don\u2019t recall. I don\u2019t remember. She\u2019s standing right next to him as a co-host at a fundraiser at a restaurant at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. The parallels here are just striking. Let me give you a couple things here from the Investor\u2019s Business Daily editorial from yesterday on this: &#8216;People forced to give to political causes and candidates they abhor &#8212; is there anything more un-American?\u2019 They\u2019re writing in reaction to the LA Times story that a couple of women were made to feel, by Norman Hsu, that they had to give to Clinton to stay in his good graces, but they had no intention to vote for her. But that marks only the beginning of the concerns. &#8216;Why would a suspected swindler be a top donor to a White House favorite? Is Hsu fronting for a group, a foreign government?\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>Who is this guy? &#8216;Why did Clinton ignore warnings about Hsu? California businessman Jack Cassidy reportedly alerted the Clinton campaign in June of his suspicions that Hsu was a fraudster. The Clinton campaign is accepting future contributions from the same people to whom, because of their associations with Hsu, it is returning $850,000,\u2019 as we mentioned yesterday. &#8216;That amounts to a shell game.\u2019 Does anybody remember the name Jack Abramoff and how the Drive-By Media was just bzz bzz bzz bzz bzz bzz for two years over what might happen to Republicans because of their association with him? Of course, the Drive-Bys, for the most part, are ignoring this &#8212; except the New York Times, ladies and gentlemen. Roger Aronoff, writing at AIM (Accuracy in Media), says keep a sharp eye on the New York Times, and if the New York Times decides that this latest scandal is an indication that Senator Clinton carries too much baggage to be a viable presidential candidate, will they pull the plug on her and carry the banner for somebody else such as Obama? Well, let\u2019s look at the New York Times today: &#8216;Clinton Sees Fear Realized in Trouble with Donor.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The Hsu case has revived ugly memories for voters about the Democratic fund-raising scandals when Bill Clinton was president&#8230; Even some of her own major donors are aghast that, given the Clintons\u2019 past problems with fund-raising, Mrs. Clinton\u2019s vetting process did not uncover Mr. Hsu\u2019s criminal history&#8230; &#8216;People have often said about the Clintons, they don\u2019t care who they hang out with as long as the people can be helpful to them,&#8221; this is one of Mrs. Clinton\u2019s major fundraisers. &#8221;The larger point in all of this is that the Clintons are the ultimate pragmatists in who they hang out with; if you can be useful to them, they will find a way to make it work.\u2019 Advisers say Mrs. Clinton is not so much furious about the scandal, as she is worried about containing the political damage.\u2019 Well, of course! Then the New York Times editorial today discusses this with the headline &#8216;Take the Money and Rue,\u2019 and they say that she\u2019s in a &#8216;scandal.\u2019 So we\u2019ll keep a sharp eye on the New York Times. The New York Times will provide the Drive-By Media with its guidance on how to treat this story and only time will tell. I know it\u2019s unlikely. I think the Times, right now, is doing its obligatory duty to cover the story and they\u2019ll drop it in due course, but we\u2019ll see. It depends on what continues to surface and how many other people decide to get interested in all of this.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Three small little observations here, and this, to me, is the most obvious question about Norman Hsu. Here is the most obvious question: How is it conceivable that the Clinton people don\u2019t know who he is and don\u2019t know his background? For somebody to have contributed that much money, he would have demanded something in return. People do not make donations of this size for ideas. You people sending $25, $50, you\u2019re sending your ideas in. Somebody like this, who is out there raising money, bundling money from people who don\u2019t have it, is expecting something in return for this. For that to happen, they have to know who he is and who he represents. You cannot return favors, unless you know who you\u2019re supposed to deliver to. This, to me, is the most obvious question about this, and this, ladies and gentlemen, is why I am host. <\/p>\n<p>Also, you remember back in one of the first reporting periods of campaign fundraising when Obama had overtaken Hillary? You remember the, &#8216;Oh, my God, why, look at that, why, how can this be?\u2019 There was a story around that time that came and went, folks. Hillary\u2019s campaign had accidentally doubled some contributions, because she had to roll back her total number. She had accidentally doubled some contributions and noticed that some contributions were checks that bounced. This happened when the action line was the fundraising contest between Obama versus Hillary, and she originally put out some false numbers, that she was way ahead, and that was what was first reported. Then a week or so later, some days later, &#8216;By the way, we need revise our numbers.\u2019 After everybody had already got the first number in their head, &#8216;Oh, wow, look at Hillary, she is really raising a lot of money.\u2019 They had to revise the numbers down a little bit. And, of course, can we forget &#8212; we cannot, can we? &#8212; the cattles future scandal where Mrs. Clinton invested $10,000 in the cattle futures market, what, six months later the ten grand became a hundred grand, and they asked her, &#8216;How did this happen?\u2019 &#8216;Well, I read the Wall Street Journal.\u2019 Remember that? Well, when did she stop reading the Wall Street Journal for cattle tips? You talk about suspending belief? How about Hillary making a hundred grand off ten grand in a matter of a few months? <\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s another thing, folks. Let\u2019s take her at her word. She didn\u2019t know who the guy was, couldn\u2019t find him, couldn\u2019t uncover one bit of information about Norman Hsu. Despite this incredible vetting process, Wolfson couldn\u2019t do it, the punk couldn\u2019t do it, Terry McAuliffe couldn\u2019t do it. She wants to be president of the United States. Do you realize how many things over the years she\u2019s admitted to not knowing? This makes her totally inept. If we take her at her word, that she didn\u2019t know, she is totally inept, ladies and gentlemen, especially her own past with money. Her self-assumed victim-hood with the media. This is an accident waiting to happen if this woman takes it far. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Here\u2019s another story on Norman Hsu. This is from NBC Channel 11, and the Associated Press also contributed to it. It\u2019s a strange article. &#8216;An anonymous tip to the FBI led to the arrest of disgraced Democrat fundraiser Norman Hsu in Colorado, according to recently unsealed court documents. Hsu, who appeared suddenly in the New York political scene about four years ago, had been scheduled to appear in court last week for a bail reduction hearing, but skipped town, forfeiting $2 million in bail. He took the California Zephyr out of Emeryville at about the same time as his court appearance. He is under guard at St. Mary\u2019s Hospital in Grand Junction, Colorado. He was arrested at the hospital after he was taken from the eastbound Amtrak train for treatment of an undisclosed ailment.\u2019 Here\u2019s the last two sentences of the story. &#8216;It is not clear when Hsu will be released from the hospital. NBC 11 reported he was taken to the surgical wing.\u2019 He was taken to the surgical wing. By the way, ladies and gentlemen, you\u2019ve heard the term &#8216;culture of corruption\u2019 floating around out there, especially as it applies to Republicans? Culture of corruption. Clinton fundraising is not the culture of corruption. It\u2019s the definition of corruption. That\u2019s how you have to look at Norman Hsu and all this. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Let\u2019s go to yesterday\u2019s program. Remember, we had two stories on Mrs. Clinton\u2019s fundraising. One was from ABC. This gets interesting, by the way. One was from ABC and their blog, and the other was from the Washington Post, both blogs. I said, &#8216;They\u2019ve given themselves cover here because they can run stories on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Let\u2019s go to yesterday\u2019s program. Remember, we had two stories on Mrs. Clinton\u2019s fundraising. One was from ABC. This gets interesting, by the way. One was from ABC and their blog, and the other was from the Washington Post, both blogs. I said, &#8216;They\u2019ve given themselves cover here because they can run stories on [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/\",\"name\":\"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T05:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T05:00:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Let\u2019s go to yesterday\u2019s program. Remember, we had two stories on Mrs. Clinton\u2019s fundraising. One was from ABC. This gets interesting, by the way. One was from ABC and their blog, and the other was from the Washington Post, both blogs. I said, &#8216;They\u2019ve given themselves cover here because they can run stories on [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125107.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/","name":"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T05:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T05:00:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/09\/12\/hillary_embroiled_in_hsu_scandal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hillary Embroiled in Hsu Scandal"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26802"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26802"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}