{"id":26254,"date":"2007-07-18T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T05:15:14","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-05-31T15:41:18","modified_gmt":"2017-05-31T19:41:18","slug":"an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/","title":{"rendered":"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax"},"content":{"rendered":"
RUSH: Nate in Buffalo, I\u2019m glad you called, sir. Welcome to the EIB Network.<\/section>\n
<\/section>\n
CALLER: Hey, Rush, pleasure to talk with you.<\/section>\n
<\/section>\n
RUSH: Thank you, sir.CALLER: We disagree on a lot of things. I know this study came out saying that the sun was not the cause of global warming. I know you disagreed with that. But I was just wondering, do you know what the first two planets were closest to the sun?<\/p>\n

RUSH: The closest planets to the sun are Mercury and Venus.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah. Well, Venus is much warmer than mercury even though it\u2019s farther away from the sun and I guess that wouldn\u2019t make much sense, but it\u2019s because of the gases that are in the atmosphere.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, but there are geophysical reasons that we can learn from the first glacial age on our own planet to explain this.<\/p>\n

CALLER: What is that?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, one thing, you can\u2019t compare the atmospheres of the earth to especially Venus, nor Mercury. And, by the way, I\u2019m not willing to concede that Venus is hotter, but if it is, then it has things to do with circumstances that do not exist on this planet at all. So not only do I reject the notion that the sun has nothing to do it, I think it\u2019s absurd. I think it\u2019s like literally absurd for anybody to think the sun is not a factor. They don\u2019t factor precipitation on the effect on climate in this country. I think it\u2019s absurd for anybody alive today to sit there ask think — this is how vain we are, that the climate today is ideal, and that from any variance from here is going to be destructive. No, we don\u2019t know that. We adapt. Human beings and other life forms on this planet have adapted to things that we can\u2019t control, and climate is one of them. It\u2019s ridiculous to me. It\u2019s intellectually depraved to me. This is a religion. This is a political issue. It\u2019s liberalism on the march. I\u2019m glad you called, because I had this story in the Global Warming Stack, and I wasn\u2019t sure I was going to be able to get to it today. But your call has provided the perfect transition to it.<\/p>\n

It is a story in BusinessandMedia.org (pdf)<\/a>. It\u2019s a website. It is written by R. Warren Anderson, a research analyst, and Dan Gainor, he\u2019s a Boone Pickens Free Market Fellow. These guys are think tank people. And they\u2019ve done an analysis of the last 100 years of journalism on global warming. It\u2019s entitled ‘Fire and ice.\u2019 It\u2019s 17 pages when you print it out. But this puts the blame for all of this hysteria on global warming exactly where it belongs, and that is the media! Now, for a hundred years we\u2019ve had wacko scientists trying to advance agendas, and if the agenda happens to fit the media — and the agenda here, by the way, is chaos. The agenda is crisis. That is why in 1979, Newsweek had run a cover on global cooling, the coming ice ag<\/a>e, and there was a cover story on some magazine of a glacier, totally surrounding Manhattan with only Empire State Building protruding. Just as today, Algore\u2019s movie has a flood wiping out Manhattan. It doesn\u2019t matter, global cooling, global warming; it\u2019s crisis; it\u2019s we\u2019re in trouble; it\u2019s we need big government to fix it; we need to punish people; we need to control their lives. People are causing this. It\u2019s been going on for 100 years.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Here\u2019s the opening paragraph. ‘It was five years before the turn of the century and major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of The New York Times was headlined with the serious concerns of ‘geologists.\u2019 Only the president at the time wasn\u2019t Bill Clinton; it was Grover Cleveland. And the Times wasn\u2019t warning about global warming — it was telling readers the looming dangers of a new ice age. The year was 1895, and it was just one of four different time periods in the last 100 years when major print media predicted an impending climate crisis. Each prediction carried its own elements of doom, saying Canada could be ‘wiped out\u2019 or lower crop yields would mean ‘billions will die.\u2019 Just as the weather has changed over time, so has the reporting — blowing hot or cold with short-term changes in temperature. Following the ice age threats from the late 1800s, fears of an imminent and icy catastrophe were compounded in the 1920s by Arctic explorer Donald MacMillan and an obsession with the news of his polar expedition. As the Times put it on Feb. 24, 1895, ‘Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again.\u2019<\/p>\n

Those concerns lasted well into the late 1920s. But when the earth\u2019s surface warmed less than half a degree, newspapers and magazines responded with stories about the new threat. Once again the Times was out in front, cautioning ‘the earth is steadily growing warmer.\u2019 After a while, that second phase of climate cautions began to fade. By 1954, Fortune magazine was warming to another cooling trend and ran an article titled ‘Climate &ndash; the Heat May Be Off.\u2019 As the United States and the old Soviet Union faced off, the media joined them with reports of a more dangerous Cold War of Man vs. Nature. The New York Times ran warming stories into the late 1950s, but it too came around to the new fears. Just three decades ago, in 1975, the paper reported: ‘A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable.”<\/p>\n

They have graphic portrayals of newspaper covers and magazine covers. Here\u2019s Science News, March 1, 1975, with Manhattan being enveloped by a glacier. ‘The future looked cold and ominous with this science depiction from March 1, 1975.\u2019 Then TIME Magazine, June 24, 1974, story showed how arctic snow and ice had grown from 1968 to 1974. I don\u2019t know if it\u2019s the cover, might just be the story, but it had a graphic here of the expanding North Pole. New York Times timeline. September 18th, 1924, ‘MacMillan reports signs of new ice age.\u2019 March 27, 1933, ‘America in longest warm spell since 1776.\u2019 ‘Temperature line records a 25-year rise.\u2019 Now, from 1924, we\u2019re talking about a new ice age and nine years later they\u2019re warning us of global warming in the New York Times, from \u201933 to 1975, ‘Scientists ponder why world\u2019s climate is changing. A major cooling widely considered to be inevitable. Global cooling was all the rage, all the magazines and newspapers back in \u201975 through \u201979. December 27, 2005, ‘Past hot times hold few reasons to relax about new warming.”<\/p>\n

This is nothing more than typical media behavior. Nothing more than typical media distortion and really what it is, is constant focus on crisis. If somebody they think is credible, a scientist or an expert, comes out and says, ‘We got global warming. It\u2019s going to happen,\u2019 you had a former vice president with a movie out there, they love it. It\u2019s crisis. It sells newspapers! It gets ratings! It promotes liberalism! It promotes big government! I don\u2019t think, folks, based on where some of our thermometers are that take official temperature readings in this country and around the world, I don\u2019t think we can possibly know for sure whether it\u2019s getting warmer or colder climate-wise worldwide. How can in the middle of global warming we set record lows in the summertime and have record highs in the winter? Some of these things just don\u2019t make sense. But aside from all that, you don\u2019t factor precipitation, you throw the sun out of the equation, and you only factor in rich countries and wealthy human beings and then point the finger of blame, you don\u2019t think that\u2019s liberalism? That\u2019s liberalism to its core, combined with a compliant media that is focused not on facts and truth and open exchange of ideas, but just promoting crisis, pure and simple. Don\u2019t fall for it. It\u2019s a hoax!<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: I got pretty passionate there, folks, on this global warming thing, but I have a tough time dealing with people that end up being robots. This is a very, very insidious (at the same time ingenious) campaign that the people on the pro-global warming side have of trying to persuade your kids and everybody else that this is actually happening and it\u2019s of course America\u2019s fault, and the fault of other Western civilizations, highly achieved, highly advanced. Travel anywhere in the world where it\u2019s not advanced and tell me that they clean up their messes as well as we do, and we\u2019re going to certify you. Beyond all that, how to explain this? At the root of this is political activism everywhere, from all the scientists on this who say it is this, and then you\u2019ve got the media that just loves to promote all this stuff. They don\u2019t question it. This great, great story called ‘Fire and Ice,\u2019 I just shared with you minute amounts of data. But it\u2019s a total study of the media and some of the scientists over the years. Every 25 years, it changes. Warming, cooling, ice age, destruction, and it\u2019s all our fault. It\u2019s happening!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>They haven\u2019t been right in 100 years about it. They have been predicting catastrophe for 100 years. It hasn\u2019t happened, and they\u2019re doing it again now, and they\u2019re revising the out-year catastrophe. Now they don\u2019t say in the next five or ten years. They\u2019re smart about it. They say 20 or 30 because you can\u2019t say in ten years it\u2019s not going to happen, so they still have 20 more years to scare you and so forth. But it\u2019s just an absolute, total, 100% hoax. Now, the climate changes all the time. I am not disputing that. I\u2019m talking about the fact that only certain human beings and only certain countries are causing this to happen. It has everything. It has class envy. It has rich versus poor. It has haves and have-nots, and of course the haves are once again victimizing the have-nots, and we\u2019re stealing all the resources and burning all the fuel and putting all the CO2 up there — and that\u2019s the thing. We\u2019re going to create an atmosphere like Venus, and we\u2019re all going to die. Frankly, it\u2019s ridiculous. It\u2019s not going to happen. We\u2019re adaptive. We can deal with it. (sigh) Anyway, I\u2019ve said my piece on this. Chris in Martinsburg, West Virginia. I\u2019m glad you called, sir. Welcome to the EIB Network.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Dittos, Rush. (garbled)<\/p>\n

RUSH: Psst. Hello?<\/p>\n

CALLER: I wanted to comment on what the last caller was saying about temperatures on Mercury and Venus. Mercury has no atmosphere. So when the side of Mercury that\u2019s facing the sun, it is extremely hot, but the side of Mercury that is in nighttime or away from the sun is very cold. If you take those two temperatures and you average them, you are going to get a temperature that is probably a little bit lower, on the average, than Venus, which has a hyperatmosphere, and therefore has a constant temperature. There\u2019s just no variation in Venus\u2019 temperature, and it\u2019s always going to be a little bit higher than an average temperature of Mercury, which has a day and a night, and vast temperature swings on its surface.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, Venus\u2019 atmosphere — correct me if I\u2019m wrong — I know it\u2019s got a very strong greenhouse effect, but it\u2019s a dense atmosphere.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Extremely dense.<\/p>\n

RUSH: You can\u2019t see through it.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Right. No, you can\u2019t see through it, and Venus —<\/p>\n

RUSH: That\u2019s how dense it is. So to compare that with ours… Plus, look how much closer to the sun it is. Because of the density… People leave this factor out of the warming claims on our own planet. We\u2019ve got CO2 here. There\u2019s a greenhouse effect here, there\u2019s no question. There\u2019s a huge one on Venus. But the CO2 portion in our atmosphere is minute compared to that which is on Venus, and the reason it changes very slowly is because the warming effect is short-circuited by weather that happens on the earth, such as clouds and precipitation that they still don\u2019t model and factor. None of that has taken place on Venus, or very little of it because the density of the atmosphere.<\/p>\n

CALLER: No, you\u2019re absolutely right, and what\u2019s going on with Venus is that oceans never form, so a lot of their atmosphere is water vapor and a lot of other greenhouse gases.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Water vapor is a huge greenhouse gas.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Absolutely. Absolutely. So, you could be very misled if you only look at the data but you don\u2019t understand what the basis is.<\/p>\n

RUSH: That\u2019s the point. Glad you called. That\u2019s exactly the point. You can be misled, you can be propagandized, and you can be brainwashed. But that guy that called, and his point was political. You know, he asked me about Venus, but he\u2019s trying to get me screwed around so that I end up tripping up and agreeing with his political point. I guess the best way for people who are ambivalent about this or even mildly curious, is think of it. It\u2019s just a political issue. It\u2019s a political issue that\u2019s shrouded in science. It is pushed forward with the best of intentions: to save the earth, and to save all living things — except humans, because the earth really will not be safe, and it will not be saved until the mass of humanity is destroyed by a virus that doesn\u2019t kill anything else. There are advocates of that who got serious treatment in a recent Newsweek column. The guy\u2019s written a book! Thanks for the call, Chris. I appreciate it.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Tom in Highland Park, Illinois, glad you waited, sir. You\u2019re next on the EIB Network.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hello, Rush.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Hey.<\/p>\n

CALLER: You know, when libs claim scientific justification for global warming —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah.<\/p>\n

CALLER: — you need to understand there\u2019s a reason why they call it scientific consensus rather than scientific theory, and the reason is theory needs to incorporate all the known data, and there\u2019s some excellent reports out there right now showing that the nearby planets in our solar system are experiencing solar rises in their surface temperature.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, we reported that, Mars, even Pluto, which they screwed by de-planetizing it for a while. But kids got upset. ‘You can\u2019t tell us that Pluto\u2019s not a planet,\u2019 and so they had to make it a planet again.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, there\u2019s another report out this year showing that all the planets in the solar system are experiencing similar rises in their surface temperatures. So if we\u2019re going to accept the scientific consensus as theory, we have to conclude that our American economy is causing a greenhouse effect across the whole solar system. Now, they realize they can\u2019t get away with calling it a theory so they\u2019ve come up with this code term, ‘scientific consensus\u2019 to hide the fact that they\u2019re advancing a political agenda rather than scientific fact.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Right. They\u2019re relying on the basic scientific ignorance of most people, ‘Oh, consensus, why most scientists agree, why, must be true.\u2019 They\u2019re relying on that. Let me ask you a question. I should ask Roy Spencer this, but I don\u2019t have access to him right now. You seem to be informed on this. Do we have the technology to accurately measure surface temperatures on these outlier planets?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, you\u2019re probably exceeding my technical knowledge, but the higher the temperature, the different the radiation is, and the different the color is, and through that I believe that they can measure the surface temperatures of the various planets.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Right. It makes sense to me but then all those things you talked about, the radiation and the color and all that, still has to go through our polluted global warming atmosphere, with all that CO2 in it. How might that be distorting it some?<\/p>\n

CALLER: I think the more important thing here, Rush, is why they are pushing global warming as such an important part of their political agenda. Would you care to suggest to your listeners why they\u2019re doing this or could I help you?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Why don\u2019t you go ahead. I\u2019ve already told them what I think.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I think we don\u2019t have to guess at it. We can look right at Kofi Annan, a speech that he made last spring I believe as the secretary general of the UN, where he claimed that global warming was such a serious worldwide problem that nations needed to forsake their sovereignty to the United Nations to fix the problem. We all know what they say the problem is. It\u2019s the American economy. So what they\u2019re asking us to do is turn over the last successful capitalistic democracy over to a group that is highly dominated by either dictators, communist nations, or highly socialized states like France, Germany, and England. What I would suggest they\u2019re doing is advancing an agenda for worldwide socialism. Would you disagree?<\/p>\n

RUSH: No. That\u2019s what the objective of socialists is, to wipe out capitalism wherever they can find it, gain control over as much of the wealth of each nation as possible, and the population.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, there\u2019s a problem with that. I mean everybody wants to help out the unfortunate, but I\u2019ve never seen a communist regime or even a highly socialized state that has not relied on autocratic rule. Therefore socialism really is the enemy of democracy. We\u2019ve never seen a democratic communist nation anywhere raising its head in history, and the American Democratic Party, if we look at their agenda, it\u2019s very hard to find one thing on their agenda that you can distinguish from any communist or socialist regime that ever raised its ugly head in history.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Aside from one thing. The Democrats have not yet proposed shooting people who try to escape or who disagree with them.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I don\u2019t think that\u2019s accurate, because last week or two weeks ago we raised a monument to the goddess of democracy in Washington, which is supposed to commemorate the millions of people that died under brutal communist regimes, and it was held in our American liberal press as a controversial monument that the monument was not telling the full story of communism. If the full story of communism isn\u2019t murdering millions of people unnecessarily, then what is the other side, Rush?<\/p>\n

RUSH: It is, no, it is. Communism kills, Undeniable Truth of Life Number 18. Communism kills. There\u2019s evidence to support it. Well, the reason that they won\u2019t let the whole story be told is because they don\u2019t want the whole story to be told, and they don\u2019t want that monument to go up. Anyway, I think all of liberalism is oriented toward control of resources and control of the population. For a whole host of reasons. An interesting call, sir.<\/p>\n

END TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Nate in Buffalo, I\u2019m glad you called, sir. Welcome to the EIB Network. CALLER: Hey, Rush, pleasure to talk with you. RUSH: Thank you, sir.CALLER: We disagree on a lot of things. I know this study came out saying that the sun was not the cause of global warming. I know you disagreed with […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nAn Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Nate in Buffalo, I\u2019m glad you called, sir. Welcome to the EIB Network. CALLER: Hey, Rush, pleasure to talk with you. RUSH: Thank you, sir.CALLER: We disagree on a lot of things. I know this study came out saying that the sun was not the cause of global warming. I know you disagreed with […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Newsweek-cooling.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Newsweek-cooling.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Newsweek-cooling.jpg\",\"width\":852,\"height\":1169},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/\",\"name\":\"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T05:15:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-31T19:41:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Nate in Buffalo, I\u2019m glad you called, sir. Welcome to the EIB Network. CALLER: Hey, Rush, pleasure to talk with you. RUSH: Thank you, sir.CALLER: We disagree on a lot of things. I know this study came out saying that the sun was not the cause of global warming. I know you disagreed with […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Newsweek-cooling.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Newsweek-cooling.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Newsweek-cooling.jpg","width":852,"height":1169},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/","name":"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T05:15:14+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-31T19:41:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/07\/18\/an_examination_of_the_media_and_the_global_warming_hoax2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An Examination of the Media and the Global Warming Hoax"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26254"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26254"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":235558,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26254\/revisions\/235558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}