{"id":25890,"date":"2007-06-11T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T05:25:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T05:25:12","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T05:25:12","slug":"caller_bush_immigration_strategery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/","title":{"rendered":"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: Jim in Boston, I\u2019m glad you waited, sir, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Yeah, Rush, listen, I\u2019m not saying that President Bush is against immigration, but I think a lot of what he\u2019s doing is strategery. And what I mean by that is, look, he wants to be able to show he\u2019s trying to do the best he can for the Hispanics, and he\u2019s always had a, you know, history with, but at the same time he knows that it\u2019s going to be overturned, and also, it confounds the Democrats so they can\u2019t go against him because they could say, ‘Hey, the president, the Republicans are going in favor of it,\u2019 and it\u2019s just like in Dubai Ports. He knew it was going to go down but this is where he said he tried to do what he could for —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Wait, wait, wait, wait. I\u2019m not following you here. What\u2019s the strategery?<\/p>\n

CALLER: The strategery is the Democrats cannot call the Republicans nativists for opposing the immigration because the president himself is opposing it. And it basically confounds their strategy.<\/p>\n

RUSH: They are calling us nativists. <\/p>\n

CALLER: But they can\u2019t do it effectively.<\/p>\n

RUSH: They\u2019re calling us yahoos. They\u2019re calling us racists.<\/p>\n

CALLER: But, Rush, they can\u2019t do it effectively because basically it\u2019s confounded the Democrats because you\u2019ve got President Bush himself pushing it.<\/p>\n

RUSH: No, but they still can because the president has split the party on this. They can call us racists and yahoos —<\/p>\n

CALLER: Rush, can I ask you a question?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Listen. President Bush may not be the most articulate, but he is intelligent and he doesn\u2019t have a tin ear. He knows. And basically for him now, even in the teeth of all this opposition to say he\u2019s going to go back to Congress and try to push it, basically is keeping the issue going, and ultimately it\u2019s going to help the Republicans by keeping the issue alive. Think about this after the fact when this is all over with, what he\u2019s accomplished. It\u2019s the same thing like with Harriet Miers. He never would have gotten Judge Alito in after Judge Roberts.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, but see, that\u2019s almost a brilliant point but it —<\/p>\n

CALLER: It is a brilliant.<\/p>\n

RUSH: It comes up a little short.<\/p>\n

CALLER: No, it doesn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yes, it does because for this to be analogous to Harriet Miers, next time they come back with an immigration bill, it\u2019s gotta be an Alito immigration bill, meaning they gotta fix it. And that\u2019s not going to be happen.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Rush —<\/p>\n

RUSH: The effort is going to be made to resurrect this bill in all of its fundamental —<\/p>\n

CALLER: No. What it does is keep the issue alive pending the election. In other words, this keeps the issue going, keeps it active, keeps people fired up, keeps the base moving. That\u2019s why it\u2019s analogous totally. President Bush never would have gotten the Judge Alito in after Judge Roberts, a conservative male, had he not gone with Harriet Miers first.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Oh, wait a second. You\u2019re telling me that he\u2019s doing this on purpose?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, no —<\/p>\n

RUSH: And you\u2019re telling me that he nominated Harriet Miers on purpose, knowing full well we wouldn\u2019t accept it, and that was the only way he could get Alito?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Not saying —<\/p>\n

RUSH: You\u2019re being too smart by half here.<\/p>\n

CALLER: No.<\/p>\n

RUSH: That\u2019s not what\u2019s happening in this case. It is not what happened with Harriet Miers.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Let me just say, I\u2019m saying it\u2019s kind of like all of the above. Because here\u2019s what I mean. Bush has Hispanic sympathies, he can show he\u2019s trying to do the best he can, the same thing with the Arab allies and the Dubai Ports.<\/p>\n

RUSH: That\u2019s not how presidents are judged. I\u2019m sorry to tell you this. Legacies are born of achievements. If this thing doesn\u2019t happen, his legacy is going to be he couldn\u2019t get his own party rallied around him to get this done. He had Democrats willing to do it, all up until Harry Reid. And, you know, that\u2019s an interesting thing to me, old Dingy Harry. Dingy Harry has been all over the ballpark on the subject of illegal immigration. You can find quotes, depending on how far back in time you want to go, where Dingy Harry was all against illegal immigration, then you find him moderating his tone a little bit. Dingy Harry called for a vote when Bush was out of the country, and he pulled the bill when Bush was out of the country. <\/p>\n

Dingy Harry wants this thing to stay failed. He wants it to go down the tubes. He wanted it to because, to him, in his political universe, presidential failure equals Democrat success. He was saying last week, ‘Well, this is a Republican bill. This is a president\u2019s bill. Sure we have some Democrats working on it and trying to help, but it\u2019s the president\u2019s bill.\u2019 The New York Times has one of the most incredible editorials. I\u2019ll give you a couple excerpts from it when we come back from the break. But they\u2019re blaming Bush, they\u2019re blaming Kyl, they\u2019re blaming conservative talk radio and so forth. Dingy Harry pulled the bill. That bill could still be up there, he could be offering amendments to it and giving it a chance — he pulled it. He wants Bush to fail because legacies are born of achievements, not effort.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Now, look, folks, I don\u2019t want you to get too smart by half out there. There\u2019s no strategery here on the part of the president to help the Republican Party by sandbagging his own bill and seeing to it that it goes down to defeat. You\u2019re way off the beaten path. The only way that this helps the Republican Party is if the failure of this bill creates a vacuum that will then be filled by a conservative. You know, there was a story that was written on Thursday. It was a blog from down there in Ft. Lauderdale. I think it was the Sun-Sentinel. It might have been the Orlando Sun-Sentinel, could have been the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Whatever. This guy wrote on his blog, ‘If the immigration bill passes, this will effectively be the end of talk radio and its influence. Oh, yes, they\u2019ll still have the hosts, and you\u2019ll still have the programs, but it will mean they\u2019re ineffective and not worth listening to.\u2019 I\u2019m paraphrasing this. ‘It\u2019ll be ineffective, no power, not worth listening to.\u2019 Well, by the same token, this guy was of the opinion, obviously, that the bill was going to pass in the Senate and that talk radio is going to go down the tubes. Well, just the opposite has happened, and you know, Washington notes things. Now, they\u2019ve still got a bug up their rear end about this bill, wanting to get this bill passed, but they know that there is a fortified opposition and they know that this opposition is largely indigenous, too.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not just because talk radio hosts are poisoning, quote, unquote, your mind. This is something simple. This is as easy for people to understand as that scam at the House Bank was when we learned that members of Congress would go in there and write checks for cash for money that was not in their account. That\u2019s something nobody can do. They were doing it for a long time, and it was being covered up. In this case, the rule of law is a fundamental American principle, as it is a fundamental conservative principle, and nobody here is making an effort to enforce it in a bill that was written in 1986. This is easily understandable, and we see the results of it, because this is affecting people\u2019s lives, where they live. People are being forced to move because they don\u2019t like the circumstances that result when you have an undereducated, low-skilled, doesn\u2019t-speak-English population that\u2019s largely infiltrating American cities and states. It doesn\u2019t take a massive education effort. This is something people instinctively understand. But the thing of this newspaper blog, the other side of that story is true, too. Well, the bill is technically dead now. The president\u2019s going to try to revive it; they still say it\u2019s on life support. <\/p>\n

But those who want to diminish and pretend that talk radio has lost its touch, lost its powers, lost its connection with people know full-fledged how wrong they are now. That cannot sit well, either, and mostly the success in talk radio is conservative, is it not? So the only way this bill going down the tubes can help the Republican Party is if it wakes up some Republicans and says, ‘You know what? Our heart is conservatism, and gets a candidate that can come here and fill the void and come up with an actual piece of legislation here that accomplishes what everybody knows needs to happen in order to solve the problem, not perpetuate it.\u2019 So there are lots of opportunities here, not the least of which is, as I told you last Thursday, McCain has been marginalized. Oh, speaking of McCain, he\u2019s on the warpath out there. He\u2019s blaming conservatives for the immigration bill\u2019s failure. ‘I think the Senate works in a way where relatively small numbers can block legislation but I also think the more conservative, anti-immigrant, anti-legislation group were very well backed up by a vocal group of people who were supporting them.\u2019 Well, we know how to translate these words, now. So he\u2019s out there saying the opponents are ‘anti-immigrant.\u2019 Nobody is anti-immigrant! We\u2019re pro-immigration — legal. We know it. I don\u2019t have to run through all of this, but that\u2019s the only way that this bill going down the tubes helps Republicans, is if they get the message, and there\u2019s no guarantee of that, by the way. <\/p>\n

This is the kind of thing. You know, psychology is what it is. This is the kind of thing you say, ‘Well, I\u2019m not going to be in a party run by a bunch of rabble-rousing loud mouths out there, a bunch of yahoo nativists racists. I\u2019m not going to be one.\u2019 So they\u2019ll just get their backs up and they\u2019ll get more defensive about it rather than learn the lesson. If anybody out there thinks that the power of the conservative movement in this country is gone, in effect? I their dreams, folks. They are living with the reality today that that is not the case and it\u2019s not going to be the case any time soon. If anything, it\u2019s going to increase. This is the kind of thing that will coalesce all kinds of people, maybe even across party lines, if they continue to try to stuff this down everybody\u2019s throat. By the way, Dingy Harry, in trying to understand what he did last Thursday in pulling the bill, Rasmussen Reports has done a poll on his favorable and unfavorable. His favorable rating has fallen to 19%. This is from last Saturday. Dingy Harry is now ‘viewed favorably by 19% of American voters, unfavorably by 45%. Just 3% have a very favorable opinion, 22% hold a very unfavorable opinion\u2019 of Dingy Harry. ‘He\u2019s been very visible over the past week in the furor over immigration report. The effort to pass a bill that was more popular in Congress than among voters may have hurt public perceptions of Harry Reid. His ratings are down from a month ago when 26% had a favorable opinion of him. His highest ratings were 30% favorable in February, now down to 19%.\u2019<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t think Dingy Harry\u2019s unfavorable\u2019s have anything to do with pulling the immigration bill. I think his unfavorables may be why, may be a factor in why he pulled it because he knows what people think about it out there. That\u2019s why he\u2019s out there saying, ‘It\u2019s Bush\u2019s bill. It\u2019s a Republican bill.\u2019 He\u2019s trying to distance himself from it because he knows that 76% of the American people are opposed it. I keep referencing this New York Times editorial. It is from Saturday. ‘A Failure of Leadership — The immigration compromise collapsed on the floor of the Senate Thursday night. Many of its hard-line foes are celebrating, but their glee is vindictive and hollow. They have blocked one avenue to an immigration overhaul while offering nothing better, thwarting bipartisanship, to satisfy their reflexive loathing for ‘amnesty,\u2019 which they defined as anything that helps illegal immigrants get right with the law.\u2019 Where do you start with that paragraph? That is just petulant and childish. This is not even up to the standards of the New York Times when it was good, and not even up to their recent standards when they\u2019ve been pathetic. This is just petulant, childish behavior. ‘Thwarting bipartisanship\u2019? What\u2019s the magic in bipartisanship? ‘Reflexive loathing for amnesty, which they define as anything that helps illegal immigrants get right with the law\u2019?<\/p>\n

Get right with the law means paying a debt to society, being pushed for breaking law or what have you, not clemency! Hell, look, 12 to 20 million illegals are going to be pardoned. We can\u2019t pardon Scooter Libby; we can pardon 12 to 20 illegals. Let\u2019s start calling it the ‘pardon bill.\u2019 If they don\u2019t like amnesty, let\u2019s start calling it the ‘pardon bill,\u2019 because that\u2019s exactly what this is. That\u2019s how you get right with the law, is to be pardoned? But anyway, it gets better. ‘But obstruction happened. Republican amendments designed to shred the compromise happened. Jeff Sessions wanted to deprive legalized immigrants — yes, legal residents — of the earned income tax credit, a path out of poverty for millions. John Cornyn wanted to strip confidentiality protection for immigrants who apply for legal status, making them too frightened to leave the shadows,\u2019 and of course, they\u2019re also upset. That was the Dorgan amendment. They don\u2019t like Dorgan. They don\u2019t mention him much in here but they don\u2019t like the fact that Dorgan brought — well, Dingy Harry brought Dorgan\u2019s amendment back after it had been defeated once and Dorgan amendment cut the five-year sunset on the guest-worker program. But there\u2019s one other aspect to it, too. The Times is upset over the effort to deport criminal illegals. They didn\u2019t even want to deport them. <\/p>\n

‘Leadership was desperately needed to stop Republicans from dragging the bill off one of its pillars, the one that would have put 12 million people on a path to legal status. It didn\u2019t show up. Republicans who should have been holding their party and the deal together — President Bush, Mitch McConnell, Senator Jon Kyl — failed utterly.\u2019 I read that and I said, ‘That\u2019s funny, because I thought Dingy Harry was the leader in the Senate now responsible for getting it through the Senate.\u2019 Dingy Harry pulls it when Bush is out of town and Bush is dealing with Kyoto and Putin. Kyl and McConnell are now to be blamed for this? ‘Leadership was desperately needed to stop Republicans from dragging the bill off one of its pillars. Restoring order will be wrenchingly difficult, but it must be done,\u2019 says the Times. ‘The country cannot leave an unlawful, chaotic system to fester with legal immigration channels clogged, families split apart…\u2019 Boohoo! ‘…crops…\u2019 See, it\u2019s like we\u2019re doing this! We are separating families. We are causing crops to rot. We are the ones who owe these people an apology. We are the ones who are making victims out of them. ‘… crops rotting, state and local governments dreaming of ways to punish 12 million people whose identities are unknown to the authorities, who aren\u2019t leaving no matter what Congress does.\u2019 (sigh) ‘We cannot simply fortify a wall while continuing to extract cheap labor from cowering workers who risk death to get here. Inaction on immigration carries a brutally high price, but those on the phobic right are willing to mortgage their country\u2019s future to pay for it.\u2019 Really? We\u2019re trying to preserve the country\u2019s heritage and future, something that the New York Times doesn\u2019t like as it currently exists and would love to tear it down and participate in the process to tear it down and rebuild it in their own childish, petulant, socialist vision. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: In all these stories — and you can predict \u2019em. In all these stories, ‘Talk radio goes down. Talk radio is losing its influence.\u2019 Why don\u2019t they ever tell the truth? ‘Ted Kennedy goes down.\u2019 Let me rephrase that. Why don\u2019t they ever write stories that Ted Kennedy ‘can\u2019t get it done in the Senate\u2019? Or that Dingy Harry can\u2019t get it done? It\u2019s always in the context of, ‘Well, talk radio can\u2019t get it done,\u2019 and when we do get it done, it\u2019s because we\u2019re nativists, yahoos, racists, and all the rest of it. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Jim in Boston, I\u2019m glad you waited, sir, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. CALLER: Yeah, Rush, listen, I\u2019m not saying that President Bush is against immigration, but I think a lot of what he\u2019s doing is strategery. And what I mean by that is, look, he wants to be able to show he\u2019s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCaller: Bush Immigration Strategery? - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Jim in Boston, I\u2019m glad you waited, sir, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. CALLER: Yeah, Rush, listen, I\u2019m not saying that President Bush is against immigration, but I think a lot of what he\u2019s doing is strategery. And what I mean by that is, look, he wants to be able to show he\u2019s […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125113.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125113.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125113.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/\",\"name\":\"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T05:25:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T05:25:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Jim in Boston, I\u2019m glad you waited, sir, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. CALLER: Yeah, Rush, listen, I\u2019m not saying that President Bush is against immigration, but I think a lot of what he\u2019s doing is strategery. And what I mean by that is, look, he wants to be able to show he\u2019s […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125113.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125113.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125113.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/","name":"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T05:25:12+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T05:25:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2007\/06\/11\/caller_bush_immigration_strategery\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Caller: Bush Immigration Strategery?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25890"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}