{"id":248907,"date":"2017-09-29T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-09-29T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=248907"},"modified":"2017-10-02T16:37:24","modified_gmt":"2017-10-02T20:37:24","slug":"everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/","title":{"rendered":"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/#!\/43265\/60337\/Cookie-Gleason-Makes-Fun-of-Cokie-Roberts-Lie\">Cookie<\/a> has sent me &#8212; by the way, I\u2019m trying to break a habit. I don\u2019t really have the habit, but I\u2019ve noticed that I\u2019m on the way to getting it, so I\u2019m gonna break it right now, and everybody\u2019s doing it. Have you noticed, ask somebody a question or if they just say something without responding to the question, have you noticed how many people begin whatever they say with &#8220;so&#8221;? I caught myself doing that. I saw somebody being interviewed on TV. &#8220;What do you think of the new flat tax?&#8221; &#8220;So&#8221; &#8212; and I started doing it and I\u2019m gonna start breaking it now. I\u2019m not gonna do it.<\/p>\n<p>JOHNNY DONOVAN: And now, from sunny south Florida, it\u2019s Open Line Friday!<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I mean, nothing wrong with it, but it\u2019s just I caught myself. It\u2019s kind of like &#8220;you know.&#8221; You know who uses &#8220;you know&#8221; more than anyone else uses &#8220;you know&#8221;? Hillary Clinton. Great to have you, folks. Rush Limbaugh &#8212; 800-282-2882 if you want to be on the program. It\u2019s Open Line Friday, and that means that anything you want to talk about is fair game. That\u2019s not how it works Monday through Thursday, but it is today. We have very few restrictions on callers. See, there\u2019s no First Amendment here, either. You can\u2019t say whatever you want, and nobody has to hear you say it. I am a benevolent dictator, of sorts. But that\u2019s what Friday\u2019s all about.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-248904\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/RIH-092917-Rush-Hannity-Grab.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"334\" height=\"222\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/RIH-092917-Rush-Hannity-Grab.jpg 334w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/RIH-092917-Rush-Hannity-Grab-300x199.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 334px) 100vw, 334px\" \/>Cookie has sent me the audio sound bite roster with the headline: &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/09\/28\/rush-on-hannity\/\">Time for you to analyze yourself on Hannity<\/a>.&#8221; She says, &#8220;You know, you play audio sound bites all day long from other people, and you analyze what you hear.&#8221; She said, &#8220;You need to analyze yourself.&#8221; And I\u2019m thinking, how self-indulgent can you get? Here I am playing audio sound bites of me from the Hannity interview last night and then commenting again on how brilliant it was. And now more about me. If that hasn\u2019t been enough of me for you, because there\u2019s gonna be more of me tonight on Hannity, let\u2019s replay me from Hannity last night while I tell you what I thought of me. (laughing)<\/p>\n<p>And Snerdley thinks it\u2019s a great idea. Well, maybe so. I\u2019m still pondering it. Still pondering it. There are some other reactions from people. (interruption) Well, I don\u2019t know. I don\u2019t know. According to the advance overnight ratings I\u2019m hearing about, it may be very few who did not. Snerdley just said, &#8220;Not everybody saw Hannity last night.&#8221; I understand that that\u2019s probably true. There are other people reacting. Newt was just over-the-top complimentary last night, but then dialed it back a little bit this morning. Not much. It\u2019s fine. Everything\u2019s okay. We got Bernie Goldberg in there and Mike Huckabee responding. I find it fascinating, like they ask these people, &#8220;So what do you think of what Rush just said there?&#8221; And you can see they\u2019re steaming, some of them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Well, I\u2019ve been saying that for years. I\u2019ve been saying that for years. I\u2019ll be happy to repeat it to you again.&#8221; It\u2019s fun. Anyway, it was a great time yesterday, and I know <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/rush-on-hannity-part-two\/\">there\u2019s another night coming tonight<\/a>. Probably gonna be some stuff from last night repeated. They\u2019re cutting it up. It\u2019s not being presented in the order it happened, which is fine, it\u2019s not a criticism. It just means it\u2019s harder for me to remember what has aired and what hasn\u2019t. We will get to that.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Three months! Just three months &#8212; the appearance of that unity, the appearance of that work &#8212; the appearance of that effort could result in the Democrats being out of power for a generation. Just three months. More months would be better, but three months is all it would take.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, the perception is that the Republican establishment, primarily the Senate, doesn\u2019t want anything to do with Trump and doesn\u2019t want Trump to succeed. Speaking of that, folks, you know, I made that point on Hannity last night and I am just now being made aware of how that has caused a major eruption reaction out there. Apparently, people on left and right are being asked about it on Fox and various websites.<\/p>\n<p>And it\u2019s interesting; it\u2019s true. The appearance is that the Republican establishment doesn\u2019t want Trump&#8230; We know they don\u2019t. They don\u2019t want any outsider to succeed. But that must have hit a nerve out there, because I\u2019m seeing more and more news stories on it featuring reaction. The media\u2019s gone to Congressman A and Senator B. &#8220;What do you think about what Rush said on Fox last night?&#8221; &#8220;That\u2019s the Senate. That\u2019s not us. No, no, no. That\u2019s not me. That\u2019s somebody else.&#8221; So they\u2019re disavowing it in certain quarters.<\/p>\n<p>Let me take a break. It\u2019s Open Line Friday. We\u2019ll come back, get started with calls &#8212; Snerdley, yes, I\u2019m gonna play the sound bites from last night. I\u2019m just establishing that the show is not all about me all the time.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s all I\u2019m doing.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m gonna get to those and I\u2019ll analyze myself.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: To the audio sound bites. They\u2019ve been after me here on the staff to get to these, and I always keep putting it off. But we\u2019re gonna replay some of the sound bites from <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/09\/28\/rush-on-hannity\/\">last night\u2019s interview on the Fox News Channel with Hannity at 9 o\u2019clock<\/a>. And this is right at the top. Hannity says, &#8220;I want to start with tax cuts. All the years you\u2019ve talked about it, Kennedy, Reagan, how it works. What do you think of this latest tax plan?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BEGIN ARCHIVE CLIP<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: It\u2019s good overall. I mean, there\u2019s some things about it \u2014 let\u2019s look at the elimination of the deduction state income tax. You know who\u2019s gonna hate that? California, Illinois, all these blue states, that\u2019s gonna cause a shortfall for them. Those taxpayers are not gonna like it. And if you look at the states with the highest state income tax rates, most of them are blue. But here\u2019s my basic problem with this. I keep hearing everybody say growth, growth. But the top rate probably isn\u2019t gonna come down or much at all. And that\u2019s where the growth is. Those are the people that hire. Those are the people that own small businesses. Those are the people that spend.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/plugins\/rush-ampmedia\/views\/external-player.php\/43265\/79876?id=4255636\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>We still have a tax system and a way of explaining it that\u2019s rooted in class envy. We\u2019re gonna give the middle class, the lower middle class, upper middle class a break; but the rich, we\u2019re gonna soak \u2019em. They don\u2019t need a tax break. They got enough. And, besides, they say we have to have a way to pay for it. What do you mean, pay for it? Why can\u2019t Washington do with less, for once? We got growth from Reagan. I saw you talking about it last night. How? Top marginal rate over eight years went 70 to 28%. Look what happened.<\/p>\n<p>Why not do it again? The reason is, everybody is afraid they\u2019ll lose votes in the middle class \u2019cause there\u2019s far more of them than there are people in the upper bracket. The top 10% are paying 70% of all income taxes. And how can you say they\u2019re not paying their fair share, and why do we want to punish them further? If you really want growth, lower everybody\u2019s taxes across the board and get out of the way for all the revenue that\u2019s gonna be coming in.<\/p>\n<p>END ARCHIVE CLIP<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: That\u2019s not what we\u2019re doing. Again, the president just today had a speech at the National Association of Manufacturers, actually said we have given Congress flexibility to even create a new rate on the super rich in order to pay for greater tax relief for the middle class.<\/p>\n<p>What he means by that is the middle class, the only way you\u2019re going to get a tax cut is if we increase taxes on others of your fellow citizens. And I think that\u2019s a net wash. If you\u2019re going to cut taxes, otherwise allow some to keep more of what they earn, you\u2019re going to &#8220;pay for that&#8221; by raising taxes on others? It\u2019s a wash. You\u2019re not going to end up with additional dollars of any significance in the economy.<\/p>\n<p>(interruption) What do I think of the Limbaugh delivery? I don\u2019t know, a little too fast. I was trying to say, I get caught up &#8212; you know, one of the problems I have with TV is I know that time is really limited. Even this interview, even though they said they were gonna do half of it tonight, half of it tomorrow night, I still know he wants to cover a lot of things. So I\u2019m racing through my answers to make room for other things.<\/p>\n<p>So if I had to critique this, I would say that my speech was a little too rapid fire. (interruption) You don\u2019t think so? Fine, but you\u2019re asking me to critique myself &#8212; but in terms of the substance I can\u2019t find a thing wrong with it. In terms of the substance I mean that\u2019s five stars right there. Nothing needs to be added to that even though I just did here, but I added to it because the president has said more. This is one of the bites that they\u2019ve been playing for guests all day on Fox and asking people to react to it.<\/p>\n<p>The question from Hannity: &#8220;You actually said that if the GOP were smart all they would do is keep their promises and they could end up running Washington for generations.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BEGIN ARCHIVE CLIP<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: This is the deal. I really believe that if for just three months, going forward, or if they had three months in the past, just three months, gut it up for three months and work with Trump on his agenda, on cutting taxes seriously, across the board, immigration reform, the wall, what have you, getting rid of Obamacare, which is just &#8212; it\u2019s an absolute crime what has happened here and what that\u2019s gonna mean to the country. Just try for three months, make it look like there\u2019s unity between the president and the people in his own party, and they would own Washington for a generation.<\/p>\n<p>END ARCHIVE CLIP<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Let me reiterate that. Again, nothing wrong with the substance there. Another five star sound bite. And, in fact, the pace of speech was fine there. I wasn\u2019t racing through that. But, imagine, folks, if the daily picture out of Washington was McConnell and Ryan and Trump working together unified on an agenda that\u2019s Trump\u2019s. I mean, he\u2019s the guy that has the mandate, he won the election on it, and it looks like we don\u2019t even need to wait to see if it succeeds, although it needs to, but even if it looks like that there is mutual respect and excitement and eagerness to get these things done, that is gonna unify the Republican base beyond Trump voters in a way the Democrats can\u2019t compete with.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-248751\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/650-092817-EIB-Hannity-Cube.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"650\" height=\"312\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/650-092817-EIB-Hannity-Cube.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/650-092817-EIB-Hannity-Cube-300x144.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px\" \/>It\u2019s gonna revive talk about how the Democrats don\u2019t have a prayer of gaining ground in the House or Senate in 2018. I really believe if this appearance of unity that had a foundation of truth propping it up, the pictures, the accompanying news stories, the attitude, the smiles, if this were happening &#8212; the majority of Americans want the Trump agenda. Even if you don\u2019t think that\u2019s true, act like it is. That\u2019s what the Democrats do. The Democrats, the media act like the cockamamie stuff they believe is accepted by a majority. We need to do it because in our case it\u2019s largely true.<\/p>\n<p>If that happened I don\u2019t think the Democrats would stand a prayer because they can\u2019t compete with it. All they can do is nitpick it and trash it and slime it in ways that will seem empty, because it\u2019s gonna be old and unpredictable. Not unify the whole country, don\u2019t misunderstand. We\u2019re talking about creating a political force here that can\u2019t be stopped. And I really think it\u2019s possible to do. But it\u2019s not gonna happen if the perception conditions that half of the Republican establishment doesn\u2019t want Trump to succeed. The same problems are gonna continue as exist now.<\/p>\n<p>If you take that perception off the board, you take the perception off the board Republicans don\u2019t want Trump to win and replace it with we Republicans have an agenda and we can\u2019t wait to implement it for the good of America, get out of the way, folks. There\u2019d be no stopping \u2019em. And I\u2019m not exaggerating about that. I\u2019m not pie-in-the-sky. It\u2019s a once-in-our-lifetimes opportunity to have the confluence of events that happened last November. Because so much happened.<\/p>\n<p>It wasn\u2019t just that Trump won and it wasn\u2019t just the Republicans have the House and the Senate. It was that what the Democrats stand for was rejected. There are two things that happened here. Republicans are victorious because of Trump. Trump was victorious, but at the same time what the Democrats stand for was rejected as it has been rejected in elections since 2010. That\u2019s why I say, it\u2019s just a tremendous opportunity.<\/p>\n<p>Now, I want to jump forward to sound bite number 6. Newt was on Hannity afterwards, and I\u2019ve gotta play this, because it was so great. It was&#8230; Well, in fact, let\u2019s play both of them. Rather than talk about it, play number 5. After the interview was over, Hannity brought Newt on. Newt had a great visual aid. He had a postcard-size piece of paper. He said, &#8220;This is what the Republican tax plan tax reform will look like, and, if they just run around the country saying, &#8216;Wouldn\u2019t you like to be able to do your taxes on this?\u2019 &#8212; it can\u2019t fail.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He had a good point, but listen to what else he said&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-248954\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHNEWTHANNITY.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"423\" height=\"237\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHNEWTHANNITY.jpg 423w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHNEWTHANNITY-300x168.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 423px) 100vw, 423px\" \/>GINGRICH: Without Rush, we might not have won in 1994. He was the clear voice for millions and millions of conservatives all across the country, many of whom would stay in their car to listen to the last half hour. They just wouldn\u2019t get out; they wouldn\u2019t give him up. So Rush has had a remarkable historic impact on the country, and his instincts are as good as they ever were and he\u2019s as worth listening to and thinking about as anybody I know. He analyzes things from angles nobody else can match. If by Thanksgiving the Paul Ryan income tax postcard becomes law, I think you\u2019re gonna find out that they are doing exactly what Rush suggested. I think this is the start of what Rush is talking about.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: And that is the Republicans coming together with Trump on an agenda. And he thinks tax reform is it. Now, that was last night. Now today, Newt &#8212; by the way, that\u2019s great; this next sound bite\u2019s not to be critical. But Newt is, A, exactly right in what he said there &#8212; the factual things &#8212; and I\u2019m appreciative as I can be of his compliments there. I really am. I was watching it last night, and I was&#8230; Well, I got a little tightness in the throat, to be honest with you, choked up. But then this morning, after the bite where I say, &#8220;If they just work together for three months,&#8221; everybody played that, Newt had a little bit different take, just slightly, and this is what he said&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-248953\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHNEWTFF.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"420\" height=\"233\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHNEWTFF.jpg 420w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHNEWTFF-300x166.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 420px) 100vw, 420px\" \/>GINGRICH: Much as I admire Rush and we\u2019ve known each other many years, I think he\u2019s a half step behind what\u2019s happening. Are there some Never Trumpers? Sure. Are there some people who cause trouble? Sure. But let me give you an example. This is the postcard tax form that 85% of Americans will be able to file under the new Republican tax plan. Literally a postcard. Now, that was developed by the Trump White House, by the House Republicans, and the Senate Republicans as a team. They launched it this week as a team. I think that they\u2019ve learned a lot of painful lessons over the last nine months.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Okay. So he thinks I\u2019m a half step behind because I was still last night saying if they would just come together on the agenda, and Newt\u2019s point is, they have. This is the first attempt at them coming together on the agenda.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Look, folks, I\u2019m not a negativist, and I don\u2019t like negative people. I think negative people make other people sick. But I am the mayor of Realville. Now, Newt says &#8212; and he did it affectionately. He said, &#8220;As much as I admire Rush and we\u2019ve known each other many years, I think he\u2019s a half step behind what\u2019s happening here.&#8221; Last night I said it would be great if the Republicans would unify and start moving Trump\u2019s agenda, and Newt says they have. And I didn\u2019t recognize or make note of that last night. Well (sigh), right now we\u2019re&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Ugh. Oh, this is so tough. We\u2019ve been here before. Although health care was a little different. It didn\u2019t appear to be a unified effort, like this does appear to be. Although I don\u2019t know where the Senate is on this. It\u2019s always the wild card, and it\u2019s always where the establishment powers go when they want to stop Trump. So we\u2019ll see. I think the jury is still out. But I\u2019m not gonna deny that this is an appearance of unity, but at some point there\u2019s gonna have to be something other than appearances.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s gonna have to be actual, solid results. I\u2019m patiently waiting. I\u2019m not going to proclaim that this is a failure or being done the wrong way, anything of the sort. I wouldn\u2019t presume to do that. Just waiting. I think&#8230; What are the odds&#8230;? Let me put it to you this way. Think of it this way. The tax plan was presented this week; the president\u2019s out there selling the aspects of it that he likes and that he thinks are persuasive. What are the odds that&#8230;?<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Cause a lot of this&#8230; I had it explained to me by a powerful ranking Republican that the committees are gonna be making final decisions on a lot of details here. Well, that means that things are going to change from day one, and if those things change in ways that lose support here or lose support there, we don\u2019t know if that\u2019s gonna happen yet or not. We have to withhold judgment until it does. That\u2019s all I\u2019m saying.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Move forward to audio sound bite number nine. This was on America\u2019s Newsroom today. Shannon Bream was speaking with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (Republican-California) and she played a sound bite of my interview with Hannity last night and said, &#8220;There\u2019s a criticism for Congress. Some of that is coming from Rush Limbaugh. What do you make of Rush\u2019s assertion that there are people even within the GOP who do not want the president to succeed?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-248988\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHKEVINMCCARTHY.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"425\" height=\"232\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHKEVINMCCARTHY.jpg 425w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/REAXTORUSHKEVINMCCARTHY-300x164.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 425px) 100vw, 425px\" \/>MCCARTHY: I don\u2019t happen to be one of those, and I don\u2019t know where one is. I\u2019m frustrated with what happens on the &#8212; the Senate side. We now have 270 bills sitting in the Senate. So I have that exact same frustration, and I\u2019ve watched and worked with this president every day, and he\u2019s been engaged. He\u2019s done everything in his power to try to get this through. And why would the Senate make everything have to be 60 votes? If the House can pass it with a majority, why can\u2019t the Senate pass it with a majority? That\u2019s really where it\u2019s coming down to, and it\u2019s affecting everyone.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: All right, now, this is fascinating to me &#8212; and, you know, Fox is doing this on their own. &#8220;Limbaugh says that there are Republicans that don\u2019t want Trump to succeed.&#8221; It\u2019s not just Republicans. The Democrats don\u2019t want Trump to succeed; some of the Republicans don\u2019t. Most of the establishment doesn\u2019t, for the reason you said last night and you\u2019ve heard me say it before. It\u2019s no more complicated than Trump, to them, is a neophyte, know-nothing outsider.<\/p>\n<p>They can\u2019t permit somebody like that to come in there and inside of two years turn it upside down and make it work. What does that make them look like? Plus what does that do to the game they have structured that keeps themselves in power in perpetuity by not really accomplishing much? They\u2019re not gonna let somebody come in and just blow that up. This is their life. This is their self-identity. This is their fortune. It\u2019s their wealth!<\/p>\n<p>Being in that club, being in the establishment &#8212; the power structure that runs the country &#8212; and they\u2019re gonna let someone they think is a pig and a reprobate come in there and make fun of them and turn what they\u2019ve done upside down and make it work? There\u2019s no question that there are people inside that town that do not want him to succeed. They\u2019re in the deep state. Where do you think all these leaks in the newspaper and the media about the collusion with Russia came from?<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s all kinds of people don\u2019t want Trump to succeed. They\u2019re trying to destroy Trump even now with the Mueller investigation. You know it and I know it, and McCarthy knows that even though his answer is, &#8220;Well, I don\u2019t happen to be one of those and I don\u2019t know where one is,&#8221; except in the Senate! There\u2019s all kinds of people in the Senate. I must say that when the ranking Republican explained the tax bill to me (chuckling), I got the same thing, before I even said anything.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And let me tell you something, Rush: Our problem\u2019s in the Senate. Do you realize how frustrated we are here? We pass bill after bill after bill &#8212; the first health care bill &#8212; and it goes over there and it just dies. I can\u2019t tell you&#8230; We have 200 bills over there! Nobody knows it \u2019cause it doesn\u2019t get reported! And they go over there and they die!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So the Republican leadership is very, very intent on everybody understanding that it isn\u2019t them bottling up the Trump agenda, that it is Senate. And I think people get that on their own anyway, but essentially what I said is acknowledged. It happens to be the case. And I\u2019m glad it\u2019s out there. I\u2019m not the only one saying it, but for some reason me saying it on Fox &#8212; and then played back as a sound bite for these guys to react to &#8212; bingo.<\/p>\n<p>Now, back to the phones. This is Patti, Newport Beach, California. Glad you waited. How are you?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Hi. I\u2019m fine. Good morning, and thanks for taking my call.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: You bet.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: I wanted to start by saying that you were impressive on Sean Hannity, of course &#8212; of course, you were &#8212; and that I can only beg you to do more, more live interviews on television in the future.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Thank you very much.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: You can see that you\u2019ve had a big impact, and you\u2019re, like Trump, a leader. You\u2019re, like Trump, extremely coherent, speak well, make a great impression, and you get to the point. I think it would be very beneficial to the conservative cause if you could do more of what you did with Sean Hannity. I just would hope you would do that. That\u2019s before my comment, but I just wanted to tell you that.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-249035\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/650-092917-Rush-Analysis-Hannity.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"650\" height=\"312\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/650-092917-Rush-Analysis-Hannity.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/650-092917-Rush-Analysis-Hannity-300x144.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px\" \/>RUSH: Thank you very much.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Oh, one more thing. One more thing.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Oh. Yes.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Newt Gingrich is wrong. You are not a step behind. You are a step ahead of him, and that annoyed me when I heard it.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Don\u2019t be annoyed. There are reasons for &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Newt\u2019s fine. Newt\u2019s cool. He wants the same thing you do. He\u2019s great.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Okay, good. My comment today was that my husband has been a medical professor of medicine for decades, is now semi-retired, and one of the things he\u2019s doing in his semi-retirement is being a medical director of a specialty testing lab. Among other things, this lab is testing for &#8212; it will be a simple blood test for the brain, the traumatic brain injury that comes from the kind of injuries and things that come from &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: You\u2019re talking about CTEs. Is your husband working the project to try to find a way to diagnose it while &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yes.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: &#8212; the patient is alive? Right now you can only diagnose it &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: Yes. That\u2019s the idea. The idea is they can draw blood when the patient is alive. And I asked him, you know, of course over the months I asked him for details. He said that the test is still unreliable, but he is sure that in the future there will be such a test. It will be a blood test. He said something about the word exasol.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Well, I wonder how they\u2019re ever going to know, because right now you can only identify it in an autopsy.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: No, there are biochemical, there are biochemical reasons that you\u2019ll be able to do it ahead of time. So they will be able to do that.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Okay, cool.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: So, obviously &#8212; yeah. Go ahead. I\u2019m sorry. I didn\u2019t mean to interrupt.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-228386\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Rush-Photos-SMALL-015.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"325\" height=\"325\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Rush-Photos-SMALL-015.jpg 325w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Rush-Photos-SMALL-015-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Rush-Photos-SMALL-015-300x300.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 325px) 100vw, 325px\" \/>RUSH: No, no, no. I just had a question. You answered it. What is the point about this that your husband is &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: The point about my call is that because of that and because it happens anyway and you can test for it in an autopsy, eventually the NFL is in danger of being sued into oblivion. And I asked my husband, &#8220;Well, what about college football? They don\u2019t have such big, deep pockets. They won\u2019t be sued so much.&#8221; And he said no, colleges still have deep enough pockets.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Oh, they do.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: However, he said, the players play for a shorter amount of time.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Right, here\u2019s the thing about this. You are so right in one way, that this is already being seen as a financial goldmine. Does the name Aaron Hernandez mean anything to you? Twenty-seven years old, convicted of murder, former tight end for the New England Patriots, 27 years old. He committed suicide in prison. His lawyer now says that they discovered in an autopsy he had an advanced case of CTE. They\u2019re trying to say that his commission of murder was not his fault. He had a brain injury because of his playing for the New England Patriots.<\/p>\n<p>So, that\u2019s a sign of where the legal community\u2019s gonna take this. So, Aaron Hernandez &#8212; in death is going to try &#8212; the state\u2019s gonna try to sue and be exonerated. Now, Patti, the NFL has already established a pool of $1 billion from which all claimants of CTE are going to have make their case. The NFL thinks their exposure to this therefore is a total of $1 billion. I ran the numbers on this, and every player even now, and adding the same numbers the next 10 years, who makes a claim that is judged legal is gonna get $137,000 or something, which is nothing.<\/p>\n<p>The league thinks they have already, as a matter of doing business, limited their liability on this because they have an agreement with a court that their liability maximum exposure is $1 billion. Now, somebody\u2019s gonna try to reopen that, because they\u2019ve opened the door to it now, and if we\u2019re gonna have deceased players\u2019 families claiming that &#8212; she\u2019s right. The NFL\u2019s got an exposure problem here, and they know that, by the way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH:  Cookie has sent me the audio sound bite roster with the headline: &quot;Time for you to analyze yourself on Hannity.&quot; She says, &quot;You know, you play audio sound bites all day long from other people, and you analyze what you hear.&quot; She said, &quot;You need to analyze yourself.&quot; And I&#039;m thinking, how self-indulgent can you get? And Snerdley thinks it&#039;s a great idea.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":249046,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>My Analysis of Myself on Hannity - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Cookie has sent me the audio sound bite roster with the headline: &quot;Time for you to analyze yourself on Hannity.&quot; She says, &quot;You know, you play audio sound bites all day long from other people, and you analyze what you hear.&quot; She said, &quot;You need to analyze yourself.&quot; And I&#039;m thinking, how self-indulgent can you get? And Snerdley thinks it&#039;s a great idea.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/FB-600-092817-Rush-with-Sean.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"George Prayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"23 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/FB-600-092817-Rush-with-Sean.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/FB-600-092817-Rush-with-Sean.jpg\",\"width\":600,\"height\":315},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/\",\"name\":\"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-29T20:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-02T20:37:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\",\"name\":\"George Prayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"George Prayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Cookie has sent me the audio sound bite roster with the headline: &quot;Time for you to analyze yourself on Hannity.&quot; She says, &quot;You know, you play audio sound bites all day long from other people, and you analyze what you hear.&quot; She said, &quot;You need to analyze yourself.&quot; And I&#039;m thinking, how self-indulgent can you get? And Snerdley thinks it&#039;s a great idea.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/FB-600-092817-Rush-with-Sean.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"George Prayias","Est. reading time":"23 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/FB-600-092817-Rush-with-Sean.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/FB-600-092817-Rush-with-Sean.jpg","width":600,"height":315},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/","name":"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2017-09-29T20:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-02T20:37:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/09\/29\/everyones-analyzing-my-hannity-interview\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"My Analysis of Myself on Hannity"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349","name":"George Prayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"George Prayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248907"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248907"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248907\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":249240,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248907\/revisions\/249240"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media\/249046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}