{"id":23956,"date":"2006-12-14T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T06:15:29","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T06:15:29","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T06:15:29","slug":"a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/","title":{"rendered":"A New Take on the Minimum Wage"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: All right, minimum wage. This is a new one. I\u2019ve not seen this method of comparison before. This is Reuters, and in fact, this is part of a package of stories on the upcoming debate in Congress on the US minimum wage. There isn\u2019t going to be much of a debate. The Republicans are going to cave on this. They don\u2019t have the votes to stop it anyway. Bush is going to sign it. This is a done deal. This is just agenda-driven pressure here on the part of the Drive-Bys. “The following table,” and I have the table here right here, “gives a rough estimate of the earning power of low-income workers in 13 countries around the world by calculating the time it would take for a starting worker at a McDonald\u2019s restaurant to earn enough money to actually buy a Big Mac. <\/line>“Based on an unscientific survey by Reuters reporters, low-income workers in Australia have the highest earning power of the 13 countries, earning enough to buy a Big Mac every 16 minutes. The lowest earning power is in less developed countries where it takes up to five hours and 15 minutes to earn the price of a Big Mac. That is if they have a McDonald\u2019s there.” So here we go. “In Australia, minimum wage workers have to work 16 minutes in order to be able to get a Big Mac. In Japan, 22 minutes. In Britain, 22 minutes. In France 25 minutes. In the United States,” the cold-hearted, cruel, mean-spirited home of hatred for the poor, “minimum wage workers have to work 30 minutes in order to be able to buy a Big Mac. In Chile, it\u2019s 43 minutes. In Russia, it\u2019s 53 minutes. In Argentina, it is one hour and 40 minutes. In Mexico, two hours and 33 minutes. In Egypt, five hours 15 minutes.” <\/line>Next story<\/a>: “Economists and politicians may disagree about the economic impact of a looming increase in the U.S. minimum wage, but Ohio restaurateur Dean Gregory already knows how much it will cost him. ‘We\u2019ve already figured out it\u2019s going to cost us between $125,000 and $150,000 a year. I\u2019ll have to raise my prices, definitely,\u2019 Gregory said. Perched above the Ohio River in downtown Cincinnati, Gregory\u2019s Montgomery Inn at the Boathouse is the busiest independent restaurant in Ohio, serving hundreds of plates of its famous barbecued pork ribs a day. The second-generation family eatery is one of many small businesses in America braced for a higher minimum wage.”<\/line>Now, there is a little paragraph here entitled, “Nobody works for minimum wage,” and what it basically is all about is that most people pay above the federal minimum wage anyway, already. “In Ohio, the wage is set to climb to $6.85 from $5.15 on Jan. 1. The minimum for workers who collect tips, a separate standard, will increase to $3.43 from $2.13.” It goes on and on and on. “One of the entrepreneurs affected by this said, ‘I don\u2019t think consumers quite understand that at some point they\u2019re going to have to pay for the increased cost of goods.'” I don\u2019t think too many of them understand it, either. This minimum wage business, “Oh, it\u2019s so compassionate. We just must do it. These people must be able to live at least a wholesome live. We can\u2019t pay \u2019em slave wages,” and so forth. <\/line><\/p>\n

Well, fine and dandy, but you\u2019re just going to be paying it yourself. There are many arguments against it, but they\u2019ve been lost. The arguments are technical. The arguments are really economic — and, of course, they don\u2019t jibe with the average American\u2019s touchy-feely passivity these days. We\u2019ve talked about the minimum wage here and how it functions and what it actually does. It actually loses jobs, and we\u2019ve also told you that the primary reason for Democrats supporting the minimum wage is because of pressure from unions. Here\u2019s the way it works, folks. All you have to know about the minimum wage, in terms of why Democrats are all for it. They cloak it in the fact that it\u2019s compassionate and that they love the poor and they want to do everything they can, Republicans are trying to keep these people down, but we\u2019re going to bring \u2019em up.<\/line>We\u2019re going to make sure that you poor people have at least two Big Macs, not just one. The dirty little secret is that the minimum wage is a benchmark for union contracts. What will happen is at the next big union negotiation with whoever — any union, could be big or small — they\u2019ll go in there to the company with whom they\u2019re negotiating and say, “Look, the minimum wage just went up from $5.16 to 6.15,” or whatever it is. “These unqualified schlubs just got a buck raise. Well, we are qualified! We\u2019re the best American workers that there are out there, and we need a comparable raise in this contract, far more than just a buck an hour. Besides, if you\u2019re going to give incompetent boobs, a bunch of schlubs, a buck an hour for the sake of it, we want to get paid on the basis of our quality, our competence, and want some more time off, by the way, too.”<\/line>This is the dirty little secret about the minimum wage, because it doesn\u2019t end up doing good things. It loses jobs, it raises prices, and the myth that there\u2019s families of four out there living off minimum wage. You know what nobody ever calculates here, folks? It\u2019s like when we do the poverty numbers. I\u2019m going to get these out here in just a second. I\u2019ve got it buried in the stack. When we calculate poverty; we never calculate any kind of government programs that people in poverty get. We simply calculate their wages, and if their wages are below the poverty line, they\u2019re said to be in poverty. But we don\u2019t add in the food stamps and all the other assistance that people in poverty get in this country, and that skews the whole thing. It\u2019s like that number that 16% of all wealth is controlled by 1% of the population. Those figures are absolutely worthless because the percentage of wealth that is calculated does not include the wealth — and it is wealth, if you total it up — that people in poverty receive as the good graces of the American people who pay for these social programs. Let me get the numbers, it will be the best way to illustrate it for you and rework the percentages. <\/line>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/line>RUSH: Now before I get to this business of calculating who has what percentage of the wealth, another in the package on minimum wage stories today from Reuters<\/a>: “Minimum Wage, Even Above $5.15, Workers Struggle.” You see, folks, the country is just one big soup line, and most of the “workers” (which is a socialist term, by the way) are just half a paycheck away from utter destruction and destitution. Conyers, Georgia is the date line here. “Just because you earn a bit above minimum wage doesn\u2019t mean that you\u2019re not one step away from financial ruin, according to people on low wages in two states. In interviews in Georgia and Alabama…” I wonder why they chose Georgia and Alabama. You suppose it\u2019s because the people at Reuters think they\u2019re a bunch of hayseed hicks anyway? <\/line><\/p>\n

“[P]eople whose wages hover above the federal minimum of $5.15 an hour, said that they were unable to save any money, and they were vulnerable to the inevitable emergencies of life. Their testimony speaks to a move by the US Congress to raise the federal minimum wage when it returns under Democrat control in January. Loss of work, a boiler breaking down in the home, a bereavement, a bad financial decision, but above all, illness were some of the factors which could quickly lead to an individual from financial stability to the edge of homelessness.” Now, wait a second. I thought there wasn\u2019t any financial stability even for people who earn a bit above the minimum wage? The minimum wage is not designed to provide a savings account, financial stability, two cars in the garage, and health care. That is not its purpose; it never was its purpose. <\/line>Its purpose all along has been a political maneuver designed to show that government and certain people who work in government care. How many times do I have to go through this? We\u2019re going to raise it from $5.15 to 6.15, eh? If that\u2019s good, why not $7.15? Why stop there? Why not raise it to ten bucks? Wouldn\u2019t that be more fair than $6.15 an hour? Of course it would! And who are we kidding? You think at ten bucks an hour you\u2019re going to be able to have a savings account, two cars in the garage, and health care? Ah! They\u2019re going to need much more than ten bucks. Let\u2019s just make it 20. Let\u2019s make it 20 an hour. Do this with any minimum wage supporter and, you know, maybe go up in smaller increments and say, “Okay, look, I agree with you. The minimum wage is not enough. Let\u2019s make it ten.”<\/line>“Yes!” At some point, you will get to a number, “Well, you can\u2019t go that high,” at which point you have won the argument and you own them if you know what to do. “Well, why can\u2019t we pay \u2019em 20?” Well, it\u2019s just too arbitrary. Well, if $20 is your limit but $19 is okay, what\u2019s the difference? If any figure that you name, a certain figure is unacceptable, don\u2019t you think logically any figure is, if it\u2019s arbitrary? Every one of these figures is arbitrary, $5.15, 6.15, 7.25 an hour, it\u2019s all arbitrary. But at some point you\u2019re going to reach this number where people will say, “No, no, no, no, I can\u2019t do that much.” Why? They won\u2019t be able to give you a reason other than to say, “Well, it\u2019s not worth that much.” Well, it\u2019s worth eight but not 20? Wow, you\u2019re really compassionate!<\/line> Turn it right back around on them, folks, if you can remember this. Then you can say, “Look, we need a living wage. We need a minimum wage of $75,000 a year in this country,” and, of course, I know most of you out there going, “Yes!” You\u2019d take it if somebody offered it. At any rate, this business of we\u2019ve gotta give some assistance here to Alan Reynolds<\/a> in the Wall Street Journal today. We are told that the rich, the very rich, earn too large a share of total income all the time. What\u2019s the figure? The figure that\u2019s tossed around is the top 1% of “people” make 16% of all of the income. The conclusion is, then, that the 1% who are taking 16% of all income is unfair, and the only way to make it fair is to raise their taxes! Yes. Raise their taxes! But they don\u2019t spell out what they would like to accomplish. <\/line>Okay, let\u2019s do this. Instead of the top 1% making 16% share of total income, let\u2019s reduce it to 10%. Because liberals who love arbitrary numbers, as in the minimum wage will say, “Yes, that would be fair; 16% is unfair; 10%, that would be fair.” Well, guess what, ladies and gentlemen? The calculation is wrong! This whole 1%, 16% thing is wrong. The figures are wrong. The conclusion is wrong. It\u2019s not new math or old math. It\u2019s simple arithmetic. They used the wrong total income. They leave out Social Security; they leave out transfer payments, tax-free income, income fudging income, and underground money income. They leave out — the transfer benefits to people who are not in the top 1% changes the total income by almost 35%. When you factor in the income that is not tabulated in this 1%, get 16% of all, 35% of total income is not calculated, and when you add 35%, the top 1% are not getting 16% of all wealth. It\u2019s much less, because 35% of all wealth is not being counted. Thank you Alan Reynolds<\/a>, Wall Street Journal today.<\/line><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: All right, minimum wage. This is a new one. I\u2019ve not seen this method of comparison before. This is Reuters, and in fact, this is part of a package of stories on the upcoming debate in Congress on the US minimum wage. There isn\u2019t going to be much of a debate. The Republicans are […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nA New Take on the Minimum Wage - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"A New Take on the Minimum Wage - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: All right, minimum wage. This is a new one. I\u2019ve not seen this method of comparison before. This is Reuters, and in fact, this is part of a package of stories on the upcoming debate in Congress on the US minimum wage. There isn\u2019t going to be much of a debate. The Republicans are […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/institute_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/institute_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/institute_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/\",\"name\":\"A New Take on the Minimum Wage - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T06:15:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T06:15:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A New Take on the Minimum Wage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A New Take on the Minimum Wage - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"A New Take on the Minimum Wage - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: All right, minimum wage. This is a new one. I\u2019ve not seen this method of comparison before. This is Reuters, and in fact, this is part of a package of stories on the upcoming debate in Congress on the US minimum wage. There isn\u2019t going to be much of a debate. The Republicans are […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/institute_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/institute_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/institute_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/","name":"A New Take on the Minimum Wage - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T06:15:29+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T06:15:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2006\/12\/14\/a_new_take_on_the_minimum_wage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A New Take on the Minimum Wage"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23956"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23956"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23956\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}