RUSH: Here is Phil in Dallas, Texas. It\u2019s great to have you, sir. Thank you for calling. Hi.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Rush, you\u2019ve rightly been asking questions about the alleged Russia hacking the election story. There\u2019s one very interesting aspect of it that I can\u2019t see anyone asking questions about. I would like you to ask about it. There are numerous stories — from Wired.com, CNS News, the Daily Mail in the U.K. — that the Democrats would not allow the FBI to look at the allegedly hacked Democrat servers. I\u2019m wondering. If you genuinely believe that your servers have been hacked in an effort to subvert a national election, why would you stop the FBI from investigating?<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Hack-PC-Screen-C.gif\")
RUSH: Well, I can think of one answer. Because there was an election that was rigged, and it was the Democrat primary in which Hillary — working with Debbie “Blabbermouth” Schultz — rigged the game against Bernie Sanders, and the evidence of that was probably on the DNC computer network.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Yes, sir. I would agree.<\/p>\n
RUSH: If I had to guess at one thing. But I think there\u2019s probably more than that.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Oh, so do I. I think there\u2019s another answer.<\/p>\n
RUSH: What is it?<\/p>\n
CALLER: Well, the Democrats told the FBI, “No, you\u2019re not coming in here and looking at our stuff. We\u2019ve hired a third party, an independent party to look at these things, and we\u2019ll have them get back to you with our evidence and finds.”<\/p>\n
RUSH: Right. And you know who that was? You know who that was?<\/p>\n
CALLER: No, I don\u2019t.<\/p>\n
RUSH: CrowdStrike was the name of the company, I\u2019m pretty sure, and they have connections with (whispers) the Russians!<\/p>\n
CALLER: (chuckling)<\/p>\n
RUSH: Russian hackers!<\/p>\n
CALLER: Rush, doesn\u2019t this seem sort of like a staged crime scene? If my house is burglarized and I run to the police and the press screaming, you know, “My house has been burgled! Thousands of dollars in merchandise are gone,” and the police show up to investigate, and I tell them, “No, no, you\u2019re not investigating this. I\u2019m gonna let a third party come in here and they\u2019ll investigate it and they\u2019ll walk around the crime scene and they\u2019ll arrange things and they\u2019ll look at evidence. Once we have the picture assembled for you, we\u2019ll get back to you.” That seems horribly suspicious to me.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/HackersRussian.jpg\")
RUSH: Well, let me tell you, not only that, if your house is burgled, as you say, and the cops or any other law enforcement authority come in and they want to investigate and you tell \u2019em,” No,” the next thing they\u2019re gonna do is investigate you —<\/p>\n
CALLER: Yes, sir.<\/p>\n
RUSH: — for not letting them investigate the burglary. They\u2019re gonna go, “What do you mean you don\u2019t want us to find out? What are you hiding?”<\/p>\n
CALLER: (chuckling)<\/p>\n
RUSH: And they\u2019ll start investigating you.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Absolutely right. But I have done searches trying to find mainstream media news accounts of this aspect of the story. You will not find it from CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Now, let me tell you how you can find this. And I\u2019m not saying that you can swear by what you\u2019re gonna find, but if you\u2019ll do a Google search of CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike was the firm the DNC hired to come in and pore through their computer network, and then the Democrats told the FBI that we will share with you what CrowdStrike finds. CrowdStrike, they\u2019re a legitimate company, but they do have hacker connections with the people like Guccifer 2.0, which is supposedly a Ukraine hacker with ties to the Russian… The current edition of the KGB. I mean, it\u2019s highly suspicious, and you\u2019re absolutely correct to have your antennae raised over this.<\/p>\n
CALLER: There\u2019s one other aspect I think is interesting.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Well, cool. What\u2019s that?<\/p>\n
CALLER: WikiLeaks just revealed that the in the CIA cyber armory they have tools that could make it look like the Russians had hacked you.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Oh, yeah.<\/p>\n
CALLER: It makes me wonder if this was arranged. They wanted to blame it on Trump. They had Brennan at the CIA, have the DNC servers hacked when the information was actually released by a DNC insider.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Right.<\/p>\n
CALLER: And then they had CrowdStrike assemble the evidence to point at Trump, and then they let the FBI have CrowdStrike\u2019s result. This is a staged crime scene, Rush.<\/p>\n
RUSH: No question about it. I don\u2019t know if every aspect as you\u2019ve laid it out is true, but there\u2019s no question the general theory is accurate. The WikiLeaks dump, the original WikiLeaks dump… There have been subsequent dumps since then, but the original dump of all of the CIA stuff that WikiLeaks. The whistleblower somewhere in the CIA gave it all to WikiLeaks. They published some of it. I can\u2019t remember the category. But you\u2019re right, there was discovered a bunch of CIA hacking programs that have the ability to make it look like the Russians or the Chinese or North Koreans are actually doing the hacking. They found a way to actually attach Russian, Chinese fingerprints or signatures to the hack. And was the Russian fingerprints that have supposedly been found, the Russians wouldn\u2019t leave evidence they were there.<\/p>\n
CALLER: No.<\/p>\n
RUSH: If it was a genuine hack and they were genuinely trying to secretly acquire information, they would not leave evidence they were there. But the CIA or somebody else might do so wanting to point to the Russians. But “staged crime scene,” I have no doubt. I also think that the refusal to let the FBI pore through the DNC network is to hide various things like what we\u2019ve just been discussing, the existence of these CIA hacker programs that make it look like others have actually done it.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/650-040717-Russian-Hack-Flag.jpg\")
CALLER: God bless you, Rush.<\/p>\n
RUSH: I appreciate —<\/p>\n
CALLER: You\u2019re a national treasure.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Well… Well, thanks to callers like you. I will tell you, the rule of them on this stuff, folks. It\u2019s not a hundred percent, but it\u2019s so close it\u2019s scary. When the Democrats start accusing other people of things, you can pretty much make book the Democrats are the ones doing it themselves. And when they start predicting, supposing, analyzing that this could have been done that way, it\u2019s because they\u2019ve been doing it that way themselves. That\u2019s how they\u2019re aware of it. Their fingerprints ultimately are gonna be found all over this.<\/p>\n
BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n
RUSH: Okay. This CrowdStrike outfit. CrowdStrike is run by a Ukrainian who happens to hate Russia with a passion. CrowdStrike, in fact, sees Russia everywhere, and if they are sourcing things for the DNC, it would not be hard to imagine CrowdStrike telling the Democrats, “The Russians are involved with Trump.” The guy just has a… Well, he hates \u2019em. He just despises them. Last week CrowdStrike got caught lying about the Russians hacking a Ukrainian military app. It turns out that it wasn\u2019t hacked at all.<\/p>\n
CrowdStrike even made up stories about the havoc the Russians caused in Ukraine. They published a bunch of lies. These are the people the Democrats had come in and analyze their computer network rather than let the FBI come in. After everybody was just caterwauling and screaming that the Russians hacked the computer network, they said to the FBI, “No, you can\u2019t come in. We\u2019re gonna let CrowdStrike do it, and whatever CrowdStrike finds, we\u2019ll pass on to you.”<\/p>\n