{"id":22300,"date":"2004-12-01T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T07:00:26","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2021-03-17T19:03:32","modified_gmt":"2021-03-17T23:03:32","slug":"liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Get this. This is from the New York Times today, actually from yesterday. “An extra $5.6 billion,” that\u2019s $5.6 billion, “must be spent on New York City [skrool] children every year to give them the opportunity for a sound basic education which they are guaranteed under the state Constitution.” This, a court appointed panel has found. A court appointed panel says $5.6 billion is needed. “Beyond that, $9.2 billion worth of new classrooms and laboratories, libraries, and other facilities must be built and maintained to relieve overcrowding, reduce class size, and provide the city\u2019s 1.1 million [skrool] children with an adequate place to learn.” Now, if I add this up, that is $14.8 billion. What\u2019s the $5.6 billion for if the $9.2 billion is for classrooms, labs, libraries and other facilities? Now, here\u2019s the question, though: “How much of that should come from the state or the city itself, the panel did not say, leaving unanswered one of the most daunting and contentious questions facing lawmakers responsible for coming up with the money.”<\/p>\n

\"\"Well, I just can\u2019t imagine where they\u2019re going to get this money, can you, folks? I just can\u2019t. What will they do in New York to come up with $14.8 billion when this court-appointed panel does not specify it has to come from the city or the state? Well, I can\u2019t imagine what they\u2019re going to do. Let me think about this for awhile, ladies and gentlemen, because this is a challenge, to come up with $14.8 billion. If I do the math here, that is 1.1 million students, and I\u2019m just going to use the $5.6 billion here, first figure. That\u2019s $5,090 per student more than what is already being spent per student.<\/p>\n

With $5,090 per student let me tell you what you can do. You can get them all their own limousines. You can take them to 21 or Ben Benson\u2019s or Patsy\u2019s for lunch every day. You can then go hire your favorite liberal professor to come in and teach \u2019em in the classroom — and you\u2019re still going to have money left over! Where is this money going?<\/p>\n

An additional $5,090 per student more plus whatever this other $9.2 billion is. Now, you people in New York City, you\u2019re famous blue citiers, New York, a blue state, and just listening to you all speak and watching your attitudes, you\u2019re obviously smarter than the rest of us. You\u2019re the elites in New York. You\u2019re the people that run things better, that know better. You\u2019re the ones that are smarter than everybody else. So how you gonna come up with this money? And by the way, how did the skrool system get in such a state that it needs all this money when it\u2019s already got more money than it\u2019s ever had before if you all are so smart? If you are the best and brightest, especially the ones in the education system, why, they\u2019re the ones indoctrinating and teaching all the rest of us and they know better, folks. They\u2019re the smart ones. How can this happen to them? I\u2019m just joking about not knowing how they\u2019re going to get the money. The first thing they\u2019ll do is raise taxes.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the first thing they\u2019ll think of. In fact, this will be greeted with a smile. The fact that they need $5.6 billion and then another $9.2 billion, this will all be greeted with a smile by certain bureaucrats in New York who will think, “Automatic tax increase! It\u2019s ‘for the children.\u2019 Why, it can\u2019t lose! We\u2019re in a blue state. Blue staters love taxes and tax increases especially when it\u2019s ‘for the children,'” but will they be able to raise taxes enough to collect all of this revenue and not choke off any economy? Probably not. My guess is, ladies and gentlemen, that there might be, before this is all said and done, there might be an effort to obtain federal funds in this crisis, in which case it will mean that the blue state elitists and pointy heads will be reaching out to those of you in the red states, you ignorant, hayseed, pickup-driving, church-going, idiot-sounding hicks will be reached out to by the elitist pointy heads, smartest-people-in-the-world New York blue staters to bail them out of their woeful education circumstance.<\/p>\n

\"\"I\u2019m not suggesting this. I\u2019m not necessarily predicting it. I\u2019m just saying I won\u2019t be surprised if this happens because the first thing they\u2019ll want to do is raise taxes and of course these idiots in the blue states will go along with it. “Oh, do you want to raise my taxes? Where do I go to sign up?” Other comments from the story: “We need to roll up our sleeves and make sure the legislature enacts this reform so that the children can get what they need,” said Michael Rebel, director of the campaign for Fiscal Equality. These are the plaintiffs in the case. “This report marks a major turning point in a case that educators, advocates, and politicians are counting on to transform the city\u2019s [skrools]. Nearly every state has battled over [skrool] spending in court but the case in New York is one of the biggest, both in terms of dollars and the number of children involved, and most closely watched [skrool] financing lawsuits in the nation. While the courts have refrained from holding legislators in contempt for failing to act, this report in New York is a significant step toward a court takeover of what has been traditionally been a legislative role, deciding exactly how much money should be spent on schools.”<\/p>\n

Oh, yes, it\u2019s exactly what — the New York Times, by the way, is ecstatic about this. You can read the glee in this paragraph. “Reports say significant step toward a court takeover….” Yes! “…of what has traditionally been a legislative role deciding exactly how much money should be spent on schools.” Yes! Let the courts do it because the courts is the only place liberals make any progress in the country today. “This case has been wandering through the state\u2019s court systems for eleven years, and in those eleven years judges have taken pains not to step in and dictate exactly how much extra money should be spent on the city\u2019s [skrool] children, but the legislature essentially forfeited that prerogative by its own inaction, this panel said.<\/p>\n

The panel of referees said it, therefore, falls by default to the judiciary to fashion an appropriate remedy to insure that the sound basic education constitutional mandate is honored.” There you have it: $5.6 billion more to run the New York City schools and anybody want to take any bets on just how successful this new money will be in straightening out the New York school system?<\/p>\n

\"\"The current New York City public school system budget is $13 billion, ladies and gentlemen. It\u2019s $13 billion. It\u2019s $13 billion now. They want an additional $5.6 billion, or it\u2019s all going to crumble. It\u2019s all going to fall apart. Is this not typical blue state procedure? It\u2019s going to add up to thirteen grand a kid, folks, $13,000 per kid in the New York City public school system. Where is the money going? Are the janitors still buying yachts? This is typically what blue states do: They just throw money at whatever problem in the world. Be it the Great Society, be it the war on poverty, I don\u2019t care what, throw money at it, and then ignore the results and say, “We just haven\u2019t spent enough yet.<\/p>\n

It can\u2019t be that we don\u2019t know what we\u2019re doing because we\u2019re the smartest people around. We\u2019re the elites. We know these things so it must be we don\u2019t have enough money.” And all the while we\u2019re not supposed to judge the results here. The intentions are it. Another pathetic item in the news, from Tucson, a federal judge — I predicted this on this program, folks:<\/p>\n

(Arizona Republic) “A federal judge blocked the state of Arizona yesterday from implementing Proposition 200 at least for the next three weeks.” Prop 187 all over again. “California judge David Bury granted a temporary restraining order after lawyers hired by The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund argued that people will be harmed if the voter approved initiative is allowed to take effect. Attorney Hector Villagra said, ‘Individuals are likely to be denied benefits to which they are legally entitled.”<\/p>\n

This denies benefits to illegal immigrants just like Prop 187, exactly 187, an activist judge rolls in there and says, “The people don\u2019t know what they\u2019re talking about. They don\u2019t know what to do. Their vote was stupid.” He didn\u2019t say it that way but that was the impending conclusion of his result, and so he threw it out. This has only been thrown out for three weeks. The state of Arizona responded that the will of the voters is entitled to be obeyed, but the judge, in his four-page ruling said the challenges have raised serious questions about the legality of the initiative.<\/p>\n

The judge said, “It seems likely that if Proposition 200 were to become law it would have a dramatic chilling effect upon undocumented aliens who would otherwise be eligible for public benefits under federal law, even though the language of the initiative specifically exempts those programs mandated by federal law.” This is the left for you, folks. This is judicial activism. This is how it happens. The people vote. It goes against the will of some liberal judge and the liberal judge throws it out saying, “It\u2019s unconstitutional,” saying, “It will deny somebody benefits,” as though the sole role of the federal government is to provide benefits to illegal immigrants in the country! Speaking of illegal immigrants, by the way, the new label has been coined by the people who hate labels. The left in this country who can\u2019t stand to be called “liberals” have come up with a new label: Anti-Immigrant.<\/p>\n

\"\"(Reuters) “Republicans who want to slow immigration to the United States and crack down on illegal immigrants believe they are gaining political strength and public backing, which may pose a problem next year for President Bush. Bush has already signaled his intention to push a major proposal to allow some of the estimated 8 million to 10 million illegal immigrants in the country to gain legal work visas for up to six years as part of a ‘guest worker\u2019 program. But he may face growing anti-immigrant sentiment, not only his own party but in the country at large, several opponents claimed.” So if you support immigration enforcement, you are anti-immigrant. If you support the enforcement of current immigration law, you are now anti-immigrant, despite the fact it\u2019s bipartisan across the country. “Led by powerful Wisconsin Rep. James Sensenbrenner, the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, anti-immigration conservatives…”<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the second time I see in this story by Alan Elsner at Reuters: “anti-immigration conservatives recently defied the White House by insisting that a bill to reform the nation\u2019s intelligence services include anti-illegal alien provisions, such as driver\u2019s licenses.” Anti-immigration, folks. So we who want to enforce the nation\u2019s immigration laws, we who wish to get tough on it as a national security measure as well as everything, we are “anti-immigrant” now. Just as when if you are anti-affirmative action, you are racist. It\u2019s the time-honored and, frankly, worn-out tactic of the left, and it survives. It\u2019s alive and well but it\u2019s a new age. This stuff is not going to have the simple route into the fabric of our society that it\u2019s always had in the past. Don\u2019t worry about this stuff, folks. This is good. I mean, what the judge did is not good, but this all is going to end up causing a backlash. This is no different than the Supreme Court of Massachusetts ordering the legislature to come up with a law legalizing gay marriage. That\u2019s not how it works in this country. The legislature comes up with the law. They pass it; they debate it; send it to the governor and then the state decides whether it\u2019s constitutional or not. State Supreme Court. You don\u2019t do that. A mayor of San Francisco illegally marrying people, that causes a backlash, and that\u2019s the kind of backlash that will be caused with these activist judicial rulings.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Here is a great example. We just got through talking about this renegade judge out in Arizona. You remember the name Sol Wachtler, Mr. Snerdley? Sol Wachtler? He was a big muckety-muck judge in New York till he had some sort of a personal scandal that derailed him for a while, but he\u2019s now teaching constitutional law at the Touro Law School. T-o-u-r-o, the Touro law school. He has a piece in New York Newsday today. It\u2019s just unbelievable. He says, “Don\u2019t revert to the days of Dred Scott. Bush should pick judges who interpret the Constitution as a living document subject to change.” Dred Scott is a prime example of judicial activism! Nothing in the Constitution supported the ruling which upheld slavery. Dred Scott upheld slavery. Nothing in the Constitution supported it. There was no backup for it. It was judicial activism that gave us Dred Scott. It\u2019s that kind of thing we don\u2019t need on the bench. This guy\u2019s teaching law! He\u2019s teaching constitutional law to young skulls full of mush in New York. Brian in New York City, speaking of the devil. Welcome to the program, sir. Nice to have you with us.<\/p>\n

\"\"CALLER: Well, I\u2019m not a devil but I certainly sometimes feel I live with them. Hey, Rush, I live in New York, and am a registered Republican, and it is just sickening to continue to see the unbelievable amounts of money that are being spent on a public school system that continually and undoubtedly fails the students that are forced to go to it. If you\u2019d look at the numbers, we are spending roughly $13,000 per student to send them to school. What do you think would happen if we took that $13,000, cut it in half, and handed every parent $6,500 to have them have the ability to go get their children an education, and you allow private enterprise to come in and build schools. You know, with a capitalistic idea of making money, you would cut the budget in half and I absolutely guarantee you you would get a better product than what the kids in this city are continually forced to go.<\/p>\n

RUSH: And that is why it will never happen.<\/p>\n

CALLER: It\u2019s just unbelievable.<\/p>\n

RUSH: The fact that you will end up with a better product is why it will never happen. These public education systems exist for one purpose, and that\u2019s to promote and maintain their own existence, and the primary way you do that is eliminate competition. You try to keep as many — and you certainly protect the teachers and the administrators because this $13 billion a year, this is simply a make-work project for civil employees of New York City and state employees in New York. That\u2019s all it is. The idea that they\u2019re then supposed to educate kids, that\u2019s the reason they exist, the public reason they exist, but they\u2019re obviously not educating kids. We\u2019ve had stories left and right, and I\u2019m sure you remember these being in the city, that over half of the Hispanic and minority students are dropping out before they get to their junior years.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Part of the reason they\u2019re dropping out is because the schools are just simply so dangerous. It\u2019s gotten to a point, there\u2019s metal detectors at every school. These kids cannot possibly get an education at these schools, and then it creates bigger problems obviously down the road. Not only is it a huge waste of money to keep these kids in these schools but on top of that you\u2019re then creating, even the ones that graduate, quote, unquote, graduate, are then going into a job market — first of all, they go into a college market where they\u2019re not prepared with the basics to be able to go and get a better education.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Doesn\u2019t matter; doesn\u2019t matter; doesn\u2019t matter. The New York university system is there to accommodate them. If they want to go spend all their class time protesting various things down on 8th Avenue, they\u2019re free to do it. It\u2019s amazing. This is a blue state, folks. This is a great example, and is it any wonder these people end up voting Democrat, which is another one of the reasons why this stuff exists. They\u2019re little indoctrination centers there. That\u2019s a great idea, cut the $13,000 per student in half, give the parent $6,500 and say go make the best deal you can in a private school. You\u2019ll see schools pop up all over the place to handle these kids, and that is why it will never happen – and that means that what\u2019s in the best interests of the churrin is not going to happen, and that\u2019s really the problem when you get right down to it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Get this. This is from the New York Times today, actually from yesterday. “An extra $5.6 billion,” that\u2019s $5.6 billion, “must be spent on New York City [skrool] children every year to give them the opportunity for a sound basic education which they are guaranteed under the state Constitution.” This, a court appointed panel […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nLiberalism Implemented By Activist Judges - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Get this. This is from the New York Times today, actually from yesterday. “An extra $5.6 billion,” that\u2019s $5.6 billion, “must be spent on New York City [skrool] children every year to give them the opportunity for a sound basic education which they are guaranteed under the state Constitution.” This, a court appointed panel […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2004\/12\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges.Par_.0001.ImageFile.gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2004\/12\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges.Par_.0001.ImageFile.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2004\/12\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges.Par_.0001.ImageFile.gif\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/\",\"name\":\"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T07:00:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-17T23:03:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Get this. This is from the New York Times today, actually from yesterday. “An extra $5.6 billion,” that\u2019s $5.6 billion, “must be spent on New York City [skrool] children every year to give them the opportunity for a sound basic education which they are guaranteed under the state Constitution.” This, a court appointed panel […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2004\/12\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges.Par_.0001.ImageFile.gif","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2004\/12\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges.Par_.0001.ImageFile.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2004\/12\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges.Par_.0001.ImageFile.gif"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/","name":"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T07:00:26+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-17T23:03:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2004\/12\/01\/liberalism_implemented_by_activist_judges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Liberalism Implemented By Activist Judges"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22300"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22300"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22300\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387369,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22300\/revisions\/387369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}