{"id":222720,"date":"2017-02-22T13:15:00","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T18:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?p=222720"},"modified":"2017-02-23T16:34:49","modified_gmt":"2017-02-23T21:34:49","slug":"if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/","title":{"rendered":"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: As for the new immigration regulations, many stories on this today. Depending on where you go, you\u2019ll find varying levels of panic. In the Breitbart version of the story, “Department of Homeland Security Removes Obama\u2019s ‘Handcuffs\u2019 on Border Patrol Agents<\/a>.” Essentially where we are right now, we are back to the rule of law now. The gloves are off, we are allowed to do our job. That\u2019s what Border Patrol agents are saying in reaction to the new immigration actions that have been taken by President Trump.<\/p>\n

“DHS Secretary John F. Kelly lifted most of the restrictions imposed on Border Patrol agents under the previous administration and ordered Border Patrol agents expand their efforts to enforce laws against illegal border crossings. The order came in a memo obtained by Breitbart Texas from DHS officials and discontinued President Obama\u2019s ‘catch and release\u2019 program.”<\/p>\n

All this is, folks, it\u2019s common-sensical as anything would be. It focuses on people who have committed crimes, who\u2019ve been deported and come back, people who are about to be charged with crimes, people who\u2019ve done anything illegally. If they\u2019re here illegally and have engaged in illegal behavior, they\u2019re going back. It\u2019s nothing more than the enforcement of existing law. And the left is running around, “These are not our values. This is not who we are. Our values are being raped right before our very eyes.”<\/p>\n

\"\"New York Times: “New Trump Deportation Rules Allow Far More Expulsions<\/a>.” They\u2019re not happy. Another New York Times story: “Mr. Trump\u2019s ‘Deportation Force\u2019 Prepares an Assault on American Values.<\/a>” That\u2019s a New York Times editorial. The deportation, it\u2019s simply enforcing existing laws. We told you yesterday that is all this is. And in fact there\u2019s an exemption they\u2019re thinking about, they\u2019re thinking about an exemption for the DREAMers. And I want to tell you where I come down on that.<\/p>\n

A lot of people think that Trump\u2019s caving because if you allow the DREAMers to stay, we\u2019re talking 750,000 DREAMers, kids, who each have two parents who could come in. Look, this is a-no-win. Nobody\u2019s gonna win anything by deporting a bunch of kids that we let in, whoever did, Obama, whatever. If we can get the strict enforcement of existing immigration law, if we can get enhanced and increased border protection, if we can start doing what we are supposed to do in defending this border, and if we can prevent amnesty from being extended to all of these adult illegal immigrants who have committed crimes or are on the verge of committing crimes or committed crimes and have been released, what have you, then the DREAMer thing may be an acceptable payoff. It could well be, if all the rest of this stuff happens. We\u2019ll have to see how it all manifests itself.<\/p>\n

\"\"Look, there\u2019s a caveat here. In order for the DREAMer thing to be acceptable, the rest of this stuff has to be by the book. No amnesty for anybody other than the DREAMers. We enforce existing law. We turn the Border Patrol agents loose to find people they already know exist and they already know where they are and deport them. People that have committed crimes, people that have been accused of crimes, they\u2019re subject to deportation. People who\u2019ve been convicted of committing crimes.<\/p>\n

These are all people that are not citizens. They\u2019re illegally here in the first place, and deporting them is exactly according to existing law. If that happens, and if they move on the wall, if they move on strict border control, then the DREAMer thing is a worthwhile compromise. You\u2019re looking at me like you\u2019re incredulous.<\/p>\n

He thinks I\u2019ve set off an earthquake here. I don\u2019t know what the politics are of rounding up a bunch of kids. I know. I know each of these DREAMers has two parents, and if you have 750,000 DREAMers, that\u2019s the number, then you gotta multiply it by two or three. I understand that. But even after you do that, we\u2019re not talking 11, 12, 15, 20 million here. We\u2019re not talking comprehensive immigration reform.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: No, I\u2019m just saying that the DREAMers, if they\u2019re properly defined, if you properly define DREAMers and leave it at that, it\u2019s a small price to pay to get the problem under control. And there\u2019s gonna be have to be some price to pay for getting it under control. You look at the memo. Kelly put out yesterday, the Homeland Security guy, put out a six-page memo, single-spaced memo detailing the new guidance.<\/p>\n

And you know what, you can sum it up in one sentence: Henceforth, the United States shall be governed by the laws of the United States. Now, if they do that — that\u2019s all that\u2019s happening here. That\u2019s what we\u2019ve been asking for. We don\u2019t need new immigration, comprehensive or otherwise. Just enforce what\u2019s on the books! If they do that, it\u2019s gonna make a huge, huge difference, and the Border Patrol sounds eager to get going.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay. I\u2019m gonna do phone calls for the rest of the half hour, \u2019cause people have been patiently waiting, and it\u2019s just not nice of me to keep people on hold for so long. Just one thing first. We have a montage here of Hillary and Bill Clinton talking about immigration reform, starting in 1995 and 2006. This is when Hillary is a senator and thinking about running for president, and Bill Clinton as president. So when you hear Clinton, he\u2019s talking in January of 1995; Hillary is in October of 2006. Here is our montage…<\/p>\n

\"\"CLINTON 1995: We are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years.<\/p>\n

HILLARY 2006: If they\u2019ve committed transgressions of whatever kind, they should be obviously deported.<\/p>\n

CLINTON 1995: We will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes.<\/p>\n

HILLARY 2006: … secure or borders with technology, personnel, uh, physical barriers if necessary.<\/p>\n

CLINTON 1995: That\u2019s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure or borders more, by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before.<\/p>\n

HILLARY 2006: We need to try to incentivize Mexico to do more.<\/p>\n

RUSH: This is exactly what Trump has said. This is exactly what we\u2019re doing! And Bill and Hillary are on record numerous times there as suggesting it themselves first. And all this is, is the enforcement of U.S. law. Look at… To show you how far gone this is, look at the cacophony of anguish at just the prospect of enforcing the law. This is not… Trump isn\u2019t even proposing anything new. That was in Clinton\u2019s first State of the Union speech, my amigos. Hillary never did the State of the Union. The State of the Pantsuit speech…<\/p>\n

But nevertheless it\u2019s identical to what Trump was saying, and so all that\u2019s happened here as the result of the six page memo that General Kelly put out yesterday, John Kelly says, “Henceforth the United States will be governed by the laws of the United States.” That\u2019s all he needed to say. It took him six pages to say that in order to deal with whatever objections that might occur, and there will be plenty of \u2019em now. Just to show you how far gone this whole immigration thing is. I don\u2019t want anybody misunderstand me on this DREAMer business.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s out the window if we don\u2019t do everything. If we don\u2019t enforce every immigration law on the books, if we don\u2019t round up all of these bad actors and criminals and murderers and thieves, purse snatchers, rapists or whatever. We know they\u2019re there! We catch them; we release them. They get deported; they come back. We round them all up. We get rid of them. We clean up America\u2019s neighborhoods and then we secure the border. If Trump follows through on everything that he said he was gonna do in terms of shoring up the border and stopping this deluge of incoming illegal immigration.<\/p>\n

Nobody, nobody is opposed to immigration. That\u2019s another thing that\u2019s really bad that\u2019s happened in this debate. “Immigration” has now been misdefined to equal anybody who has gotten into the country any way. That is called “immigration.” Just coming here, just arriving, just getting here is what the left now calls “immigration,” and it isn\u2019t. Immigration is a legal process that must be followed, and people that doesn\u2019t must be thrown back out, sent back out, and they must come in the right way — and we have control over who gets in.<\/p>\n

We have control. It\u2019s our country.<\/p>\n

We control the borders. We determine who gets in.<\/p>\n

Not the Democrat Party, not the Republican Party, not the left, the United States government at the time using existing law determines who gets in and how many. And it\u2019s not an endless number. There is a limit, and it\u2019s based on assimilation. It has to be based on assimilation. IF you\u2019re gonna let whatever number of people in, you\u2019ve got to be assured the people you\u2019re letting in love America and want to become Americans and that they want to learn English, and if you can\u2019t confirm that about them, they don\u2019t qualify.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not cruel.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not mean.<\/p>\n

That is simply preserving who we are.<\/p>\n

That is actually preserving our values. Our values, American culture is distinct in the world, and it\u2019s rooted in our founding documents, proclamation of the freedom inherent in each individual at birth, not by government edict. And if we don\u2019t maintain that, if we don\u2019t preserve that as a primary American fundamental value, then the country\u2019s gonna end up being something it was not founded to be, which is what many in this country want to happen. And immigration — wanton, open borders — is the fastest way to undermine the founding of this country.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why so many in the left are in favor of it. So Trump was very clear and very precise throughout the campaign, and he created no confusion about this. People who voted for Donald Trump think they know exactly what he intended to do because he spelled it out. If he does all that, gets a handle on incoming, returns us to the rule of American law? Then okay.<\/p>\n

Now back to the phones, because, as I say, I want to get as many in this half hour as I can because people have been holding.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Koko at the website sent me this today. I would not have seen this if Koko hadn\u2019t sent it. I don\u2019t know how Koko ran into it, but he did. Well, I might have run into it, but maybe not. It\u2019s in the Weekly Standard. It\u2019s a column by Fred Barnes. Now, before I get into what this is about, let me reset the table in terms of what this is about. Since 2010, the Democrats have lost 1200 seats nationwide.<\/p>\n

The Republicans control the White House. The Republicans control the Senate. The Republicans control the House. The Republicans have their biggest opportunity in a generation to implement conservative policies and make them stick, and the greatest opportunity to shape the Supreme Court for multiple generations. The 2018 midterms look so bad right now for the Democrats… I know anything can change, but the Democrats have a nearly impossible task.<\/p>\n

\"\"It could well be that if a lot of things happen, if Trump moves his agenda, and if the economy goes gangbusters and if tax reform happens, if much of what Trump said begins to happen, the Republicans could end up with 60 seats in the Senate in 2018. They could end up with 58. They\u2019re clearly going to win. The Democrats have 25 seats to defend, and 18 of them are in states that Trump won by double digits. So what is this column? It\u2019s a column by Fred Barnes. And it\u2019s entitled, “Houston, Republicans Have a Problem.<\/a>”<\/p>\n

And here is the relevant pull quote. “There\u2019s an untold story from the 2016 election that should encourage Democrats and worry Republicans. It happened in Houston, the nation\u2019s fourth largest city in population and the hometown of former President George H. W. Bush. To be precise it\u2019s Harris County, Texas — which consists mostly of Houston — that we\u2019re talking about.<\/p>\n

“On November 8, Hillary Clinton lost Texas to Donald Trump by 9 percentage points. But she won Harris County by an astonishing 13 percentage points. And that\u2019s not all. Republicans lost every county-wide race (including incumbents) and 24 of 24 judgeships. The son of Lt. Governor Dan Patrick was among Republican judges who were ousted.<\/p>\n

“Democratic strategists are relying on a one-word political panacea to boost the party in overtaking Republicans: Hispanics. They\u2019re already a plurality — 42 percent — in Harris County. Whites are 31 percent, blacks 20 percent, and Asians 7 percent. And the Hispanic population continues to grow. Democrats control the big Texas cities — Dallas, San Antonio, El Paso, to name three — thanks to Hispanic voters.”<\/p>\n

So Mr. Barnes\u2019 point here is — and Fred Barnes, by the way, is a member in good standing of what we all would call the Republican establishment. And as a member in good standing, he probably is voicing sentiments shared by many in the Washington establishment on the Republican side who are obsessed that Trump\u2019s ramping up his immigration plan — I think that\u2019s what this story\u2019s about. Remember, the Washington establishment is just hell-bent on comprehensive immigration reform, slash, amnesty.<\/p>\n

\"\"The Republican Party, because most of its donors are of this frame of mind, elected Republicans, people in the House and Senate today, if they had their druthers, there would be a comprehensive immigration reform bill and there would be amnesty granted to every illegal immigrant in the country. Republican donors want this and many Republicans like Mr. Barnes here think this is the only way we\u2019re ever going to be able to win elections again.<\/p>\n

Now, the Republicans were saying that exact thing before this election. The same establishment were saying before the election if we don\u2019t reach out to Hispanics, and if we don\u2019t come to grips with immigration, we\u2019re never gonna win the White House again. Yet we just did, on a what? Not an amnesty platform, that\u2019s for sure. But, yeah, I guess you can take Houston, microcosm, and say that it\u2019s a fortune teller of sorts.<\/p>\n

But it seems to me as I read this, and I\u2019d have to talk to Mr. Barnes to be certain in my analysis here, but it seems to me that nothing\u2019s changed. Even though the Republicans won this election, they still think that if we don\u2019t do amnesty, and if we don\u2019t grant amnesty to these whatever numbers of millions of illegals here, andif we don\u2019t do whatever we have to do to show that we love Hispanics and we want \u2019em, that we don\u2019t have a prayer in the future.<\/p>\n

I can understand this before the election. And I halfway understand where Mr. Barnes is going here. This is strictly party politics. And they don\u2019t consider Trump a Republican, by the way, in the establishment. He\u2019s not a conservative, and he\u2019s not a Republicans. He\u2019s a populist. You know, he\u2019s a nationalist. But I found this fascinating, that with everything going on out there that this is still at the top of some people\u2019s minds in the establishment out there.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: If we can get the strict enforcement of existing immigration law, if we can get enhanced and increased border protection, if we can start doing what we are supposed to do in defending this border, and if we can prevent amnesty from being extended to all of these adult illegal immigrants who have committed crimes or are on the verge of committing crimes or committed crimes and have been released, what have you, then the DREAMer thing may be an acceptable payoff. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nIf Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: If we can get the strict enforcement of existing immigration law, if we can get enhanced and increased border protection, if we can start doing what we are supposed to do in defending this border, and if we can prevent amnesty from being extended to all of these adult illegal immigrants who have committed crimes or are on the verge of committing crimes or committed crimes and have been released, what have you, then the DREAMer thing may be an acceptable payoff.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/650-022217-Rush-Take.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"George Prayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/650-022217-Rush-Take.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/650-022217-Rush-Take.jpg\",\"width\":650,\"height\":312},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/\",\"name\":\"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-22T18:15:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-23T21:34:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349\",\"name\":\"George Prayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"George Prayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: If we can get the strict enforcement of existing immigration law, if we can get enhanced and increased border protection, if we can start doing what we are supposed to do in defending this border, and if we can prevent amnesty from being extended to all of these adult illegal immigrants who have committed crimes or are on the verge of committing crimes or committed crimes and have been released, what have you, then the DREAMer thing may be an acceptable payoff.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/650-022217-Rush-Take.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"George Prayias","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/650-022217-Rush-Take.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/650-022217-Rush-Take.jpg","width":650,"height":312},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/","name":"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2017-02-22T18:15:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-23T21:34:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2017\/02\/22\/if-trump-tales-us-back-to-the-rule-of-law-on-immigration-exempting-the-dreamers-is-a-small-price-to-pay\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"If Trump Takes Us Back to the Rule of Law on Immigration, Exempting the DREAMers May Be a Small Price to Pay"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a2bc43fbe4b4e1ff4d1f092c6086a349","name":"George Prayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a43c262983f0228d5f474ce08e691cf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"George Prayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/georgeeibnet-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222720"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222720"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222869,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222720\/revisions\/222869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}