{"id":214436,"date":"2016-09-19T17:07:34","date_gmt":"2016-09-19T21:07:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/172.24.32.11\/daily\/2016\/09\/19\/hillary_s_on_the_wrong_side_of_history\/"},"modified":"2016-09-19T17:07:34","modified_gmt":"2016-09-19T21:07:34","slug":"hillary_s_on_the_wrong_side_of_history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/19\/hillary_s_on_the_wrong_side_of_history\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary\u2019s on the Wrong Side of History"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a> <\/p>\n

\n

RUSH:  Okay, so let\u2019s review before we get into the commentary aspect here.  Saturday, a guy goes on a stabbing spree at a shopping mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota, while “making references to Allah,” as in “Allahu Akbar!”  Nine people are injured.  They have a giant press conference. The FBI, local police, everybody that you can think there was there at the stage to announce what they are doing vis-a-vis the investigation.  Meanwhile, a device explodes in Seaside Park, New Jersey.<\/p>\n

About 80 minutes later, 80 miles away in New York City, a bomb goes off in Chelsea. In that, almost 30 people are hurt.  An unexploded device found nearby turns out to be a pressure cooker bomb.  You want a story about that? It happened to be a reporter who saw it? You know what the reporter thought it was?  Honest to God. I\u2019m not making this up.  The reporter who saw this second bomb and said, “Wow, that looks like a science experiment!”<\/p>\n

<\/a>Now, why would a reporter stumbling across what is obviously a bomb think it was a science project?  Well, remember the kid from Dallas, the young Islamic kid who made a “science project” that was a clock<\/a>, and there was nothing technologically advanced about the clock? It was actually a timer, an explosive device. But everybody said, “Oh, what a great kid! See, this proves that Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism! It\u2019s just a great science project.”<\/p>\n

So the media reports this garbage, and it sticks with them.  So potential bombs are just nothing but science projects.  That\u2019s what this reporter thought.  Thank God the reporter thought to call somebody.  ‘Cause there was a second device, and this was shrapnel inside a pressure cooker.  That is a serious bomb.  The same kind of bomb that the terrorist… I\u2019m sorry.  I\u2019m sorry.  We\u2019re trying to empathize with these people, right?  The same kind of bomb…<\/p>\n

How the hell would that happen? It\u2019s the same kind of bomb that terrorists used at the Boston Marathon. It was a pressure cooker with shrapnel in there.  Then the all-left, the wacko extremist leftist mayor of New York City, Bill de Blasio comes out and first reaction is it\u2019s the new normal.  “It\u2019s not terrorism.  I don\u2019t care whatever you think, it isn\u2019t terrorism.  You got it?  It isn\u2019t terrorism.”  In fact, he didn\u2019t even want to use the word.  It was “a deliberate act.”  What will they call this now? “Non-workplace violence” if I\u2019m not mistaken.<\/p>\n

They\u2019re gonna have to call it something.  If they don\u2019t want to call it terrorism, what are they gonna call it?  Non-workplace violence.  Fort Hood, as you know, the terrorism there was “workplace violence.”  So after the guy goes on a stabbing spree in Minnesota — making references to Allahu Akbar, nine people are injured — a bomb goes off Seaside Park, New Jersey, then 80 miles away in New York City another bomb goes off. Another bomb is found, and 30 people there wounded, with the same kind of bomb terrorists used in Boston.<\/p>\n

The mayor comes out and says, “It\u2019s not terrorism!” <\/p>\n

“It was a deliberate act,” he said, “but it was terrorism.”<\/p>\n

The Drive-By Media then immediately turn their fury on — dadelut dadelut dadelut dadelut — Donald Trump, because Donald Trump called it a bombing.  “He jumped the gun.  He said it was a bombing before anybody really knew! Well, he said it was a bombing before the official investigation had concluded that it was a bomb.  No, no, no.  Bad, bad no-no.”  That is profiling.  That is politically incorrect.  You\u2019re not supposed to say what everybody knows.<\/p>\n

You\u2019re not supposed to identify what everybody knows.  You\u2019re not supposed to call terrorism “terrorism.”  So they turn their fury on Trump for being irresponsible — proving, they say, that Trump is unfit for office.  “Why, he called a bomb a bomb, and we can\u2019t have somebody like that in the White House!  That poses such a great threat to our population and the populations of the world. A president who sees a bomb and calls it a bomb? We can\u2019t have that.” <\/p>\n

They turn their fury on Trump. Hey, I\u2019m not trying to be funny, folks, but you can\u2019t help it.  That\u2019s exactly what happened.  Hillary also called it a bombing and she criticized Trump for calling it a bombing after she herself did, and CNN edited her saying that.  The Minnesota attacker was killed by law enforcement, and was later identified by his father as Dahir Adan from Somalia.  We don\u2019t know if he was a Somali pirate or not but we do know he was a Somali terrorist.  After the stabbing attack, ISIS claimed that this guy was one of their “soldiers.”<\/line><\/p>\n

So at the press conference the next day, the FBI said they are investigating the multiple stabbings by an Islamic guy making references to Allah claimed by ISIS as a soldier as “a possible act of terrorism.”  They\u2019re not sure.  They don\u2019t know what the motive could be.  It\u2019s like right out of San Bernardino! They don\u2019t know what the motive was. They can\u2019t find the motive.  They\u2019re looking hard. They\u2019re overturning every rock. They are interviewing anybody that might know anything.  They, God bless them, cannot come up with a motive!<\/p>\n

And until they can come up with a motive, they can\u2019t say that what happened this weekend was terrorism.  Authorities in New York and New Jersey are reported to be searching for a link between the incidents, but it\u2019s gonna be tough because they\u2019re bunch of lone wolves.  And, by definition, lone wolves don\u2019t have linkage. Except on CNN an expert said, “Well, maybe these three lone wolves just coincidentally acted at the same time.”  Well, then how can they be lone wolves if there was coordination?<\/p>\n

How can that possibly be?  But that\u2019s what they say. That\u2019s their story. Experts on CNN say, “Two or three lone wolves may have gotten together.”  That\u2019s the exact quote.  “Two or three lone wolves may have gotten together.”  So Minnesota, New York, New Jersey authorities are reported to be searching for a link between the incidents, while everybody in America can tell \u2019em what the link is: Radical Islamic terrorism.  No!  We\u2019re not supposed to say so.  Trump\u2019s dead-on right calling it “bombing” and “terrorism,” and he didn\u2019t just do that. <\/p>\n

He went on and attached Obama and Hillary to it.  Did you hear, Hillary goes to Silicon Valley or she makes a plea? The first thing she said when she rips Trump, is it\u2019s because his rhetoric is creating all these terrorists.  His anti-Muslim, anti-Hispanic, anti-this, anti-that rhetoric is making all these otherwise worldly, peaceful people really mad.  That\u2019s right.  You have peaceful worldly people, highly sophisticated. They\u2019re minding their own business.<\/p>\n