{"id":214069,"date":"2016-07-27T19:14:50","date_gmt":"2016-07-27T23:14:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/172.24.32.11\/daily\/2016\/07\/27\/what_offends_rachel_maddow\/"},"modified":"2017-07-12T09:35:03","modified_gmt":"2017-07-12T13:35:03","slug":"what_offends_rachel_maddow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/27\/what_offends_rachel_maddow\/","title":{"rendered":"What Offends Rachel Maddow"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: I\u2019m lifting the ban on MSNBC: Rachel Maddow last night after the Bill Clinton speech was not happy…<\/p>\n

MADDOW:\u00a0 I think the beginning of the speech was (pause) a controversial way to start, honestly, talking, you know, “the girl… a girl,” leading with this long story about him being attracted to an unnamed girl and thinking about whether he was starting something he didn\u2019t finish. Uh, building her whole political story for the whole first half of the speech around her marriage to him.\u00a0 I think, you know, unless there were worries that this is gonna be too feminist a convention, that was not a feminist way to start.<\/p>\n

RUSH:\u00a0 Let me explain.\u00a0 She\u2019s reacting as a woman of today would.\u00a0 “Girl?\u00a0 We\u2019re not girls!” But back in 1970, \u201960, \u201965, \u201970, it was common for the girls to call themselves “the girls.” The wives would call and say, “Hey, yeah, the girls and I are gonna go to a club. The girls and I…” And the husbands called \u2019em “the girls.”\u00a0 It was loving; it was affectionate. It certainly wasn\u2019t insulting.\u00a0 Today, it is.\u00a0 You don\u2019t you don\u2019t call \u2019em “babes.” You don\u2019t call them “chicks.” You don\u2019t call \u2019em…<\/p>\n