{"id":213887,"date":"2016-06-30T16:14:36","date_gmt":"2016-06-30T20:14:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/172.24.32.11\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/"},"modified":"2018-01-26T20:09:01","modified_gmt":"2018-01-27T01:09:01","slug":"what_i_think_bill_told_loretta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/","title":{"rendered":"What I Think Bill Told Loretta"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/37\/72082\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" alt=\"Listen to it Button\"><\/a> <\/p>\n<section xmlns:image=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/image\/\" xmlns:xhtml=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/xhtml\/\" xmlns:custom=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/custom\/\">\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Well, we\u2019re gonna kick off today with competing polling data.&nbsp; We have a surprise visit by Bill Clinton to the attorney general in a private plane on the tarmac at Phoenix.&nbsp; If it hadn\u2019t been for a local Phoenix ABC affiliate, we wouldn\u2019t know that it had happened.&nbsp; We got Obama going off on Trump in a rant supposedly against populism and so forth. And <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2016\/06\/29\/jake-tapper-trump-is-living-rent-free-in-obamas-head-video\/\">Jake Tapper, CNN, actually described it as Trump living rent free in Obama\u2019s head<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So yet again, ladies and gentlemen, another unique usage of language started on this program finding its way into the general lexicon in the United States.&nbsp; Of course the first noted example of that was the word &#8220;feminazi,&#8221; which is now everywhere, started by this program back in 1988.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, great to have you with us, folks, as we march on.&nbsp; Another three hours of broadcast excellence here.&nbsp; The telephone number if you want to be on the program is&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"tel:800-282-2882\">800-282-2882<\/a>, and the email address,<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"mailto:elrushbo@eibnet.com\">ElRushbo@eibnet.com<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124276\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Bad-Gradpa-Bill-Clinton-Loretta-Lynch.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">In the old days we call them lighthearted stories that we would laugh about.&nbsp; Today, we don\u2019t laugh anymore.&nbsp; I mean, we do, but at the same time we realize that not everybody else is. It\u2019s probably got a little bit more substance to it than we would otherwise think.&nbsp; But it\u2019s nevertheless encouraging.&nbsp; I\u2019ll leave you to ponder what that might be.&nbsp; Get to it here in just a second.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>But first off: &#8220;Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton\u2019s use of email and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/06\/28\/truth_vs_narrative_benghazi_exemplifies_what_has_happened_to_our_country\">hours before the public release of the Benghazi report<\/a>, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton. The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane,&#8221; that was being used by Loretta Lynch and her husband.&nbsp;They\u2019re traveling around doing appearances on how the Justice Department\u2019s taking over local police departments.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, neither Clinton nor Loretta Lynch actually arrived in Phoenix on that plane.&nbsp; Did you know that?&nbsp; You didn\u2019t know that?&nbsp; The plane on which they met is not the plane either of them used to get there.&nbsp; It looks like somebody put that plane there so nobody would see the meeting.&nbsp; And again, as I say, if it weren\u2019t for this local ABC affiliate, for some reason had a camera crew out at Sky Harbor, we wouldn\u2019t know that this meeting had taken place.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The national Drive-Bys were nowhere near, even though Loretta Lynch is the attorney general.&nbsp; You would think that there is a body watch on her, a media body watch.&nbsp; I mean, you know what those are, right?&nbsp; The media, there\u2019s constantly somebody watching public figures in case something extraordinary happens.&nbsp; It\u2019s just a fact of media life.&nbsp; And I would think that she rates a body watch. Maybe she doesn\u2019t.&nbsp; Apparently not, because there weren\u2019t any Drive-Bys there.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t know whose airplane it was.&nbsp; It could be that she gets a private plane.&nbsp; She could get a government plane to fly to Phoenix if she\u2019s on government business.&nbsp; It depends on the fleet, depends on what\u2019s available.&nbsp; And we do know that she was flying around meeting with various local police departments as the federal government establishes, quote, unquote, guidelines for local police departments, which is nothing more than actually a takeover.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, here\u2019s what we are told this was all about.&nbsp; For some reason, former President Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area.&nbsp; We don\u2019t know why.&nbsp; He just happened to be there.&nbsp; The story is that he was playing golf in Phoenix.&nbsp; It\u2019s 108 degrees, Bill Clinton playing golf in Phoenix.&nbsp; Somebody who has had serious heart surgery.&nbsp; It sounds to me like a bit of a stretch but we\u2019ll go with it because that\u2019s what is being reported here by the local ABC affiliate, KNXV in Phoenix.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/sRWDP-PWunE\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>So the story is this.&nbsp; Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area, arrived at Sky Harbor Airport&nbsp;Monday&nbsp;evening to leave.&nbsp; This is what it says next.&nbsp; &#8220;Sources tell ABC15 Clinton was notified Lynch would be arriving at the airport soon and waited for her arrival.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What I like to do is actually envision this.&nbsp; Here\u2019s Clinton, he\u2019s played golf, done whatever he\u2019s done in Phoenix, on the way to the airport to leave.&nbsp; I don\u2019t know how he travels, but he\u2019s probably got a Secret Service contingent. That means they\u2019re in a series of SUVs, one or two of them. And somehow, on the way or after he arrives, somebody says, &#8220;Hey, Slick Willie, guess who\u2019s coming in here&nbsp;in 10 minutes&nbsp;or so, guess who\u2019s landing, Loretta Lynch.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(Clinton impression)&nbsp; &#8220;Hey, is that right?&nbsp; Oh, Loretta\u2019s coming in?&nbsp; Well, you know what, let\u2019s delay our departure.&nbsp; Let me just go over and say hi.&#8221;&nbsp; Really?&nbsp; So Clinton just happens to be told that Loretta Lynch is arriving soon when he just happens to be arriving to depart at Sky Harbor International Airport.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124275\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/ClintonAG-in-AZ-TRUTH.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">&#8220;Lynch was arriving in Phoenix for a planned visit as part of her national tour to promote community policing,&#8221; which again is Obama taking over police departments.&nbsp; &#8220;The private meeting comes as Lynch\u2019s office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton\u2019s email server.&#8221; That would be Hillary Clinton\u2019s email server, she the spouse of the aforementioned Bill Clinton.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The private meeting also occurred hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving Hillary Clinton and President Obama\u2019s administration.&nbsp; Lynch said the private meeting on the tarmac did not involve these topics.&#8221; Do you know what Lynch said they talked about?&nbsp; Loretta Lynch, attorney general, arriving in Phoenix to help take over the Phoenix police department and no doubt probably the sheriff\u2019s department, too, get Joe Arpaio out of the way, showing up there, all of a sudden is told Bill Clinton is arriving soon and wants to have a meeting with you.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So they find a vacant plane on the tarmac, and Loretta Lynch goes there, Clinton, after having been told Loretta Lynch has just arrived or soon arriving, goes to this tarmac, no doubt at general aviation, gets on board the plane. Loretta Lynch says their conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social, about their travels.&nbsp; She said the president mentioned that he played golf in Phoenix.&nbsp; And Loretta Lynch admitted all this&nbsp;on Tuesday&nbsp;afternoon while speaking at the Phoenix police department.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So we are supposed to believe here that Bill Clinton, a 70-year-old man with a history of heart trouble, played golf in Phoenix where it was 108, 110 degrees, maybe he played on Sunday when it was 108, I don\u2019t know.&nbsp; And then he\u2019s on the way to the airport to leave, is told that Loretta Lynch, the attorney general, is soon due to arrive, delays his departure, goes to a vacant private jet on the tarmac where she happens to be.&nbsp; He delays his departure to go have the meeting at which they discuss their grandchildren and their travels.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(Clinton impression) &#8220;Hey, Loretta, you know, I heard you were here, and I just wanted to come say hi before I left.&nbsp; You know what?&nbsp; Got a grandkid coming.&nbsp; Do you have any grandkids, Loretta?&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yes, Mr. President.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124277\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Clintonbill-counting-chickens.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">&#8220;Aren\u2019t they great?&nbsp; That\u2019s the greatest thing in the world.&nbsp; I\u2019m glad I caught you.&nbsp; I\u2019m glad I found you before you left so I could talk about our grandchildren with you.&nbsp; I\u2019ve been playing golf here in Phoenix.&nbsp; What are you gonna be doing?&nbsp; Is that right?&nbsp; You\u2019re over here to take over the police department.&nbsp; Good for you.&nbsp; Hey, good seeing you.&nbsp; I\u2019m glad you waited for me, have this little meeting about our grandkids before you leave. Hope you have a great visit, whatever you do, and I\u2019ll check you later,&#8221; and he leaves.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>I try to envision that and it just doesn\u2019t work for me.&nbsp; It just doesn\u2019t work for me.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So what else might have been going on at this meeting?&nbsp; Well, let us continue here with a story from ABC Phoenix affiliate, KNXV.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Sources say the private meeting at the airport lasted around 30 minutes.&#8221; &nbsp;Okay, how many grandkids does Clinton have?&nbsp; Chelsea\u2019s got two now?&nbsp; Okay.&nbsp; So how many minutes per grandchild do you discuss with the attorney general?&nbsp; How many grandchildren does she have?&nbsp; Let\u2019s say she\u2019s got four, just for the heck of it, pick a number, six grandkids, 30 minutes, basically five minutes per grandchild.&nbsp; And maybe three minutes because you\u2019d have to have some discussion about mutual travel, you know, how was the trip into Phoenix.&nbsp; She would report.&nbsp; He would describe what it was like playing golf in this oppressive heat and how happy he was to be getting out of there and back to where he was going, and then he\u2019s off.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And then this express item.&nbsp; &#8220;There was no discussion on any matter pending before the Department,&#8221; or anything having to do with Hillary Clinton\u2019s emails or anything related to it.&nbsp; Nothing like that happened.&nbsp; That just doesn\u2019t work for me.&nbsp; Let me propose an alternative.&nbsp; Let me run something by you and see what you think of this.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s take elements of this story, and let\u2019s believe them.&nbsp; Let\u2019s say that Bill Clinton was &#8212; well, we know he was in Phoenix.&nbsp; Let\u2019s say he was leaving, he was on the way to the airport, and it\u2019s not beyond the realm of possibility, he\u2019s told that Loretta Lynch is gonna be arriving soon at the same airport where he\u2019s gonna be leaving.&nbsp; So Clinton decides, &#8220;You know what?&nbsp; I want to have a talk with this woman.&nbsp; I want to meet her, and what a great time, nobody knows that I\u2019m here, and nobody knows that she\u2019s here.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124278\" class=\"img_right\" align=\"right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/HillaryClintonGlasses_large.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">So a meeting is hastily arranged on a private jet, passenger compartment on the tarmac at Sky Harbor.&nbsp; Now, for those of you think, wouldn\u2019t it be hot in there?&nbsp; No, no.&nbsp; All they have to do is fire up the auxiliary power unit, the APU, and they can get AC blowing in the plane.&nbsp; No, it would not be a sweat box.&nbsp; They could do this without starting the engines.&nbsp; Perfectly fine to do.&nbsp; So don\u2019t factor that in.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>Somehow they tell Loretta Lynch that Bill Clinton is in town on the way to the airport, wants to meet her.&nbsp; She has two options.&nbsp; She could blow it off or say, &#8220;Oh, okay.&#8221;&nbsp; She takes the meeting.&nbsp; Again, we wouldn\u2019t know this happened &#8212; this is a crucial point &#8212; we would not know this happened were it not for this ABC affiliate in Phoenix.&nbsp; The Drive-Bys haven\u2019t told us a word about it.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>What about this possibility.&nbsp; Clinton hears that she\u2019s there, demands a meeting, it gets set up, he boards plane, she\u2019s there, and he says something along the lines of: (Clinton impression) &#8220;Madam Attorney General, how you doing?&nbsp; It\u2019s such a honor to meet you.&nbsp; You are doing such a great job.&nbsp; You know, I was one of the people that told Barack Obama to put you in this job.&nbsp; I\u2019ve been one of your champions for I can\u2019t tell you how long.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Let me tell you how things are gonna go from here on out. If you want to keep this job, if you want to keep your reputation, because remember, don\u2019t forget what I told Ted Kennedy way back in 2008.&nbsp; It wasn\u2019t that long ago that Barack Obama would be serving us our cocktails, be serving us our coffee.&nbsp; It wasn\u2019t that long ago, and he got mad at it, Loretta. But I\u2019m telling you, things haven\u2019t changed, it\u2019s still that way, and if you want to keep it that way, you know this email thing?&nbsp; It doesn\u2019t exist.&nbsp; Just broom it, Loretta.&nbsp; Just forget about it.&nbsp; Ain\u2019t nothing there.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Nothing to see.&nbsp; Tell Comey.&nbsp; No matter what he wants, you don\u2019t have any evidence.&nbsp; That\u2019s it.&nbsp; It\u2019s been great seeing you.&nbsp; It was fun playing golf.&nbsp; I hope your grandkids are doing great.&nbsp; I hope you have a great time taking over the Phoenix Police Department.&nbsp; I gotta go.&nbsp; Don\u2019t forget what I told you, Loretta.&nbsp; And remember who put you here.&nbsp; Remember how you got here.&nbsp; And remember how easy Loretta it would be to send you somewhere else.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Okay.&nbsp; Okay.&nbsp; If you have doubts about that, let\u2019s give \u2019em both the benefit of the doubt for a moment, even though I know this isn\u2019t true, but let\u2019s just say that Lynch and Clinton are both telling the truth and the whole thing is just happenstance and it was a wonderful meeting of two former colleagues.&nbsp; Isn\u2019t having a friendly chat for 30 minutes, once it\u2019s been discovered, isn\u2019t is that bound to influence her decisions on Hillary and the FBI investigation?&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Isn\u2019t this what we might call an appearance of impropriety?&nbsp; Isn\u2019t it what the left might call an appearance of impropriety?&nbsp; Isn\u2019t this one of those circumstances where the left would say, &#8220;No, no, no, it\u2019s about the seriousness of the charge. The nature of the evidence is irrelevant.&nbsp; It\u2019s the seriousness of the charge.&#8221;&nbsp; And I don\u2019t believe that.&nbsp; I think this thing was set up long ago.&nbsp; I don\u2019t think this was happenstance at all, ladies and gentlemen.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124279\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/LorettaLynchTHought.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">Things like this just don\u2019t happen.&nbsp; And if you think that I\u2019m stretching when I say that Clinton would go in there and remind her who put her there, you people may not remember this.&nbsp; Who do you think it was that appointed Loretta Lynch to be the US attorney for the Eastern District of New York?&nbsp; It\u2019s a plum assignment.&nbsp; The Southern District is big because that\u2019s Manhattan.&nbsp; But the Eastern District of New York, that\u2019s Long Island.&nbsp; That\u2019s Brooklyn, Long Island, that\u2019s no slouch district.&nbsp; Bill Clinton appointed Loretta Lynch to be US attorney, Eastern District, New York, when he was president.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>So, when Bill Clinton gets on board the private plane with Loretta Lynch (Clinton impression), &#8220;Hey, hey, hey, hey, Loretta, I\u2019m sure you remember how you got this job.&nbsp; I\u2019m sure you can put two and two together.&nbsp; I\u2019m sure you can realize that you are the AG because I made you a federal judge, and before that nobody had ever heard of you except the Congressional Black Caucasians. I took their recommendation, and now look where we are.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And again, folks, I want to remind you, we wouldn\u2019t know about this were it not for a local Phoenix affiliate.&nbsp; That\u2019s not an insignificant thing.&nbsp; The Drive-Bys were nowhere near this.&nbsp; And even if the Drive-Bys had gotten wind of it, do you think they would have reported it complete with photos like the ABC affiliate in Phoenix did?&nbsp; Doubtful.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now some people are suggesting Loretta Lynch may have to recuse herself. (laughing) That makes me laugh.&nbsp; If that were to happen, there\u2019s not a single Democrat judge on the Supreme Court that could hear any case.&nbsp; They\u2019re all compromised.&nbsp; They don\u2019t recuse themselves.&nbsp; It\u2019s the exact opposite.&nbsp; They are there to make sure that whatever needs to happen can happen.&nbsp; If it\u2019s corrupt, if it\u2019s on the edges of the law, fine and dandy, because the advancement of the agenda and the protection of the players &#8212; in this case, Hillary Clinton &#8212; trumps everything.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I mean, Eric Holder, this guy, he should have recused himself from Ferguson; he should have recused himself from half the cases \u2019cause he\u2019s out there prejudging everything and tainting the jury pool in every instance where there was a jury trial.&nbsp; He didn\u2019t recuse himself.&nbsp; It\u2019s laughable that she would have to recuse herself.&nbsp; That would never happen.&nbsp; That\u2019s the exact reason why she\u2019s there, in fact.&nbsp; But if she did recuse herself, that would open it up for Comey.&nbsp; But if she recused herself there would be somebody else in there next in line, you know, next person steps up and it would be the same old thing. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Now I got this story from Politico, and I don\u2019t believe this either. &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2016\/06\/bill-clinton-loretta-lynch-224972\">Democrats Groan After Bill Clinton Meets Loretta Lynch <\/a>&#8212; The private meeting rekindles concerns about a possible conflict of interest while his wife is under federal investigation. Lynch said she and Clinton talked only of grandchildren, golf, and their respective travels.&#8221; &nbsp;What an absolute &#8212; does anybody believe this? &nbsp;Of course we don\u2019t. &nbsp;But now we\u2019re told that the Democrats are struggling. &nbsp;There\u2019s a struggle here about the possible conflict of interest.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re not struggling with anything. &nbsp;The only thing they\u2019re worried about here is that people found out about this. &nbsp;And, by the way, Loretta Lynch says all they talked about was their grandchildren? &nbsp;Well, how would that manifest itself? &nbsp;Well, here\u2019s an idea. &nbsp;&#8220;Ms. Lynch, you say that you and the president only talked about your grandchildren. &nbsp;What did the president say to you?&#8221; &nbsp;(imitating Lynch) &#8220;He asked me explicitly not to indict Chelsea\u2019s baby\u2019s grandmother. &nbsp;That\u2019s how we talked about our grandchildren.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp;John in Hilliard, Ohio. &nbsp;You\u2019re next and first. &nbsp;Great to have you, sir. &nbsp;Hi.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/06\/28\/truth_vs_narrative_benghazi_exemplifies_what_has_happened_to_our_country\"><img id=\"eZObject_124287\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/HillaryBenghaziCAR.jpg\"\/><\/a>CALLER: &nbsp;Good afternoon, Rush. &nbsp;It\u2019s an honor to talk to you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: &nbsp;Thank you. &nbsp;Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: &nbsp;I have an alternative theory on the meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch. &nbsp;My thought is that it may have been &#8212; I mean, your theory I think is credible, but it could have been also what I would call a courtesy call, and the courtesy call could have been for one of two things. &nbsp;One, it could have been, &#8220;Hey, Mr. President, Hillary needs to come in and talk to us, because, from what I\u2019ve read in the news, she\u2019s been avoiding going in for any kind of an interview.&#8221; &nbsp;The second alternative may have actually been to say, &#8220;Mr. President, we hate to inform you of this, but your wife is gonna be indicted.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: &nbsp;Okay. &nbsp;Now, I understand how a theory like that would originate. &nbsp;You\u2019re a man of honor. &nbsp;You\u2019re a man of great decency. &nbsp;Obviously a constitutionalist and law-abiding. &nbsp;And you also are a man of sensibilities and propriety, and you would think that would be a fair and very proper thing for two colleagues who know each other with mutual respect, that if that indictment that you suggested about to happen, that she would, as a courtesy, give him, as the husband, a heads-up. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It also indicates that &#8212; how would I say this? &nbsp;I don\u2019t want to make it personal here, but your theory, which is much preferable, I mean, I would applaud something like that. &nbsp;I think it is naive and illustrates a gross misunderstanding of how the Democrat Party functions. &nbsp;If what you say is true, if Loretta Lynch finds out Clinton\u2019s gonna be in town, you know what? &nbsp;Perfect time for the courtesy call. Terfect time for me to tell him that the gig is up on his wife and we\u2019re gonna hand down the indictment. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>He gets on a plane and she tells him. (imitating Lynch) &#8220;Hi, Mr. President. &nbsp;I know you appointed me to the federal bench. I know I wouldn\u2019t be the attorney general if it weren\u2019t for you. &nbsp;But I have to tell you, we\u2019ve got the goods. &nbsp;Your wife subjected this country to national security threats and violations. &nbsp;Our enemies have everything that was on her server. &nbsp;I\u2019ve got no choice. &nbsp;She\u2019s going to be indicted. &nbsp;We don\u2019t know when, but I think you deserve a heads-up.&#8221; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So what does Bill Clinton do? (Clinton impression) &#8220;Hey, hey, Loretta, I\u2019m glad you made me detour my departure. &nbsp;Appreciate that heads up. &nbsp;I know you\u2019re doing a great job, and this is proof of how great a job you\u2019re doing.&#8221; &nbsp;Or, would it be, &#8220;Loretta, you really want to think about this. &nbsp;You better remember Bob Torricelli, remember Andrew Cuomo. There\u2019s a whole bunch of examples I could give you, Loretta. People you know, people that used to be alive and breathing and big in politics, you can\u2019t find \u2019em now, Loretta. &nbsp;And, Loretta, don\u2019t make light of the fact I appointed you AG of the Eastern District. &nbsp;If I hadn\u2019t done that you\u2019d be nothing different than the guy serving Ted Kennedy and me my coffee back in South Carolina.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: &nbsp;What is the point of having power and not using it? &nbsp;What\u2019s the point of having power and allowing your opposition to get rid of your presidential nominee? &nbsp;Come on, folks, it ain\u2019t ever gonna happen here.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: This is Leanne driving through Michigan.&nbsp; Great to have you, Leanne.&nbsp; Welcome to the EIB Network.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Hey, Rush, how are you?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Fine and dandy.&nbsp; How are you?<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124295\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/RushPhonesWeGoLaugh.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">CALLER:&nbsp; Good.&nbsp; Listen, I have a little bit of a different scenario about Loretta and Bill, and I think the conversation may have gone something like this.&nbsp; &#8220;Hey, Loretta, you know, I know you really love your grandchildren, right, Loretta?&nbsp; And we want our grandchildren to have a good world to grow up in and, you know, we want them to have opportunities just like we had, right, Loretta?&#8221;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; You think that President Clinton might have attempted to scare the attorney general about her grandchildren\u2019s future?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Well, you know, I didn\u2019t hear anything in that conversation other than about the grandchildren, did you?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; The grandchildren and their travels, such as she taking over police departments and him playing golf.&nbsp; Those were the three things mentioned.&nbsp; The grandchildren was the big one.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Grandchildren\u2019s future and, you know, how they may grow up in the next 20 years and what political opportunities they may have in the future.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Well, look, I understand the way you\u2019re thinking.&nbsp; I mean, here you have Bill Clinton, who appointed this woman to the federal bench in the Eastern District of New York.&nbsp; She\u2019s now the attorney general.&nbsp; And he finds himself in Phoenix and just happens to find out that she\u2019s there, they arrange a meeting, and they talk about the grandchildren.&nbsp; And you\u2019re extrapolating here to think that what could there possibly be about grandchildren that\u2019s a subject matter unless Bill wanted to talk about futures and how they could be bleak or rosy, and it\u2019s all up to her, that kind of thing.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Well, you know, all of this is about the future and what our future &#8212; mine, his, yours, our grandchildren\u2019s future &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; True.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; &#8212; might look like.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; It really is.&nbsp; All of this is exactly about that.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; I like what the gentleman before me said, but I think that\u2019s a throwback from 40 years ago and &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Exactly, exactly, exactly.&nbsp; That is when we actually had a Democrat Party that your parents or grandparents would be familiar with and would recognize, but we don\u2019t anymore.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Exactly.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Now, if your theory &#8212; let\u2019s just take this one step further.&nbsp; If your theory is the right one, let\u2019s say, then part and parcel of it is that Bill Clinton would have to be thinking she would indict his wife.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; You know, he\u2019s a smart man.&nbsp; I don\u2019t think he\u2019s quite as overt as some people might think he would be.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Yeah.&nbsp; I know.&nbsp; My point is that, why would he be thinking Loretta Lynch would do anything to cross him?&nbsp; Why would he even consider that she could possibly &#8212; I mean, we\u2019re talking the Democrat Party here.&nbsp; We\u2019re talking the presidential nominee of the Democrat Party.&nbsp; Why would Bill Clinton be thinking that it\u2019s even remotely possible his wife would be indicted, necessitating this conversation with her?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Well, sometimes the truth runneth over.&nbsp; I don\u2019t know &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; No.&nbsp; I\u2019ll tell you why.&nbsp; I\u2019ll answer my own pregunta.&nbsp; If Bill Clinton is thinking it\u2019s a possibility, then there\u2019s more than smoke here.&nbsp; I realize all of this is hypothetical, we don\u2019t know, we\u2019re all guessing here, but we are using intelligence guided by experience.&nbsp; Bill Clinton\u2019s a known quantity.&nbsp; Hillary Clinton\u2019s a known quantity.&nbsp; We know how they look at the judiciary. We know how they look at power. We know how they\u2019ve used it in the past.&nbsp; We know that the last thing in the world anybody wants or expects is Mrs. Clinton to be indicted, but if Clinton thinks that it\u2019s possible, then there has to be a reason for it.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/01\/08\/clinton_indictment_talk_swirls\"><img id=\"eZObject_124296\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/HillaryMugShotHillMugShot-2.jpg\"\/><\/a>If he\u2019s out there thinking she could be indicted and it\u2019s crazy close enough, that he\u2019s gotta go talk to the AG about it, then there\u2019s probably a whole bunch of reasons or validity for indicting her, which would be tantamount to being included in your theory.&nbsp; If Clinton\u2019s running around thinking, &#8220;She didn\u2019t do nothing wrong. Hell, she hasn\u2019t done nothing anybody else hasn\u2019t done. This is crazy. This is all ginned up by the vast right-wing conspiracy,&#8221; he would be thinking Loretta Lynch is thinking the same thing, there\u2019s no way there\u2019s ever gonna be an indictment, but he\u2019s gonna go talk to her, thinking that there could be an indictment that must mean that his wife\u2019s done something that could justify an indictment.&nbsp; That\u2019s what I\u2019m saying.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I think we all know there\u2019s been enough, even if there is no investigation. What we\u2019ve learned about these emails and how she\u2019s dealt with \u2019em and how she\u2019s lied about it and how the guy who set up her server has taken the Fifth Amendment 125 times in a deposition, after having been granted immunity.&nbsp; We\u2019ve had hackers claiming that they have hacked into the server and they\u2019ve got evidence.&nbsp; Huma Abedin &#8212; I haven\u2019t got to this yet, but Huma, Mrs. Carlos Danger, she unloaded the other day.&nbsp; She made it clear here that Hillary was asking people how to set up a server so that what she was working on would not be part of the State Department record.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Hillary didn\u2019t know how to do it.&nbsp; She was asking around how this could be done.&nbsp; We also know who we\u2019re talking about here.&nbsp; The Clintons.&nbsp; We know that there\u2019s no such thing as transparency with these people.&nbsp; So now you add what we instinctively already know, intelligence guided by experience, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/01\/08\/clinton_indictment_talk_swirls\">with various expert opinion like Joe diGenova<\/a>, who\u2019s got contacts in the FBI. He says the evidence is overwhelming, that there will be an indictment, diGenova\u2019s been out there saying this for months.&nbsp; We\u2019ve heard what a straight-up law-and-order guy James Comey is, that he can\u2019t be talked out of it, can\u2019t be compromised, can\u2019t be interrupted, and yet there\u2019s been nothing happen.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Okay, folks, we\u2019ve got something to add to this now, something that\u2019s been further revealed about the conversation between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton.&nbsp; But first, did you know &#8212; I did not know this &#8212; exhaustive research here during the commercial break has informed me that Loretta Lynch doesn\u2019t have any kids.&nbsp; So they\u2019re talking grandkids, but she doesn\u2019t have any kids.&nbsp; She doesn\u2019t have any grandkids, then.&nbsp; She only got married in 2007, which was nine years ago.&nbsp; Hmm.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124305\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/ObamaLoretta-Lynch-B2.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">Now, her new husband has children &#8212; well, new since 2007 &#8212; and one of her husband\u2019s children is a daughter who\u2019s 21, but she would be a stepdaughter, not a granddaughter.&nbsp; By the way, Loretta Lynch\u2019s stepdaughter was thrown in jail back in January for refusing to pay her Uber fare.&nbsp; Hmm.&nbsp; Now, here is the additional thing that we have just heard about.&nbsp; They talked about grandchildren, golf, travel, the Brexit decision, and former attorney general Janet Reno, according to Lynch.&nbsp; This is according to ABC, that Loretta Lynch weirdly mentioned that they talked about Janet Reno.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>How in the name of Waco, Texas, does Janet Reno come up, in casual conversation, ever?&nbsp; Why would they be talking about Janet Reno on the tarmac in the passenger cabin of a private plane in Phoenix?&nbsp; Does anybody even know where Janet Reno is?&nbsp; Does anybody even know what Janet Reno is doing?&nbsp; Why would Janet Reno come up?&nbsp; Well, you are asking the right person.&nbsp; I can see it something like this (Clinton impression),&nbsp; &#8220;Hey, hey, Loretta, you remember Janet Reno?&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yeah.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hillary and I, Hillary is actually the one found her.&nbsp; She was so great.&nbsp; I mean, whatever we told her to do, she was right there.&nbsp; When we needed the banks threatened to make loans to people that couldn\u2019t pay, she went right in there, and she threatened them exactly as we would have done ourselves.&nbsp; Remember that kid, Elian Gonzalez, that kid that didn\u2019t want to go back to Cuba, she flew down there herself, Loretta. She flew down there and she picked up that kid and made like she was gonna take him to Cuba herself.&nbsp; Do you know what happened to the Branch Davidians, Loretta?&nbsp; All we had to do was say there were children in there and she opened fire like it was D-Day 2.&nbsp; Janet Reno, that babe sure knew how to handle an ongoing investigation.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, that\u2019s how Janet Reno\u2019s name could come up.&nbsp; Clinton could sit there and praise her virtues.&nbsp; &#8220;Janet Reno was one of us, Janet.&nbsp; Janet Reno, Loretta, she was so loyal.&nbsp; She never forgot who put her where she was, and she never forgot she\u2019da been nothing if it hadn\u2019t been for Hillary plucking her out of obscurity and putting her in there.&nbsp; What a great AG she was.&nbsp; It was like we were over there running it ourselves.&#8221;&nbsp; (Laughing)&nbsp; I can see that, can\u2019t you?&nbsp; And Loretta Lynch is going, &#8220;Okay, I get it.&nbsp; I get it.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;By the way, Loretta, you don\u2019t know where she is.&nbsp; I\u2019ll tell you, she\u2019s still alive.&#8221;&nbsp; (laughing)&nbsp; &#8220;You haven\u2019t seen her in a while, but I guarantee you she\u2019s still ticking, she\u2019s still ticking, yeah.&nbsp; We got a lot of people looking after Janet.&nbsp; I think she runs around with Donna Shalala now and then, but besides that we know full well what a great AG she was.&nbsp; Like I say, Loretta, it was as though we were over there running Justice ourselves.&#8221;&nbsp; Think that\u2019s plausible?&nbsp; Yes, it is.&nbsp; Right.&nbsp; That\u2019s right.&nbsp; &#8220;How Janet handled her things, be it Elian Gonzalez or investigating the banks or threatening the banks or Ken Starr, Loretta, you should have seen how she helped us out with Ken Starr.&nbsp; If there\u2019s anybody besides my buddy Carville who could have turned that vanilla cracker into a sex pervert it was Janet Reno.&#8221;&nbsp; I can hear this.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH Oh, just in on our EIB exclusive news wires, from TheHill.com.&nbsp; &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/floor-action\/senate\/286106-top-senate-dems-defend-lynch-clinton-meeting\">Top Senate Democrats Defend Lynch-Clinton Meeting<\/a> &#8212; Two of the Senate\u2019s top Democrats are defending a private meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton this week. &#8216;She\u2019s an honorable person. We know that,\u2019 Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), expected to be the next Senate Democratic leader, told reporters on Thursday. &#8216;She has said nothing was discussed related to the investigation so you have two choices: To say this didn\u2019t matter or she\u2019s lying. I think it didn\u2019t matter. I don\u2019t think she\u2019s lying.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Harry Reid weighed in. &#8220;All I can say is Loretta Lynch is one of the most outstanding human beings I\u2019ve ever known. No one could ever question her, her strong feelings about the rule of law and her ethics &#8212; I repeat &#8212; are the best.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We can certainly question her. We can certainly question her.&nbsp; The appearance of impropriety doesn\u2019t count when it involves Democrats.&nbsp; When it involves Democrats all that matters is the nature of the evidence.&nbsp; When it\u2019s Republicans, the evidence doesn\u2019t matter, it\u2019s the seriousness of the charge.&nbsp; But with the Democrats, that\u2019s never a factor.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124314\" class=\"img_right\" align=\"right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/542134788_large.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">RUSH:&nbsp; There\u2019s another thing.&nbsp; There\u2019s one other thing that they could say here about Clinton and Loretta Lynch talking about Janet Reno.&nbsp; Janet Reno has Parkinson\u2019s disease, as you know, if you recall, and she and Lynch were actually close.&nbsp; The people that are in and out of government, this is probably true of both parties, know each other from way, bay back.&nbsp; I mean, that\u2019s what being a member of the establishment is.&nbsp; It\u2019s what being an elite is.&nbsp; You get in it, you know everybody in it.<\/line><\/p>\n<p>So one of the things I\u2019m sure they\u2019ll say since the Janet Reno thing has been introduced, &#8220;No, no, no, she\u2019s an old friend, Parkinson\u2019s, they were just commiserating about her health. &nbsp;How dare on anybody allege that Janet Reno is part of whatever nefarious conversation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But the Democrats are beginning to circle the wagons on this with Chuck-U Schumer and Dingy Harry now coming out and saying &#8212; well, notice they did not exonerate Bill Clinton.&nbsp; They said, &#8220;Loretta Lynch, why she\u2019s as honest as the day is long. Loretta Lynch there\u2019s no way under the sun.&#8221;&nbsp; They didn\u2019t say that about Slick Willie.&nbsp; You notice that?&nbsp; Yes, yes, yes, I\u2019m fully aware she\u2019s got Parkinson\u2019s and that would be something they would talk about, Clinton appointed her, she and Loretta Lynch are close, way back, establishment and all that.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Detroit next.&nbsp; This is Steve.&nbsp; Great to have you on EIB Network.&nbsp; Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Well, it\u2019s a pleasure.&nbsp; Thank you very much for taking my call.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Thank you, Steve.&nbsp; I appreciate that.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; You know, I can\u2019t stop laughing, but then being totally frustrated as well with all this corruption, but, you know, Slick Willie in his infinite wisdom back in his gubernatorial days and making people go away and then his tenure, these people are pros. In law enforcement in the state of Michigan for the last 20-plus years, I realized that this notion for some clandestine rendezvous is just not possible.&nbsp; There\u2019s too many contingencies.&nbsp; The agents have to do a ton of work.&nbsp; It was definitely preplanned.&nbsp; So I\u2019m sure the conversation was very unique.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Okay.&nbsp; Let me stop you right there, \u2019cause I want the audience to hear. Did you say that you are in or have been in law enforcement, or security or some such?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; I am currently.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; You are currently.&nbsp; Okay.&nbsp; So the story is presented to us &#8212; I mean, this is literally how it\u2019s written.&nbsp; Clinton was on the way to Sky Harbor to leave, found out Loretta was there, and delayed the departure to go over and meet and send word that he wanted to go talk to her.&nbsp; You say that the contingencies necessary security-wise, it couldn\u2019t happen ad hoc like this?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; I highly doubt it.&nbsp; I think it\u2019s preplanned because there are just too many other &#8212; you have to worry about (unintelligible) approach and so on and so forth, these agents, so I think it was preplanned.&nbsp; Having said that, being preplanned, they had an agenda to discuss.&nbsp; And it probably wasn\u2019t about Janet Reno or the grandkids.&nbsp; That\u2019s just what the media\u2019s putting out.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; That\u2019s right.&nbsp; Why would you, if you\u2019re gonna have a planned meeting that has an agenda, you\u2019re right, why would it be over &#8212; you could do this in an email.&nbsp; (ahem.)&nbsp; You could send her a private email.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; I think for the most part, to me anyway, it\u2019s pretty obvious.&nbsp; The content is, &#8220;Hey, remember who helped out your current boss campaigning in 2012 to keep him on the road.&nbsp; You know who put you in there.&nbsp; You keep doing your deed and you can write your own ticket or continue to write your own ticket once I\u2019m the new first lady and my wife is now the commander in grief. You can paint your own portrait. You want to be the longest running AG in history as a woman, a black woman, fantastic.&nbsp; You want a nomination to the Supremes or whatever, you let me know, we\u2019ll take care of you, as long as you take care of us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Sounds plausible.&nbsp; Sounds plausible to me, especially you want to be on the Supreme Court, we could guarantee your future.&nbsp; If my wife becomes commander in grief, then you can write your ticket.&nbsp; I can see something like that.&nbsp; That doesn\u2019t constitute a threat.&nbsp; That\u2019s dangling a giant carrot.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Exactly.&nbsp; Because she doesn\u2019t need money, I wouldn\u2019t assume.&nbsp; It\u2019s about power and continued authority and &#8212;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124316\" class=\"img_right\" align=\"right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/526533480_large.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">RUSH:&nbsp; Well, true, but, believe me, everybody, especially those people. Those people have gotten away with convincing everybody they don\u2019t care about money.&nbsp; They\u2019re in it for the good works.&nbsp; They\u2019re in it to help people.&nbsp; Look at the Clintons if you think it\u2019s not about the money to people on the left.&nbsp; It\u2019s always about the money, and I guarantee you that living on whatever the AG salary is, that\u2019s not real money.&nbsp; Not compared to the people that she would be palling around with, like it wasn\u2019t when Clinton was governor and Hillary was the Rose Law Firm and so forth.&nbsp; But it\u2019s always about the money.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>And I\u2019ll tell you this, no matter how much they have, it\u2019s never enough.&nbsp; &#8216;Cause you can always lose it.&nbsp; You always need a pad.&nbsp; It\u2019s human nature in a way.&nbsp; Let\u2019s say, just pick some random numbers here.&nbsp; If you earn a hundred thousand dollars, it\u2019s not enough.&nbsp; You live based on hundred thousand dollars.&nbsp; You think if you got 150 you got a pad now.&nbsp; You won\u2019t change your ways. It just works no matter what you earn, you live it. So the prospect of more always essentially equals a cushion.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u2019s not true for billionaires, of course, but I was talking about salaried people like we\u2019re talking about here.&nbsp; Most people live their incomes, because most people have to, and so whatever it is that you have is what you need.&nbsp; So there\u2019s always more.&nbsp; There\u2019s never enough. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I didn\u2019t see what he said, but David Axelrod, the guy that ran Obama\u2019s campaign, he\u2019s had a statement on this Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton meeting.&nbsp; So a lot of Democrats are coming out of the woodwork here to &#8212; I think what it was, it was a tweet, but then the closed-captioning was on top of it, so I wasn\u2019t able to see what the quote was attributed to Axelrod.&nbsp; Here\u2019s what I think.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Oh look at that.&nbsp; Romney is at the Aspen Ideas Festival, too.&nbsp; You know, Romney is running around talking about how Trump\u2019s no good, not gonna vote for Trump. He might write in his wife\u2019s name.&nbsp; Anyway, I think what Axelrod said was that these are two people with great integrity.&nbsp; There would be no way to suspect, but I can see why people might.&nbsp; Axelrod said it was a foolish thing to do even though both of them are beyond reproach. There clearly couldn\u2019t have been anything to see here, it was foolish to do nevertheless.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Okay.&nbsp; Let\u2019s say that it was foolish.&nbsp; They did it anyway.&nbsp; It must have been important enough to risk it being found out and reported.&nbsp; Whatever happened in that meeting, it had to be important enough that whatever was gonna be said about it they could figure out, they had to do it anyway.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Of course, I\u2019m telling you, if we know it looks bad, they have to know it looks bad, that\u2019s my point.&nbsp; It\u2019s important enough for them to do it anyway.&nbsp; Everybody here knows it looks bad.&nbsp; That\u2019s why Schumer\u2019s coming out and trying to defend it, Dingy Harry, now Axelrod, there will be others on the Democrat side.&nbsp; Do you wonder, folks, you\u2019ve heard of the phrase &#8220;the appearance of impropriety,&#8221; as a legal phrase.&nbsp; Do you know why it exists?&nbsp; Do you know why the appearance of impropriety is a substantive allegation?&nbsp; It is.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124313\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/DemocratPlaybook101.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">Now, the Democrats have bastardized it, and they\u2019ve converted it.&nbsp; For example, during the Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill hearings, somebody comes up with an absolute worthless, baseless charge, or, even better example, in 1992, Gary Sick, a professor at Columbia, writes a book claiming that George H. W. Bush was flown to Paris on an SR-71 blackbird to meet with representatives of Iran to secure the release of the hostages after the election, after Ronald Reagan wins.&nbsp; Do not release them during the campaign.&nbsp; That was what was H. W. Bush supposedly negotiated with the Iranians.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>There was never any evidence because it didn\u2019t happen.&nbsp; It didn\u2019t even come close to happening.&nbsp; But there\u2019s Tom Foley, the Speaker of the House, who said, &#8220;Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate.&#8221;&nbsp; And they did. The House of Representatives, as part of the presidential campaign in \u201992, endeavored to investigate this charge made by this Columbia professor in a book.&nbsp; So when the Democrats, the nature of the evidence, if it\u2019s Republican, it doesn\u2019t matter.&nbsp; Doesn\u2019t matter if there\u2019s any evidence or not.&nbsp; It\u2019s the seriousness of the charge and that\u2019s all it takes.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, when you turn it around, when the Democrats are involved, the seriousness of the charge is irrelevant.&nbsp; The appearance of impropriety is irrelevant.&nbsp; You better damn well have evidence or we\u2019re not doing anything on this.&nbsp; And that\u2019s exactly how it works.&nbsp; Republicans, you don\u2019t need evidence to charge \u2019em.&nbsp; You don\u2019t need evidence to investigate.&nbsp; With Democrats, you do.&nbsp; You can\u2019t get away with just an outrageous allegation and cause hell to unfold.&nbsp; The legal ethics standard is &#8220;appearance of impropriety&#8221; because there is an assumption, there is an assumption that people in high positions, say at the Department of Justice, there is a vast assumption, and it\u2019s a proper one, that there are ethical people there.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We are not supposed to have to worry whether there is any impropriety.&nbsp; That\u2019s one of the trusted elements in a trusted institution like the Department of Justice.&nbsp; The normal, everyday belief is that there isn\u2019t any impropriety.&nbsp; Because we\u2019re gonna have really ethical people in charge.&nbsp; That\u2019s just so.&nbsp; The rule is, the standard operating rule is that ethical people, by definition, stay out of situations that look bad.&nbsp; If they\u2019re ethical, they don\u2019t even go there.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>That is why the legal ethic standard is &#8220;appearance of impropriety.&#8221; &nbsp;We\u2019re not supposed to have to worry about it if they actually did anything bad because we are to trust the fact that they\u2019re ethical.&nbsp; So when something happened that makes us question that trust, that equals the appearance of impropriety and is justifying an investigation.&nbsp; And that\u2019s where we are.&nbsp; Because there\u2019s clearly an appearance of impropriety.&nbsp; And with one of these two people, the benefit of the doubt on ethical behavior does not extend, and that\u2019s to Bill Clinton.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124319\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/ClintonsMoneyPIX-52416.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">So, another very important point to remember here &#8212; you might not think it\u2019s a big deal &#8212; we wouldn\u2019t even know about this if it weren\u2019t for a local Phoenix ABC affiliate.&nbsp; Stop and think about that.&nbsp; And I don\u2019t know how they got onto it.&nbsp; I don\u2019t know whether they have somebody at the airport.&nbsp; I don\u2019t know if they leaked to them.&nbsp; You know, they might just have a bureau, for lack of a better word, at the airport, just to have somebody on station 24\/7 if something happens there.&nbsp; Airports are areas of terrorist activity, aircraft accidents, any number of things.&nbsp; So you might have somebody there as a bureau 24\/7.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>But aside from that, if that wasn\u2019t the case, somebody had to inform them. But if it weren\u2019t for that local affiliate, we wouldn\u2019t even know this happened.&nbsp; We wouldn\u2019t have a shred of knowledge about it.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Let\u2019s try Ron in Grand Junction, Colorado.&nbsp; Hello and welcome.&nbsp; Great to have you here.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Hey, Rush.&nbsp; Thanks for having me on.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Thank you.&nbsp; You bet.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; You\u2019re awesome.&nbsp; Hey, I sort of think that maybe there was nothing really said at that meeting.&nbsp; I think Bill was letting Loretta Lynch off the hook.&nbsp; I couldn\u2019t imagine wanting to make a decision to move forward against the Clintons on this indictment.&nbsp; So did he just kind of maybe let her off the hook?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Well, if you can\u2019t imagine any going forward, there\u2019s no indictment, why have to have a meeting to thank her?&nbsp; Why would he have to have a meeting at all with her?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Well, I was sort of thinking that the FBI\u2019s probably getting ready to recommend (unintelligible) go against the Clintons.&nbsp; And I just think that she doesn\u2019t want to be put in that position of, you know, kind of between her integrity and the power of the Clintons and the president.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Okay, I\u2019m losing you here.&nbsp; You\u2019re saying Clinton gave her a pass telling her &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; I\u2019m just thinking that if the FBI recommends charges, Loretta Lynch doesn\u2019t want to have to make that call.&nbsp; So I think by doing something that looks sketchy, she can step back from it and say, because I had this meeting &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Oh, you\u2019re thinking she\u2019s gonna recuse herself?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Exactly, yeah.&nbsp; I don\u2019t think she wants to make that call.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Okay, let\u2019s process this.&nbsp; Even though we\u2019re told by virtue of the way the story has been reported and that\u2019s, of course, we can\u2019t count on anything anymore in the media.&nbsp; The story is that Clinton wanted the meeting. That Clinton found out she was in Phoenix, &#8220;Hey, you know, I\u2019m on my way outta here, she\u2019s landing,&#8221; we\u2019re told that he was told that she was arriving soon, he wanted to go meet her.&nbsp; So if that\u2019s the case, your theory doesn\u2019t hold up.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But your theory in and of itself, that she knows that Comey is gonna recommend an indictment, and she doesn\u2019t want to go anywhere there, so the best way to get out of it is to have a meeting with Clinton that is uncovered, making it necessary for her to recuse herself.&nbsp; Possibly.&nbsp; And I could see why people might think that.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">Here\u2019s the Axelrod tweet, by the way.&nbsp; &#8220;I take them at their word that the Justice Department\u2019s probe into Hillary\u2019s email server did not come up, but foolish to create such optics.&#8221;&nbsp; Okay, but they\u2019re not fools.&nbsp; See, this is the point, folks.&nbsp; <\/line><img id=\"eZObject_124318\" class=\"img_right\" align=\"right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Axelrod_large.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">They\u2019re not fools.&nbsp; They had to know that if this were uncovered, this would be the normal reaction to have.&nbsp; They had to know that.&nbsp;<\/line>\n<p>So who benefits here?&nbsp; Who benefits from public knowledge, public awareness of a meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch?&nbsp; Who benefits from this?&nbsp; Because there has to be a benefit for this to happen.&nbsp; &#8216;Cause they\u2019re not fools.&nbsp; Axelrod says: &#8220;foolish to create such optics,&#8221; but they did.&nbsp; Now, they may be leftists, but they are not fools.&nbsp; They may think they\u2019re untouchable. They may be so arrogant as to think they could get away with it, but they\u2019re not fools.&nbsp; Okay, so one theory is she wants a reason to recuse herself.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I need to ask a legal beagle expert of mine a question.&nbsp; I mean, you have quite an assumption in your point, that Comey is gonna recommend an indictment, that the FBI\u2019s gonna recommend an indictment.&nbsp; Can she not head that off?&nbsp; Can she say to Comey, &#8220;Look, don\u2019t waste your time, it\u2019s not happening.&#8221;&nbsp; Wait.&nbsp; Remember who we\u2019re talking about here.&nbsp; Now, the wild card in that is Comey.&nbsp; Comey is Mr. Law and order.&nbsp; Comey has this reputation of strict by the book law and order stuff.&nbsp; Nonpartisan guy.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So if she were to say something like that to him, &#8220;Hey, look, Jim, great work, but, sorry, don\u2019t even present any because we\u2019re not gonna do anything.&#8221;&nbsp; Would he stay quiet on that, or would he go public?&nbsp; Would that be a risk for her to do that?&nbsp; Sounds extraordinary, sounds like no way anything like that would happen.&nbsp; But remember who we\u2019re talking about here. People always forget who we\u2019re talking about.&nbsp; Bill Clinton, we are talking about the Obama administration, which, Constitution, when they don\u2019t want it to exist, it doesn\u2019t.&nbsp; Nothing is out of the realm of possibility.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But I\u2019m still drawn to this Axelrod tweet.&nbsp; &#8220;I take them at their word, that the Justice Department\u2019s probe into Hillary Clinton\u2019s email server &#8211;&#8221; note that he got that out there.&nbsp; I mean, he\u2019s providing details of what this is all about.&nbsp; That\u2019s not necessary, but he did it.&nbsp; &#8220;I\u2019m sure that did not come up, but it was foolish to create such optics.&#8221;&nbsp; But they did.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>You\u2019re saying, &#8220;But, Rush, nobody would have known if weren\u2019t for that ABC affiliate, like you\u2019re saying.&#8221;&nbsp; I know.&nbsp; I know.&nbsp; But believe me when you do this, you always assume people are gonna find out.&nbsp; Something like this, you always assume that.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Mark in Big Lake, Minnesota.&nbsp; Great to have you, sir.&nbsp; You\u2019re next.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Hi, Rush.&nbsp; Thanks for taking my call.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Yes, sir.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; I have a different theory about why Bill Clinton requested that meeting with Loretta<\/p>\n<p>Lynch.&nbsp; I think he went there to beg her to indict.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; (Laughing).<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:&nbsp; Think about it.&nbsp; Think about it.&nbsp; If you\u2019re married to Hillary, wouldn\u2019t you want her to go away for 10 to 20?<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124320\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Bill-Clinton-NY-Post-Cheat-Husbands.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">RUSH:&nbsp; You know, you\u2019re funny.&nbsp; Your call is uproariously funny, and intriguingly attractive as a theory.&nbsp; But I think people don\u2019t understand the Clinton relationship.&nbsp; Bill\u2019s got everything in the world he could possibly want.&nbsp; He\u2019s got a wife that covers for him when he cheats. He\u2019s got a wife that tries to destroy the concubines, not him.&nbsp; He\u2019s got a wife who has perfected making a quarter million dollars for a 20-minute speech.&nbsp; He has a wife who is as obsessed about money as he is.&nbsp; He has a wife who is as obsessed ideologically as he is.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>He has all the freedom in the world.&nbsp; He can fly around the world on a pedophile-owned jet, and he has it with impunity.&nbsp; He can go play golf anywhere he wants.&nbsp; He can stay at home at Chappaqua and have the women come to him.&nbsp; He can pal around with anybody.&nbsp; He\u2019s got this foundation and this charitable organization that has netted these people influence and hundreds of millions of dollars.&nbsp; And now he\u2019s about to be vaulted back into the White House with no responsibilities once he gets there.&nbsp; He\u2019s going redefine what first lady is.&nbsp; I don\u2019t think he has any desire to be rid of Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH:&nbsp; Well, we\u2019re gonna kick off today with competing polling data.&nbsp; We have a surprise visit by Bill Clinton to the attorney general in a private plane on the tarmac at Phoenix.&nbsp; If it hadn\u2019t been for a local Phoenix ABC affiliate, we wouldn\u2019t know that it had happened.&nbsp; We got Obama going off on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":70,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>What I Think Bill Told Loretta - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"What I Think Bill Told Loretta - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH:&nbsp; Well, we\u2019re gonna kick off today with competing polling data.&nbsp; We have a surprise visit by Bill Clinton to the attorney general in a private plane on the tarmac at Phoenix.&nbsp; If it hadn\u2019t been for a local Phoenix ABC affiliate, we wouldn\u2019t know that it had happened.&nbsp; We got Obama going off on [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jaime Endemano\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"45 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/\",\"name\":\"What I Think Bill Told Loretta - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-30T20:14:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-27T01:09:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What I Think Bill Told Loretta\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e\",\"name\":\"Jaime Endemano\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jaime Endemano\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/jaimeendemano\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What I Think Bill Told Loretta - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"What I Think Bill Told Loretta - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH:&nbsp; Well, we\u2019re gonna kick off today with competing polling data.&nbsp; We have a surprise visit by Bill Clinton to the attorney general in a private plane on the tarmac at Phoenix.&nbsp; If it hadn\u2019t been for a local Phoenix ABC affiliate, we wouldn\u2019t know that it had happened.&nbsp; We got Obama going off on [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jaime Endemano","Est. reading time":"45 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/","name":"What I Think Bill Told Loretta - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-06-30T20:14:36+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-27T01:09:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/30\/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What I Think Bill Told Loretta"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e","name":"Jaime Endemano","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jaime Endemano"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/jaimeendemano\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213887"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/70"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213887"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213887\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":262012,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213887\/revisions\/262012"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}