![](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushLIES.jpg\"\/)
RUSH: It\u2019s just getting laughable now. Now we have the Washington Examiner. A fifth woman is coming forward and suggesting Herman Cain sexually — well, raising questions about Cain\u2019s behavior. A former employee of the United States Agency for International Development, USAID, says that Herman Cain “asked her to help arrange a dinner date for him with a female audience member following a speech he delivered nine years ago. Donna Donella, 40, of Arlington, said the USAID paid Cain to deliver a speech to businessmen and women in Egypt in 2002, during which an Egyptian businesswoman in her thirties asked Cain a question.<\/p>\n
You know, folks, I gotta tell you something. We\u2019ve had liberalism roaring through our culture for 50 years. At times it has been sneaky, slow, deliberate. At other times it has roared its way through. As I listen to earnest journalists in their thirties and forties describe what Herman Cain is said to have done — no, sorry. When I listen to journalists in their thirties and forties unable to explain what Cain has done, but treating it as though it is reprehensible, I sadly conclude, we\u2019re losing this. Political correctness, which is censorship, has now spread to behavior, not just speech. It\u2019s spread to behavior. And sexual harassment now is a political weapon, and it\u2019s anything anybody wants it to be. You don\u2019t need a specific allegation. All you need is the appearance of impropriety.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s where this gets dicey, because with this roaring liberalism through our culture, what appears to be inappropriate in the old days was nothing. I remember when Blake Edwards, who was married to Julie Andrews, he got an award during the Oscars. I think this was in the last ten years. And he praised his wife Julie Andrews, he called her the best damn broad that there ever was, and the place was outraged. It was a term of endearment to him. It wasn\u2019t a put-down. The way Blake Edwards and his buds, Peter Falk, that\u2019s the way they talked. Can\u2019t do that anymore. Can\u2019t call a woman a broad even if it\u2019s affectionate. You can\u2019t even say, “Hey, baby.” No, can\u2019t even do that. What the hell did Herman Cain do here? He goes up and says, “Can maybe we go to dinner and answer the question,” and that means that we\u2019ve got a predator on our hands? <\/p>\n
Now, you know and I know that during the nineties — and you guys who have lost your kids in custody fights, you know exactly what I\u2019m talking about — the feminists, the feminazis went out there, there was a period of time in this country where every man and every husband was a predator by virtue of his existence alone, by virtue of just being a man. This is what the feminazis taught, and I think this is its legacy in part. It\u2019s absurd. And everybody that goes into journalism has been treated to this informal education. All of these alleged acts of impropriety are whatever the accuser thinks. All you have to do is be offended by somebody. You can be accused of sexual harassment and the crowd will pick up the charge and start yelling and yet looky, I keep going back to Gallup, and Gallup says nobody relatively, comparatively is paying any attention. And maybe that is because there is a majority and a large section of the country thinks all of this is just a bunch of bogus left-wing claptrap. Efforts to control, not just thoughts, but behavior and votes and all of that. <\/p>\n
The number of people who walk around today in abject fear of being themselves would stun you I\u2019ll bet, the number of people that walk around today afraid to tell you what they really think about something. How often does it happen to you, you\u2019re in a group of people and you want to say what you really think but you whisper it to one person that you think you can trust because you\u2019re afraid there\u2019s some busybody in the group. It doesn\u2019t have to be a woman, it can be any liberal, any pantywaist liberal that\u2019s gonna take great offense and get holier-than-thou on you and start preaching to you, and who the hell wants that? (interruption) Well, no, \u2019cause I don\u2019t care. No, it doesn\u2019t happen to me. I don\u2019t care. That\u2019s the whole point. I don\u2019t care what people say.<\/p>\n
I don\u2019t care what they think. That\u2019s a very liberating thing. But most people aren\u2019t that way. Hell, people whisper things to me all the time. I can\u2019t hear \u2019em \u2019cause I\u2019m deaf, and they know it and they still won\u2019t raise their voice so I can hear it \u2019cause they\u2019re afraid of what people might say when they want to comment about something going on within a group of people. I\u2019ll tell you, the left has everybody running around in straitjackets, handcuffs and gags. Everybody gagged, blindfolded, you name it. That\u2019s what they want. A fifth woman now! In a period of two weeks. Herman Cain\u2019s been alive how many years, 65 years, and in two weeks of his life, bammo, five women from out of nowhere when he takes a lead in the polls. <\/p>\n
I\u2019ll tell you, you women, why don\u2019t you just make it official, put on some burqas, and I\u2019ll guaran-damn-tee you nobody will touch you. You put on a burqa and everybody will leave you alone, if that\u2019s what you want. I can remember, folks, and I\u2019ve told you this, early seventies, I\u2019m away from home, my early twenties, first time in my life and it coincided with the modern era of feminazi-ism. You couldn\u2019t tell a woman that she looked attractive without arousing some sort of suspicion about what you intended. On a date. I don\u2019t mean at work. On a date. I got grief for opening a car door. “I can do that myself, thank you.” You praise a woman\u2019s attractiveness and get a sermon on how you don\u2019t respect her brain. That stuff happened to me and a lot of people in the early seventies, and it\u2019s just built and built and built. <\/p>\n
Cain ran for the Senate in 2004. Where were all these women then? He ran for the Republican nomination for president in 2000. He ran for the Senate in Georgia in 2004. Where were all these women then? This one, Bialek, not that this means anything, but she lives in Axelrod\u2019s building in Chicago. They see each other in the gym and they wink. How come she\u2019s not after him for sexual harassment? Everybody knows what a guy means when he winks at a girl in a gym. This is maddening stuff. People can\u2019t be who they are anymore, particularly men. But it\u2019s not just men. Everybody\u2019s walking around in some form of trepidation or another. But I\u2019m not. ‘Cause I don\u2019t care. But most everybody else does. <\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/TIME-men-and-women-different_large.jpg\"\/)
<\/a>I can\u2019t say with a full 100% blanket that I don\u2019t care. Obviously you use discretion in certain things, places, because I have got no anonymity. I mean even with people who have total anonymity, I mean, I\u2019m so famous it doesn\u2019t really matter. I\u2019m the kind of guy people make things up about, in addition to whatever they hear that might be true. But people that have anonymity are still running around scared of everything because of crap like this. And I always said, the biggest problem with the feminazis, the biggest problem with militant feminism was that its basic goal was to structurally alter human nature. <\/p>\n