RUSH: Yeah?<\/p>\n
CALLER: The president or his administration sent guns into Mexico and had to assume that they\u2019d be used and kill Mexican citizens. But then the president\u2019s trying to get Latino votes, but he doesn\u2019t care if Mexican die?<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/HolderFastFurious_585.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
RUSH: Well, he didn\u2019t figure on Mexicans figuring out Fast and Furious<\/a>. I know what you\u2019re saying. “What\u2019s Obama trying to pull off? I mean, he authorizes the walking of assault weapons across the border, and Mexicans end up getting killed. Yet he\u2019s running around pandering for the Latino vote when he obviously doesn\u2019t care if Mexicans are killed in drug violence!” That\u2019s a great question, except Obama never expected us to get to this point. Remember, everybody was laughing at Fast and Furious.<\/p>\n Everybody was treating it as some sort of right-wing conspiracy birther-type thing. But your question is now very relevant. Now it\u2019s a good question. Now we can ask Hispanics: “You\u2019ve got the president of the United States and his attorney general in charge of a program that ultimately resulted in Mexican citizens being killed. Including a US border agent, by the way, in addition to Mexican citizens. And yet, he\u2019s out pandering for the Latino vote, but he doesn\u2019t care if they die.”<\/p>\n He put weapons in the hands of drug lords. He created crimes. He and Holder<\/a> allowed weapons to end up in the hands of Mexican drug cartels, and those cartels take action against Mexican citizens. And Obama knew that that was gonna happen. He wanted it to happen. He wanted there to be crimes with these weapons, folks. He wanted an assault weapons ban. He couldn\u2019t get one politically. The American people didn\u2019t want it. This was…<\/p>\n It\u2019s sort of like if you\u2019re NBC and you want people to think Romney doesn\u2019t understand a supermarket scanner <\/a>at Barbara Walters\u2019 store. So you cut short a video of Romney and make it look like he\u2019s never seen one of these scanners before. Or if you\u2019re NBC and you want people to think that George Zimmerman\u2019s <\/a>a racist pig, you doctor the 911 call. This is what Obama was doing. This is what the American left does, by the way. They can\u2019t be straightforward.<\/p>\n “Oh, yeah?” Issa said. “We need some proof.”<\/p>\n “Uhhhhh, okay. I guess Mukasey didn\u2019t know about it. We retract it.”<\/p>\n So in the midst-of-all this, President Kardashian asserts executive privilege. What is he trying to hide? Like I said, folks: If they want to lay it off on Bush, make these documents available! They\u2019re trying to blame Bush for the economy; they\u2019re trying to blame Bush for us being hated; they\u2019re blaming Bush for foreign policy problems. If they could lay it off on Bush, why don\u2019t they release the documents? But they\u2019re not. Executive privilege.<\/p>\n So what\u2019s Kardashian hiding?<\/p>\n What does he not want us to know?<\/p>\n When you boil it all down, that\u2019s the question.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s John in Topeka in Kansas. Great to have you on the program, sir. Hi.<\/p>\n CALLER: Googolplex dittos, Maha Rushie.<\/p>\n RUSH: Thank you, sir, very much.<\/p>\n CALLER: What\u2019s the difference between the Iran-Contra scandal where the Democrats and the media tried to hang President Reagan, my favorite president, when he didn\u2019t use — I don\u2019t think he used — executive privilege to try and cover anything up and now when Obama has basically implicated himself in this scandal?<\/p>\n RUSH: Well, I think you might find some dispute in the notion that Obama has implicated himself. You think he has because he\u2019s trying to hide something. But others might not look at it that way. You could easily say that Obama is sympathetic, and I expect this to be said, by the way. His media minions are gonna say it. “He\u2019s not trying to protect himself. He\u2019s trying to protect the presidency! You can\u2019t just have Congress running roughshod over the executive branch.<\/p>\n “He\u2019s asserting the privilege here to protect future presidents, to make sure the executive branch doesn\u2019t get run over by the legislative branch. Don\u2019t be surprised if you hear that. You are inferring that Obama is implicating himself. It is a legitimate question: What is he trying to hide? As to Reagan, he asserted executive privilege number of times. Reagan asserted it three times. I just don\u2019t know when. I don\u2019t remember whether it was Iran-Contra or not. John, thanks for the call. I appreciate it.<\/p>\n This is Eric in Boise, and you\u2019re next. Great to have you with us, sir. Hi.<\/p>\n CALLER: Great to talk to you, Rush. I\u2019ve listened to you since the eighties and it\u2019s an honor to talk to you.<\/p>\n RUSH: Thank you very much, sir.<\/p>\n CALLER: My point is every American should be outraged by this Fast and Furious operation, because the bottom line is a border agent was killed. A life was lost. There was a cover-up. And now I believe the president, by asserting executive privilege, is complicit in the murder and cover-up of that Border Patrol agent.<\/p>\n RUSH: Brian Terry was his name.<\/p>\n CALLER: Yes.<\/p>\n RUSH: Well, this is the political problem that Kardashian has. This is what people are going to think. They\u2019re going to think, “What\u2019s he hiding? This was gonna be the most transport presidency ever!” This is Obama, again, in 2007 being asked about executive privilege.<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/ObamaHolderFastFurious.jpg\"\/)
![](\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/HolderIssaFastFurious.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n