{"id":11806,"date":"2013-07-30T19:04:58","date_gmt":"2013-07-30T19:04:58","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2021-03-17T17:23:25","modified_gmt":"2021-03-17T21:23:25","slug":"weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/","title":{"rendered":"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons"},"content":{"rendered":"

RUSH: I gotta do the Weiner stuff \u2019cause it\u2019s just funny. The Clintons are just loaded for bear here on the Weiners. Every day they\u2019re getting madder and madder and madder at the Weiners\u2019 attempt to equate themselves with the Clintons. It\u2019s funny. The Clintons are literally outraged by this. New York Daily News: “Anthony Weiner Would Remain Defiant Even if the Clintons Called for Him to Drop Out of Mayoral Race.”<\/p>\n

“‘I am not terribly interested in what people who are not voters in the city of New York have to say,\u2019 Weiner said in response to a question about whether the former president and secretary of state, who live in Westchester County, could influence his decision. He said he only was thinking about New Yorkers, and ‘I am focused like a laser beam on their interests.'”<\/p>\n

And then here\u2019s this story, 78% of young women in a poll of 18,000, not a sample of the usual 1,200, but 18,000 women on a sugar daddy website, 78% of \u2019em 18 to 26 love Weiner. I know it sounds funny, but it is what it is. And overall on this website, it\u2019s in the sixties who approve of Weiner. Here\u2019s a story. Sally Quinn in the Washington Post blaming Huma. Before we get into this piece, let\u2019s go to the audio sound bite number two, \u2019cause they dovetail. Low-information outreach, folks.<\/p>\n


\nMy efforts to reach out to the low-information audience continue to pay dividends. They wouldn\u2019t be expected to know this at Entertainment Tonight because nobody in the pop culture reads Maureen Dowd any longer, but before I play the sound bite I want to read for you how Maureen Dowd of the New York Times opened her Sunday column. Quote, “Huma was raised in Saudi Arabia, where women are treated worse by men than anywhere else on the planet. Comparatively speaking, the pol [Weiner] from Queens probably seems like a prince. Even though he?\u2019s a punk.”<\/p>\n

So Maureen Dowd writes a piece on Sunday, says Huma was raised in Saudi Arabia where the only difference between women and a bag of excrement\u2019s is the bag. And so Maureen Dowd\u2019s saying that Weiner looks like a panacea compared to the men that she was exposed to growing up. Okay, that\u2019s Maureen Dowd, no conservative, who wrote that. Entertainment Tonight last night, here\u2019s a portion of a report by the cohost Rob Marciano about the latest scandal involving Weiner and Huma Weiner and, of course, your lovable host, me.<\/p>\n

MARCIANO: What role does religion play? Anthony is Jewish, and Huma is Muslim. Controversial radio host Rush Limbaugh weighed in on the air about their interfaith marriage.<\/p>\n

RUSH ARCHIVE: Huma is a Muslim. In that regard, Weiner ought to be able to get away with anything. Muslim women don\u2019t have any power, right? Muslim women are beheaded, stoned, whatever, if they drive, have affairs. In certain countries Muslim women, if they\u2019re raped, are killed. It\u2019s their fault.<\/p>\n


\nLUDWIG: The Muslim-American women are not getting stoned and beheaded, and they don\u2019t think the reason why Huma is afraid to leave her husband is because she\u2019s gonna get stoned.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I didn\u2019t say that! Did you hear that? That was Robi Ludwig, who is a psychotherapist. (interruption) Should have just stopped at psycho? Okay, Robi Ludwig, psycho, who probably thinks the Redskins ought to change their name. We gotta hear this again because everything I said here is accurate. I did not say Huma\u2019s gonna get stoned. I was talking about she\u2019s Muslim, and all I said was what Maureen Dowd said, in my own way. I\u2019m not making it up. This is not even an attack. We\u2019ve seen the movie, The Stoning of Soraya M., <\/a>Iranian woman. We know what happens to Muslim women. There are stories each and every day about it.<\/p>\n

You know, this just goes to show there are certain things you cannot say without pop culture erupting and thinking it\u2019s profoundly controversial. So they quote me and then they go to this psychotherapist (imitiation), “Muslim-American women are not getting stoned and beheaded, and I don\u2019t think the reason why Huma is afraid to leave her husband is because…” I didn\u2019t say that. I simply pointed out the difference in religion. Maureen Dowd made the point that Weiner might seem like a prince to Huma. So here comes Sally Quinn in the Washington Post. This is kind of like Bob Schieffer\u2019s rant <\/a>from Sunday, where he said the whole thing\u2019s sickening, except this rant is from Sally Quinn, who is the unquestioned social doyenne of Washington society.<\/p>\n

When Sally Quinn writes about something like this, we\u2019re getting the view from the Mount Olympus of DC. And in this piece, Sally Quinn even says that Huma standing by Weiner was such a setback for women everywhere. But if I\u2019m Huma I gotta be a little… why didn\u2019t anybody say that about Clinton, about Hillary? If I\u2019m Huma, I gotta feel betrayed right now. I\u2019ve been Hillary\u2019s body woman. I\u2019ve been loyal. I\u2019ve been everything Hillary wanted, and I\u2019m trying to save my marriage, and now all these liberal women are throwing me overboard when they didn\u2019t throw Hillary overboard. Sally Quinn writes that Huma standing by her husband is a setback for women everywhere.<\/p>\n

In fact, folks, isn\u2019t Hillary supposed to be the foremost champion for women in the history of the world, the world\u2019s best role model? But Sally Quinn gives Huma hell here for following Hillary\u2019s example to a T. Everything Sally Quinn says in this piece about Huma could be applied to Hillary in spades. But Sally Quinn doesn\u2019t even seem to notice that. Now, arguably the funniest thing about this piece is that after all of her lambasting of Huma here — she calls her a “power mad liar” and a setback for women everywhere. After saying all of that about Huma, Sally Quinn suggests Huma run for office. “Blaming Huma Abedin.” It\u2019s just amazing.<\/p>\n

Byron York has a piece. It says the reason why Weiner can\u2019t get away with it and Clinton did — what do you think the reason is? Why did Clinton get away with it and Weiner didn\u2019t? Clinton denied it. This is Byron York\u2019s theory. Clinton denied it. Gennifer Flowers, went on TV and denied it. He gave his war room buddy, Stephanopoulos and The Forehead every opportunity to go out and defend him. He didn\u2019t do it. He sat there right next to Hillary on 60 Minutes and said Gennifer Flowers was lying. He didn\u2019t do it. It was only later that secret tapes between Gennifer and Bill showed up. It was on those tapes, by the way, that Clinton compared Mario Cuomo to the Mafia, and Bill had to do some fast dancing and apologize on that. But he had denied it, and then Monica Lewinsky, he denied it.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

There weren\u2019t any pictures. He denied it. He went on TV, remember, he wagged that long, crooked finger (impression), “I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky, not a single time, ever. I never asked anybody to lie, not a single time. And now I gotta get back to work for the American people.” Turned around and walked out of the room. Didn\u2019t do it. Denied Paula Jones, denied all of them. There weren\u2019t any pictures. Weiner admitted it. Once you admit it, they can\u2019t defend you. And this is the point that Byron York makes is that once you admit it, you are not Bill Clinton. And York even makes the point that the media, even though they knew Clinton was lying, they still had the denial and they marveled at how good he lied.<\/p>\n

But Weiner sent the pictures, Weiner admitted it, Weiner resigned. Clinton didn\u2019t do any of that. And that\u2019s why the Clintons think that the Weiners are pikers, \u2019cause they had the stupidity to admit it. And then the Weiners furthermore said there would be more. The Clintons, even in the middle of proof, denied everything, including lying under oath. “There\u2019s been a lot of debate about whether Huma Abedin, the wronged wife of New York sex fiend and mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner, is following the ‘Clinton playbook\u2019 in standing by her man on the campaign trail. Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote Volume I of the playbook by surviving a big sex scandal in 1992, when Bill was first running for president. They added Volume II by surviving a bigger sex scandal in 1998, during his second term in the White House.<\/p>\n

“Mrs. Clinton was a key player in her husband\u2019s defense on both occasions, and today she is close with Abedin, her long-time aide. So why shouldn\u2019t Abedin try to emulate her mentor\u2019s success? Because it won\u2019t work. Abedin can\u2019t follow Volume I of the Clinton playbook because Weiner can\u2019t deny everything, as Clinton did — falsely but successfully — in \u201992. And she can\u2019t follow Volume II because Weiner is not president of the United States.<\/p>\n

So the Weiners cannot use the Clinton playbook because they\u2019re not even following it. And the Clintons are offended because — I mean, they\u2019re just offended that Weiner would attempt to elevate himself to the same vaunted perch that Clinton occupies. Now, remember, we\u2019re talking about the Democrat Party, so vaunted perches are different things. But every day the stories continue how angry the Clintons are getting over this.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Last night in the Bronx, after a candidate forum, Anthony Weiner spoke with reporters, and he said this about people calling for him to drop out of the race.<\/p>\n

\"original\"
\nWEINER: I am not terribly interested in what people who are not voters in the city of New York have to say. I am focused like a laser beam on their interests. I\u2019m focused like a laser beam on what they care about.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Dissing the Clintons there, because the Clintons, you see, don\u2019t live in New York City. They live in West Chester and Chappaqua. And then he added this.<\/p>\n

WEINER: There are a lot of people who are saying a lot of things about this campaign. I\u2019m interested in what pundits say, I\u2019m interested in what other politicians say, but not that much.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I don\u2019t care what the Clintons are saying. Don\u2019t ask me about it anymore. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, on the Today Show today terribly upset about Weiner.<\/p>\n

MITCHELL: Friends say that the Clintons view Weiner as that son-in-law you\u2019d never want in the family, but there is no sign they are pressuring Huma to get him out, despite concern in their inner circle of potential fallout for Hillary Clinton herself. But Weiner made it clear last night, he doesn\u2019t care what the Clintons think.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, on World News Now early this morning on ABC, Jeff Zeleny, former New York Times, now with ABC, the coanchor babe, said, “At a campaign appearance as late as last night people asked him about Hillary and the relationship he has with her. What did he have to say about that?”<\/p>\n

ZELENY: It\u2019s all about the Clintons. He said, “Look, I am only focusing on the people of New York City, the voters of New York City.” So he was not giving much respect to the Clintons. Of course, they don\u2019t live in New York City; they live outside the city. So he basically said he\u2019s not going to take his marching orders, his cues from the Clintons, to voters last night.<\/p>\n

RUSH: This is not going to end well. Somebody needs to remind Weiner of Andrew Cuomo. Oh, before even Andrew, Bob Torricelli. Bill Clinton was sent to visit Torricelli. (Clinton impression) “Hey, Bob, how you doing, buddy? He-he-he. Yeah. Yeah, I got this piece of paper I need you to sign here on your way out. Trust me, trust me, I mean, you don\u2019t want to mess around with this.” And thing the same Andrew Cuomo. “Andrew, you\u2019re gonna drop out of this race. It just isn\u2019t in the cards for you, buddy. Your time is coming, but it isn\u2019t now. Just sign this. And John Huang, you\u2019ve never see him, everything will be cool.” And those two guys both split. Weiner is hanging in.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yes, I think it\u2019s safe to say that the young women, they surveyed 18,000 of \u2019em on this sugar daddy website, and 78% of the women 18 to 26 on this sugar daddy website, safe to say they hope Weiner sticks it out and hangs in there, and it looks like that\u2019s gonna happen.<\/p>\n

Now, Snerdley just asked me, they\u2019re gonna do this Hillary miniseries, and how can they have one of those without me in it. Because the Hillary miniseries is not gonna focus on anything pre-Obama. From what I\u2019ve read, and, of course, we won\u2019t know \u2019til the thing airs — oh, probably we\u2019ll know before that. But the speculation now is that the miniseries, the docudramas, I think there are two of them, NBC\u2019s gonna do one and somebody else is gonna do one, they\u2019re all gonna focus on Hillary from secretary of state on. There may not be a story, but there\u2019s a hell of a lot of history revision that has to take place.<\/p>\n

They gotta turn Benghazi around and make her look good in that. They gotta make her look good as secretary of state when she bungled it. They\u2019ve gotta made her look good losing to Obama. The Arab Spring has to look good. They\u2019re not gonna waste time on any of the pre-Obama Hillary stuff. I mean, she\u2019ll probably be mentioned as a Senator, but they\u2019re not gonna do anything from the nineties, none of that, from what I\u2019ve read. Of course it\u2019s gonna bomb. Diane Lane is gonna star as Hillary in one of them. My question remains, I just saw a picture of her, and I don\u2019t know if she can fill out those pantsuits. I\u2019ve said, I\u2019ve said repeatedly — this is the kind of stuff coming up, by the way, that the 24-year-old girls just hate — that Hillary is just like all the other guys. She puts her pants on one leg at a time.<\/p>\n

But Diane Lane, I mean, Snerdley, “How can you do a Hillary miniseries without vast right-wing conspiracies?” What is the purpose of the miniseries? It\u2019s to get her elected. It\u2019s to get her nominated. They don\u2019t want to rehash the Clinton stuff where she was the doormat. That\u2019s the doormat era. Hillary minus Bill is the focus of this. Hillary as secretary of state — (interruption) are you kidding, with the low-information voters? Some of these people that are gonna be watching this thing have never heard of Gennifer Flowers, never heard of Monica Lewinsky, and to the extent that they have, they think it\u2019s all cool. Not a big deal. You\u2019re applying the wrong metrics to this. You\u2019re looking at somebody doing a miniseries on Hillary to expose her.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not what this is. This is building her up. This is creating the Hillary that everybody thinks exists, that everybody hoped would happen. This is to create a myth, not rehash what really happened. That\u2019s why they\u2019ve gotta do it, to overcome what really happened. Not highlight it. Some days you surprise me in not understanding the leftist media and the pop culture. I don\u2019t think they care about ratings, Snerdley. They don\u2019t care about ratings in this. I mean, granted, they hope a lot of people watch, but they\u2019re not doing this for ratings, \u2019cause once this airs, excerpts can air on cable news forever. Once this airs they have re-created the person, new image, everything. This will become the new reality that everybody\u2019s exposed to. It\u2019s simply the vehicle in the reconstruction effort. Maybe not the best choice of words, but in the remaking. They\u2019re finally gonna put Hillary on TV in a miniseries as they always hoped and thought she would be, smartest woman in the world, whatever. Chelsea will be in there.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: I gotta do the Weiner stuff \u2019cause it\u2019s just funny. The Clintons are just loaded for bear here on the Weiners. Every day they\u2019re getting madder and madder and madder at the Weiners\u2019 attempt to equate themselves with the Clintons. It\u2019s funny. The Clintons are literally outraged by this. New York Daily News: “Anthony […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nWeiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: I gotta do the Weiner stuff \u2019cause it\u2019s just funny. The Clintons are just loaded for bear here on the Weiners. Every day they\u2019re getting madder and madder and madder at the Weiners\u2019 attempt to equate themselves with the Clintons. It\u2019s funny. The Clintons are literally outraged by this. New York Daily News: “Anthony […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushET.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushET.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushET.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/\",\"name\":\"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-30T19:04:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-17T21:23:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: I gotta do the Weiner stuff \u2019cause it\u2019s just funny. The Clintons are just loaded for bear here on the Weiners. Every day they\u2019re getting madder and madder and madder at the Weiners\u2019 attempt to equate themselves with the Clintons. It\u2019s funny. The Clintons are literally outraged by this. New York Daily News: “Anthony […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushET.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushET.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/RushET.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/","name":"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2013-07-30T19:04:58+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-17T21:23:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/07\/30\/weiner_hangs_in_disses_angry_clintons\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Weiner Hangs In, Disses Angry Clintons"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11806"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11806"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11806\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387334,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11806\/revisions\/387334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}