{"id":11352,"date":"2013-09-17T16:35:46","date_gmt":"2013-09-17T16:35:46","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2013-09-17T16:35:46","modified_gmt":"2013-09-17T16:35:46","slug":"global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/","title":{"rendered":"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: I have a bunch of global warming news in the Stack<\/a> that I did not get to yesterday. It\u2019s about the IPCC, the United Nations unit, I guess, that is the repository for the hoax. You know the University of East Anglia in Britain. Well, the hoaxers are there, but they reported to the UN, this guy at Penn State with his fake hockey stick graph. These guys all reported to the IPCC. <\/p>\n

All of these models that they constructed over the years predicted calamity by now, and the calamity never happened. I was still living in California 1985, and I\u2019m watching This Week with David Brinkley on Sunday morning, and there\u2019s this guy named Oppenheimer, and he\u2019s a global warming guy. He\u2019s saying, “We\u2019ve got 20 years!” This is 1985, and he says, “We\u2019ve got 20 years! I don\u2019t know if we\u2019re right, we\u2019re not sure if we\u2019re right, but we can\u2019t take the chance! <\/p>\n

“If we don\u2019t get started now on reducing greenhouse gases,” and all that same BS, “then we\u2019re not gonna have any chance to stop this.” That was 1985. So those 20 years ended in 2005. The bottom line is, there isn\u2019t any warming. Their models have been all wrong. UK Daily Mail<\/a>: “A leaked copy of the world\u2019s most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.”<\/p>\n

This is not news to you. Because you listen here, you\u2019re on the cutting edge. But it\u2019s just added information to put in your back pocket and have on file. The UK Daily “Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),” which is the holding company, if you will, for all the hoax data. <\/p>\n

“[T]he final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments\u2019 are accepted by environmentalist [wackos], politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science. They are cited worldwide to justify [increasing] fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable\u2019 energy. <\/p>\n

“Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that the world has been warming at only just over half the rate claimed by the IPCC in its last assessment, published in 2007,” despite the fact that there is bunch more CO2 in the atmosphere. The so-called greenhouse gas has just been expanding by geometric proportions, and yet the temperature increase is negligible. <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Back in 2007, the UN “said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2C every decade — a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made by [their precious] computer climate models. But the new report says the true figure since 1951 has been only 0.12C per decade — a rate far below even the lowest computer prediction. The 31-page ‘summary for policymakers\u2019 is based on a more technical 2,000-page analysis which will be issued at the same time.<\/p>\n

“It also surprisingly reveals: IPCC scientists accept their forecast computers may have exaggerated the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures — and not taken enough notice of natural variability.” Natural variability! They didn\u2019t account for nature! The left never does, when it projects anything — taxes, rates of increase or decrease. Anyway, the hoax continues.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Stick with the global warming here for just a second, because, again, you in this audience, because you here are fully aware of the facts about it, you\u2019re fully aware that I call it a hoax, and that might be off-putting to some. The simplest way to explain to people who want to believe it\u2019s true — and you know who they are. Those are people looking for ways to make themselves matter. They run around and they hear that they\u2019re to blame for the world getting warm, or that the country is, America is to blame, our prosperity, our high standard of living and the fact that we\u2019ve stolen all these resources from around the world, that we\u2019re using more oil than we have any right to, and all of that.<\/p>\n

When they\u2019re hit with a solution, then they can be big people. They can do something about it. Everybody wants to matter. And that\u2019s the sales pitch. So all you have to do is go out and, you know, buy some new kind of newfangled hybrid car or agree to raise taxes or, if you go to the store, buy everything and anything with a green label on it and you are saving the planet. I understand it\u2019s seductive for people who want to believe it. But it is a hoax in the sense that it\u2019s nothing more than another of the never-ending issues, political issues by the left, by the Democrat Party, to advance their ultimate agenda of bigger and bigger government and more and more control. <\/p>\n

That\u2019s all global warming ever was. For the scientists involved in it, it was a living. You go out and promote what the leftists wanted to hear, and you got grant money. And if you run around and really sound like you believe it, then they\u2019re gonna make you a star. And if you\u2019re Algore and you realize you can capitalize on your vice presidency, you can become a multimillionaire spreading this hoax, which he has done. But Algore, 2007 prediction, that summer in the North Pole could be ice free by 2013. Algore made this prediction. He cited it in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech. <\/p>\n

There\u2019s another totally fraudulent recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. Gore hadn\u2019t done anything but make a movie that itself was filled with misrepresentations about the amount of ice the poor polar bears have to live on, doctored photos. He said in his acceptance speech in 2007, getting a Nobel Peace Prize, that the North Pole would be ice free by 2013. If that was the case, New York City would be underwater by this year. “In his Dec. 10, 2007 ‘Earth has a Fever\u2019 speech, Gore referred to a prediction by US climate scientist Wieslaw Maslowski that the Arctic\u00c2\u2019s summer ice could ‘completely disappear\u2019 by 2013 due to global warming caused by carbon emissions.”<\/p>\n

Now, if you haven\u2019t heard this, the ice at the North Pole, arctic ice, is at a record amount this early in the post-summer season. Algore said six years ago there wouldn\u2019t be any arctic ice. Today the truth is, there is a record amount of arctic ice for this time of year. He couldn\u2019t have been more wrong. Now, let\u2019s go back. Here\u2019s a story from the AP: “Documents released Friday by the Nixon Presidential Library show members of President Richard Nixon\u2019s inner circle discussing the possibilities of global warming more than 30 years ago.”<\/p>\n

Now, one of Nixon\u2019s favorite people was Daniel Patrick Moynihan. He\u2019s a Democrat, but Nixon liked the guy. I think he was ambassador to the United Nations for Nixon. Moynihan told Nixon in an inner circle meeting 30 years ago that we would be underwater by the year 2000 because of the rapidity of global warming and the North Pole and the South Pole ice would melt and flood the coasts of this country. <\/line><\/p>\n

“There is widespread agreement that carbon dioxide content will rise 25 percent by 2000, Moynihan wrote in a September 1969 memo. ‘This could increase the average temperature near the earth\u2019s surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit,\u2019 he wrote. ‘This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet. Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington, for that matter.'”<\/p>\n

Thirty years ago, Moynihan, smart guy. George Will thinks he\u2019s the smartest guy that ever lived. George Will loved Moynihan. Moynihan bought into this. That\u2019s how seductive it is. Otherwise intelligent people buy into this notion. Their vanity and everything else makes it possible. “Oh, yeah, we have the power to destroy the planet. Oh, yeah, we have the power to raise temperatures and melt all the ice, oh, yeah.” We don\u2019t have any such power. We couldn\u2019t do any of this if we wanted to. But never mind. “Moynihan was Nixon\u2019s counselor for urban affairs from January 1969 — when Nixon began his presidency — to December 1970. He later served as the US ambassador to the United Nations.”<\/p>\n

So in 1969 — I was 18 years old — Moynihan tells Nixon, the temperature is gonna rise 7 degrees Fahrenheit by 2000 and bye-bye New York and Washington. And it\u2019s just progressed. I mean, that\u2019s about the beginning of the modern era of the feminist movement as well, by the way. Coincidence? Hmm. There are no coincidences. I learned that from the Clintons. So the hoax is out there. Every one of these proponents is dead wrong about everything they say, and yet people like me and you who object to it, we are called deniers, and we are targeted for some sort of character assassination and attack because what this is is nothing more than a leftist political effort to expand the size and role of government. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Minor, minor, minor — all caps, MINOR — correction. Antarctic sea ice, the ice at the South Pole just reached a record high during their winter. It is the North Pole ice, Arctic ice, that\u2019s increased by 60% compared to last year\u2019s melt season. So it\u2019s the South Pole where there\u2019s a record amount of ice, and at the North Pole, 60% more ice than last year. Remember, the North Pole ice was supposed to be melted by now. <\/p>\n

That\u2019s what Algore said would happen, accepting his Nobel Prize in 2007, if we didn\u2019t change anything — and we haven\u2019t. All we\u2019ve done is add more CO2, the supposed killer. CO2 is supposedly the primary agent of warming. We\u2019ve added it out the wazoo because we can\u2019t help it. We exhale it. There\u2019s nothing really we can do. Yet not only the ice not melt, there\u2019s 60% more of it! Now, Moynihan back in 1969 was talking to Nixon about this.<\/p>\n

He said air pollution, CO2, was causing the warming. They were getting ready for global cooling. A 1975 Newsweek cover was gonna talk about the ice age coming. So they\u2019re really confused how to play it back then. But Moynihan told Nixon it was air pollution that was causing global warming. Now we\u2019re being told, by the way, air pollution is what stopped global warming, like volcano eruptions. <\/line><\/p>\n

Yeah, yeah. That\u2019s putting so much smog and dirt and junk up there that it\u2019s interrupting the warming process, and those brilliant models didn\u2019t account for any of this, damn it! And then there\u2019s the dust from the Sahara Desert. That\u2019s what\u2019s being blamed for no hurricanes. Well, they\u2019re really ticked off about that. The left is beside themselves that there aren\u2019t any hurricanes \u2019cause that\u2019s what they promised.<\/p>\n

You know, after Katrina, global warming was supposed to increase every hurricane, you know, by a week. Each one would be deadlier than the one before it, and there haven\u2019t been any. They\u2019re just vacant, folks. They\u2019re empty. They\u2019re so devoid of facts to back up any of their claims or contentions. <\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start in Grafton, Ohio, with Rich. Glad you called, sir. Great to have you on the EIB Network. Hello.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hi, Rush. It\u2019s an honor and a pleasure to talk to you.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I appreciate that, sir. Thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I wanted to talk to you a little bit about models. I work for NASA, and couple years ago I went to the Goddard Space Flight Center website where you can download the models that they use, and the process of going through \u2019em, I found out that one of the biggest variables in determining what the temperature is going to be is what the cloud cover is, and we don\u2019t have a way of figuring out or even modeling exactly what the cloud cover\u2019s gonna be, and it can swing the models one way or the other.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Are you familiar with the name Dr. Roy Spencer?<\/a><\/p>\n

CALLER: Yes, I am.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, that\u2019s one of Dr. Spencer\u2019s areas of investigation<\/a>, has been the role of cloud cover in global warming.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Right.<\/p>\n

RUSH: It\u2019s impossible. You can\u2019t measure it. You can\u2019t predict it. It\u2019s really impossible.<\/p>\n

CALLER: That\u2019s right.<\/p>\n

<\/a>RUSH: You can\u2019t measure cloud cover worldwide. They dissipate and form so quickly, and in all of weather forecasting, predicting cloud cover — what percentage of the skies be covered by clouds, other than when you have a storm system moving through — is such a variable, nobody can get a handle on it. It\u2019s as much as we can do to understand how they\u2019re formed, and how much it\u2019s gonna happen. We\u2019re clueless.<\/p>\n

CALLER: That\u2019s correct. It\u2019s KS modeling, and you can\u2019t do it. But the other thing I wanted to tell you is when you go to figure out a model, because you can\u2019t sample every place on earth, you have to figure out a grid size that you\u2019re gonna use, and the size of the grid that\u2019s typically used, whole islands like Japan fall through the grid. So you have to go back. I believe we should study this better, but the reality is, the models just aren\u2019t mature enough to make the kind of predictions that people are making.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, they never have been. You know what? School\u2019s out, as far as I\u2019m concerned, on how many of these scientists are actually knowingly participating in a hoax and how many of \u2019em really are true believers on this stuff and think their models are infallible and so forth. This is the one thing that I don\u2019t know, and it\u2019d be impossible to find out, really. <\/p>\n

The political movement funds these people with donations if they produce the right outcome in their research. So that tends to dictate what kind of research you\u2019re gonna get in your lifestyle, if your living depends on it. But there\u2019s no question that they have, in this movement, converted a bunch of just everyday, ordinary meteorologists into huge proselytizers for it.<\/p>\n

Your average, ordinary everyday local news-weather guy has become one of the biggest proponents — whatever market you go to — of global warming. It\u2019s almost required that you buy into this in order to get that little stamp of approval from the AMS. But the modeling, my problem with this is… I\u2019m not a scientist on any of this stuff, and yet I I\u2019ve talked to scientists, and they cannot deal with my reasoning on this, \u2019cause it isn\u2019t scientific. <\/p>\n

I\u2019ve talked to many of them about this. So the left asserts there\u2019s global warming, and they assert that there\u2019s manmade global warming, and they assert that it\u2019s caused by CO2, and they assert that they\u2019ve got models for it. I can dispel all of that with my religious beliefs. I can dispel all of that with common sense. But they can\u2019t rely on that, the scientists who oppose it. <\/p>\n

They say they have to come up with other science that contradicts the science that\u2019s put forth by “the believers,” if you will. So they\u2019ve embarked… Some have done great work in doing so, but they are routinely denied permission to testify at government committees, like Senate and House committee hearings on this stuff, and if they are allowed to testify, they\u2019re shouted down, and they\u2019re not shown much respect, which is just more proof that the fix is in regarding this. <\/p>\n

I have never believed the manmade global warming allegation, but I fully understand however the people who do. All it takes is a 105-degree day in July, and the normal reaction is, “Man, it\u2019s getting hotter! I wonder if we\u2019re getting hotter?” When I was a kid, everybody wondered, “Are we on getting closer to the sun?” This is a natural thing. This is really where the left is really smart. They have the ability to tap into what people of their own volition are already concerned about, and then they give \u2019em a reason, and they give \u2019em substantiation for it. <\/p>\n

But the whole thing is a joke. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: John in Savannah, Georgia. Hello, sir. I appreciate your patience. Hello.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hi, Rush. I\u2019d like to thank you, first of all, for what you do to put common sense and conservative values out there in front of the indoctrinated masses.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.<\/p>\n

CALLER: My comment was brought to mind by a previous caller\u2019s discussing the issue of global warming, climate change, or whatever you want to call it these days. I am a retired aerospace engineer. I\u2019ve done a lot of work with math models and that sort of thing, and I think one thing that people don\u2019t realize when you\u2019re building a math model, is generally the work you do is built on the work of others. In other words, rarely are you building a model from first principles where you go through the physics of the situation. You basically rely on work that is done by previous individuals.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Not only that, aren\u2019t you relying on the past to predict the future as well? I mean, what other kind of data input do you have?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, actually the math models themselves predict the future. However, they should also jibe with the models, data of the past. In other words, you check your models with past data and then use it to predict future data. Now, that\u2019s a fundamental problem. As you know, there were scandals in Great Britain where the data was actually fudged because it didn\u2019t match up with existing models.<\/p>\n

RUSH: It didn\u2019t match the agenda.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, yes. Yes. I believe it is the agenda. I think there are basically, as you discussed a little earlier, two different approaches to this. One is the true believer, and the other is the one who\u2019s gotta get his research funding. That is brought over mass media to the American public, and they swallow it hook, line, and sinker. But specifically to the comment I was going to make, a great deal of the work on — and you know the term “runaway heating” or the “greenhouse effect.”<\/p>\n

Most of that, or I would say all of that, is based on some work that was done on stellar atmospheres in the early 1900s, back when Einstein and other physicists were looking at how stars evolved and grew. A gentleman (and I don\u2019t have his name in front of me) did some work on stellar atmospheres looking at the heat and light transmission through stellar atmospheres. <\/p>\n

Now, these stellar atmospheres take a look at things like photons starting from the center of the star and moving out. It takes tens and hundreds of years for a photon to emerge from the sun from the center. It bounces around in there and it takes that long. Now, this fellow was looking at that. He used differential equations, which some of your listeners may be familiar with.<\/p>\n

RUSH: I doubt very many.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Maybe not, but these equations are notoriously hard to solve, and there are many equations that cannot be solved explicitly on paper.<\/p>\n

RUSH: You know, that is exactly right. So what then is relied upon is the complexity, and, “You must just trust us. We wouldn\u2019t lie to you. We are the only ones capable of running these models and putting them together and then analyzing what they say. It\u2019s so complex, just trust us.” But one of the problems here, John, is that scientists refuse to release the data after a whole lot of Freedom of Information Act requests, and the hoax was exposed when the data was leaked from the University of East Anglia.<\/p>\n

There had been people asking for the data, the hockey stick data, all of this stuff. They\u2019ve been asking for it, the stuff in the models you\u2019re talking about. They wouldn\u2019t release it. “Oh, it\u2019s too complex. You wouldn\u2019t understand it. It could easily be distorted. It takes professionals like us to be able to analyze this and tell people what it really says, and we\u2019re the only ones capable of charting it and graphing it and putting it in an understandable format for people to see and absorb.”<\/p>\n

But then somebody at East Anglia says, “You know what? I\u2019m gonna leak some data that\u2019s in these e-mails,” and they found out that they were plugging in data, as you say, to fit an outcome that they wanted or predicted or the models they\u2019d predicted. They were fudging it. They were fudging it, because they didn\u2019t like the result. It\u2019s like economic models. <\/p>\n

You cannot factor dynamism, or they refuse to, in an economic model. The left, CBO, whatever. A tax cut or tax increase is proposed into law, and they do a static analysis of it because they cannot model dynamism. They can\u2019t, just like they can\u2019t model cloud cover. They can\u2019t analyze it, they can\u2019t predict it, they can\u2019t explain it — and it\u2019s a huge factor. So ultimately, here, John in Savannah is right on the money. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: By the way, our previous caller, John from Savannah, talking about photons and how long it takes them to get anywhere from the middle of the sun — let me tell you something. Apple has found a way to capture \u2019em fast. The new iPhone 5S has not expanded the mega pixels in the camera. It\u2019s still eight. But they\u2019ve opened the aperture to F2.2. More light\u2019s gonna get in. You\u2019re gonna be able to capture more photons, so the global warming modelers may have a tough time with their photons, but Apple has it covered. They\u2019ve found a way to capture \u2019em like that (snapping fingers) to even improve on your pictures. Not a plug, not a plug, just photon news. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: I have a bunch of global warming news in the Stack that I did not get to yesterday. It\u2019s about the IPCC, the United Nations unit, I guess, that is the repository for the hoax. You know the University of East Anglia in Britain. Well, the hoaxers are there, but they reported to the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nGlobal Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: I have a bunch of global warming news in the Stack that I did not get to yesterday. It\u2019s about the IPCC, the United Nations unit, I guess, that is the repository for the hoax. You know the University of East Anglia in Britain. Well, the hoaxers are there, but they reported to the […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/\",\"name\":\"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-09-17T16:35:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-09-17T16:35:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: I have a bunch of global warming news in the Stack that I did not get to yesterday. It\u2019s about the IPCC, the United Nations unit, I guess, that is the repository for the hoax. You know the University of East Anglia in Britain. Well, the hoaxers are there, but they reported to the […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/","name":"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2013-09-17T16:35:46+00:00","dateModified":"2013-09-17T16:35:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/09\/17\/global_warming_scientists_we_were_wrong\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11352"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11352"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11352\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}