{"id":10161,"date":"2014-02-13T19:30:53","date_gmt":"2014-02-13T19:30:53","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2014-02-13T19:30:53","modified_gmt":"2014-02-13T19:30:53","slug":"the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/","title":{"rendered":"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"\/\/videos\/37\/55818\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" alt=\"Listen to it Button\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>RUSH: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7hVR9o3N6k8\" data-rel=\"lightbox-video-0\">Dale Hansen is a sports anchor at WFAA-TV<\/a> Eyeball 8 news in Dallas, and he had some thoughts on Michael Sam, the University of Missouri football player who has sex with other men and who is going to be joining the National Football League in the draft this year.  This is Monday night on air, Dale Hansen speaking about the University of Mizzou defensive end Michael Sam\u2019s announcement that he is gay.<\/p>\n<p>HANSEN:  You beat a woman and drag her down a flight of stairs pulling her hair out by the roots, you\u2019re the fourth guy taken in the NFL draft.  You kill people while driving drunk, that guy\u2019s welcome.  Players caught in hotel rooms with illegal drugs and prostitutes? We know they\u2019re welcome.  Players accused of rape and pay the woman to go away? You lie to police, trying to cover up a murder? We\u2019re comfortable with that.  You love another man? Well, now, you\u2019ve gone too far.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  That\u2019s his take on the current makeup of the NFL.  That sounds like he sees it as the Crips and Bloods.  &#8220;Well, you beat a woman, drag her down a flight of stairs, pull her hair out by the roots, you\u2019re the fourth guy taken in the NFL draft.  You kill people while driving drunk, you\u2019re welcome.&#8221; That\u2019s true.  There\u2019s a player&#8230; That\u2019s also true in politics, by the way.  That happened in Massachusetts. <\/p>\n<p>You kill people while driving drunk, that isn\u2019t just the NFL.  That\u2019s also Massachusetts, but let\u2019s just be honest about it here.  &#8220;Players caught in hotel rooms with illegal drugs and prostitutes.  We know they\u2019re welcome.&#8221;  Hey, that\u2019s happened for mayors of Washington, DC, too.  Marion Barry. &#8220;The b-i-itch set me up,&#8221; remember that?  Washington, DC, hotel room.  &#8220;Players accused of rape and pay the woman to go away?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You lie to police, trying to cover up a murder? We\u2019re comfortable with that.  You love another man? Well, now, you\u2019ve gone too far.&#8221; Nobody\u2019s saying keep the guy out.  In fact, they\u2019re bending over to&#8230; Unintentional.  People are, I think, really opening their arms to be welcoming to Michael Sam.  Now, Dale Hansen continued and got a little bit more political in the next sound bite.<\/p>\n<p>HANSEN:  It wasn\u2019t that long ago when we were being told that black players couldn\u2019t play in our games because it would be uncomfortable, and even when they finally could, it took several more years before a black man played quarterback, because we aren\u2019t comfortable with that, either.  So many of the same people who used to make that argument, and the many who still do, are the same people who said government should stay out of our lives, but then want government in our bedrooms.  I\u2019ve never understood how they feel comfortable laying claim to both sides of that argument.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, is that an attack on conservatives there?  Is that what that was?  Let me see. &#8220;It wasn\u2019t that long ago when we were being told that black players couldn\u2019t play in our games because it would be uncomfortable&#8230;&#8221; Well, it was the fifties.  &#8220;[E]ven when they finally could, it took several more years before a black man played quarterback, because we aren\u2019t comfortable with that, either. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;So many of the same people who used to make that argument&#8230;&#8221; Who still makes that argument?  Who is still saying blacks can\u2019t play quarterback?  &#8220;So many of the same people who used to make that argument, and the many who still do, are the same people who said government should stay out of our lives,&#8221; that\u2019s a non sequitur, &#8220;but then want government in our bedrooms&#8221;? <\/p>\n<p>Who\u2019s he talking about?  Who wants the government in our bedrooms?  What is that in reference to? Is that in reference to abortion? Is it in reference to prostitution? What\u2019s that reference to?  &#8220;I\u2019ve never understood how they feel comfortable laying claim to both sides of that argument,&#8221; and finally, he wraps it up with a plea for all of us to celebrate Michael Sam.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" src=\"\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Olc5C4SXAYM\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>HANSEN:  I\u2019m not always comfortable when a man tells me he\u2019s gay.  I don\u2019t understand his world.  But I do understand that he\u2019s part of mine.  Civil rights activist Audre Lorde said, &#8220;It is not our differences that divide us.  It is our inability to recognize, accept, and celebrate those differences.&#8221; We\u2019ve always been able to recognize \u2019em.  Some of us accept \u2019em, and I want to believe that there will be a day when we do celebrate \u2019em.  I don\u2019t know if that day\u2019s here yet.  I guess we\u2019re about to find out.  But when I\u2019ve listened to Michael Sam, I do think it\u2019s time to celebrate him now.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.  Fine.  Let\u2019s see.  Now, this gets back to my other question.  Why is there&#8230;? I\u2019m asking this as an open-ended thing &#8212; and let\u2019s not forget, Jackie Robinson was a Republican.  Let\u2019s not forget this.  Branch Rickey was a Republican.  They try to stereotype all these things.  But my question is: <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?p=10195\">Why is there a political agenda attached to men who love other men<\/a>? <\/p>\n<p>Why is there a political agenda to men having sex with other men?  Why is it a big deal here?  If we have colorblind and other types of blind, what is the big deal?  Why are we celebrating, or why should we celebrate a homosexual joining the NFL?  Don\u2019t read anything into the question.  The question is self-contained, and there\u2019s nothing behind it except a desire for an answer.  Why should we celebrate it? <\/p>\n<p>Why should we celebrate anybody else that goes into the NFL for any reason?  Maybe somebody who is escaping poverty and finally, through hard work, is gonna get drafted in a high round and earn some money.  Should we celebrate that?  I think Mr. Hansen has some decent points he\u2019s making.  I\u2019m not trying to pick a fight or anything here.  I\u2019m really questioning: Why is there a political agenda to this? <\/p>\n<p>What is the politics of this?<\/p>\n<p>I mean, we know the answer.  I\u2019m just asking it, out there. <\/p>\n<p>Should we celebrate the people who disagree with us?  We celebrate our differences?  It says here. Yep, celebrate those differences.  We are different. &#8220;It is not our differences that divide us.  It is our inability to recognize, accept, and celebrate those differences.&#8221; Okay, so we celebrate the people who disagree with Dale Hansen that Michael Sam needs to be celebrated? Yeah.  Right.  He\u2019s critical of those who don\u2019t want to celebrate. <\/p>\n<p>So being critical of those that is different. <\/p>\n<p>Well, I don\u2019t know. <\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s just grab a bottle of champagne and be done with it, okay?<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Judy in Clarkston, Michigan.  Judy, I\u2019m glad you called.  Great to have you on the program.  Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Hi, Rush.  I\u2019m so happy to speak to you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Thank you.  Great to have you.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  I was calling regarding the gay NFL player coming out to be celebrated, as you said.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  No, no, no.  It\u2019s not saying that. I was asking why.  It\u2019s the sports anchor in Dallas.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  I realize that.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  That\u2019s okay.  Go ahead.  I just want to be clear.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  My point was, though, if the football players are not supposed to feel anything about this or be uncomfortable in the showers &#8212; you know, in the locker room, in the showers &#8212; in that case, why don\u2019t the cheerleaders and the football players shower together?  I mean, if nobody\u2019s supposed to feel uncomfortable.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Hmm.  Let me see if I understand this.  Let\u2019s take this beyond cheerleaders, because cheerleaders are not gonna be in the locker room of football teams. But you\u2019re still trying to make a point here.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Correct.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  You\u2019re saying if men and women shower together, men may be unable to help getting excited &#8212; and maybe the women, too. Who knows?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Exactly.  Or feel shy and uncomfortable.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Either one.  Either one.  Okay.  So what you\u2019re asking, I think, is, if you put a man who gets excited by other men, rather than women, in a shower full of other men, you\u2019re thinking that somebody in there might feel uncomfortable?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Correct.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.  So then what?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Well, I don\u2019t know.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Cause the uncomfortable are supposed to get over it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  The cheerleaders and the football players showering together, they\u2019re not supposed to feel anything, not supposed to feel uncomfortable.  And yet I just think it\u2019s human nature to feel uncomfortable.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay, let\u2019s not use cheerleaders because we know that isn\u2019t gonna happen.  Not that we would ever hear about it, but, I mean, it\u2019s &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  The principle is the same.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  What you\u2019re saying is, okay, let\u2019s take a female girls volleyball team and let\u2019s have men go and shower with \u2019em.  All right?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yes.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  You\u2019re saying that would never be permitted because it\u2019s a recipe for absolute disaster. The woman won\u2019t like it, the men can\u2019t help but being excited. These are female beach volleyball players, not wearing much to begin with, okay, you\u2019re giving an example of men and women in the same shower together, and you\u2019re thinking it\u2019s ridiculous to ask both of them to act like there\u2019s no big deal here.  Right?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yes.  Yes.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?p=10195\"><img id=\"eZObject_87207\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/MichaelSam.jpg\"\/><\/a>RUSH:  So you\u2019re extrapolating further, okay, so you put in a room full of men one guy who\u2019s essentially looking at a lot of women if he were heterosexual, excited by other men, then there\u2019s gonna be a level of discomfort in there, and you\u2019re saying if that\u2019s okay, then why don\u2019t we let men and women shower together.  Right?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  You got it.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay. And what\u2019s your answer?  Why don\u2019t we let men and women shower together?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  For that very reason.  They\u2019re gonna shy and uncomfortable and feel very awkward.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, how about it\u2019s because we\u2019re a backward society?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  I don\u2019t go with that.  (laughing)  I don\u2019t go with that.  There\u2019s not many jobs where you shower with your coworkers, or where you\u2019re in that intimate setting.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  I know, it\u2019s a sad thing, too.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  So I don\u2019t know.  Get them their own shower room?  I don\u2019t know the answer.  But what bugs me about it is acting like the guys that would feel uncomfortable are no good, homophobic.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  They\u2019re being set up to be called names &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Exactly.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  &#8212; simply by acting naturally?  They\u2019re gonna be chastised as insensitive or what have you.  Well, let me ask you this, Judy, since you\u2019re attuned to this issue, do you watch football?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yes.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.  Do you watch the National Football League?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yes.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Let me construct a scenario.  Michael Sam is drafted by a team and makes it and is playing in a game.  He\u2019s a defensive end so he\u2019s not gonna ever really catch passes, run with the ball, unless he intercepts it.  But let\u2019s say that at some unfortunate point during the season he blows out his knee, and here is instant replay from every possible angle of the jury, as they do for every injury.  What happens if somebody thinks that it was purposeful and that it was a hate tackle or a hate hit?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  (laughing)<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Can you see that happening?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Absolutely.  Absolutely.  That\u2019s my whole point.  It\u2019s just wrong.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Now, the reason why &#8212; I better jump in here and make a point real quick.  The reason why is because there are gonna be a lot of people who I think are hypocrites.  They\u2019re gonna say that this ought not be any big deal, and they\u2019re gonna be the ones making it a big deal.  They\u2019re gonna accuse others of being bigots, who aren\u2019t gonna say a thing about this, who aren\u2019t gonna have an opinion expressed about it, nobody\u2019s gonna know what they think.  But it\u2019s gonna be assumed by these people that there are a lot of bigots out there. And the people that are going to make this a big deal, i.e., the media, are the ones who preach to us about how we shouldn\u2019t make it a big deal.  They\u2019re gonna be the ones focusing all this attention. <\/p>\n<p>You know there\u2019s gonna be some media people demanding that this guy become an activist.  He may just want to play football.  He may not want to be. There\u2019s gonna be a lot of pressure on this guy to fulfill a lot of, I don\u2019t know, dreams or desires on the part of other activists.  But to most people, I would have to say that it isn\u2019t going to be a big deal except the media is gonna make it a big deal and therefore people are gonna get ticked off because of that. (interruption) Hm-hm.  What was the overriding need to declare in the first place? Mr. Snerdley is asking me why I think the player felt it necessary to go public and come out when he did.  What I heard him say was that a lot of people knew, his Mizzou teammates knew, and a lot of people in the NFL already knew, just nobody is talking about it. And what he said was that he wants and wanted to be in control of how the story is told. <\/p>\n<p>He wanted to be on offense, if you will. He didn\u2019t want to have it leak out by somebody else and then immediately be on defensive explaining himself.  He said it wasn\u2019t activism; it was he wanted to be in control of his message or in control of the story coming out.  No, I don\u2019t think the guy is an activist.  That\u2019s my point.  Others certainly are gonna try to make him one.  But I don\u2019t know.  We\u2019ll see.  To most people, particularly in this country, this day and age, most young people, this isn\u2019t a big deal.  I guarantee you a lot of 16, 18, 20, 24-year-olds are running around watching, what is the big deal?  It isn\u2019t a big deal to them.  Homosexuality is not a big deal.  They\u2019re trying to figure out what is the big deal about this?  This is my point, is who is it that\u2019s making it the big deal? <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  You know, folks it\u2019s actually kind of interesting out there.  I have an article here from The Nation &#8212; a far, far left-wing, extremist publication, rag &#8212; and they are mad that there hasn\u2019t been any right-wing reaction to Michael Sam.  The headline of the article:  &#8220;Why the Curious Right-Wing Silence on Michael Sam? &#8212; Jonathan Cohn asked an interesting question at The New Republic this week.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Where is the mainstream, right-wing reaction to NFL prospect and SEC defensive player of the year Michael Sam\u00c2\u2019s announcement that he is gay?&#8221; The left is actually mad that conservatives are not outraged about this &#8212; and that, folks, is very interesting in and of itself.  The left is a little upset. They\u2019re curious, they can\u2019t figure it out, and they\u2019re a little mad that there isn\u2019t any opposition to this, no reaction to speak of from the so-called right wing. <\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s how that piece ends: &#8220;Republican elites, caught between their own friends and family and their own donors and voters, have decided that silence is the better part of valor. History will judge this as cowardice. That we now hear nothing from them but a chorus of crickets just makes them look odd.&#8221; So, you see, folks, if conservatives react negatively, that fulfills the stereotype and the left is happy. <\/p>\n<p>If conservatives don\u2019t say anything, that means they\u2019re cowards, because we know what they all really think.  They just don\u2019t have the guts to speak up, and that makes \u2019em look really odd.  That\u2019s right.  And if, if a right-winger happened to stand up and say, &#8220;Hey, Michael Sam, we love you, too! Welcome to the NFL,&#8221; they would accuse the right-winger of lying.  So the conservatives can\u2019t win, no matter what. <\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t say anything?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Cowardice!  They\u2019re trying to cover up what they really think!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If they welcome the guy to the league, they\u2019re lying. <\/p>\n<p>But the left is curious.  They can\u2019t figure it out. So, I go back to my original question: Why is there a political agenda to this?  What is the left\u2019s overall political agenda in the hierarchy of things?  What animates them more than anything? It\u2019s their opposition to us, their hatred for us, and they get really disappointed when they don\u2019t see any outward behavior that would warrant hatred, on their part.  They\u2019re ticked off here.  I find it all fascinating, both from a political and a psychological basis. <\/p>\n<p>Here John in Salt Lake City, Utah, as we head back to the phones.  Great to have you, sir, and the EIB Network.  Hi.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Ah, the pleasure is all mine, Rush.  I\u2019ll get right to the point.  I think I have an answer to your question that you asked a couple of days ago as to why the traditional values of America are being attacked so fervently by the left.  My belief is that at the core it is, as you well know, power.  Where they get their power from is they\u2019re able to get control over the narrative and pretty much just go. As long as they are getting people all behind them, they\u2019re able to then take power over the situation and then twist it around on the Republicans or the conservative right, if that makes any sense.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  So liberals are trashing traditional values&#8230;?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Maybe I should elaborate.  Think of it this way: Liberals know history just as well as the conservatives do, whether they show it or not.  You look back at history. America was able take down one of the greatest nations at the time, England, from men sharing values of freedom. Of course, the English nation was everything that the liberals strive for &#8212; control, power &#8212; and then that\u2019s why things like the tea party happen, the original tea party. They were able to push an entire empire out of their nation.  The liberals are trying to do it from within the nation, but they\u2019re just using a different tactic of doing it.  They\u2019re trying to eliminate the freedom aspects so that they can have free reign.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay, it is an assault on freedom, you think.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Essentially, yes. They claim to be big proprietors of freedom, but everything that they do is contrary to that, whether it\u2019s going against the Constitution or whatever the case may be. Everything they do goes against freedom.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  But why?  Don\u2019t they want to be free themselves?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Absolutely not.  Think of it this way.  All the kings of England, they were terrified of freedom for one person, and they tried to block it out by blocking out knowledge.  The Catholic Church, the British Empire, they had their own church.  I mean, as you point out in your great book, Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims, people who strive for freedom, they couldn\u2019t get it there.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Right.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  They actually had to leave to accomplish their end goals.  So they don\u2019t want to be in the position that the Pilgrims were in.  They want to be in the position that King George was in where he is the one controlling the people: &#8220;Oh, we will save you from everything that ails you. Just make sure we get the credit. Make sure we get the power.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  And they\u2019re able to do what they want.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  So even the schlubs of the left want to be able to exercise power over people? Even these pajama-clad guys that don\u2019t have jobs and live in the basement, still want to be able to wield power over people?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Exactly.  Think of it this way.  A person just sitting in their basement, doing nothing all day, they probably don\u2019t feel powerful. But if an issue comes up &#8212; oh, for example, your last caller, a gay football player is coming out &#8212; all of a sudden they have the power to say, &#8220;Yeah, yeah, we support him, and we do not like anybody that has even a smidgen of an opinion saying otherwise,&#8221; and it gives them a little bit of a sense of power to a certain extent.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.  Well, I understand that.  You know, I asked this question a couple of days ago in a series of questions.  Sometimes I do that. For those of you new to the program, the problem is once I opine on something, there generally is not much left to say about it.  That really denies a lot of people an opportunity to get their opinion out there, people in this audience.  So sometimes I hold back.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes I do not present my full opinion on things and instead I pose questions to the audience that are designed to get the mental juices flowing and to cause independent thought, as I think that\u2019s key, and I think it\u2019s also educational. I think it\u2019s fun.  I actually think it\u2019s a great exercise, thinking.  It\u2019s hard work to a lot of people, but it\u2019s nevertheless fun.  There are always results to it.  There are always results when we start thinking. <\/p>\n<p>I think it\u2019s fascinating.  It\u2019s not taught, thinking. Most people are programmed and propagandized and told what to think, not taught how to critically think.  It\u2019s one of the big problems we have.  So sometimes I just sit there and ask questions.  Okay, typical question: &#8220;What is the politics of one man having sex with another?&#8221;  What is the politics?  Why is there politics? <\/p>\n<p>What is the agenda to one man loving another man?  What is it?  Because there is.  Everybody knows it.  No, everybody doesn\u2019t know it, actually, when you get down to it. Everybody doesn\u2019t think that there is a political agenda attached to it.  One of the reasons for asking the question was to establish the fact that it is political.  It isn\u2019t just interpersonal relationship stuff.  It is political. <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Cause everything the left does is political, and everything the left does political has an agenda.  They have an agenda. There\u2019s an endgame. There\u2019s a desired result to it.  There\u2019s a reason why they do it all, and oftentimes the real reason has nothing to do with what they say the reason is.  But if I were to just tell you what I think, that\u2019d be the end of it; there would be nothing left for anybody else to say.  So sometimes I just pose questions. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  We have a call via Skype from El Segundo, California.  It\u2019s Ron, and thank you, sir.  Great to hear from you.  Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Rush, mega dittos from Southern California, the center of command.  Thank you for taking my call. <\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Do me a favor.  Ron, slow down just a little bit so that I can comprehend what you\u2019re saying.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Okay, I\u2019m sorry.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  It\u2019s not your problem, it\u2019s mine, but if you just slow down I can deal with it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  The media here is emphasizing on Mr. Sam\u2019s homosexuality, when in fact in doing so they are diminishing his personhood by putting emphasis on something that has nothing to do with his humanity.  And in doing so it\u2019s really diminishing &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Now, this is an interesting point.  Let me make sure I understand what you\u2019re saying.  Your premise or your point is that by virtue of supporters of Mr. Sam in the media and so forth focusing on his homosexuality, they are ignoring everything else about him that makes him human?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Correct.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  They\u2019re ignoring everything about him that defines him as a person?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Right.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  That\u2019s interesting.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Because homosexuality is a very personal aspect of his private life.  It has nothing to do with his public image.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, it didn\u2019t, but it does now.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yes, because of the media, and what they\u2019re trying to do is destigmatize the homosexual &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: But wait a minute, he\u2019s the one who confirmed it.  He announced it. <\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  And he\u2019s making a mistake by doing so, because, again, that\u2019s the root of the problem.  When homosexuals say they\u2019re homosexual, it draws attention away from the humanity and puts emphasis on their sexuality.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, no, they think it\u2019s part of their humanity, and they don\u2019t like living the secret.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  But it\u2019s not.  It\u2019s part of their sexuality.  It\u2019s part of a private behavior that I as a public human being, as a person of the public rather, it has nothing to do with that.  I don\u2019t need to know that he\u2019s a homosexual.  All I know is he\u2019s a person, he\u2019s a human, and he should live his life the way that he should live it.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Wait a minute.  Why do you not care that he\u2019s homosexual?  Why does that not interest you?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Because it\u2019s a private behavior.  Has nothing to do with his person.  His homosexuality has nothing to do with him driving the car to and from work, or paying his taxes, or going to the grocery store and buying groceries.  I don\u2019t go to the store and say, &#8220;Hey, hi, everybody, I\u2019m a heterosexual.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  No, but the day may come where you\u2019ll have to.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yeah, if the liberals have their way, yeah, sure.  And that\u2019s why I\u2019m saying &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  I mean, we\u2019re fast approaching a world where it ain\u2019t cool to be straight.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Right.  And the lady prior that called made an excellent point.  What\u2019s to say the men and the women can\u2019t be in the shower together?  I mean, what about public restrooms?  Should we have same &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, but we\u2019ve already answered that, too.  There are co-ed dorms at institutions of higher learning.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yeah.  So why stop there?  Why can\u2019t we have restrooms with boys and girls going in the same restroom?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, I think that\u2019s a good question, actually.  Why can\u2019t we?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  And the answer is because privacy matters, and you should keep it private, because it has nothing to do &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  We must lift the veil on bigotry, and the only way to do it is throw people in the shower nude.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  But it\u2019s not bigotry.  It\u2019s common sense.  I don\u2019t go into the girls\u2019 restroom.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, you may think it\u2019s not bigotry, but you\u2019re not the one defining it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Right.  Right.  I understand.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  These are all valid questions.  They\u2019re all valid questions.  And the privacy aspect, after making a big deal and going public is when they then demand privacy.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  The whole gay marriage aspect, the whole gay marriage movement is based on the person\u2019s sexuality.  I am gay and therefore you should accept me as being a gay person.  Never mind that I\u2019m a person.  Focus on my homosexuality first.  And that is wrong.  They\u2019re doing themselves a disservice.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, let me ask you, but what if a person\u2019s homosexuality is, in their own mind, what defines them?  What if their homosexuality is the thing they think most important about themselves?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Then they need to go see a psychologist, because there\u2019s more to them than their sexuality, and they need to find themselves, and define themselves by their humanity, not by their private parts or who they sleep with.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, why can\u2019t sexuality be part of humanity?  Why are you separating their sexuality from their humanity?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Because it has nothing to do with their public &#8212; public has nothing &#8212; I have no business knowing what they do in private.  What they do in private is their private business, and it should remain private.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.  So you think the Drive-Bys, the State-Controlled Media are objectifying Michael Sam, turning him into a sex object?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Correct.  They\u2019re engaging in political prostitution, if I may be so bold, and devaluing every person\u2019s humanity who happens to be homosexual.  It has nothing to do with their person, nothing.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, that\u2019s where they would disagree with you.  They think it has everything to do.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Well, they\u2019re wrong.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Otherwise he wouldn\u2019t go public with it.  Doesn\u2019t that stand to reason?  It\u2019s a huge deal.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  To the liberals, yes, because they don\u2019t see the person.  They see &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Let\u2019s face it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  They see gender.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, that\u2019s true, that\u2019s true, they see the surface stuff.  They see the sex. They see the race. They see the gender. They see the orientation. They see the economic circumstance. They see everything but the humanity.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Right.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  They see victims.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  That\u2019s what this is about.  They see victims.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  They see victims, and they perpetuate the idea that everybody is a victim, and that\u2019s who votes for them, the victims.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, you know, you got some interesting points.  It\u2019s all genital politics.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  That\u2019s right.  And, Rush, you put on a great show.  Thank you for a wonderful 25 years, and a happy belated birthday to you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Thank you, Ron, very much.  That\u2019s Ron via Skype.  He\u2019s in El Segundo, California, where a good friend of mine, George Brett, grew up in and around El Segundo.  Every time I hear El Segundo, I think of number 5. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Back to the phones we go.  Summit, New Jersey.  It\u2019s the Rush Limbaugh program.  This is Jeff.  Great to have you, sir.  Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Rush, first let me thank you for maintaining steadfastness in the face of almost insurmountable adversity.  So thank you so much for doing that.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Thank you, sir.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  There are times when my knees are a little weak.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, I appreciate it.  Thank you very much, really.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  I\u2019ve got two things for us, first, I think I have an answer to your question about why the left is so opposed to traditional values, and then I have a comment on a story you read before, but I think the left is so opposed to traditional values because it flies in the face of everything they use to further their agenda, and that is traditional values teach straight morality.  It has a straight moral compass, there is a right from wrong, there is a should and a should not.  It loops in religion, but I think the underpinning backbone is that there is straight morality.  That doesn\u2019t work for the left, and some of the examples are abortion versus capital punishment.  Capital punishment sends them into an apoplectic fit but they are all in favor of abortion.  If you smoke a cigarette they want you wrapped in a hermetically sealed bubble, but as far as marijuana smoke goes, you know, have at it.  All of those things don\u2019t comport to a straight moral compass.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  All excellent points, but there\u2019s one thing that I really want to add to what you\u2019re saying, and it is that they will not acknowledge that there are people that stray from morality.  The people that do that, they\u2019re not wrong, they\u2019re victims.  They have been pushed there, and therefore they can\u2019t be blamed for it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  That\u2019s true.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  There\u2019s no accountability for it.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  That\u2019s a form of moral relativism. <\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Absolutely right.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  It\u2019s not wrong because circumstances make it not wrong.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  And because of the people defining it as wrong have no right to do that; therefore, it\u2019s not wrong.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  That\u2019s absolutely right.  And I think that\u2019s why they are so frightened by people who adhere to traditional values, because there is straight morality and there is a defined black and white and right and wrong for a lot of things.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  From an authority that\u2019s higher than themselves. <\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  That\u2019s exactly right.  Now, I have a comment also.  There was a story you read before about women who marry down intellectually but marry up in terms of economy.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Right.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  If you can marry down intellectually, if somebody who\u2019s nowhere near as smart as you or as educated as you can make more money than you do, doesn\u2019t that completely undermine the left\u2019s argument about income inequality and how those who have higher incomes had an unfair advantage, they had an unfair start, genetic &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Exactly.  Except it points to sexism as the explanation for the abnormality or the disparity.  Yeah, how can you have income inequality when the stupid make more than the education?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  It think it\u2019s an excellent point.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  And especially when somebody marries somebody stupider than they are and the stupid one earns all the money, how in the world is that fair?  That\u2019s a dilemma. <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  After all, folks, we cannot expect victims to hew to values.  How can they?  Values are used to oppress the victims.  You can\u2019t make victims behave according to values.  That\u2019s what\u2019s made them victims in the first place. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Dale Hansen is a sports anchor at WFAA-TV Eyeball 8 news in Dallas, and he had some thoughts on Michael Sam, the University of Missouri football player who has sex with other men and who is going to be joining the National Football League in the draft this year. This is Monday night on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Politics of the Michael Sam Story - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Dale Hansen is a sports anchor at WFAA-TV Eyeball 8 news in Dallas, and he had some thoughts on Michael Sam, the University of Missouri football player who has sex with other men and who is going to be joining the National Football League in the draft this year. This is Monday night on [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"27 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/\",\"name\":\"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-02-13T19:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-13T19:30:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Dale Hansen is a sports anchor at WFAA-TV Eyeball 8 news in Dallas, and he had some thoughts on Michael Sam, the University of Missouri football player who has sex with other men and who is going to be joining the National Football League in the draft this year. This is Monday night on [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"27 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/","name":"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2014-02-13T19:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-13T19:30:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2014\/02\/13\/the_politics_of_the_michael_sam_story\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Politics of the Michael Sam Story"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10161"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}